Welcome!

Hello, SoSaysChappy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Alientraveller (talk) 10:06, 5 August 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Archives

Aug 08 - May 09 Jun 09 - Jul 09 Nope

		The Original Barnstar
		For writing the "Plot" section at The Day the Earth Stood Still, the size of the contribution fitting the plot guidelines, a rarity to be found on Wikipedia's film articles! —Erik (talk • contrib) 18:13, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For you excellent work on the South Park character articles! Keep up the good work! :) TheLeftorium 21:13, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I echo this sentiment! Excellent work, and congrats on your deserved GAN pass for Eric Cartman! — Hunter Kahn _(contribs) 21:56, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The South Park Barnstar
		For vastly improving South Park character articles, and other great South Park work! 96T (talk) 22:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hello and thanks for all your help on Independence Day. Can you look at the recent edit history and let me know what you think is the best place for the picture of the White house? Plot or production? -- Jombage (talk) 22:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the amazing work on South Park related articles.

You are the dawg! Suranah (talk) 05:14, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm placing South Park "On hold". The rest of the concerns are at Talk:South Park/GA2.--WillC 20:59, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and passed the article. Good job and God bless.--WillC 19:25, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They both seem reliable enough to me to use on a limited basis. They are both seemingly backed by major news publishers which is a key point in determining reliable sources I do believe. One of them is a newspaper in itself, so all newspapers are supposed to be reliable. Really all of the descriptions you gave before I passed it I agreed they were reliable. The ones after I passed it I have yet to read.--WillC 20:40, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your lengthy message on my talk page. I had assumed that you were new to Wikipedia based on what seems to be a recent join date. So I had no idea about your previous contributions, as I believe your name was still highlighted in red. Even if I had known about your contributions, I felt that adding a lengthy plot like that while the movie is still in theaters is pretty much a bummer. I realize that Wikipedia allows spoilers, but it felt as if the Hurt Locker page was being attacked by a band of people intent on making negative contributions to try to thwart potential audience members from seeing the film. It is a low budget independent film, and that is something that is almost extinct. It depends on good word of mouth, and while I'm not making contributions to market the movie, people do look for accurate information here and I am intent on helping to provide that.

I'm also aware, because of your join date, that there is a high possibility that you are an "alternative account" perhaps one that belongs to one or two of the people who have already participated in the conversation. So you see my stance on this and where I was coming from. These people had reverted all of my recent contributions and one of them has been hounding me on this page for over a year, reverting nearly everything. You can see how many sources I've cited. That's a big reason why! Anyway, I went back and looked at WP:PLOT and found that it states pretty clearly that Wikipedia is not about plot. Personally, I think it would be better if just a simple one or two paragraph synopsis or premise of a film was listed. However, since you and "Erik" both seem intent on keeping a lengthy plot, I think it needs to be either more concise or it needs to have the other scenes and sequences of the film, which have been selectively omitted, there in their entirety. Perhaps I'll try to fill in some of the blanks and maybe do a bit of re-writing, since you have suggested that you do these plots to get the ball rolling. So if you don't mind... that's what I'll try to do. I'm glad that you explained what your intent was. Feel free to jump back into the conversation at any point. Inurhead (talk) 02:02, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just restored some content that disappeared from the article since I last got involved. I'll be sitting on the article for the long run. Erik (talk | contribs) 21:17, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow - there almost enough socks to keep a basketball team happy, at least if you believe Inurhead. Sorry to see you get slapped with that too. It wasn't worth me dealing with more of his crap, and with you and Erik actively working on the article, it was a good time to step away. Good luck handling him! Ravensfire (talk) 23:19, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a new discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Inurhead continued incivility and edit warring at The Hurt Locker regarding the issues at The Hurt Locker and with Inurhead. FYI in case you wish to add any comments about the situation. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 05:01, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2009 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next six months; members can still nominate themselves if interested. Please vote here by September 28! This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:20, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, although I wasnt signed in, I was the one that added that sentence to the Kyle Broflovski page, about him being a diabetic. I have just watched the 'Cherokee Hair Tampons' episode from season 4. It IS mentioned that 'Kyle has always been a diabetic'. Please watch the episode on southparkstudios.com if you don't think this is true. I'd appreciate it if you could add this fact into the article as I feel that it is important to put in about him. He's a fictional character obviously, so it isn't a huge deal I suppose. But I still feel it is relevant. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Firebomb 87 (talk • contribs) 08:52, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I got your message about what i added. I totally understand your reasoning for not adding that. lol, and it makes a lot of sense definately. Thanks for the input man. I appreciate it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Firebomb 87 (talk • contribs) 03:17, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message, I might just add my name to the SP wikiproject when I get a chance to sit down and edit some more articles in depth. Alastairward (talk) 14:42, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Correct? Good work on the article(s) btw! Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 09:50, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it might pop up on your watchlist, nevertheless just wanted to make sure you saw the edit :) Regards, Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 20:06, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If there are punctuation to correct then please do so. The earlier plot left out plot structure and flowed badly. Alatari (talk) 07:13, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You did a complete rewrite of the plot synopsis here but you didn't ask for permission. Alatari (talk) 07:17, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SoSaysChappy. I saw your post about the Dances with Smurfs plot issue, and I wanted to draw your attention to my recent post over there with my thoughts and suggestions for the plot summary. As I said over there, I think you both have good points, so I tried to reach some sort of middle ground. Let me know what you think... — Hunter Kahn _(c) 16:40, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• No prob! — Hunter Kahn _(c) 23:46, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Las Vegas is a dab page. This needs to be changed to an article. The dab I made is correct since it correctly reflects the larger area. Please don't remove this or change to an article that is not correct. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:31, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On November 23, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dances with Smurfs, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Mifter (talk) 01:16, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SouthParkep1311.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 02:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SouthParkep1313.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 03:02, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just want to call your attention to some cleanup of The Hurt Locker's award section. I've outlined what I'm thinking about doing on the talk page here, and would appreciate your thoughts and comments! There's been some contentious editing on this article in the past, and I'd like to avoid that here if at all possible. Thanks! Ravensfire (talk) 20:32, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I wanted to get your thoughts on the idea of joining the two discussed here. Thanks! Ruodyssey (talk) 06:06, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SoSaysChappy, I've posted a new proposal for discussions here. Do give your suggestions. Thanks ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ _―Œ ^{♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣} 04:34, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there SoSaysChappy, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free images are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some images that I found on User:SoSaysChappy/Sandbox1. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page. See a log of images removed today here, shutoff the bot here and report errors here. Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 00:39, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SoSaysChappy. Would you mind weighing in on the discussion at Talk:Sexual Healing (South Park) regarding the quote box (which has been removed). I've made my points, so has the objector, and frankly, I've already wasted too much energy on what is ultimately a trivial matter. I'd much rather get a WP:CONSENSUS developed than keep going back and forth with him, so your thoughts would be much appreciated. — Hunter Kahn 14:51, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SoSaysChappy,

Thank you for your message regarding Medicinal Fried Chicken. I feel that your comments, and edits with respect to the capitalization, and italicization of the re-branded name for KFC at the end of the episode (i.e. Medicinal Fried Chicken) confuse the reason for the capitalization, and italicization. Capitalization is necessary as Medicinal Fried Chicken is the actual name to which the franchise is changed at the close of the episode (i.e. it is used as the name of the franchise, not as a generic term). Indeed, for greater accuracy, it should actually be rendered as MEDICINAL FRIED CHICKEN, as this is how the name is rendered on the exterior of the building in the episode, however, my fear was that total capitalization might confuse readers. The purpose of the italicization is simply to highlight the name change to the reader. Another means of doing this would be to avoid italicization, and use parentheses instead.

I hope that this clarifies the situation, and the nature of my edits.

Thanks. CrimeCentral (talk) 12:20, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Told the episode's name and description by a moderator of the official German South Park forum who is directly connected to Comedy Central. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.184.40.212 (talk) 01:06, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please join the discussion at Talk:South Park#Easter egg link? Thanks. --John (talk) 19:00, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I posted my answer right now, sorry it took s long Greetings --Alosolo (talk) 12:33, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the person who added the info about the speach at the end being about "intimidation and fear," but it seems to come from Matt and Trey's press release at the bottom of controversy section. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 02:55, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, you addressed this in your previous edit summary. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 02:57, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SoSaysChappy. You have new messages at Talk:Eric Cartman#Cats.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hearfourmewesique (talk) 22:47, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SoSaysChappy! I'm planning on nominating 200 (South Park) and 201 (South Park) for GAN in the next couple days, (I was actually going to do so yesterday or today, but I wanted to give it a few more days now to see if this Times Square thing produces anything more.) and I was planning on listing you as a co-nom, since you've been helping out and contributing so much with this (and other) South Park articles. Let me know if you have any kind of strong objection.

Also, just to warn you, I will be going on an extended trip starting this upcoming Saturday and will be gone for about a month. I will have limited Internet access and will be checking in on Wikipedia from time to time, but my contributions will be largely to check on any outstanding reviews. That means I might not be as quick as I would be, so I wanted to warn you in case we do co-nominate it. Would that be a problem? — Hunter Kahn 12:35, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Good work to you as well! I'll probably nominate it in a day or two. Even though we will both have other things going on, between the two of us I'm sure we will be able to address any and all objections that might arise. — Hunter Kahn 18:59, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • By the way, congrats on the pending graduation! — Hunter Kahn 00:09, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've nominated them. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 12:38, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There have been regular difference of opinion in article deletion debates regarding NPOV application. It's an intersecting of WP:WAX the final entry on legitimate usage, WP:BIAS and the current reading of WP:NPOV. I hopefully summarized my case effectively here. Alatari (talk) 06:39, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You reverted my edit to Eric Cartman and I'd like to find out why. Thanks, ArtistScientist (talk) 09:27, 24 May 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:53, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SouthPark1403.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:48, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Chef sings2009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:10, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:StanMarsh.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:06, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Underpantsgnomes1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:21, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Million Award
		For your contributions to bring South Park (estimated annual readership: 1,990,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:46, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

This editor won the Million Award for bringing South Park to Good Article status.

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:46, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SouthParkep1309.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 00:44, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SouthParkep1310.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 00:46, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SouthParkep1308.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 23:04, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SouthParkpeetsunami.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 00:50, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cartmanchalk.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 23:36, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:South Park sex addicts.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 14:51, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SouthParkSarahJessicaParker.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 03:23, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have added your name to this list due to inactivity. Please remember to remove yourself from the list of you ever return. Additionally, thank you for all of your contributions to South Park articles. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:35, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

You uploaded or restored , File:SouthParkDistribution.png, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work:
please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers.

If it's not entirely your own work, or the media is based on the work of others:
Please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers. You should also read Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission which details how to confirm any permissions you obtained for works by others that are still in copyright.

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If media is not claimed, and there's no other obvious source or authorship information, the file may have to be removed for copyright reasons.

It's okay to remove or strike messages like this once the concerns have been addressed. :). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Spsign.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, user-created image with no apparent encyclopedic value

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. mattbr 06:39, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]