Thanks for the quick revert of the pleasant vandalism on my editor review page. Funny how people take speedy deletion of their articles so personally... Regards, Bencherlite^Talk 08:07, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

I had my eye on that guy from earlier. Happy to help though! --ShakataGaNai (talk) 08:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Done. Not too fussed about policy in the circumstances, but speediable as advertising. Bencherlite^Talk 08:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

I saw that. I'll remember just to mark it as AFD next time. Awesome! Thanks!! --ShakataGaNai (talk) 08:13, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Actually, on further reflection, what I should have done was just replace the user page with a block notice - indef blocked users don't get to keep a regular user page, so I needn't have worried about a rationale for deletion and you needn't look for AFD/CSD reasons in such circumstances. Cheers, Bencherlite^Talk 22:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

You are correct. I've found that to be the SOP. User indefinitely blocked templates also happens to help --ShakataGaNai (talk) 22:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

So trivia written by other people gets to stay, and my trivia is deleted? How is that fair, exactly? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.216.47.11 (talk) 08:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

To answer the question you probably wanted to ask was: "Why did you (ShakataGaNai (talk)) remove all my trivia?" And to that I have the answer. Per WP:TRIVIA, it is discouraged the creation of trivia sections. I also removed trivia/notes sections on other pages in the same area of your edits. So I apologize if you felt targeted - it was just easier to follow your contribs. --ShakataGaNai (talk) 22:25, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page - the IP editor seems to be a bit annoyed that I'm just the latest admin to remove linkspam from Llandudno and protect it against such abuses! Regards, Bencherlite^Talk 15:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

LOL - IP vandals seem to think that they'll win. Ha! But I'm happy to help. --ShakataGaNai (talk) 22:04, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, ShakataGaNai. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. β^_command 14:35, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

In reference to the Soudan Mine link. The Soudan Mine is a paid member of the Lake Vermilion Chamber Of Commerce with information, photos, hours, contact information etc about the Soudan Mine. The Soudan mine pays the Lake Vermilion Chamber Of Commerce to create such links to inform those interested in visitng the park including Wikopedia. Please explain your authority and reasoning behind erasing information that is specifically relevant to the subject matter and threatening messages. Thank you for your response [user:swanymn] 13 December 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Swanymn (talk • contribs) 02:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

See WP:EL --ShakataGaNai (talk) 04:58, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

It doesn't appear that I have the consensus to merge those pages. I would recommend removing the merge proposal tags and leaving those pages alone now, I can also do it myself later. hateless 08:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)