Hello! Sj96, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Rosiestep (talk) 04:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sj96, and Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Also, make test edits in the sandbox

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
If you need help, please see our help pages.--Rosiestep (talk) 04:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, there is no need to be so over-specific about the state that Auustralian places belong to. As such, I have reverted your page move at Granite Island (Australia) and reverted or slightly modified some of your other edits. You might be interested in WikiProject Australia and the Australian Wikipedians' notice board. Graham87 16:07, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, country names shouldn't generally be linked. While I think that the link you added to New Zealand at the New South Wales article was OK because it's directly relevant to the topic, the link to Australia that you added to Kinglake West, Victoria was not so good. Graham87 16:27, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 16:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Message sent with Global message delivery.

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Mel Gibson. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 12:44, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. - 220 of ^Borg 13:44, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peninsula, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stockton and Redcliffe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is absolutely no need to specify which state a city is located in unless the context is referring to a towns with a similar name but of lesser significance than the city that is more commonly known. Including states in the prose does nothing except clutter up sentences and lead to overlinking. Please refer to WP:MoS for future references. YuMaNuMa ^Contrib 03:42, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SatuSuro. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of impact craters in Australia without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Please do not play with formatting text - the article/list was almost rendered meaningless by your edits - please check to see fmt is correct when you do that sats 09:28, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Singapore Airlines. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 17:52, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Dave, As requested I've added sources to my edits. Regards, Scotty Sj96 (talk) 03:21, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • You're adamant on re-adding this, aren't you? And now per WP:UNDUE, your input has been reverted. --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 09:08, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'm sorry Dave but I had to undo your revert as reliable sources were provided as you requested. Your new tack is also flawed as the article itself states that SIA is majority government owned. Are you perchance Singaporean? Please note, I did try to meet you halfway by not deleting the obvious bias I deleted previously. Regards, ScottySj96 (talk) 10:30, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • Whatever your agenda, I've asked an Admin to review your edit and he has confirmed to me that it is nothing short of WP:UNDUE and your edit has been reverted. --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 19:22, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My agenda is to create a better, more neutral article for everyone. Unfortunately the non-synthesis of other viewpoints into this article undermines WikiP's credibility. ScottySj96 (talk) 19:41, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to be technical, the states of Australia are not sovereign states, rather they are federated states, meaning with current laws they cannot function independent of federal government. This is due to the division of power clause under the constitution, which transferred some of the powers of states to the federal government. As stated in my edit summary, the federal government can pass laws that override the laws of states, rendering states practically powerless in certain situations. YuMaNuMa ^Contrib 12:46, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sj96. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Actually, the Australian states are sovereign entities, as weird as that is (Queen of Victoria ... I kid you not). But that doesn't matter one bit here. What we need is to minimise redundancy in locations. "Melbourne", or "Melbourne, Australia", is quite enough, depending on the context. "Perth, Australia" is often needed, rather than "Perth", because there's a Scottish namesake. I find the little town of Sydney, Nova Scotia, not worth making the distinction for when citing "Sydney". But definitely avoid "Sydney, NSW, Australia". Tony (talk) 06:43, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. satusuro 13:56, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]