Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, StarmanW. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 10:47, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for patrolling article changes but a user has to be appropriately warned before being reported. Please see Wikipedia:Vandalism#Warnings. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:10, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Cape of Good Hope: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. I've already warned the IP in this case, so it's just a message for future reverts. Feinoha ^Talk 01:54, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The

Adventure

Hi StarmanW!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there! Play The Wikipedia Adventure This message was delivered by TerraCodes (talk to me) 04:59, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! 𝒮𝓉𝒶𝓇𝓂𝒶𝓃 𝒲 16:23, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Thank you very much and Merry Christmas to you too. Wish you a wonderful holidays there! : ) 𝒮𝓉𝒶𝓇𝓂𝒶𝓃 𝒲 11:59, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am wondering why this article has been considered for deletion? Clearly stated where he played and what he did with references.. There's millions of players played in very lower divisions and they exist on Wikipedia . In his case everything is authentic and proved Bellow you have few examples of players and his clubs he played for https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/FK_Rabotnički https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/FK_Sloga_Jugomagnat https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/FK_Madžari_Solidarnost Macedonia National team youth appearances Yes Nike Athlete & Ambasador Yes Budweiser Football winner Yes Poland national team yes http://polishsoccer.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=14616 http://m.sportowefakty.wp.pl/pilka-nozna/91030/kristian-boskovski-pol-polak-pol-macedonczyk-marzy-o-grze-dl There's many players with no football ground history appearing on Wikipedia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kire_Markoski Wikipedia should be free encyclopaedia to help people and searchers to find out more. Thanks

Klasyk17 (talk) 07:55, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, that page seems to be candidate for deletion for some reasons, you could further your questions here. Thanks 𝒮𝓉𝒶𝓇𝓂𝒶𝓃 𝒲 08:01, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Starman,

I know that the edits have been rather drastic, but I believe it has to be necessitated to keep up with the encyclopaedic tone of Wikipedia. It sounds more like a real estate pitch than an actual article hence the shedding of "fluff" to keep up with the objectivity.

Fun back story: I created the page in 2008 when I was 12! I've changed emails and lost the account over time but I cringe whenever I look back at my writing.

Please comment at my page if you'd like to pursue this further. Have a great day!

--124.197.109.214 (talk) 15:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)Kumaran59 (or whatever my IP address is)[reply]

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=2oczE7SODTUnF5j_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_5alnPlHxWHzGzzf&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 15:15, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you might want to review this diff where you reinstated obvious vandalism that an IP user had removed? I've made good. Take care etc.... Blue Square Thing (talk) 11:02, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, thanks for letting me know, I probably misread that and did not notice it was actually an obvious vandalism edit. My apologies and thanks for pointing it out to me! Take care. 𝒮𝓉𝒶𝓇𝓂𝒶𝓃 𝒲 14:23, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi StarmanW! I took some time and reviewed your recent contribution history. Since you've been doing well with reverting vandalism, I felt that you could use the rollbacker user rights. Instead of making you request the user rights, I went ahead and just enabled it for you. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you don't want the rollback user rights, let me know and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:46, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, Oshwah. Thanks for granting me the rights. I've read the guidelines and I will use it when appropriate. You're welcome and I'm happy to help out! 𝒮𝓉𝒶𝓇𝓂𝒶𝓃 𝒲 08:54, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cool deal! Don't hesitate to message me with any questions that you have regarding rollback. I'll be happy to answer them and help you out. Cheers -- ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:18, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, StarmanW. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, StarmanW. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]