Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one(s) you made to Maroon 5, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Roleplayer (talk) 19:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Let There Be Rock (international album) do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '[A-Za-z][0-9]{2,}\.photobucket\.com/albums/.*\.jpg' (link(s): http://s240.photobucket.com/albums/ff306/Niels_Bohr/?action=view&current=ACDC-Let_There_Be_Rock-Frontal.jpg" http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/ff306/Niels_Bohr/ACDC-Let_There_Be_Rock-Frontal.jpg") . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 19:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Slipknot (band). If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Blackngold29 23:24, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Retro junk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Epbr123 (talk) 19:01, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Fflogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:20, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:81x3mlh7.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Esprit15d • talk • contribs 14:21, 19 June 2008 (UTC) --Esprit15d • talk • contribs 14:21, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm afraid this article is not likely to survive, because Wikipedia doesn't do articles about future events where there is so little information - see Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and the guideline on Notability (music), especially the section headed "Albums", where you will see it says "Until there is sufficient reliably sourced information about a future album, early information about it should be in the artist's article only, not in a separate article about the unreleased album. For example, a future album whose article is titled "(Artist)'s Next Album" and consists solely of blog or fan forum speculation about possible titles, or songs that might be on the album, is a WP:CRYSTAL violation and should be discussed only in the artist's article." Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:58, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Untitled seventh studio album, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled seventh studio album. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? JohnCD (talk) 21:06, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Peter Fleet (talk) 21:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at War and Peace. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jowa fan (talk) 07:28, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to War and Peace with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tiderolls 22:29, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Rebecca Black. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Shearonink (talk) 22:35, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I came here to see why a regular would need templating and, wow...you need to explain how you are helping this project. I'm going to go through you edits because a cursory search revealed nothing but jokes and vandalism. Maybe an indepth look will show a different picture. I hope so. However, if you've got some relevant comment, here's your opportunity. Tiderolls 22:39, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Ok, it appears that you've tried to be helpful in the past. It's hard to tell because you don't source the content you add. I'll let you know, though, if your future attempts are as disruptive as your latest efforts, your editing privilege will be in jeopardy. I'll watchlist this page in the event you have any questions. Tiderolls 23:31, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]