Hi Simpleabd! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Soni (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Simpleabd reported by User:AsceticRose (Result: ). Thank you. -AsceticRosé 04:25, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Simpleabd. You have new messages at AsceticRose's talk page.
Message added 05:10, 29 September 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tawhid. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tawhid was changed by Simpleabd (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865569 on 2015-09-29T08:38:13+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:38, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Muhammad in Islam. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. clpo13_(talk) 09:43, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  NeilN ^{talk to me} 12:56, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Simpleabd. Please don't be upset.

You seem to be under the impression that if an edit is true and sourced, then nobody should stop it from being in an article.

Please understand that if that edit is disputed for whatever reason, you should use the article talk page to discuss things rather than just continuing to put the edit back.

When unblocked, please try that. Okay? I'm here if you have any questions. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 17:16, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note I have extended your block to one week for socking. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:25, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now one month (I've posted to the talk page of your latest account). You really should take Anna Frodesiak's advice. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:46, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please, please do not register any more accounts or use any IP. Making and using Weaktry was not a good thing. You, personally are blocked. Please do not make things worse. Just wait for the block to expire and then discuss those changes to articles before making them. Feel free to talk to me here now. I am friendly. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:19, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You just created User:Wearenotknowing. I have therefore blocked you indefinitely for abusing multiple accounts. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:57, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Simpleabd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

In the unblock request, i can be unblock even i am blocked indefinitely.

I am new in this website. I do not know about the policy yet. In September 29, I though i am banned indefinitely but it was just for 2 days.

I left this account because of what i though and i use some of my account.

In september 30 and october 1, my 2 accounts banned indefinitely for violating policy. my account snowweatyh just got banned indefinitely.

I have unblock request in manname but it was rejected because of being low competence.

What i don't understand is why do people judge me by how i talk to them.

I know that i need to respect islamic topic and any topic that help people.

I have no intention to disrespect the article in this website. I also didn't realize that i have violated the policy in this website.

I request to unblock because when i am unblock, I will use this only account in this website.

Islamic topic in this website is important. I will try to contribute in islamic topic and any topic that help people.

I will try to focus on my writing skill when contributing in this website.

Thank you and sorry for misunderstanding.

Decline reason:

You have clearly failed to understand the reason for your block, in spite of being told several times, both before and since the block was imposed. There is also a competence issue, which of itself is enough to refuse your unblock request. I suggest that you edit the Wikipedia of your own language. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Simpleabd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I request to unblock. People can use informal english during conversaion. People can use freedom of speech with limitation. we have right to help. My account came in this website on september 26, 2015. i really do not know about the policy yet. It is also unfair for me if the moderator of this website judge my english skill in my conversation when there is do not bite the newcomers. I request to unblock because i like to add some information in any topic that help people which is not prohibited and i will try to use this only account in this website. i am trying to be content in this website policy and in other stuff such as when the moderator edit my changes. that's all.

Decline reason:

I am not willing to unblock you at this time. Please see my full response below, and please answer my questions under point 6. Please reply as a discussion thread below my comment; do not create another unblock template with your reply. —C.Fred (talk) 04:30, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Going item by item through your unblock request:

1. I'm not sure what you mean by a complicated request. However, your requests have not (until now) addressed one big reason for your current block: your use of multiple accounts.
2. "Freedom of speech" is a bad card to play in an unblock request. Strictly speaking, users don't have freedom of speech. (Wikipedia has that freedom to speak without government restriction, though—and is free to, among other things, block users for not following rules.
3. Looking at your edits, it's questionable whether they were helpful. You added a lot of opinions and material that did not cite a secondary source.
4. Your account is relatively new, but you were informed of the relevant policies before you were blocked. You were only blocked after you repeatedly broke the same guidelines.
5. Yes, we're giving you some latitude because English is not your primary language. That said, you would have gotten blocked for your conduct regardless of your skill with English.
6. Now, finally, to your unblock request:
   1. Will you follow all of the guidelines and policies, including those regarding primary sources? Put bluntly, will you refrain from citing the Quran as a source in any circumstance other than directly quoting it?
   2. Are you acknowledging that you did use other accounts and indicating that you will not use any account other than this one from this point forward?
   3. Can you give an example of an edit that you would make that complies with the guidelines? Be specific about what article you would change, how you would change it, and what reliable source(s) support your change. —C.Fred (talk) 04:30, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Will you follow all of the guidelines and policies, including those regarding primary sources? Put bluntly, will you refrain from citing the Quran as a source in any circumstance other than directly quoting it?

I am trying follow in the guideline and policy. . Holy Quran is primary source, i try to use it carefully.

Are you acknowledging that you did use other accounts and indicating that you will not use any account other than this one from this point forward? yes i acknowledge.

Can you give an example of an edit that you would make that complies with the guidelines? Be specific about what article you would change, how you would change it, and what reliable source(s) support your change

yes, i can try. simpleabd (talk) 04:43, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Simpleabd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I really do not know the rule and policy yet, i am sorry if i cause trouble in bad manner. I will try not to disturb and make trouble with any editors in this website. i will use this account only in good manner. that's all.

Decline reason:

Your example below makes it abundantly clear that you do not have the required level of competence to edit Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:33, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Before an unblock is considered, you must give an example of an edit that you would make that complies with the guidelines? Be specific about what article you would change, how you would change it, and what reliable source(s) support your change.

anna (talk) 05:03, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

okay, i choose the article about peace of mind in the request. peace of mind can cure any medical condition. the source can be found in the context. ~simpleabd (talk) 13:29, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the above answer which indicates a strongly pro-fringe stance and a complete lack of awareness of WP:RS and these requests I do not think this editor can contribute constructively to this encyclopedia. --neiln ^{talk to me} 13:50, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

it is just an example. we can add information based on the context. it is nice we need peace of mind but sometimes we can't control ourselves. simpleabd (talk) 13:55, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I tried. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:59, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Simpleabd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

there is wiki: do not bite newcomer. i already put it in my previous unblock request. i do not know what happen why it is neglected.

the source i used in previous example was on context. i try to have valid information based on context. ordinary people made mistake. we do not owned this website by the way.

i am sorry if i am careless in my example. same article again. peace of mind is the absence of mental stress or anxiety. the source can be found in dictionary. being stress in this website gives nothing but disadvantages. peace out.

Decline reason:

Sorry, but you really need to actually read our policies. Max Semenik (talk) 00:23, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Simpleabd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I appreciate the response immediately. i can try to read the guideline and policy. i can use the guideline i learn in my english lesson. during my block period in this website, i think i have learn some policy in this website.

Decline reason:

You're welcome to request an unblock when you can demonstrate that you have read and understood the guidelines. Unblocking you now would lead to consistent, inadvertent errors. Huon (talk) 00:40, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are done wasting our time. Your talk page access has been revoked, per WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. You are free to use WP:UTRS to make further appeals. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Simpleabd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i sorry if i careless, disrespect, cause trouble or life threaten some users in this website. now, i am going to put a reliable information and nice detail if i contribute an information. an example is article in walking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walking. walking can also defined by moving at a regular pace by lifting and setting down each foot in turn,. about neiln? why you don't talk but you act? weird. ohnoitsjamie, you are not involved? why you want to disable newcomer? i admit we need to respect all human beings who want to be treated nice and it is in the article in human right. i try not to cause trouble in this website and i try to understand people. i try to improve my behavior and i do not create account anymore.

Decline reason:

Per the above declines, I just don't see where you really understand why you were blocked or where any of the very, very patient attempts to explain things to you have really sunk in. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Also, trying to use a second account to contest a block is not a good idea. Especially when one of the reasons for blocking was sockpuppetry. I'm sorry, but I don't see you ever getting unblocked at this point in time, if ever. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:46, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]