Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, SideshowBob7. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Wikih101 (talk) 01:52, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ricky Coulson. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List_of_Airbus_A350_XWB_orders_and_deliveries have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Making changes to Wikipedia content when based on a reliable source (a webpublication by RELX and quoted in related pages), should not be undone by another contributor simply because he or she has a preference for another source that might not have been updated yet. I think that is not how Wikipedia works as all contributions, especially those with referenced sources, are to be accepted as equal. The revision, based only on that preferred source, is therefore vandalism to a work by another. —Preceding undated comment added 17:26, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Ricky Coulson says hi! I have reverted your reversion of the A350 list. Thank you for checking on the numbers, they are totally correct now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ricky Coulson (talk • contribs) 19:15, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SideshowBob7! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Half Barnstar
		This is the barnstar that better fits into the message I wanted to deliver to you. I award you this for your recent edits to Qatar Airways, specially for eventually making me note that I was wrong. You deserve three-quarters of the credit, not just the half of it.Jetstreamer Talk 13:27, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just for future reference... Your comment to your edit to American Airlines fleet leads me to believe you misunderstand the use of the word "American". In most usages, "American" refers only to the United States of America. That is what the user that added the word meant. HuffTheWeevil / talk / contribs 15:19, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I came by to personally tell you that the column you removed from the Boeing 777X firm orders table has been readded. I do not remember seeing a consensus met about not adding the flag icon, or country name. I am not saying your edit was incorrect, but there is a discussion started at the article’s talk page whether there was a consensus met. Please join the discussion. If you have any questions, leave a message at my talk page. Thank you and Happy Holidays! --PilotJaguar1996 (talk) 20:04, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you reverted some un-sourced contribution made by the other user, that is fine. But you mentioned me responsible for edits without proper reference, which is untrue. check out the IndiGo histroy and u will find that my last edit on 21:07, 3 April 2015, exactly similar to your latest :edit on fleet data. So from next time onward check your fact before blaming someone like me who edits with full responsibility. M.soumen (talk) 7:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi, you probably misunderstood the edit summary (which is by the way autogenerated by Twinkle anyway, so I didn't really write it), it is not blaming you for anything. It just says that all the changes after your last one were reverted. SideshowBob7 (talk) 18:55, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please read edit summaries properly, and check revision history carefully as well - you will soon see that I did not revert edits after your first correction. Yny501 (talk) 11:12, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Who speaks of reverting Yny501? You made an unsourced (and wrong) change at 02:43, 20 June 2015. This is why I gave you the warning on your talk page‎. SideshowBob7 (talk) 18:05, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Read the revision history - you'll see that the edit you're referring to isn't made by me. It seems that others have had issues with this as well previously, judging by the comments above. I understand that you may have a pet peeve with firm order/MOU confusion issues, but don't just implicate everyone involved in the issue, but rather seek out individuals who make mistake multiple times. Yny501 (talk) 04:18, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did check the revision history it says: "02:43, 20 June 2015‎ Yny501 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (70,749 bytes) (+238)" So it was either you who made that unsourced change (for the 2nd time) or somebody else, using your account. However I admit that your other changes that got reverted with this one were constructive, so I will try to restore them. SideshowBob7 (talk) 12:51, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Garuda Indonesia page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask why you reverted my edits? I provided a visually attractive and well-organized gallery to present the various elements of the Emirates fleet to the reader. As you can see, I have done the same for: Delta, United, American, and Air France, with no objections. Your reversion to an earlier edit may have unintentionally undone my edits. Spartan7W § 15:49, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As per WP's image policies, which state in part " the use of a gallery section may be appropriate in some Wikipedia articles if a collection of images can illustrate aspects of a subject that cannot be easily or adequately described by text or individual images. The images in the gallery collectively must have encyclopedic value and add to the reader's understanding of the subject." You didn't provide reasons why a gallery does meet those requirementsSideshowBob7 (talk) 01:39, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So completely remove it? How about WP:BOLD? Tell me, what is wrong with what I did? How does it harm the article? How does organizing photographs into a clean space harm the value of this article? 96.39.226.99 (talk) 04:08, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not an image repository if a gallery doesn't add any encyclopedic value to an article it shouldn't be included. One rule of thumb to consider: if, due to its content, such a gallery would only lend itself to a title along the lines of "Gallery" or "Images of [insert article title]", as opposed to a more descriptive title, the gallery should either be revamped or moved to the Commons. Please read the Image galleries section of Wikipedia:Image use policy for further information. SideshowBob7 (talk) 18:41, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Go On Norwegians Facebook page and you will see that NAX have ordered A321LR and not the NEO... NEO is a fuel efficient one and LR is Long Range Aviationexpert (talk) 10:58, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook is not a reliable source! But since you Adressed me in a civilized manner this time I'll try to explain my point: A321 LR is just a Marketing Name for a higher Weight Version of the A321neo, so every A321LR is an A321neo as well. But you provided a Link to the current engine A321 which has nothing to do with the LR SideshowBob7 (talk) 23:48, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SideshowBob7. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SideshowBob7. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SideshowBob7. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]