Archives

Archive No.1   Archive No.2   Archive No.3  Archive No.4   Archive No.5   Archive No.6  Archive No.7   Archive No.8   Archive No.9  Archive No.10    Archive No.11  Archive No.12    Archive No.13  Archive No.14    Archive No.15  Archive No.16

Please start new conversations at the bottom of this page (use 'New section' tab above).
Remember to sign your comments by typing four tildes (~~~~)

Hi, thanks for spotting my factual error regarding Plasnewydd as community vs. electoral ward. However, I think in that case the sentence needs a better reference, as the Wales Online story (also referenced elsewhere on Wikipedia) is about proposals to make a change, rather than the change actually taking place. I can't easily find such a reference online - any suggestions? Martpol (talk) 13:29, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's harder to prove something doesn't exist than prove it exists. Maybe a citation to Ordnance Survey Election Maps would help? Sionk (talk) 15:05, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the article I did about the San Clemente Literary Prize (moved to 'draft' by you some moths ago) you comment "Surely if it is existed for 24 years there must be more than 2 news articles about it?". There are more than 2 linked articles, and they are not from blogs, but from one of the largest private foundations in Galicia, from two newspapers (one of them is the largest read in Galicia and the other the largest published in Santiago de Compostela, the capital of the Autonomous Community of Galicia), and from the official website itself. There are photos, the winners are linked, etc. I don't understand the criteria to reject the page. What is the problem? You don't think the prize exists or you don't think that the highest prize in Galicia awarded by underage readers, and one of the largest in the Iberian Peninsula, has enough "entity" to have a page on Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gasparoff (talk • contribs) 19:45, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Galerie Urs Meile, Beijing-Lucerne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galerie Urs Meile, Beijing-Lucerne until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 02:16, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll leave you people to discuss not doing anything. Love that line. 👌 Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 19:15, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Croeso :) Sionk (talk) 20:33, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for entering some of the results for South Oxfordshire & Cherwell (and others?). I spotted & fixed an error for Peter Dragonetti, South Oxfordshire Kidmore End, and provided data for Didcot South, but as a newbie, didn't know how to re-order by votes cast, or make bold, so left it at that. Do you have a slick process for getting the results into the appropriate format? If so, we may be able to collaborate. I have a spreadsheet of results with ward, party, candidate, votes, vote share (adjusted for the number of votes allowed - so for Didcot South, with 3 votes allowed, the share should add to close to 300%). HenleyMan (talk) 13:13, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's no slick or clever way of inputting the info ...well, none that I'm aware of, other than copy-and-paste. The successful candidates will get 'bolded' if you add the word "winning" into the table template. So rather than "{{Election box candidate with party link" the template would begin "{{Election box winning candidate with party link". I'd suggest using the "Show preview" button before saving what you add. Sionk (talk) 18:18, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks sionk, although preview doesn't show me how to get what I want, just that what I've entered isn't quite right. HenleyMan (talk) 23:36, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• 73.89.211.188 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Douglas Rigby (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have revised this multiple times, adding in relevant citations that include coverage by the NY Times

This is NOT "a genealogical piece," as noted by one reviewer. Moreover, the subject meets the notability guidelines and is supported by solid citations.

IMO, this is worthy of being added and should be approved without further delay.

Thank you

73.89.211.188 (talk) 23:46, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We cannot list all writers, only notable ones. What is Rigby's claim to notability? I suppose the reviews in the NYT suggest one or more of his works may have been widely reviewed, but only one review is cited at the moment. Sionk (talk) 12:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I wanted to know the reason for your rejection of the article, and I hope that you will return the article instead of deleting it. Thank you هشام محمود حسونة (talk) 15:49, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I gave my reason when I rejected the article - it's not notable outside of the JESC (and sources closely related to Eurovision) at the moment. The article was returned originally to draft space because it was too soon before the event (and there was no wider interest from non-Eurovision publications). Judging by the lack of independent sources, it's still too soon, in my view. I could reject it again, but I'll leave it for another Articles for Creation editor to look at. Sionk (talk) 16:44, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think your reasons are not convincing, such as creating the draft too early for the event. This is not the first time an article has been created on JESC

I believe that anyone's duty is to fix and improve the article, not to delete it and leave it to another editor. Because of your action, readers will not be able to know the competition's developments. هشام محمود حسونة (talk) 16:54, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There aren't sufficient independent news sources to improve the article at the moment. Well, none that I can find. Little has been done to improve the article and take on board the reviewer's advice, since April. Wikipedia isn't here to advertise future events. Sionk (talk) 18:15, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly do you mean by independent sources? You mentioned Eurovoix as a news source but there are other ESC-focused sources cited (such as EurofestivalES and ESCPlus, which are Spanish Eurovision news sites) and several publications from either news media based in the broadcasters' countries or from the broadcasters themselves (i.e. Avondhu Newspaper for Ireland, TVM News for Malta, NPO Zapp for The Netherlands). Many of those other countries' news outlets are focused on far more than just Eurovision if that's what you're getting at. Also, how is it too soon for JESC's article when the contest is in November, yet the Eurovision 2024 article is already up despite the contest being almost a full year away?

(Really not trying to be argumentative, rather just trying to understand). 68.132.63.117 (talk) 06:46, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Eurovision Song Contest is considerably better known than the Junior version, it's not surprising it gets far more discussion and news coverage well in advance. Sionk (talk) 10:23, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You think it's still too early to talk about JESC It means that you have to return the article in September, then it will not be too early to talk about the contest or maybe in August هشام محمود حسونة (talk) 14:08, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 June 18 § Category:Association football people by prefecture in Japan. Qwerfjkltalk 16:38, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Re. Ffotogallery‎, I restored "Category:Photography museums and galleries in Wales". If you look at its web site it prominently describes exhibitions that appear to be at Ffotogallery‎ and not at Turner House Gallery. -Lopifalko (talk) 12:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article is about the organisation, not about a particular gallery or exhibition. Sionk (talk) 12:31, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Look here, scroll down to "Gallery: Installation Shots" for photographs of their extensive gallery. See also their web site's menu option What's on: Exhibition. An establishment such as this can be both an arts agency and a photography gallery. Or am I missing something? -Lopifalko (talk) 15:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's an organisation that often runs, or has access to, an exhibition space/gallery. Hence the opening sentence says it "is the national development agency for photography in Wales". I doubt it's current gallery in Cathays would be notable enough for it's own article. Sionk (talk) 18:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for adding cleanup tags to my Andy Roberts (wrestler) page. What would you like me to do? I'm happy to shorten it or have it shortened by other contributors. I don't believe there are any unreliable sources but I'm happy to remove any that are indentified. SugeRight (talk) 07:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. The Guardian review of the tasting menu was laugh-out-loud hilarious! Love the Portmeirion list, by the way. Doing my best to fill in some of the image gaps. KJP1 (talk) 14:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Diolch. Yes, they won't be inviting The Guardian back for a free lunch any time soon. Sionk (talk) 20:52, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 9 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Campanile, Portmeirion, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Campanile, a bell tower in Portmeirion, north Wales, was built in 1928 using stone from a nearby 12th-century castle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Campanile, Portmeirion. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Campanile, Portmeirion), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 12:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § X by Y in Z on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 11:31, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sionk:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1800 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lists of people by place in the United Kingdom has been nominated for merging to Category:Lists of British people by location. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 13:38, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Sionk, Greetings. You mean our National New Paper New Vision is not an independent and reliable source, Human Rights Centre Uganda www.hrcug.org, The Independent (Uganda) newspaper, World Movement for Democracy, Voice of America (VOA) are not reliable and independent sources? Unless there are reasons why this article is rejected not any of the reasons given.Micheal Kaluba (talk) 06:51, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article in New Vision is not about Hassan Shire. The article in The Independendent newspaper is written by Hassan Shire, so neither of them count towards his notability. Sionk (talk) 11:28, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sionk. The new pages patrol team is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles and redirects needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help. I believe that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines. Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions. If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here. Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around! Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 19:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good grief that is a big backlog! Sionk (talk) 22:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2024! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Invisible Barnstar
		Thank you for your participation in the Articles for Creation's November 2023 Backlog Drive! You made a total of 32 reviews, for a total of 49 points. – robertsky (talk) 06:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

– robertsky (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

– robertsky (talk) 06:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the one at mine too! DankJae 09:18, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sionk. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
• Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
• Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. – Joe (talk) 22:11, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Savannah Phillips has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 7 § Savannah Phillips until a consensus is reached. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:53, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I have been searching for sources for this subject, the article for which you succesfully proposed for deletion and have found the following multiple independent reliable sources:

• BBC News website: [1]
• Oxford Mail: [2]
• The Echo (Essex): [3]
• SussexWorld: [4]
• NorthWales.com website: [5]

In light of these five, plus the existing RIS in Simon Garfield's The Wrestling as you mentioned in the debate makes six, I would suggest that this subject easily passes WP:GNG for multiple reliable indepdndent sources and the article should be restored.
I am tagging HHH Pedrigree, Oaktree b and ArcAngel who all participated in the original debate and Liz who closed the original debate as Delete. Romomusicfan (talk) 13:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Romomusicfan, most of these are brief mentions in relation to events he was taking part in, though the Oxford Mail article gives a little info about his family and home location. The NorthWales.com article is a little stronger, though this isn't a major news site by any means. Maybe the closing admin, Liz, can advise you about where to go from here. Sionk (talk) 15:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well so far that's BBC News (main photo and three paras), Oxford Mail (greater depth on Mason's background and philosophy on wrestling) and a chapter in Simon Garfield's book still left, and three is "multiple" enough for GNG (and similar rules in SNGs). Romomusicfan (talk) 16:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No response from any of them thus far. Romomusicfan (talk) 10:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sionk, are you able to retrieve the script for the last (pre-deletion) version of the James Mason (wrestler) page so that I can work outside of article space on getting it into a condition where it clearly and undeniably passes GNG? If so, please paste it into my sandbox. If not, who can I contact about this? Romomusicfan (talk) 16:52, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since I never got a reply for this, I have copied the entry on Everybodywiki (a mirror of the page as it was in late 2023) to my sandbox and will be working to incorporate the above sources so the article can be republished.Romomusicfan (talk) 10:59, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Isla Phillips is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isla Phillips until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

voorts (talk/contributions) 23:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Connor Brothers, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Connor Brothers were believed to be two 20-something artists from Brooklyn, but are actually two British art dealers from London? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Connor Brothers. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Connor Brothers), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Welsh people of West Indian descent has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 13:53, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Sionk for collecting more than 50 points during the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:37, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Worm Gear Award
		This award is given in recognition to Sionk for collecting at least 7 points during each week of the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 23:03, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sionk,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rugby union players by city or town has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Art awards by country has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 21:18, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some time ago you accepted this at AFC. I have no issue with that. I often accept drafts that are borderline. Would you mind looking at it today, please. I ask as a courtesy to you, since I cannot see other than PR pieces, announcements etc in the references it has today. What do you think I am missing, please? I also see a potential UPE creating editor. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:05, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't let me stop you from nominating it for deletion, or cleaning it up. But the show appears to have attracted significant media attention so I expect it would survive an AfD nomination. Sionk (talk) 14:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll tag it first, see what transpires 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sionk,

I hope this post find you well and in good spirits.

I am working, among other articles on Lebanon's cultural and natural heritage, on a page for Charles Corm II. I saw you commented on the Charles Corm page a few years ago and really liked your editorial stance. despite some contributors publicly attacking you for it. I guess you cannot please everybody.

I would love to get your feedback on whether the Charles Corm II page is good and would be considered for Publication on Wikipedia before I go on and submit it for Publication.

If you have a few free minutes, please let me know your thoughts.

Lots of respect and kind regards.

Caliban31 (talk) 08:26, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for your message. I think you would have difficulty getting your Draft:Charles Corm II accepted at the moment. You give the impression most of the citations are about his business, or his grandfather. The books you cite are available online, so I would stringly suggest you cite the page number(s) where the information about Corm II can be found (I did a Google search of The Big Tech Score book, for example, and couldn't find a mention). Charles Corm II will need to meet WP:GNG criteria and have several examples of substantial coverage about him in reliable sources e.g. journalistic news articles or books Sionk (talk) 12:31, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your educated and prompt response. I will of course take all this into consideration. Regards Caliban31 (talk) 12:40, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to restore the Connected Contributor tag that this edit of yours seems to have removed from this article talk page, I'm guessing it was an automated tools error. But if it was intentional or if you have any other objections, please say. --GRuban (talk) 12:49, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Be my guest. I think it was something that happened during the automated acceptance from AfC. Sionk (talk) 13:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment on the DYK nomination page for Mary Jane Patterson. I have followed your suggestion. Can't think how I missed that! Balance person (talk) 08:23, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And his German twins. Thank you so much for bringing the text online in the past in English. I translated the text into German but accidentally created two versions.. [6]https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_„Jo”_Lindner and [7]https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_"Jo"_Lindner Could you by any chance remove the latter? Very grateful for all your support! MarvDjEng (talk) 17:15, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would be best to ask an administrator on de.wikipedia. Unfortunately I don't have the tools to delete pages, here or anywhere else. Sionk (talk) 17:40, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sionk. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/South West Norfolk in the 2024 United Kingdom general election.
Message added 09:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of South West Norfolk in the 2024 United Kingdom general election at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:59, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article South West Norfolk in the 2024 United Kingdom general election, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that by losing her constituency of South West Norfolk in 2024, Liz Truss became the first former UK prime minister since 1935 to lose their seat? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/South West Norfolk in the 2024 United Kingdom general election. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, South West Norfolk in the 2024 United Kingdom general election), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sionk. I helped Balance person with their first DYK and noticed that a recent one for Mary Jane Patterson seems to be stalled and may time out. I'm resonably experienced at DYK and the alt0b hook there looks fine. Given your recent comment and the fact that you were first to pick up that DYK nomination for review, is there any reason why you can't just approve it now? I know that other editors have made comments but none look like show-stoppers. Any further issues could be handled between approval and the DYK reaching the mainpage. Mike Turnbull (talk) 10:47, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've already approved it twice. Sionk (talk) 10:54, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies! I thought it was still in WP:DYK but I now see it's in WP:DYKNA. My bad! Thanks for your work there. Mike Turnbull (talk) 10:59, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Just been checking up on the Van page I attempted to draft, thanks for all your edits, super useful! It's my first time trying to write a proper page so am in need of a lot of help. Demosthenes1999 (talk) 19:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sionk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kanishka Narayan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:09, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:54, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DankJae 21:04, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]