Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Non-stop flight: You may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. -MBK₀₀₄ 07:51, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! ShondaLear (talk) 22:26, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep reverting the term Majors? The four Majors have been called thus for far longer than the term slam. Slam started somewhere in the late 70's while the term Major has been around for so long I can't recall when it wasn't used. "Slam" and the incorrect "grand slam" are far more modern terms. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:10, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Refer to WP:Source. Thanks! ShondaLear (talk) 19:43, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

seems kinda silly for common usage, but then I guess we will need a source for slams too. I'll plop it in plus the "need facts" citation for the term slams. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:43, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok, You are losing me. It's common usage but you want it sourced. Slam is common usage but you don't want it sourced. Pick a side. And if you disagreed with extra sourcing why revert my sourced section? Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:50, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong to do so, which makes wikipedia a fraud if it keeps on happening! We must go by the tournament record for the percise nationality and quit making it up, which it says USA go look! I even got an e-mail from the verifing the case of nationality, as well. http://aeltc.wimbledon.org/en_GB/about/history/rolls/ladiesroll.html TW-RF (talk) 18:38, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 05:17, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]