User:SushiGeek/Title

Hello, LUUWDA! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! DuncanHill 08:16, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

No you aren't, try contributing to the encyclopedia. Batbert (talk) 09:23, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've seen Varney, Kentucky and FreeRice, have you? I do contribute. --Let Us Update Special:Ancientpages. 09:26, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since Special:Ancientpages is a special page, it cannot be updated by ordinary editors (even administrators). You may want to post a bug on bugzilla to request that it be updated, but campaigning on the wiki itself won't accomplish anything. —Random832 14:34, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My effort to regain adminship was unsuccessful, and I'll do what I can to ensure your opinion of my suitability for adminship improves. Thank you for taking some time out of your day to voice your opinion.--MONGO 04:59, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

.: RFA thanks :.

Thanks for supporting me! My RfA passed with a final tally of 5 neutrals, 1 oppose and 148 supports, a turnout I couldn't have dreamed of. I'm going to do everything I can to help out the community, help with sysop tasks, and of course, contribute to the encyclopedia. If you ever need a hand with something, feel free to give a shout! Cheers! Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 17:44, 10 February 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Carré D'agneau, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 16:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I happened to notice something rather odd while browsing through some pages. This appears to be a little-used IP address using your signature in a welcome template. It could be a good-faith mistake or confusion, or it might be something else. I just thought you might want to know about it. Pyrospirit (talk · contribs) 19:12, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you know that all edits made by wikipedian editors to wikipedia are released under the terms of the GFDL, so you can't claim text as yours. If you're gonna put it here; any text you submit can be modified; built upon; deleted; changed; moved; turned into an article; ect. - -[The Spooky One] | ^{[t c r]} 05:09, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And also, it's not stealing, it's simply creating an article. At Anypoint; somone could have moved your subpage to the wikipdia article on it. and as for the creating the 3,000,000 article thing; that seems very hard to do and highly inprobable; because there have been over 3,000,000 articles, just not 3,000,000 that were kept. Alot of newly created articles get deleted. - -[The Spooky One] | ^{[t c r]} 05:13, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please, assume good faith. It looked to me like you were merely posting to get something more popular on Digg. Have a nice day! :) — neuro^(talk) 22:42, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unsure if it is suitable at all, as it is merely promoting an entry, but since you don't appear to just be here to promote it I won't think anything more of it. As for the question itself, if it is already a viral, everyone on Digg will have already seen it. People only Digg if they find something new or exciting which hasn't been done before. Merry Christmas, by the way. :) — neuro^(talk) 11:41, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep posting links to articles that don't exist? What is the point of that? If you think those articles should exist, then write them; then link to them. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 04:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't make that up. Please go and read Wikipedia:No original research, which is one of our most important policies. It basically says what you wrote in the edit summary: We can't include something you've just seen on TV, unless you actually cite the source (the news report). If you would've seen something as an eye witness instead, for example, we couldn't include what you've seen at all, unless reliable sources report what you've seen, too. --Conti|✉ 12:14, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Original research is theory, etc. without reliable sources to back them up. The age-check page is source enough, which reinforces the fact that it's solid fact. Moreover, original research ≠ solid fact, as proven here. --Let Us Update Special:Ancientpages. 21:27, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The policy is called No Original Research, this means (ta-da!) No Original Research!! Now the edit you keep re-adding is (by your own admission) Original Research, and as it has no reliable sources other than your own Original Research, then it does not belong in the article. Until you can provide some reliable third party sources then your edit will always be reverted, and in this case be reverted by more than one editor. If you continue to add that OR then your edits will be seen as vandalism and although you are only making the edit once a day (to avoid 3RR) it can still lead to you being banned. At this moment you are the one trying to add unsourced info, and policy states that this info will be removed, which is what I and other editors have been doing. Darrenhusted (talk) 10:44, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please, you've been around Wikipedia long enough to know that what you're doing is wrong. Wikipedia is not censored: we are here to report the facts, even if they are uncomfortable ones. I don't know whether people with AS are more likely to be pedophiles and/or murderers than NT's; having a guy who was both on a list of people with AS does not provide us with an answer to that question. To omit his entry on the list, however, is censorship. If you question Dante's diagnosis, then let's discuss it. Adding an unreliable link claiming Woody Allen has AS is not the right thing to do. I would like to warn you also that you are on the verge of violating WP:3RR and I will not revert your last edit for this reason. Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 01:38, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I'm pretty much always on IRC. I will be going to bed in an hour or so though so if you want to talk to me today please come in soon. Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 02:19, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to join the race to get the 3,000,000th article, you'd better hurry, because it's due to go up tonight. My apologies if you missed out on your chance. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 23:01, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was on a 5-hour drive when this happened. Looks like that I'm predestined to be on a mode of transportation somewhere else every time Wikipedia hits an odd millionth article. 1,000,000 - I was riding a bicycle on my university's campus the moment it happened. 3,000,000 - I was driving my sister back home on the Interstate. Apparently, I'm on the computer if an even millionth article hits. 2,000,000 - I was on here. I made Varney, Kentucky at the moment that many users rushed to make their article the 2,000,000th. I pulled the trigger too early; Varney, Kentucky was Article # 1,999,994. --Let Us Update Special:Ancientpages. 07:53, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content like you did on Ellis Lankster, this is against WP:BLP as it is WP:Undue weight on a minor incident, and lacks reliable sources. Thankyou Martin451 (talk) 23:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to IPad, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you.  GSK (talk ● evidence) 08:24, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings LUUWDA, I see you're up for adoption, and I'm in the market. If ever you need advice or answers, just ask me -- any question, any time. I'd like to help however I can. Happy editing - Draeco (talk) 02:02, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{adoptoffer}}

Congrats on getting adopted, (LUUWDA)! If you have any questions I might be able to answer, just let me know! Cheers! :> Doc9871 (talk) 04:42, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll be migrating my user, talk and subpages to a new account at some time. You'll know what it is when my current pages become redirects. --Let Us Update Special:Ancientpages. 01:40, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, LUUWDA. Just a note regarding the FMyLife article. In your counter-undo summary, you said "many website articles talk about spin-offs, and how/why they're spin-offs in the first place. This is fine. GMH was created because of FML". Unfortunately, your addition falls into the category of link-farming, since all you provide is a link to a site which is largely unrelated in practical value to FML, and doesn't establish a plausibly notable connection to FML. It's for this reason that several other similar additions have been reverted in the past couple of weeks alone, as they are largely gratuitous and irrelevant to the article itself. Please see WP:EL for some more detail. The fact that some other articles also violate convention doesn't set a precedent, however. Thanks. KaySL (talk) 04:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Abu Yedda, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Sheeana ^Talk 01:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It might not have been a hoax, in which case could you please contain your writing to a formal encyclopedic style. Your contributions are valued by the community but this is not the Lonely Planet Guide and they will attract less negative perception or risk of deletion if you drop the light hearted banter. It would be great if you could please clean up what I had left in it. Thanks.--Kudpung (talk) 17:29, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Shawn Ahmed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JDDJS (talk) 03:53, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nuff said JDDJS (talk) 04:18, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Shawn Ahmed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 06:14, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Abu Yedda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references cited to establish WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 06:17, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Shawn Ahmed, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 07:10, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Shawn Ahmed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 07:30, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Shawn Ahmed. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Use the article's talk page to discuss the speedy deletion of this page. AfD is not necessary when CSD are met. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 07:32, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• What's the meaning of this? Since when do we add {{fact}} tags in AfD discussions? Erpert (let's talk about it) 18:17, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(An accusation was made by some individuals.) --Let Us Update Wikipedia: Dusty Articles 07:43, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Come on, you know better than this. —Soap— 14:28, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Evidently someone accused me of duckpuppetry. No one bothered to Checkuse? Anyway, over 50 people attended Shawn Ahmed's speech. I don't think I'd be the only one who was interested in creating an article on him. Therefore, it would be quite reasonable for another student at the college he spoke at, to copy my article from my user subpage after getting deleted, and reinstating it. Of course they would give it another title because a lot of users would think that titling it something else would evade it from the deleting user's eyes.

If anyone decided to Checkuse and pull up the IP the article was edited from, it would be from a university IP shared by many mobile devices through our campus-wide wi-fi network. Even I would have showed up under the IP, along with many other devices. Sorry that anyone thought I was being a duckpuppet. --Let Us Update Wikipedia: Dusty Articles 07:43, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Temple Riders is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Temple Riders until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 16:18, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article AOL Answers is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AOL Answers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. [CharlieEchoTango] 06:34, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Gaddafi's drain. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Death of Muammar Gaddafi. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Death of Muammar Gaddafi - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. andy (talk) 11:24, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello LUUWDA! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

The article Rolltop computer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dubiously created for marketing purposes, only sourced to one company. See WP:NOTPROMOTION.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 08:39, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Rolltop computer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Zzaffuto118 (talk) 09:24, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Michael Swaim has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Malcolma (talk) 11:08, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cloud Atlas (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fusion and South Pacific (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi LUUWDA! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! 20:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Template:User pyongyang, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User pyongyang and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User pyongyang during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ansh666 09:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LUUWDA, and thank you for your contributions!

I wanted to let you know it seems an article you worked on, List of defunct companies, is copied from another Wikipedia page, List of business failures. It's fine to do this as long as you provide the following information in the edit summary:

1. a link to the article you copied from
2. the date you copied it

You can do this now by , making any minor edit to the article, and adding the above information into the edit summary.

If you're still not sure how to fix the problem, please leave a message at the help desk. It's possible that I made a mistake, so feel free to remove the tag I placed on the article.

Thanks again for helping build the free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 19:17, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 20:17, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Freerice requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. K6ka (talk | contribs) 16:35, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Insurgent attack on Fort Hood. Since you had some involvement with the Insurgent attack on Fort Hood redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 20:07, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is in mainspace. I see you have a version in your userspace and it seems to contain some superior information. Perhaps you could merge it? Candleabracadabra (talk) 18:18, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You can do it for me; I permit you to copypaste over the details the mainspace may need. With so much else to do in my life now, I haven't gotten back to edit much lately, and I don't even care to log into my username today, but I did see this notification in my email, so that's how I knew that you left me in the message in the first place. --2602:30A:2EE6:8600:4894:C26:A80F:38E4 (talk) 19:07, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Giappone. Since you had some involvement with the Giappone redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 11:23, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Doolb. Since you had some involvement with the Doolb redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. JZCL 18:46, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Col-6 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:22, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alorica has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:42, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LUUWDA,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pjongjang. Since you had some involvement with the Pjongjang redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:45, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cholima(magazine). Since you had some involvement with the Cholima(magazine) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:17, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Abu Yedda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks since 2010 of sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:55, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Kawasockie and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 22 § Kawasockie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 21:01, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Old Libya and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 9 § Old Libya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — kashmīrī ^TALK 09:09, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]