The Original Barnstar
	Flag of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 16:12, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Scu ba. Thank you for your work on Dan Cantor. Chaotic Enby, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Great job, congrats!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Chaotic Enby}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ChaotıċEnby(t · c) 21:21, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, O'Donnell and Naccarato, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Articles must be based in independent third party sources, not the company’s own website. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:14, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Scu ba. Thank you for your work on Sarmat Ikoev. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:12, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clearfrienda was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This page was moved from main to draft because it wasn't ready, but was resubmitted without any changes. It's pretty close, but it doesn't meet WP:NCORP yet. Large portions of this aren't sourced properly (inline citations don't match). Please improve the article before resubmitting or it will get declined again.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:O'Donnell and Naccarato and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clearfrienda ^💬 03:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Scu ba! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Clearfrienda 💬 03:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Scu ba. Thank you for your work on Alan Alborov (politician). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:19, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Scu ba. Thank you for your work on Inal Tasoev (politician). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:44, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 July 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Syrian parliamentary election, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 00:45, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, regarding this edit, how come you reverted to restore the article, when the township clearly became Mahwah, New Jersey? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 06:49, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Historical municipalities that got abolished should be kept on separate pages Scu ba (talk) 01:43, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any reason you feel that way? If historical municipalities became a current one, then that would just fall under the "history" section, as there isn't much to add if it no longer exists. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:11, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is precedent with having an abolished township having it's own page. In this instance although they shared borders there is no continuity between the municipal governments, and the former township was abolished instead of reincorporated as is usually the case in a township becoming a borough.

Additionally, only a portion of the township became Mahwah, there where also portions that became Allendale and Upper Saddle River. All three boroughs can trace themselves back to Hohokus Township, as such it would be unfair to the other two to have Mahwah monopolize the history of the township. Scu ba (talk) 16:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to mention Ramsey too was also spun out of Hohokus township Scu ba (talk) 16:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 September 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Algerian presidential election, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 23:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pompton Lakes Seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pwr MOS:INFOBOXFLAG, "Human geographic articles – for example, settlements and administrative subdivisions – may have flags of the country and first-level administrative subdivision in infoboxes." So U.S. and state flags ae OK; County flags are not. As in this edit to the article for Paterson, New Jersey, and for other places in Passaic County, uses of the county flag should be removed. Alansohn (talk) 00:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems nonsensical. Why have flags for 2/3 subdivisions, instead of 3/3? Scuba 01:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This policy was based on consensus and added to the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Icons in this edit in March 2012, more than a dozen years ago. There are municipalities with four levels of government, such as Lynbrook, New York, which is a village in a town, in a county, in a state in a country. Some people had wanted no flags in the infobox for any article for a place; consensus was to keep flags for country and first-level administrative subdivision (which would be a state within the United States here). I'm usually fighting to restore flags that have been removed from municipality articles without justification, but it goes both ways, as in Passaic County. Alansohn (talk) 03:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Im not sure if you read the edit you sent. Human geographic articles - for example settlements and administrative subdivisions - may have flags of the country and first-level administrative subdivision in infoboxes; however, physical geographic articles - for example, mountains, valleys, rivers, lakes, and swamps - should not. Where a single article covers both human and physical geographic subjects (e.g. Manhattan), the consensus of editors at that article will determine whether flag use in the infobox is preferred or not. I am not talking about a mountains, valleys, rivers, lakes, and swamps im talking about a settlement. Scuba 03:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is an article about a settlement. As you cited, Human geographic articles - for example settlements and administrative subdivisions - may have flags of the country and first-level administrative subdivision in infoboxes. Which means that flags for the United States (the country cited in the MOS) and New Jersey (the first-level administrative subdivision in this case) may be included; Passaic County would be a second-level administrative subdivision, for which a flag is excluded. Alansohn (talk) 14:55, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The text you cited does not explicitly say second-level administrative subdivision flags should be excluded. Scuba 14:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the Manual of Style allowed flags for populated places at all levels, it could have said all levels; listing only "country and first-level administrative subdivision", when what was intended was all levels, seems to be a tortured reading, at best. If MOS:INFOBOXFLAG meant to include the second-level administrative units (i.e. counties, in our case), it could have said that explicitly and its absence seems pretty definitive that it's not included. Alansohn (talk) 21:41, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removing the county flags because the manual of style doesn't even mention county flags is not only a waste of people's time, but also a rather weasely way to enforce the manual of style. Why do you care so much? Scuba 21:44, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding these county flags is a weasly way to violate the Manual of Style, which specifically advises against uses of flags for decorative purposes, Why do you care so much to waste your time adding them? Alansohn (talk) 23:17, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because I fundamentally disagree with the concept that including all three flags in an infobox is better than just including 2 of the 3 flags. Scuba 03:22, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mr rnddude (talk) 22:06, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Russo-Ukrainian War. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Johnuniq (talk) 09:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comment in the ANI discussion. Johnuniq (talk) 09:54, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding North Korean involvement in the Russian Invasion of Ukraine. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Russian Invasion of Ukraine.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

--Rc2barrington (talk) 00:23, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Scu ba. Thank you for your work on George W. Brewer. Another editor, Sir MemeGod, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good job! :)

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Sir MemeGod}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

SirMemeGod  18:20, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 October 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Cuba blackouts, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 15:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Scu ba. Thank you for your work on EagleEye (satellite). Another editor, Sir MemeGod, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good job!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Sir MemeGod}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

SMG _chat 17:37, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 November 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Mauritian general election, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 01:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Scu ba. Thank you for your work on Zalina Lalieva. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day ahead for you and your family.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:32, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Scu ba. Thank you for your work on KP Labs. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a wonderful and blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:05, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After looking into it, there is no official logo for the Chabad Movement, as it is made up of many smaller affiliated organizations (see Chabad-affiliated organizations). 770 Eastern Parkway is the best image to represent the movement because it is the official headquarters.

The icon I uploaded (here) is just the logo for Chabad Houses (centers for non-Orthodox people to pray or learn about Judaism) and does not represent the entire movement as 770 does.

So, for now, the image for the Chabad sidebar template should remain 770 Eastern Parkway because it is the best image to represent the movement. Thank you for your contruibutions and your work tho.

YisroelB501 (talk) 09:33, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@YisroelB501 My question then is why is that the logo on the Chabad website? Scuba 18:18, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 November 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Northwestern Syria offensive (2024), which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 06:15, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at that. Listing every reaction with flags just invites it to become a useless list of very similar statements multiplied by every country that reacted... Plus regular text is usually more informative anyways 2607:FA49:5543:A300:0:0:0:2D3A (talk) 18:14, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. Including the flags is far more informative. Flagcruft is limited to just infoboxes, you can't argue that here. Scuba 18:14, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not what it says. I might have linked the wrong section (not been here very recently) but "Do not use icons in general article prose" and "Do not use too many icons". Simply listing countries by name (and grouping similar reactions, to avoid repetition) is far better. 2607:FA49:5543:A300:0:0:0:2D3A (talk) 18:16, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flagcruft is designed to prevent "nationalistic pride" that's literally the first sentence. You can use flags otherwise. Scuba 18:17, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's not clear about "Do not use icons in general article prose"? The section can be expressed far more clearly (and shortly) as general prose than as a country-by-country lists. Flags are just decorative in that context. 2607:FA49:5543:A300:0:0:0:2D3A (talk) 18:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, read the article. The example given is having an article about the Beetles and going "Beetles member Paul McCartney was also a member of the wings " what you keep reverting has nothing to do with FLAGCRUFT. you are persistently abusing a rule you clearly don't understand. Scuba 18:21, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are missing the forest for the trees. The literal example might be a Beatles article, but a list of by-country reaction is also just prose, and there's no reason to add flags to it. 2607:FA49:5543:A300:0:0:0:2D3A (talk) 18:25, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, The list of countries does not count as flugcruft. separating out the reactions by each country is infinitely better than a word-vomit paragraph combining them all. Why am I even arguing with you? you're an IP editor. Scuba 18:31, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I arguing with you? You're hiding behind an alias, who's to say you're even a human being? More seriously, there's a good reason to avoid separating the reactions by country - it promotes it becoming just a useless list of routine reactions (ex. "Country X stated it was "closely monitoring" the situation") and allows for the more important reactions to be properly written about. Imagine if the equivalent section at Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine#International_reactions was a flagcruft-list, would be entirely useless... 2607:FA49:5543:A300:0:0:0:2D3A (talk) 18:39, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In any case, I invite you to reply on the article talk page if you wish to continue debating this. 2607:FA49:5543:A300:0:0:0:2D3A (talk) 18:58, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Heavy Moss has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 10:01, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!
A bit of a random question, I've noticed you tend to vote "oppose" for ITN nominations where the article quality isn't sufficiently high quality.
I was wondering if there is a particular reason for this preference over "not ready" which I've noticed is a far more common vote regarding article issues? "Oppose" (imo) reads more like an issue regarding the subject rather than article quality issue.
Best regards 31.44.227.152 (talk) 02:07, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Votes should be binary support or oppose. If the article is updated to become high quality I'd change my vote to support. Scuba 03:44, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Scu Ba. I have removed the 15 principles from the article, as it's copyright content; the page is marked as "Copyright © 2024 IAP Utah - All Rights Reserved." Also, I am pretty sure we don't normally include complete quotations of platforms/principles of political parties. --Diannaa (talk) 17:55, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yeah okay, I'm fine with that, didn't really know how to summarize the 15 points coherently so I just put them in in full. Scuba 17:58, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You could offer an external link maybe. Diannaa (talk) 20:44, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Syrian Civil War and ISIL. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:24, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that there is a topic-wide one revert rule for all pages related to the Syrian Civil War. You have made two reverts to Syria within the past 24 hours, including this one and this one. Please self-revert your most recent edit. Also, please note that any other reverts that you make to content that others have inserted within the next 24 hours may result in a block or sanction, unless an obvious exception applies. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:32, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, editor, I noticed you recently participated in a discussion of a requested move for the article Brian Thompson (businessman). There is a new discussion open at Talk:Brian Thompson (businessman) § Killing of Brian Thompson, and I'd like to invite you to participate. Thank you. BarntToust 19:11, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" _(hihi) 01:23, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Talk:Syria, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:56, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

great Scuba 02:14, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Kalmar Union. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Also noting edit warring to restore said OR without consensus. TylerBurden (talk) 13:59, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Igor Kirillov (general). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 02:08, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Liberal Party USA Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Association of Liberty State Parties Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 06:40, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]