https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:British_diplomats could do with a 'consul' sub-category...

https://www.orc.govt.nz/plans-policies-reports/regional-plans-and-policies/water/freshwater-management-units/cluthamata-au

https://www.cluthagold.co.nz/roxburgh-gorge-trail

https://www.cluthagold.co.nz/clutha-gold-trail

Welcome!

Hello, Somej, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Longhair | Talk 04:19, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Happy new year 2016.

As from Curtius baronets I've seen that two article about the same person exist: Johann Heinrich Alsted latinized called Alstedius. To merge... it is already tricky at my German WP, nor I have knowledge about for English WP.... Whom I should contact? I asked already at Talk:Johann Heinrich Alsted / Talk:Alstedius. Many thanks. br's --Commander-pirx (talk) 16:07, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! My plan for Curtius baronets is to move most of the content to a page dedicated to William Curtius (first baronet). The Curtius baronets page can then be about the family and the curti-schloss. But I'm only halfway through - am trying to translate some of the German sources, which is very slow work for me .

For Alstedius, I've responded to your comment on the talk page there. Somej (talk) 07:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Commander-pirx:, I've finally posted a new page for Sir William Curtius, and started to remove content from Curtius baronets. The new page is mostly based on a very slow translation of Grosskopf,^[1] and Akkerman.^[2]

Hoeufft, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 08:42, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

At Talk:Jean Hoeufft#Who_hit_who.3F you mentioned you arrived there via "his sister Anna, and the von Gressenich link". Can you please explain? I see no article for Anna Hoeufft or Pierre Fabrice de Gressenich. What about them led you to Jean Hoeufft? Mathglot (talk) 08:11, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I was meaning outside of Wikipedia. Anna's daughter married another Protestant diplomat and (minor) financier to royalty, William Curtius ; possibly when Curtius was with the Palatine court in exile at the Hague. The Hoeufft surname led me to Jean Hoeufft. Somej (talk) 08:42, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, well even outside of WP, can you tell me where, is it written material we can use? Also, thanks for the Curtius baronets link; I see only one 'Anna' there, "Anna von Gressenich"—are you saying she's Jean's sister? That would be a good link to document, and if we can, I'd like to add a comment to the Curtius article, linking him to Jean Hoeufft as his brother-in-law. Mathglot (talk) 23:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hi @Mathglot:Yes, Anna von Gressinich, née Hoeufft , was Jean's sister; Curtiius is her son in law . See http://www.lagis-hessen.de/de/subjects/idrec/sn/bio/id/8610, https://books.google.co.nz/books?id=qxoMAQAAMAAJ&lpg=PA372&ots=l1nfBV2Ha3&dq=johann%20martin%20du%20fay&pg=PA372#v=onepage&q=johann%20martin%20du%20fay&f=false, and my draft rewrites of Curtius' page Draft:Sir William Curtius#to Hesse. Somej (talk) 08:42, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Mathglot: I've published the Sir William Curtius page, and found a reference to Curti in the Dienne book to add to Jean Hoeufft Somej (talk) 08:12, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
121		2016 Fukushima earthquake (talk)	Add sources
182		300 (number) (talk)	Add sources
1,801		Surrey (talk)	Add sources
14		André Frossard (talk)	Add sources
130		Hobie Cat (talk)	Add sources
18		Jean, Baron de Batz (talk)	Add sources
74		Protestant Union (talk)	Cleanup
52		Joan Blaeu (talk)	Cleanup
6		Jean Morin (theologian) (talk)	Cleanup
12		Jean-Patrick Capdevielle (talk)	Expand
12		Victoria University of Wellington Students' Association (talk)	Expand
29		Clem (TV series) (talk)	Expand
16		Genoa–Ventimiglia railway (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2		John Dackombe (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
85		Electric vehicle conversion (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
113		Catholic liturgical rites and particular churches (talk)	Merge
198		Kankaria Lake (talk)	Merge
215		Riviera (talk)	Merge
18		Gabriel Hanotaux (talk)	Wikify
42		Staff function (talk)	Wikify
8		Quarto dei Mille (talk)	Wikify
5		Libreria Bozzi (talk)	Orphan
22		D'academy Asia 2 (talk)	Orphan
8		1977 Women's National Conference: Minority-Latino-Women (talk)	Orphan
30		Europa Universalis (board game) (talk)	Stub
51		Narco (film) (talk)	Stub
6		Megh Singh (talk)	Stub
7		Accademia Ligustica di Belle Arti (talk)	Stub
3		Patrick Dignan (talk)	Stub
117		Scott James (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:14, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Material you included in the above article was copied from the web page https://teara.govt.nz/en/biographies/1t59/te-puoho-o-te-rangi. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed, as the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 New Zealand Licence is not a compatible license, because it does not permit commercial use, and our license does. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:51, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thanks @Diannaa, i've left some comments on your talk page Somej (talk) 05:08, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Somej. I noticed this edit to WP:NCROY. Please see Talk:Elizabeth Stuart, Queen of Bohemia for the extensive prior discussions on how to name the article for this person. And, Elisabeth of Bohemia (disambiguation) is a huge list, so that's hardly a distinctive name. Suggest you consider undoing your edit to the naming convention unless you can get a consensus. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 03:49, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

thanks EdJohnston (talk · contribs). Seeing as that all I have done is point the link directly to the main article, I won't make any further changes to Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(royalty_and_nobility). While it's ironic that the very page used as the example has since been changed (after, as you say, extensive prior discussion), I"m not picking sides in the argument about what the general naming convention should be.

Probably it is a weakness in the guideline if it has to use a piped link as an example. Piped links are already discouraged for use in DAB pages (MOS:DABPIPE). Maybe the solution is to think of an example we could use in NCROY other than Elizabeth of Bohemia. Or, what would you think of changing the NCROY guideline to replace the piped link with its target, Elizabeth Stuart, Queen of Bohemia? EdJohnston (talk) 15:42, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Dunedin Collective for Woman, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:35, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Very grateful @CommanderWaterford: if you could take a moment to review it again. Thanks! Somej (talk) 10:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

George Lennox Rawdon Berkeley, 7th Earl of Berkeley

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dunedin Collective for Woman. Thanks! Furius (talk) 17:59, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:

Can you provide references for the middle block section in the 2nd para, and the 2nd sentence in the Formation section. Give me a shout when you're done and I will promote it into mainspace.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dunedin Collective for Woman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dunedin Collective for Woman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 21:00, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Somej! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! scope_creepTalk 21:00, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am a NZ editor who came across the article in draft space and have made some changes and resubmitted. Lets see what happens! Coincidentally I am running and edit-a-thon in Dunedin 10 July 2021 at the Hocken Collections if you might interested in joining in. Pakoire (talk) 11:07, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Pakoire: - it's been accepted!

I'm nowhere near the Hocken unfortunately. But apparently it has the Collective's archives- the files for Herstory might give good pickings for more Wikipedia bios? Somej (talk) 20:11, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to both review Phil De Luna as well as directly make edits. It's taken a while but it's a stronger article having been through this process. Greenbound (talk) 13:08, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see you reverted my edits on this page. I made the edit because these musicians are not notable enough for the LEAD of the article - the list in the lead is already too long, and we can't keep adding in each editor's favourite musicians to it. Perhaps you could re-evaluate which of these musicians need be mentioned here, and which can remain either within the main body of the article, or in the longer list of Boulanger pupils? And it would be nice if the list in the lead could be alphabetical. Many thanks! pgbrown (talk) 10:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DrThneed:, @Pakoire:, you may be interested in Draft:Jocelyn Harris that has just gone into the Articles For Creation queue. Thanks for setting up the wikidata for her! Somej (talk) 10:17, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jocelyn Harris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 10:21, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Somej/changes Special:Prefixindex/User:Somej

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dart River.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There's no benefit in having two separate pages; once the rename goes through, depending on community consensus on renames of this sort, we can move it to the new page title. Content about the rename should be on the Commission's singular article rather than a separate page under the new name. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 04:34, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Response is on your talk page Somej (talk) 04:44, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi There! I saw you were a new user very active on AfC - I sure could use some feed back on this if you're interested in Earthquakes. Draft:EarlyWarningLabs EricFishers11 (talk) 21:03, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Jocelyn Harris. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:59, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Somej:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1800 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Turnagra was:

Article needs a solid copy edit before being accepted - I note there are still a few placeholders in areas, or sections which seem incomplete. Definitely a good start though and I can't see any issues in accepting this once that's been done.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Angus Ross (New Zealand Historian) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Turnagra (talk) 08:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I read the summary note of your edit in the Klaus Fuchs article. In 1911, the Grand Duchy of Hesse was not a sovereign state (anymore), as it had joined the federation of states that formed the Deutsches Reich (German Empire) in 1871. The German Empire of 1871 was a federal monarchy. The Grand Duchy, like other member states of the German Empire, was only granted very limited autonomy, which was mostly restricted to the cultural and social sector. The state also had to close its ministry of foreign affairs, as this had become the Reich's domain. Imho, it should either say "Rüsselsheim, Grand Duchy of Hesse, Germany", where then "Germany" should be linked to the article covering the German Empire, or just "Rüsselsheim, Germany". If you just mention (and link) the GD of Hesse, the readers will be (mis)led to think that the GD was a sovereign state at the time. GeeGee (talk) 15:10, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Angus Ross (historian), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Schwede66 09:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! This is a reminder that you're a probationary Articles for Creation reviewer. Because you haven't performed any reviews in the last six months, you may be removed from the list of participants. Don't be a stranger! We'd love to see you take on any number of reviews, but even a single one will be enough to maintain your reviewer status.

Thanks for volunteering, and thanks for the reviews you've done so far! -- asilvering (talk) 19:24, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for releasing Middle East International from drafts. It was intended as a footnote and turned into an albatross, but I learnt a lot along the way. "I'm a peacock - I can fly". Also thanks for the time you have spent sorting out the details. Padres Hana (talk) 10:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]