– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

@Rubbish computer: Thanks very much - happy new year to you and yours, too! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 23:14, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 23:29, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Psapharochrus-stub has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the stub template guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the template's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 01:32, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

January songs

in friendship

Thank you for being around, wizard of categories, and for your good Quaker wishes! - Happy new year, in friendship! - One of my pics was on the Main page (DYK) and even made the stats. - In this young year, I enjoyed meetings with friends in real life, and wish you many of those. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:11, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Thanks very much. I should have sent out New Year greetings this year, but I was feeling pretty desultory on the day itself, so I decided to be lazy instead. :-)

Currently I'm waiting out the worst of this latest variant, hoping that it passes before too much longer, and trying to decide what orchestral concerts I want to partake in this year. The Baltimore Symphony Orchestra has some attractive options, as does the Annapolis Symphony Orchestra. And I'll always support the Fairfax Symphony Orchestra in whatever they try to do. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:25, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:02, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 began happily with vacation. I uploaded images but stopped at 22 January - click on songs. 30 January means 10 years of Precious. It's also the birthday of a friend, - I'm so happy I mentioned his DYK on his 90th birthday when he was still alive. I have a great singer on DYK whom I heard, Elena Guseva, and wait for a Recent death appearance of Georg Christoph Biller whom I saw in action. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Nothing so exciting here, I'm afraid. I'm currently debating whether or not to get a ticket for Jennifer Koh playing Missy Mazzoli's violin concerto with the National Symphony Orchestra this Friday (under Gemma New, for the record). I like Mazzoli's work, and it's in a new hall that I'd like to have a look at. Still sorting out what I want from the rest of the month.

Incidentally, I'm gratified to see that Deutsche Oper Berlin has at least a few free videos on its YouTube channel. Some fodder for future use, perhaps? --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:19, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

that sounds fine! - update: we have now Guseva pictured, Biller picured better (but still not on the Main page), and one more day of my pics --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:35, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Very nice. Always nice to see more free images turn up. :-) Later in February we have the Fairfax Symphony Orchestra playing something by Sylvie Bodorová - their conductor is a particular champion of her work, and I've heard something else of hers done by them before. I think I'm going to try and go to that one for sure; I really enjoy the FSO's programming, and feel like they get overshadowed too often by other local groups. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:57, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February songs

frozen

my joy - more on my talk --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:29, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Saw that there this morning: thought you might have had a hand in it. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you - Valentine's Day edition, with spring flowers and plenty of music --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:21, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Thanks very much - and to you as well! :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 22:32, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

stand and sing Prayer for Ukraine --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:31, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:49, 15 February 2022 (UTC) I took the pic mentioned above in 2009, and it was on the German MP yesterday, with the song from 1885, in English Prayer for Ukraine. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:16, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Well done. Sorry for missing your previous message...it's been a long and somewhat peculiar week around here. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:09, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ser Amantio di Nicolao!

I learned about you from this Youtube video, which I am watching right now. You are incredible. Thank you for all you do :-) 85.193.252.19 (talk) 23:34, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@85.193.252.19: Dziękuję bardzo - you're very kind. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:08, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The blog post cited is offensive and misinterprets the film and the way the performers are depicted and identify. That is why the revision was made. 68.237.60.251 (talk) 20:08, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Forgive me if this isn't the right procedure, but although I have edited a few pages and created one on Wikipedia, I am never quite sure what I am doing! There is a page I have worked on for Gary_Williams_(singer) and I have noticed an edit on there that doesn't have a citation and seems potentially derogatory. I don't know how to challenge it in the correct way. I can see you have done a few edits to this page, so wondered if you could help or have a look.

It's the last line in the Broadcasting section that reads:

Williams has done corporate work, mostly instructional videos, modelling himself on the Alan Partridge persona.

His corporate work has no citation. I can see his has a profile on Fiverr where he works but I don't know if this is sufficient. Also the reference to comedian Alan Partridge could be considered derogatory and since it has no citation, it seems like opinion, and I assume should be removed.

Sorry to bother you, but maybe you can help. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bosents (talk • contribs) 14:38, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bosents: I don't necessarily see the reference as derogatory, but either way: if you don't see a reference, there's no reason you can't remove the line yourself once you've done sufficient investigation. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:28, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--Bosents (talk) 19:11, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Ok. Thanks.[reply]

Hie, I'm french, and I'd type " Santorin " looking for the greek island of this name, and I found this Player with the same name . 1° there no cross-reference in the entry of the article on the island, or to a page of namesake " Santorin" . 2° by curiosity I read the article about this player, and nowhere there is a word about the sport he use to practrise ! ! ! Which sport ? ! 3° I try to write that in " discussion" but for some reasons, it's complicated for this article, and so I write that at the end of the article, hoping that a person would changed the article and write down the name of the sport, and made cross-reference to the greek island.... Tks for all. --Christofol (talk) 18:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be a reason why you are doing something here but twice you appear to have un-italicised the title with your change. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:11, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Philafrenzy: Would you happen to have more information on which two? I'm removing a template which has been superseded by a change in infoboxes for some while now - any place I remove it should keep an italicized title due to the infobox in use. I'll take a look and see what's causing the issue. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• DK Atlas of World History and Toxic Shock: A Social History. There may be others that I didn't spot. I put it back manually in both cases. Philafrenzy (talk) 18:17, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Philafrenzy: Thanks. I've fixed the infobox in both cases and removed the hatnote, so everything should be in order (basically, the infobox contained "title of book" as the designator at the line "italic title", which doesn't generate a response from the article). They look OK to me from this end, at least. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:20, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, why does "italic title =" exist? Philafrenzy (talk) 18:35, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Philafrenzy: If I understand the documentation correctly (not having created the infobox myself), it's so that if there is a reason that the display title should default to something other than fully italic, it can be noted there. If it's not filled in, the infobox defaults to generating an italic title much like the {{italic title}}, superseding it for those pages. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:39, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How can you see if an infox template has the italic switch? For example Template:Infobox game has an obvious on/off ith |italic title=yes. But looking at Template:Infobox person I can only tell by looking at the title of the infobox example itself. I'll remove the italic template when I see it. Can you point me to a reference to the change so I can reference it in the edit summary when I remove the template. Sciencefish (talk) 08:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sciencefish: See the hatnote at the top of Template:Infobox magazine, for instance; the template tells you when it's designed to automatically italicize the title of a page. There's a handful that do - infoboxes for magazines, books, plays, journals, television series, and films, for instance. So I'd check the infobox template page for information before moving. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 13:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, just fixed this edit, which rendered the title unitialicised. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 13:44, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you're doing well. I'm new to Wikipedia(as a contributor) and you are a huge inspiration to me. Cheers from Canada! LittleFinn9 (talk) 18:25, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LittleFinn9: Thanks very much - you're very kind. :-) I hope you enjoy it here. Welcome aboard, and happy editing! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:29, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, can you help me create a discography page for YNW Melly as I keep up with him a lot and can't edit his normal page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trippletripple223 (talk • contribs) 12:07, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Trippletripple223: Sorry, I'm no good with discographies. You might want to ask over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Discographies for more information. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 13:05, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ser Amantio di Nicalo, Can you review articles upon request? Fade258 (talk) 17:49, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fade258: Depends on the subject, but generally not, sorry. I don't review draft articles at all. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not talking about drafted articles but articles which are in mainspace. Fade258 (talk) 17:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC

@Fade258: As I say: depends on the subject. Generally not, but once in a while I will. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:58, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Subject means ? Fade258 (talk) 18:03, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fade258: What's the article about? --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Austrian people of Finnish descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 18:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ser Amantio di Nicolao, I just wanted to let you know that I absolutely love your username! How charming it truly is. I hope the start to your new year has been well. Kindest regards, Spinster300 (talk) 19:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

@Spinster300: Thanks very much - you're very kind. I don't quite know what it is, but I've always been taken with the old-fashioned Italian way of creating professional names - Ser Marcantonio, Ser Amantio, that sort of thing. It's nice to have a character name that's so accessible for it. :-)

Happy new year to you as well, and happy editing! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 22:39, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Ser Amantio di Nicolao! It is quite charming and musical the way they do it. Thank you for taking the time to write back; I sincerely appreciate it. Happy editing to you, as well! Kindest regards, Spinster300 (talk) 13:27, 20 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Ser Amantio di Nicolao I’m a new user and I am trying to create a redirect link but don’t know how, I saw you recently made an edit so wondered if you could help?

I would like to redirect Regan Gascoigne to Paul Gascoigne#Personal life as he is his son. Thanks TomChaplinPoodle (talk) 22:52, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TomChaplinPoodle: Done. For future use: to create a redirect, type #REDIRECT, followed by a link to the page/section you want redirected to. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 23:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pusse-Ela, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pusse-Ela until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll likely propose a project for a project on Congressional slaveholders as something to do for Black History Month based on data recently released by The Washington Post. My early draft of the proposal is at The Signpost newsroom, Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/Black History Month

I'm also working on the format of a possible list article User:Smallbones/List of U.S. congressional slaveholders

If anybody wants to help or comment please contact me on my talk page or via email. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 17:08, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HELLO! I once contributed regularly to Wiki..and took special care to contribute an article about intact Biblical graves along the Old Silk Road routes..with a special empahsis on obtaining DNA from these sites, beginning with DNA from the 7 biblical patriarchs & matriarchs who are interred in 'Grave of the Patriarchs' in Hebron. I was severely edited by people who had 'other' religious pursuasions..then came all out edit wars and deletion wars just on that one page...because (they said)I had 'conflicts of interest' because I had written and self-published a book on the topic..Apparently this is a great sin for wiki editors..my article was taken over by others with obvious religious interests that conflicted with alternate p.o.v. My entire family got involved in the struggle to save my page and my name on Wiki...I think I was associated with about 25 alleged 'sock puppets' (that's gotta be a record) and permanently barred from Wiki-- even my name is barred from every wiki page everywhere in the world now..as not being significant or worthy enough. I am resolved to my fate now...but I believe you are all missing one hell of a good topic! geesh,,talk about busting someone's ego!!Wiki did that for me. Every now and again I peek back in on Wiki and those biased editors, and see my original page/ideas remain altered and completely off the mark.. totally destroyed- converted to 'something else' entirely... other religious groups (Christians and Muslims) vie to make their views dominate the topic of Roza Bal, its relics,and my DNA quest...all gone...I lost respect for wiki and most of its editors because of these bad experiences.....I wish there were more like you! Great work. You have my respect sir. Stay safe and have a great day! Suzanne Olsson, author/research/wiki sock puppet creator extrodinair... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.224.54.25 (talk) 06:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222 Online events: New: Black women | Hong Kong and Macau | Women in sport Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month by registering in the box at the top of our main page. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi, I see you are adding the Wikidata short description to some articles here, e.g. [1]. At the short descriptions talk page, there seems to be consensus that this specific short description (either with "Wikimedia" or with "Wikipedia") should not be used on enwiki, as being basically useless. These are normally either replaced by something meaningful, if the list title isn't clear, or (in most cases) changed to "none". Having "Wikimedia list article" is not helpful on enwiki, as "Wikimedia" is unclear for most readers, "Wikipedia is superfluous", and "list article" is usually blatantly obvious from the title already, and doesn't really convey much information. On Wikidata, these descriptions mau be useful to distinguish these from e.g. scientific articles or anything else (and in any case it is their choice and prerogative to use whatever short desc they like), but here, it should be avoided. Fram (talk) 08:38, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram: Huh. Thanks for that. Given the number of occasions I've seen it in use I was sure I was on safe ground with it. Just goes to show you...something.

Thanks for letting me know. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 12:52, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, it's not something that one can magically be aware of obviously. Fram (talk) 13:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram: Oh, certainly. I just find it amusing, as I've been starting to look at short descriptions and finding that in most instances there doesn't seem to be consensus as to what constitutes the best answer. The one place where I thought I saw consensus turns out to be the most problematic. It appeals to my perverse sense of humor, is all. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:02, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, how come you removed the category of Italian brands from Iso Automobiles? Is this a category cleanup? Thanks Obama gaming (talk) 01:34, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Obama gaming: Yes. The article is in Category:Car manufacturers of Italy, under Category:Motor vehicle manufacturers of Italy. under Category:Italian brands - no need for it to be in both. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:19, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of high schools in Central, Paraguay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of high schools in Central, Paraguay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Jax 0677 (talk) 00:19, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please change Adam's bridge to Rama setu as it is in Indian subcontinent, it should be Indian name. Prinaki (talk) 08:27, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon Mr. di Nicolao! (Steven?)

I hope this message find you. I am Michael McGuirk, a filmmaker, activist, entrepreneur, artist, and adjunct faculty at Montclair State University. I am in the early stages of trying to put together a simple page or article on my work.

I am in request of your service or if you could recommend an editor. I really appreciate your work.

Also, you would be fantastic in my film The Abandoned... the renowned and twisted story of American Arctic explorer Adolphus Greely.

Feel free to reach out any time.

email: mike@filmmaker.nyc Cell: 323-774-7746

Relevant Links:

https://filmmaker.nyc

https://mikemcguirk.medium.com

https://www.blissfactory.org

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3445383/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikemcguirk/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henry Thorough (talk • contribs) 22:29, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Regarding your high speed bot-like editing, I'm sure you have been asked about this previously, but I would prefer you to perform these edits on an alternate account with the bot flag, in accordance with the bot policy. Is there a reason why you don't do this? Best wishes — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 03:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MSGJ: Simple answer: I don't get asked to, generally. Once in a great while, and I've never pursued it because I've never really seen what difference it would make. What I do try and do is watch my edit rate, but it gets away from me once in a while. Usually a sign that I should back off for a bit. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:26, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re these edits, thank you for adding a short description. Per WP:SDFORMAT, short descriptions should start with a capital letter. Don't worry about the ones you have already done; there is a bot that runs periodically to fix them. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:34, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonesey95: Great - thanks for the tip. I'm heading out the door in a sec but I'm going to be doing more tonight - I'll remember to tweak the template then. Incidentally...it looks like the helper tool automatically capitalizes them for me, is that correct? --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 22:35, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, in my experience, if you use the helper tool to import a Wikidata description like "politician from Ohio" by clicking "Import", the resulting SD will be "Politician from Ohio". – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:55, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonesey95: I thought so - thanks! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 06:55, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225 Online events: New: Women's History Month Art+Activism | Feminism and Folklore | Dutch Caribbean Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman | Women in sport (Feb/Mar) Other ways to participate: Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month by registering in the box at the top of our main page. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi. This is a reminder about the categorisation issue I previously brought up, in case it slipped your mind, like mine. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:40, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Paul 012: It did, yes - thanks for the reminder. I'll begin talking to a couple of folks in the next few days and see if we can't come to a consensus. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:35, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I just became aware of WP:WikiProject Temperance and Prohibition. It would apply to everyone in this category: Category:Woman's Christian Temperance Union people. If you have time/inclination, would you please add the project template to the women's talkpages? Thanks! --Rosiestep (talk) 17:27, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosiestep: Sure - I'll try to take a look tonight. (Got a couple of chores to handle.) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:29, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosiestep: There - should be all done. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 06:51, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're the best, Ser! Thanks! --Rosiestep (talk) 16:59, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosiestep: Any time - always happy to be of help. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:03, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I noticed that you recently edited the Robert K. Brown article to replace a page number citation of “13-19” with “ 13–19”, I’m just curious to what the purpose or intent of that is. Thanks! Neighborhood Review (talk) 03:35, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I think I might have answered my own question by seeing what the code did haha Neighborhood Review (talk) 03:36, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Neighborhood Review: Yes, it's one of the automatic formatting changes AutoWikiBrowser makes whenever I make an edit with it. I wouldn't do it on its own, but as part of a content-adding edit it's a different matter. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 03:51, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Theodore Wolf (politician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tymewalk (talk) 04:39, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ser Amantio di Nicolao Hi as you are the most experienced editor Could you please create a redirect from Charity Shop Sue to Shane Meadows as this is a tv series he has written and produced. Thanks Rockchick09 (talk) 21:59, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rockchick09: Done. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:40, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You were at the top of the list of "recently active admins" so to "skip the drama" (WP:ANI), since there's no need for drama over this, I come to you. I noticed that an RFD I participated in, Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 4#Abeceda, was closed (less than 24 hours after the RFD was initiated) by a non-admin who had also !voted in the discussion. As I understand it from WP:NAC, only uninvolved editors are supposed to close discussions. Should it be reopened? Largoplazo (talk) 20:36, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Largoplazo: I would assume so, but I don't spend a lot of time on that side of things, and I'm about to step away from the computer for a while, so I won't have time to do a proper investigation. I'd ask someone who spends more time over at WP:RFD, honestly. Sorry I can't be of more help. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 20:39, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, OK, thanks. Largoplazo (talk) 20:41, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Polish people of Egyptian descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:52, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

when all you are doing is adding via awb -

{{short description|None}}

to a significant number of lists of heritage sites in western australia that in many cases might actually deserve something to explain what or where they are?

I know awb has some eds in thrall - but in this case it looks like it might not be what is required, in the even of short descrips being more than a blob or blank or whatever...

JarrahTree 02:53, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JarrahTree: My understanding is that "list of" articles, generally speaking, don't require a short description because the description of what they are is actually part of the title of the article, and so the short description risks being redundant. That being said, I have no objection to scrubbing my lists of any other such articles when I come across them, and the ones that have already been done can be easily updated. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:56, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - an explanation thanks for that - who knows what might become of short descrips - btw I suspect your archived talk pages are reminiscent of lewis carrolls the hunting of the snark perhaps? JarrahTree 03:01, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JarrahTree: Perhaps. Bringing order out of chaos has never been my strong suit, but I've tried desperately with the material in my archives, at least. :-) Ctrl+F helps me more than I'd like to admit.

As a recent convert to working on short descriptions, I feel like there are some kinks yet to be worked out. Chief among them is standardization - I've found that there's a severe lack of standardization in some of the fields I've looked at (i.e.: three different Australian politicians, with short descriptions: "Australian politician", "Australian politician [dates]", or "Prime Minister of Australia", for instance.) Consequently I'm trying to bring at least a semblance of order to bear in the various fields.

There's also the matter of reconciling (or not) short descriptions with Wikidata, which I think makes some sense sometimes and doesn't at other times. List articles seem to me to fall into the latter category - many are labeled "Wikimedia list article" on Wikidata, which seems to me to be less than apposite on Wikipedia.

Ah, well...we learn as we go, I suppose. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 03:07, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hahah - indeed one is reminded of reading zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance when it came out - there are some interesting linkages... JarrahTree 03:10, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JarrahTree: Which do tend to crop up now and...zen. (Sorry.) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 03:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was just in the recent change log, and saw like 3 or 4 edits in less than 10 seconds. How is this possible? Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 06:06, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Iamreallygoodatcheckers: Partially AutoWikiBrowser with a good connection; I've also noticed that, for some reason, adding short descriptions to articles goes a lot more quickly than a lot of the other types of edits I make - I'm not sure why the pages save so much faster than when I do other edits. Regardless, I am trying to slow myself down, so thanks for the trout upside the head. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 06:08, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose the faster you contribute the more impact you make. Keep up the good work! Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 06:10, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Iamreallygoodatcheckers: Perhaps, but I really do try to slow it down...otherwise I risk tunnel vision, for one thing. Also overwhelming things like recent changes patrol. Still, thanks for the kind words...and happy editing! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 06:11, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ser Amantio di Nicolao !. You can help me ? I can't find some article in English Wikipedia. I mean Central Lowland. Please, look at this map, you'll see Central Lowland. But, i can't find this article in English Wikipedia. So, what's going on ?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.151.136.116 (talk) 12:12, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you reverted and locked a perfectly written and exceptionally well sourced article please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.139.208.234 (talk) 12:55, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@212.139.208.234: I'm not in the habit of enabling the work of sockpuppets. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 13:12, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! I wanted to ask why are you intentionally marking article descriptions as 'none'? Emir Shane (talk) 07:48, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Emir Shane: I'm only doing it to list articles - there has been some discussion as to whether or not "Wikipedia (or Wikimedia) list article" (as is used in Wikidata) is a useful short description. I tend to think that it is not, and that most any short description for a list article will reduplicate the title. Hence the use of "none" - see here for further information. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 07:52, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I get it, Thanks for elaborating. I also think that there isn't a need for a description when the title says it all. Emir Shane (talk) 07:55, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Emir Shane: Any time. It's a new world, these short descriptions, and I find I'm still feeling my way around them. And I certainly have no objection if anyone feels that "none" is insufficient and wishes to change it for a given list. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 07:59, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite surprised that "none" is considered better than just leaving the template out. But it does say that right in the template doc, and I guess I can kind of see how there might be a technical reason for it. I'm just not super happy about the churn. GA-RT-22 (talk) 15:30, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GA-RT-22: I do understand it, to a certain extent...otherwise someone might look at the article without short description, think "Oooh, a short description can be added here", and add something. And short descriptions are hidden in the first place, so it takes a conscious effort to go looking for them, generally speaking. It also populates several hidden categories, which I can see would be useful in this instance. As for churn...yeah, I do see the frustration, but there are always going to be tasks which require a certain amount of mass input, and the best I can try to do is to minimize that churn as much as I can. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just added an automatic shortdesc to the craters infobox, so your spamming of shortdesc is no longer needed. Thanks. Primefac (talk) 17:43, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: Ah, thanks. I didn't even realize that was an option. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:44, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, a lot of astro objects are in the process of having it done, craters just haven't happened yet. Primefac (talk) 17:45, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: Great, thanks. I'll remember that when generating my lists. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:45, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing! And if you find a large group like that in the future, feel free to drop me a note; 90% of the time there's an infobox or similar template that can add a shortdesc and save a lot of time (and edits). Primefac (talk) 17:46, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: Will do, absolutely. I'm heading out for the day in a bit, but I'll have another look later tonight, if anything comes up. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:47, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thank YOU! for your dedication to edit Wikipedia it means a lot to me TheScottish801 (talk) 19:47, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TheScottish801: Thanks very much - you're very kind. Welcome aboard, and happy editing! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:19, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228 Online events: New: Gender studies | French overseas territories New Contest (Apr/May/Jun): Translation contest Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month by registering in the box at the top of our main page. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello, I am new to Wiki and I just added a proquest NYTimes cite to the page and it's not linked or lighting up. Can you help me fix this please as I am eager to learn from my mistakes and I noticed you are an experienced wikignome and work on this page. Thank you very much in advance!Simplefinder33 (talk) 17:06, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - Thank you! Should I have chosen automatic and paste the URL? What did I do choose? - I can't remember. Trying to learn basics. Simplefinder33 (talk) 17:18, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Simplefinder33: Usually that's what I would do, and then run it through reFill]. That didn't quite work in this instance, so once I ran it through reFill I manually changed the title using the title from the original page. But nine out of ten times reFill will do the trick. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 20:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic! Simplefinder33 (talk) 11:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	You're awesome bro, ly mate Dababyspersonaleditor (talk) 04:01, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dababyspersonaleditor: Thanks very much - you're very kind. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:42, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello friend, attempted to add text and new manual cite to Roy S. Durstine page but it assigned me 13, an already in use footnote number. Want to add "In 1935, Durstine created the Cavalcade of America radio program. And cite Cavalcade of America page. Maybe because 13 was footnote just after and I didn't hit return? Sincerely grateful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simplefinder33 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yes, 2 different sources sharing same footnote number. I think I'm having issues with the URL. I'm cutting and pasting from browser. Isn't that correct? Simplefinder33 (talk) 19:26, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

forgot to sign Simplefinder33 (talk) 17:20, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hello, it's me again. I would like to insert said item after second paragraph under BBDO years. Very grateful for your help again.Simplefinder33 (talk) 17:25, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ser, I'm doing same thing on John Peale Bishop page. I attempt to add new cite yet it assigns existing footnote number. Thanks in advance for your help.Simplefinder33 (talk) 18:19, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Simplefinder33: That usually means you're adding a source that's already in the article - is it possible that's the case? If not - if you have two different sources sharing a footnote number - you should be getting an error message. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:43, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ser, idk, I'm putting in URL fine. Please check Roy S. Durstine, I entered text, my URL for Cavalcade of America cite not taking with new footnote. at present, citeless, can you add https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cavalcade_of_America&oldid=1078124160 Simplefinder33 (talk) 19:56, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Simplefinder33: I'm afraid I don't quite see what the problem is. Can you show me a diff? If it's here, you didn't add any references to the article, and the reason Cavalcade of America is in bold is because you didn't add brackets. Is that what you're talking about? --20:08, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

I see you tagged Rence page for lacking links. We have many pages of links to three years of coverage and can share, if you'd like. - Rencestaff@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:8A01:5B60:E547:54CE:955:4D60 (talk) 20:53, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello friend, thank you for being so patient and helpful. You are spot on - I don't see the problem either; however when I paste Cavalcade's address into automatic and generate then insert, or go the manual route, I keep get existing footnote 13 so I abort mission and do not hit publish. I bolded Cavalcade using visualeditor to mimic how it's shown on its' page. Is that OK? Yes, I can try one on John Peale Bishop page where I'm having same issue. Your help is very much appreciated. Simplefinder33 (talk) 13:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Friend - Yay, it worked! I didn't realize that when you hit publish the footnote numbers reorder themselves. Thank you for your support! Simplefinder33 (talk) 14:30, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And why no new books? 2601:681:5280:1FD0:A85C:3D06:264A:F701 (talk) 04:04, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to change my Wikipedia account Username ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dahvedh (talk • contribs) 12:09, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dahvedh: Yes - see Wikipedia:Changing username. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 12:14, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks much Dahvedh (talk) 12:15, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am concerned that you recently tagged three articles as orphans that were not. They had extant links in other articles. Michael Marriott (rosarian)‎,Fergus Garrett‎ and Charles Dowding‎. Please have a check back through articles you have tagged as there seems to be some kind of glitch or mistake, perhaps, in software you may be using. Thanks Anna (talk) 03:21, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Anna Roy: That has to do with the settings used by Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser - I would raise the issue at the talk over there if you wish to pursue it; I know one or two other editors have raised it before. That being said...Michael Marriott (rosarian) does not appear to be linked from any other articles - you might want to double-check if there's one you're expecting to see. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 06:22, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marriott is mentioned here. I will raise it on the talk page. Anna (talk) 16:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Anna Roy: Ah. The link was incorrect; I've corrected it. That's why it didn't show up when I checked. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:10, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did I address the orphan article problem ?

--Vidharris (talk) 15:31, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vidharris: I'm not sure what you mean, exactly - address how? What aspect of the problem? (I don't see it as a "problem" per se, honestly.) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:34, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ser Amantio, the article you tagged as "orphan" is linked from List of Johns Hopkins University people

Thanks much. March 31 2022. Vidharris (talk) 17:42, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've just removed the orphan tag from the List of people from Pembury and List of people from Sevenoaks. Neither of those were orphaned, as they are linked from Pembury and Sevenoaks respectively. Please take care to ensure that only articles and lists with no links from other articles are tagged as orphans. Mjroots (talk) 05:49, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ser Amantio, List of people from Mainz that you just tagged as "orphan" is linked to (via a redirect) from Mainz, the only place you'd really expect it to be linked from, see Special:WhatLinksHere/List_of_people_from_Mainz. Can you double check your AWB settings so you don't overlook redirects (assuming that is the problem)? Thank you! —Kusma (talk) 08:40, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Must be some other issue. I've just looked through your last 50 edits, and all of the orphan tags you placed are wrong. Please go through your edits and fix these. —Kusma (talk) 08:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And same problem at List of people from South Orange, New Jersey. When using AWB, please exercise your responsibility to verify that each and every edit is made correctly. Alansohn (talk) 12:00, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kusma:, Mjroots, Alansohn: this is...huh. I know this is an issue that has come up before - that basically the "orphan" tag is one of a set that AWB automatically adds to articles as part of a series of general fixes - and that my own feeling is I like the other general fixes enough to accept the odd orphan tag. But this isn't an issue that I've faced much before, and I'm wondering if something went wrong with my AWB as a result of my recent computer troubles (I had to re-download it, and I'm wondering if I missed an update somewhere along the way.) I need to look into it further, but I won't have time today, as I'm going to be busy for the next couple of days. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:31, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so you're now aware that there is an issue. If you need a couple of days to sort it that is OK. What must not happen is further tagging of articles that are not orphans in the meantime. Mjroots (talk) 17:44, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:AWBRULES, "You are responsible for every edit made. [emphasis in original] You are expected to review every edit, just as if you were making an edit using Wikipedia's edit form when editing by hand. Do not sacrifice quality for speed, and review all changes before saving." You have been making 20 to 30 AWB edits per minute, which barely gives you more than two or three seconds to press enter to accept the changes, which is nowhere near enough time to review the edits. The fact that these edits are robotically adding "{{short description|None}}" to articles only makes this more frustrating. If you wouldn't add an orphan tag to an article without checking that there are no links, you shouldn't be doing it using AWB. The ends do not justify the means, even if your "own feeling is I like the other general fixes enough to accept the odd orphan tag." Why is it my job to remove a tag you added as part of a series of mass edits that added nothing of any use to the article and that should have been done by a tested and approved bot? Alansohn (talk) 17:47, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mjroots: I had an answer written out about how I was going to be away for a few days and how it was unlikely I would be able to troubleshoot until next week...and then I find out that there's been a fix since late 2020, and I either didn't notice it, or had it in place until the recent system reboot and forgot about it (which knowing me is quite possible) (and please don't ask me to try and remember what I was doing in November 2020...I'm not sure it's possible at this juncture). So the point's moot, then - I'll implement the fix, and that should be that. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 19:32, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, I see that the above article has been tagged as an orphan. I'd like to know what that means and how it can be fixed - perhaps I do not understand how this linking thing works.

Thanks in advance AKibombo (talk) 05:10, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I fear that my wiki skills are poor. I have JOHNNY HODGES Alto Blue Vinyl LP Record STEREO Album 1966 VSP Verve Records REMASTERED Issue VSPS-20 Cool Jazz Blues "Side One Recorded on April 5, 1958. Side Two Recorded on September 10, 1958." Side One Center Label Matrix: "JO8Y-1153" Side Two Center Label Matrix: "JO8Y-1154" As far as I can find, it's a 1966 reissue of 1958 recordings. I don't see this anywhere in the Johnny Hodges page.

Thank you, Pat (in Hilo) Link to picture, I hope: https://www.ebay.com/itm/264905787043?chn=ps&norover=1&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-117182-37290-0&mkcid=2&itemid=264905787043&targetid=1262749490102&device=c&mktype=&googleloc=9032751&poi=&campaignid=15428034462&mkgroupid=133947154481&rlsatarget=pla-1262749490102&abcId=9300763&merchantid=114695125&gclid=Cj0KCQjwgMqSBhDCARIsAIIVN1WhfOnqdEE_RWPJE9lJNzDmHNiU5IUs0Kd4C46AThV5qbWbV5pUTLEaAg4GEALw_wcB#vi-desc-maincntr — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patfromlogan (talk • contribs) 02:08, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Patfromlogan: Sorry, but I'm not terribly familiar with most discography-related things. I'd ask over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Discographies for more assistance. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 03:06, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for what you do around here. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:22, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosiestep: Thank you kindly, both for your kind words and for everything you do around here. (Incidentally, I meant to shoot you an email last week - I was having a nice (few) taster(s) of cider, and it got me thinking about that movie Cider With Rosie, and I thought sending you a picture would be the next best thing. But apparently my brain was not working overtime, and I forgot...sorry. Next time you're out this way I'll take you out to the mountains and rectify the omission. :-)) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:43, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Uh Atoll has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no Atoll by the name of U or Uh (name variant). All contents relating to the municipality of that name is already found in U, Pohnpei.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Hey I’m a rapper and I was wondering if u can help he make a Wikipedia page please hit me back I also have Instagram so if u can contact me please do through there if u can @lilgoosey Jon76yuo (talk) 19:59, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	First class editor. BoldLuis (talk) 16:45, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BoldLuis: Thank you kindly - it's been a long time since I've been a first-class anything. :-) Happy editing! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:39, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your dedication on improving short descriptions.... Keep it going! Volten001 ☎ 15:32, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Volten001: Why thank you kindly - always happy to be of help with such little tasks. Happy editing! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:25, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's noticed and appreciated, and you're most welcome. Happy editing as well... Volten001 ^☎ 18:36, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

According the news I consume (CNN, currently on), this is jumping the gun even if it seems likely to happen. I reverted the new user. Exactly the same words were returned to the lede a few minutes later by an IP. My edit summary had said that this needs to at least be sourced. Another redlinked username has just added a source, which says that Putin says he is going to barricade the steel factory. This is not the same thing imho as “has control of Mariupol” and why would we believe him anyway?

This might seem a bit subtle but it all looks sketchy to me and I am just a humble user who has already reverted once, so could you please take a look, or, if you are not available, let me know so I can try someone else? In case you are wondering, I am asking you in particular because you were on a list of recently active admins. Thanks for whatever you do. This is me seeing something, saying something Elinruby (talk) 06:01, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Elinruby: I really don't get involved with current events editing much, sorry. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 06:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Hmmm. Thanks for getting back to me Elinruby (talk) 06:08, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you created a 'low importance' article on Serena Williams's early career and was wondering why this wasn't just included in the main Serena Williams article? I was considering merging it but I figured I would ask you first. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 40.133.234.46 (talk) 22:18, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@40.133.234.46: Sorry - I just tagged it. Can't speak to why it's been split out. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

on Robert Barnes (attorney)? I note that you are the only Admin who has had input into this article. There has been recent edit-warring by IP users, both attacking and praising the subject, none of it directed at producing a better article in keeping with WP standards (ignoring NPOV, RS and/or OR). The most active of these IP editors has ignored a request to take the issues to the talk page. So I am suggesting that you implement a lock on the article at least temporarily (for an extended time?), limiting further editing to auto-confirmed or extended-confirmed users? (Separately, I would question the genuine notability of the subject, and wonder whether the article should be discussed and considered for possible deletion.) PDGPA (talk) 16:15, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PDGPA: Really not my bag...that being said, having a look at it I think it's still at the level of a content dispute right now. I would suggest WP:ANI as a next step before page protection. ---Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, will do PDGPA (talk) 16:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please, if you can't be bothered doing the short descriptions properly, stop doing them at all! I suppose you are picking people up from "painter" categories, & just assuming that "Fooish painter" is an adequate short description. It very often isn't. Look at this one. I know the guy & it was news to me he painted at all. The rather peacocky bio says he is a "opera director and designer, filmmaker, writer, painter, interior designer, art editor, creative director and curator", mentioning an exhibition in 2013, probably of his stage designs. I'd put "painter" at the very end of the list, if I included it at all. He's certainly not notable as a painter. These would also be better if you added a death (or birth) date. Johnbod (talk) 00:40, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnbod: I try to refine things as carefully as possible, but things do slip through from time to time. Thanks for spotting...I've revised accordingly and will attempt to keep a better eye on things in future. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:42, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnbod Maybe it's none of my business, but I don't understand the point of your snarky comment. The "short descritions," like anything else on Wikipedia, can be edited by anyone who feels they can make them better. Why not just do it yourself, rather than complain to Ser Amantio, who does so much, and clearly tries so hard, to improve WP every day? PDGPA (talk) 02:05, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PDGPA: With respect: Johnbod had every right to bring up his concerns to me, and I'm glad that he did so. Whether or not I do so much, or try so hard...I am not infallible, and I appreciate having my errors pointed out to me, so that I can address them, defend the reasons behind the questioned edits if I feel it necessary, or otherwise to work to improve my editing. A concern was raised, I've said I'd address it: as far as I'm concerned the matter is closed. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 03:38, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll just say, I do quite a lot on sd's, but normally improving or correcting other peoples, which is a big task... Johnbod (talk) 15:01, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230 Online events: New: Women in the Ancient World | British Overseas Territories Contest (Apr/May/Jun): Translation contest (second month) Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Wikimedia District of Columbia: 100 DC Women contest The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Innisfree987 thank you for cleaning up my mistake! Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, dearest Oratory of Saint Cénéré, how are you?

Me I'm very well.

I opened this new page, but I have a little trouble with localization: it makes an "error" in the infobox, why? I put the right coordinates. Can you halp me, please? Thank you a lot and see you very soon.

Rei Momo (talk) 07:42, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know why the formatting on my userpage: User:Evrik won't confine itself to the page? What is wrong with the coding? --evrik ^(talk) 15:25, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Evrik: Not sure, but offhand it looks like there might be a misplaced bracket somewhere along the way. Happens to me once in a while. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ser Amantio di Nicolao,

I have a problem, I cannot merge two wikidata items, maybe because of, in the English Wikipedia there are two lists of municipal presidents of San Luis Potosí City or San Luis Potosí Municipality

In the Wikipedia in English there are two "similar" lists of municipal presidents of San Luis Potosí City. I think List of presidents of San Luis Potosí Municipality (the TOO short and incomplete list) must be DELETED, and List of mayors and municipal presidents of San Luis Potosí City (the long list, with more references) must be PRESERVED.

This situation appeared when I was trying to merge two items at Wikidata: Q24062676 and Q111955806, because I believed both of them simultaneously link to their respective lists in the English Wikipedia and in the Spanish Wikipedia Anexo:Alcaldes de San Luis Potosí, but I am not sure.

What IT IS CERTAIN to me, is that List of mayors and municipal presidents of San Luis Potosí City and Anexo:Alcaldes de San Luis Potosí are "one and the same", except for the languages.

When I was trying to merge the above-mentioned Wikidata items, the system returned a message: "Error:". The older item, with the earlier number is https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q24062676; the newer one, https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q111955806.

Could you please help me? That is, in the case I am right.

(On 10 May 2022, I had posted an almost identical message to this one, to User talk:Rodw, but I had not noticed that he is on a long vacation, since 19 April 2022.)

Heterotrofo (talk) 07:31, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Heterotrofo: Sorry, I don't use Wikidata very much - I would ask for assistance/suggestions over there rather than over here. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 12:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ser Amantio di Nicolao,

Okay, I will look for another Admin.

Thanks.

Heterotrofo (talk) 14:52, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Heterotrofo: Rather than asking an admin on Wikipedia, I would suggest you ask for assistance over at Wikidata, given the nature of your question. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 20:52, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ser Amantio di Nicolao

Thank you very much for your good advice. I will do that way.

Heterotrofo (talk) 21:09, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Bias Fortes to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Wrugtrab (talk) 03:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Admin's Barnstar
	I saw something on YouTube about you, I think you are an amazing contributor and you should be so proud knowing that you have helped so many people! Thank you! Blanchey (talk) 09:17, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Blanchey: You're very kind - and I very undeserving. Thanks very much. And happy editing! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:10, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ser Amantio di Nicolao - thank you so much for correcting the categories in my articles. It is quite embarrassing that i did it wrong. I hope, with the next article i do it better! Have a nice weekend, --Naomi Hennig (talk) 11:51, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Naomi Hennig: Happy to be of assistance. Categories can be a little esoteric and confusing at the best of times - they still throw me for a loop as often as not. Anything I can do to help. Happy editing! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:11, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good day Steven,

I am writing this to ask your help and support to publish the article for our nonprofit organization. This is all about AMASS Association Friends of Cancer Patients (Arabic Name: جمعية أصدقاء مرضى السرطان -the Arabic word “AMASS” means in need of help and assistance) is a Saudi Arabian volunteer-based, non-profit, charitable organization that aims to provide psychological and moral support to cancer patients and their families, and to educate and spread health awareness to the community about the disease and the importance of early detection.

Appreciated your favorable response please.

Regards, Amass Admin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amasssaudi (talk • contribs) 10:20, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your selfless dedication to knowledge will be your legacy. You are a truly great man and there are millions of us who respect you and your work. The last time someone said something bad about you on the internet she had so much backlash she deleted her Twitter. You have transformed Wikipedia into a truly great source of information that is gaining more and more respect the longer it is used. Thank you sir.

GamerGateVeteran (talk) 01:11, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Von World Pens Hall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Von World Pens Hall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Happyecheveria (talk) 03:22, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nigerien people by period has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 08:13, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May songs

Thank you for your constant categories work! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 04:52, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Anything for you. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:53, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you ;) - a strong woman singing today --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:17, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: She's welcome to it. I tried Tristan...God knows, I tried. Saw it once with Carol Yahr, who probably warrants an article. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:37, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Probably. My last Isolde: I wanted to write an article about her, and found out she had one, and you can probably guess who wrote it ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: That happens to me more often than I'd like to admit. Often with minor American composers - I particularly remember William Clifford Heilman. (Lovely piano trio, by the way - there's a recording.) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:51, 25 May 2022 (UTC):::::: thanks for sharing - I like my talk today (actually mostly from 29 May - I took the title pic), enjoy the music, two related videos worth watching! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Very nice. Congratulations on the nice stream of DYKs as well - always nice to see a little culture on the front page. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 19:44, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would you happen to know why Antonio Rotta’s the devoted child is unavailable to be purchased as a print? Thanks, Jordi Stewart 2601:2C6:4B80:C6C0:CCE:7708:413D:C23E (talk) 05:40, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@601:2C6:4B80:C6C0:CCE:7708:413D:C23E: Sorry...I just edit articles. Don't know that much about a lot of the subjects. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hackleys Crossroad, Virginia has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 13:32, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Harris Crossroads, Virginia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just like Barker Crossroads, Virginia and Bennets Crossroads, Virginia, this is a road junction, not a community. No significant coverage. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• Barker Crossroads, Virginia
• Hidden Acres, Virginia
• Lawrenceville Hills, Virginia
• Bennets Crossroads, Virginia

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interview about Being a Kannadiga https://www.deccanherald.com/amp/entertainment/entertainment-news/prashanth-neel-and-the-question-of-loyalty-1101195.html I just provided source about living person Prashanth Neel he consider himself a proud Kannadiga please remove Telugu people content from personal life, https://www.deccanherald.com/amp/entertainment/entertainment-news/prashanth-neel-and-the-question-of-loyalty-1101195.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by LR1988 (talk • contribs) 10:26, 29 May 2022 (UTC) Prashanth Neel the living person his native is Neelakantpuram, can be technically telugu but his mother tongue seems to be Kannada. It's difficult to find he is Telugu or Kannadiga please review the attached file below & remove Telugu content in personal Life,http://www.chalanachithram.com/discus/messages/115/463102.html?1651142780 — Preceding unsigned comment added by LR1988 (talk • contribs) 07:34, 30 May 2022 (UTC) It's difficult to find whether he is Telugu or Kannadiga, Mother tongue is not mentioned so adding from Telugu family is not right. Remove both Kannadiga & Telugu from personal life part. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LR1988 (talk • contribs) 08:38, 30 May 2022 (UTC) Ethencity seems to be added on the basis of Caste it seems. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LR1988 (talk • contribs) 08:41, 30 May 2022 (UTC) This https://telugu.abplive.com/andhra-pradesh/prashant-neil-is-a-close-relative-of-ap-congress-raghuveera-reddy-30437 citation is needed for only to change Surname not for ethencity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LR1988 (talk • contribs) 08:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233 Online events: New: LGBTQ+ women | Greenland and the Faroes | Women in music Contest (Apr/May/Jun): Translation contest (third and last month) Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi. Could you explain the "Removing from Category:Brazilian footballers in subcat" changes? Example at Adryan: [2] Robby.is.on (talk) 12:11, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Robby.is.on: See WP:DIFFUSE - they are in the category "Category:Footballers from Rio de Janeiro (city)." That said, I'm about to revert - there's no hatnote on the parent category, but it seems that there should be (se Category:English footballers for an example of what I'm talking about.) I would recommend a similar hatnote to prevent something like this in the future. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 12:15, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. Does that mean "Brazilian footballers" is a "non-diffusing" category?

A related question: If "Brazilian footballers" were a diffusing category and I were to search for "Brazilian footballers" like so [3] would that return a subject that's in the "Footballers from Rio de Janeiro (city)" category? Robby.is.on (talk) 12:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Robby.is.on: I can't answer your first question: I would say that it should match other footballer-by-nationality categories, whatever their designation. There should be consistency across the board.

For the second, I'm not especially familiar with the way the search feature works, but I would assume as much. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 12:30, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 12:32, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am trying to figure out what the deal with Upattinas (The democratic school found in PA) is. You are the only person to have edited the page in the past 4 years, so I was hoping you are knowledgeable on it. To start, do you know if the YouTube channel acof911 is from the same Upattinas, and if so, who are the "representatives from Illinois" referenced around 0:35 in Upattinas School 4-12-86 Title 1 - Chapter 2

Just as a heads up, I am new to Wikipedia so apologies if I take a while to respond or anything like that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KulmGrunt (talk • contribs) 21:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nvm, found the NCACS link cause I'm dumb. Still let me know if you are knowledgeable on the school because I am curious about it KulmGrunt (talk) 22:40, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@KulmGrunt: Sorry - I don't know anything about the place. I've just added a few cosmetic things to the article now and again. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Curious about this change on Cornelius Conway Felton; article suggests he was an alum, as well as a president and faculty member. --Engineerchange (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Engineerchange: He's in the subcategory Category:Hasty Pudding alumni now. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ser Amantio di Nicolao: Ah, that makes sense. Appreciate the clarification. Edit on! --Engineerchange (talk) 14:45, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Admin's Barnstar
	What you do amazes me and I hope I can be someone like you Kaue (They/Them) (talk) 17:03, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kaue548: Thanks very much - you're very kind. Happy editing! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:50, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Campbell Corner, Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campbell Corner, Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hog Farm _Talk 02:52, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you give me the background on the removal of lots of people from, for example, Category: House of Orleans. I'm not familiar with a decision about this. Noel S McFerran (talk) 20:50, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mcferran: They're in a variety of subcategories - for instance, Category:Dukes of Orléans, Category:Princesses of France (Orléans) - they don't need to be in the parent category as well. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 20:56, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now I understand. Thanks. Noel S McFerran (talk) 22:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mcferran: Any time. Happy editing! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:47, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I random checked 20 of these changes, I found 5 ([4] [5] [6] [7] [8]) that had been rendered unitalicised. Perhaps worth checking back over those changes. It appears that in the {{Infobox book}} template if the italic title and name parameters are both filled in, then the article title is rendered without italics. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 15:05, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Goldsztajn: Thanks very much - I seem to recall running into this issue back when I was doing the changes in the first place. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:31, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a follow-up: the |italic name= parameter is the culprit ... it appears if there is any text other than "yes" or "force", the title will appear without italics. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 21:11, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Goldsztajn: Thanks - I think I encountered that as well a few months ago. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:13, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, hello from Serbia! Secondly, how you came to that Parni Valjak's song Sve jos mirise na nju is actually a sample of Rijeka suza i na njoj ladja? Last but not least, you added this as sound-alike on January 12, 2021. Thank you! EmiliaITČA (talk) 18:01, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@EmiliaITČA: I'm sorry, but I'm afraid I didn't make that edit - it was made before I edited the article. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:52, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry. EmiliaITČA (talk) 18:55, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@EmiliaITČA: No trouble at all. Sorry I can't be of assistance. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:57, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing Ser Amantio di Nicolao a very Amantio di Nicolao happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Best wishes! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:19, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CAPTAIN RAJU: Thank you kindly - that's very kind of you. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:09, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red July 2022, Vol 8, Issue 7, Nos 214, 217, 234, 235 Online events: New: Alphabet Run: A to B | Baltic States Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Women in Green's Good Article Editathon: July 2022 – Women and the Environment Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ana Ugalde is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ana Ugalde until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jkaharper (talk) 20:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oi! I've seen the amazing work you have done, thank you for contributing you will always be a huge part of the Wikipedian community. 73.126.133.15 (talk) 21:12, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@73.126.133.15: Thanks very much - you're very kind. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 22:10, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June songs

Today is a birthday. Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Very nice. Congratulations on the main page notice. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:45, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

His 80th birthday is today, the notice was in 2018. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Ah, sorry. Got a lot on my plate today. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 19:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

She does not want her age (via her date of birth) known. Worried about unfair age discrimination Eugeneoconnor (talk) 18:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Eugeneoconnor: That category doesn't necessarily invite people to search for a date of birth. It merely indicates that the article lacks one. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:44, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:3amdigital.jpg, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/File talk:3amdigital.jpg and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of File talk:3amdigital.jpg during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:23, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ser Amantio di Nicolao, thank you for your unbelivable large number of Wikipedia improvements. In this case, though, I wonder why you inserted all these  . Was this an error of some tool you use for editing? I've removed them now again. --Cyfal (talk) 21:32, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyfal: That's...odd. All I did was highlight the name of the vessel and click on the "Bold text" button at the top of the edit screen. I can't imagine why it should cause that to happen.

That'll teach me to automate such a simple task. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:35, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed strange! Thank you for your quick answer! --Cyfal (talk) 21:38, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]