Hi, if you want to propose merging two articles you need to put the merge template on both articles and have them both point to a section on the destination article's talk page that gives your reasons why they should be merged so others can comment - see wp:merging#Proposing a merger. Richerman (talk) 22:36, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Open–closed political spectrum, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2017 French presidential election was not fought between left and right, but between open and closed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Open–closed political spectrum. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Open–closed political spectrum), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

		The Peer Review Barnstar
		Thanks for your help at Wikipedia peer review! --Tom (LT) (talk) 21:56, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Bamber Bridge, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Battle of Bamber Bridge began when white American military police arrested a black USAAF soldier in an English village pub (pictured), and ended with a mutiny that left one dead and seven injured? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Bamber Bridge. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Battle of Bamber Bridge), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

The article Government News Network has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia:Notability (media) and Wikipedia:Notability (websites)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 22:36, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on the promotion to FA status of your Northern England article. I think it would make for an excellent article on the home page. I think you should propose it at WP:TFAR. I will certainly support it. Best, Edwininlondon (talk) 20:51, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Edwininlondon: Thanks! Have nominated it here Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/Northern England. Smurrayinchester 08:26, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the Northern England article has been scheduled as today's featured article for September 4, 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 4, 2017, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:18, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for "an increasingly distinctive cultural area, shaped by centuries of Celtic, Roman, Saxon, Danish, Norman and Scottish invasion and more recently by the rise and fall of heavy industry"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated this article for deletion. As a contributor, your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election. Robofish (talk) 22:57, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Irene Clennell at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:25, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Irene Clennell case, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Irene Clennell was deported from the UK, despite having a British husband, because she had spent too long abroad? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Irene Clennell case), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Airlift, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Supplies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article GRIM test, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a GRIM test on a sample of published psychology articles revealed that over half contained at least one mathematically impossible result? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/GRIM test. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, GRIM test), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

A year ago ...

Chester trust "for life"
... you were recipient no. 1522 of Precious, a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:25, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:30, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

... and three --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:28, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Smurrayinchester. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NSB Di 8, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Steel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Alem Bekagn at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --Farang Rak Tham (talk) 22:51, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States federal government shutdown of 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Standard Time (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article AU Conference Center and Office Complex, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that claims have been made that the headquarters of the African Union, donated by the Chinese government, was bugged by the Chinese? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/AU Conference Center and Office Complex. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, AU Conference Center and Office Complex), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Hello! Your submission of Alem Bekagn at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:38, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alem Bekagn, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the killings at the Alem Bekagn prison were visible from the windows of the Organisation of African Unity headquarters, but were never mentioned by the OAU? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alem Bekagn. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Alem Bekagn), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evrik (talk • contribs) 14:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 9 November 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article July 1968 England and Wales dust fall storms, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during storms on 1–2 July 1968, hailstones the size of tennis balls fell in Cardiff and blood-red rain covered Southern England? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/July 1968 England and Wales dust fall storms. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, July 1968 England and Wales dust fall storms), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List organisations in the United Kingdom with a royal charter. Since you had some involvement with the List organisations in the United Kingdom with a royal charter redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:26, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Smurrayinchester. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You moved the Independent Group DAB page to the main title, and the art movement article to a disambiguated title. However, you've left all the incoming links for the art movement pointing at the DAB page. Could you please fix them all? You can see the list here. Cheers, Number 57 13:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:29, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:EACherryicecream.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Bad edit of Image:Cherryicecream.jpg for the now-defunct Esperanza group. Not necessary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:22, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Let Nature Sing at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:47, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Let Nature Sing, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Let Nature Sing", a single consisting of nothing but unedited bird song, reached number one on the UK Singles Sales Chart? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Let Nature Sing. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Let Nature Sing), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Template:WikiProject Lemony Snicket has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Trialpears (talk) 09:23, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		The Like-Minded Persons' Club
		For displaying here common sense and uncommon good taste by agreeing with me or saying something I would have said if only I'd had the presence of mind, I hereby bestow upon you Provisional Membership of the Like-Minded Persons' Club. To qualify for Full Membership, simply continue to agree with me in all matters for at least the next 12 months. (Disagreements are so vulgar, don't you think? And, as Bruce Chatwin said, Arguments are fatal. One always forgets what they are about)

Well done. Keep it up. Cheers. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 11:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, did you think about renaming Severe_acute_respiratory_syndrome-related_coronavirus into sarbecovirus ? This would make it clearer and more accurate with respect to the scientific literature (look at page 7). Sarbcovirus is a "subgenus" of the genus betacoronavirus. Reuns (talk) 14:27, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Reuns: Thanks. For what it's worth, I went with Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus as the title because that's the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses nomenclature for the species. That said, it looks like Sarbecovirus taxonomy is currently a mess (there's no current distinction between Sarbecovirus and the SARS-related coronavirus species) and it seems perfectly plausible to me that when this is all over there will be a reorganisation that puts SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 in different species under Sarbecovirus. This probably needs input from people who know more than me at Talk:Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus. Smurrayinchester 14:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Smurrayinchester I'm not saying Sars-related doesn't exist in the taxonomy, but according to https://talk.ictvonline.org/taxonomy/ it is the only "species" of the subgenus sarbecovirus,

         Riboviria › Nidovirales › Cornidovirineae › Coronaviridae › Orthocoronavirinae › Betacoronavirus › Sarbecovirus › Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus

so it would make it clearer to group Sars-Cov, Sars-Cov-2, Bat_SARS-like_coronavirus_WIV1 into the sarbecovirus subgenus (the article doesn't exist yet, all we have to do is to rename Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus and edit its Taxobox) Reuns (talk) 15:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why "Putting a footnote inside the percentage breaks the chart"? I see the chart correctly, so maybe it changes with browsers? Can we put it in some other place? --151.48.13.156 (talk) 10:38, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On Firefox, it seems to cause the bracket after the percentage to appear on the next line, making that row twice as wide. Smurrayinchester 12:31, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Relevance fallacies has been nominated for merging with Template:Formal fallacies. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 13:39, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Oxford Circus panic, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that sixteen people were injured while fleeing a non-existent terrorist attack during the Oxford Circus panic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Oxford Circus panic. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Oxford Circus panic), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Hello, Smurrayinchester. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:14, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Wombat.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, is widely distributed on the Internet, no proof that the uploader is author.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, with the recent page move made, can you please take care to fix all of the Clay Walker related links to the new article location? Thanks. DLManiac (talk) 07:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. They should all be fixed now. Smurrayinchester 12:10, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Photography game, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that photography video games often play like non-violent shooter games, with the player equipped with a camera instead of a gun? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Photography game. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Photography game), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Dear fellow Wikipedian, Despite having been off Wikipedia for sometime now, I am coming back with a few specific ideas in mind for which I may need to get help and advice. I am looking to create a few Wikipedia pages about various financial institutions which are quite high in notability but have not yet been covered, however, despite my experience and my knowledge of the field, I am new to this kind of content.

Therefore, I am looking for other, recognized editors that I could consult in case I need help or advice if I encounter roadblocks during my endeavor. I would need to get advice from someone who is well versed in the fields of finance and business.

Let me know if you could help me with this task and if not, let me know if you know someone on wikipedia that would be the go to person to help with such matters ? I am trying to contact a few administrators who seem to be highly competent in those fields but am currently having a hard time finding someone. Thanks in advance, SUPERGTOR (talk) 03:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SUPERGTOR: Please see the reply that I left at User talk:Legoktm#Need help for creation of finance and business pages. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:23, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

I need help with editing protection templates around my data. Realme233 (talk) 17:26, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Smurrayinchester. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Black-green coalition, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:57, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Being questioned is not a criminal conviction, receiving an FPN is not a criminal conviction, and under caution is not the same as receiving a caution. You need to be much more careful when editing in WP:BLP areas. DuncanHill (talk) 09:31, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nargess Eskandari-Grünberg, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nargess Eskandari-Grünberg (pictured), the new mayor of Frankfurt, gave birth to her first child while a political prisoner in the wake of the Iranian Revolution? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nargess Eskandari-Grünberg. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Nargess Eskandari-Grünberg), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

November songs

Thank you for a good one, featured also on Portal:Germany. Opera and Advent choral music on my talk --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:36, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay–ooh. New teeth newsletter. That's weird...

Hello!

Welcome to the first regenerated issue of The Space-Time Telegraph, the official newsletter of WikiProject Doctor Who. We hope it finds you well in your safe travels across the Whoniverse! This newsletter was founded in 2008 and seemed to get lost in the time vortex quite quickly. Thanks to the Doctor dragging Sutekh through the time vortex and bringing life by bringing death to death (yeah... I'm a little confused too), it seems to have regenerated. The writing staff hopes to bring you future editions quarterly.

For this first edition, we have created an updated version of our mailing list that includes any active editors who previously had their usernames included in our participants list. If you do not wish to receive future editions, please remove your name from the mailing list. If you no longer wish to participate in the project, please also remove your name from the participants list.

I think that's enough about the newsletter for now. Let's dive into interesting things happening within the Doctor Who side of Wikipedia. Geronimooooo.....

Discussions of Note

A move discussion is currently underway on whether or not Doctor Who series 14 should be moved to Doctor Who season 1 (2024). The discussion also involves conversation on a few other adjacent articles. If you have an opinion on the matter please read over the discussion or leave comments.

Contributors

• TheDoctorWho (talk)
• Pokelego999 (talk)
• Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her)