Welcome!

Hello Sanbeg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Vsmith 00:27, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to participate in these additional votes:

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human-baiting
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lion-baiting
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rat-baiting

Cordially SirIsaacBrock 01:26, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Am working on your suggestions to tighten up and better reference the notability issues you brought up on the Kiki Carter page. Do you have a moment to look at this and see if this is a better presentation. Thank you for you help and useful suggestions.Eaglefeather11 19:29, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Really like what you did on this article. Looks much improved with the table of contents and the sections. I had gotten a comment early on about lack of references so maybe I went overboard linking them up. I'm really new to this and trying to find my way through the maze of help files. It took me awhile to find how to do multiple links to one article. Step by step, I guess. Do you think I should upload relevant photos that are in the public domain? Eaglefeather11 19:38, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Thank you for your feedback. The sources list was made first (the article came from these sources) and then when the footnotes were added they culled from some of these same sources. Maybe I could delete the duplicates and rename the Sources section "additional sources" since they were used in the creation of the article. I will see what I can do. 209.81.121.200 00:43, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sanbeg, that was quite some time ago, so I forgot about it. Well, we leave it in now mainly due to legacy concerns: we have some old bots and scripts that still use "pg=" and "text=", so simply replacing them with a numbered argument wouldn't work. I'd figure on using an OR statement so that numbered arguments will work along with the "pg=" and "text=". I didn't modify it back then because I wasn't an admin, but then simply forgot about it (and didn't see any further discussion on it). Thanks for asking about this, since I'd forgotten it. I'll probably play around with the templates in my sandbox to see if it works. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 00:41, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to your question, I resumed my seven month old work and made this change, which does what it needs to do as mentioned above. Thanks! --Deathphoenix ʕ 00:57, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, my code hack doesn't work because it leaves residual code behind (take a look at the first section ). I'm going to self-revert my edits because I don't know enough about Wikicode to do this. --Deathphoenix ʕ 03:30, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sanbeg, thanks for giving this a shot. Just using the PAGENAME environment variable doesn't work because some articles get nominated more than once, and we need a different page for each subsequent nomination. --Deathphoenix ʕ 13:51, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I guess the one thing to make my modifications work is to find a way to suppress the "pg" and "text" text to prevent them from showing up if I make a normal numbered parameter call. I'm sure the <noinclude> would make a play, but I'm not enough of a Wikicode Monkey to be able to solve this one. --Deathphoenix ʕ 14:19, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I deleted your sandbox with an auto-deletion script because you had a proposed deletion tag on it. Are you sure you want it deleted? If not, I can restore it, but will have to remove the tag.--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 21:54, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Restored, and I have placed it in nowiki tags. Cheers!--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 22:10, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added info to the article that help establishes notability, and I was hoping you may re-visit the AfD. Please respond at the AfD rather than this talk page, since I am leaving this message for several editors. Thank you! PT ^(s-s-s-s) 18:37, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I began looking at your proposed solution to the labeled section transclusion problem, and replied to you at the discussion page at Wikisource. It looks promising, but I confess that I don't fully understand how it works. Would it be possible for you to write up (perhaps at the talk page there) a step-by-step explanation? Thanks, Dovi 08:14, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I came across a number of articles you took to afd for deletion while doing new pages patrol and I was wondering if you were familiar with the Proposed deletion process. Basically, you add {{subst:prod|reason for deletion}} to articles the deletion of which is not controversial, such as blatant advertizing, etc. Thereafter, if the prod template remains in the article for five days it is deleted without any debate. Anyone can remove the template for any reason. If that is done, you can take the article to the far more resource intensive afd process.--Fuhghettaboutit 03:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and sorry for not replying before. I don't know enough about inner workings of MediaWiki to tell if the patch works correctly. I think that it would be the best if you would open up a bug report on Bugzilla with the patch and let Brion handle it. Poem isn't in the list of extension, but you can submit it as a general MediaWiki bug. Nikola 06:18, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice, though you might add Brion as a co-author as well. He did all the adjusting of the extension to MediaWiki that was needed. Nikola

It shows up in Google Maps under the name of "Six Mile Run State Park" click the link I added to the Google map. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 22:22, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

40°28′31″N 74°34′00″W / 40.475207°N 74.566569°W / 40.475207; -74.566569

Check it out, let me know what you think. I fixed the coordinates. I still had it on the porevious search which was the princeton cemetery.

I am really running behind in my correspondence lately, and my apologies for taking so long to contact you. Thank you for having added your name to the project. Right now we are working on tagging all of our articles, and considering which articles we think are of the greatest importance to the project. Although I have worked with a variety of projects before, this is the first project I have ever created, and I hope that you can forgive me for my failures to date. Please feel free to make any comments on any of the proposals on the project pages, positive or negative, and thank you very much for having joined. If you have any specific questions or comments, please also feel free to contact me at my own user page. Thanks again for joining, and I hope we can help you with your own contributions to wikipedia.  :) Badbilltucker 23:23, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Sanbeg, to the WikiProject Germany! Please direct any questions about the project to its talk page. If you create new articles on Germany-related topics, please list them at our announcement page and tag their talk page with our project template {{WikiProject Germany}}. A few features that you might find helpful:

• The project's Navigation box points to most of the pages in the project that might be of use to you.
• Most of the important discussions related to the project take place on the project's main talk page; you may find it useful to watchlist it.
• We've developed a number of guidelines for names, titles, and other things to standardize our articles and make interlinking easier that you may find useful.

Here are some tasks you can do. Please remove completed tasks from the list.

• Requests: German Archaeological Institute at Rome [de], Deutsche Familienversicherung [de], Dietlof von Arnim-Boitzenburg [de], Rolf von Bargen [de], Hennes Bender [de], Georg Bernhard [de] (1875–1944), Eduard Georg von Bethusy-Huc [de], Rolf Brandt [de] (1886–1953), Jan Philipp Burgard [de], Lisa Feller [de], Georg Arbogast von und zu Franckenstein [de], Georg Gafron [de], Ferdinand Heribert von Galen [de], Gundula Gause [de], Karl-Heinz Hagen [de], Herbert Helmrich [de], Nils von der Heyde [de], Monty Jacobs [de] (1875–1945), Hans Katzer [de], Siegfried Kauder [de], Matze Knop [de], Wolfgang Kryszohn [de], Claus Larass [de], Isidor Levy [de] (1852–1929), Markus Löning [de], Tobias Mann [de], Mathias Müller von Blumencron  [de],Günther Nonnenmacher [de] Anke Plättner [de], Hans Heinrich X. Fürst von Pless [de], Gerd Poppe [de], Victor-Emanuel Preusker [de], Günter Prinz [de], Ulrich Reitz [de], Hans Sauer (inventor) [de], Franz August Schenk von Stauffenberg [de], Paul Schlesinger [de] (1878-1928),Oscar Schneider [de], Hajo Schumacher [de], Otto Theodor von Seydewitz [de], Christoph Sieber (comedian) [de], Dorothea Siems [de], Werner Sonne [de], Udo zu Stolberg-Wernigerode [de], Christoph Strässer [de], Joseph von Utzschneider [de], Jürgen Wieshoff [de], Hans Wilhelmi [de], Dietmar Wischmeyer [de], Alexandra Würzbach [de]
• Unreferenced: Unreferenced BLPs, Bundesautobahn 93, Benjamin Trinks, Steeler (German band), Amelie Beese, Zoologisches Museum in Kiel, Emil Krebs, Prussian semaphore system, Partenstein, Peter Krieg, Porsche 597, Christa Bauch, Curt Cress, Stefan Beuse
• Cleanup: 53541 issues in total as of 2024-03-03
• Translate: Articles needing translation from German Wikipedia
• Stubs: Albersdorf, Thuringia, Ingo Friedrich, Berndt Seite, Federal Social Court; 117 articles in Category:German MEP stubs
• Update: Deutsches Wörterbuch
• Portal maintenance: Update News, Did you know, announcements and the todo list
• Orphans: Orphaned articles in Germany
• Photo: Take/Add requested photographs
• Help assess the quality of 968 unassessed articles

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project! Kusma (討論) 16:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you use {{WikiProject Germany|class=|importance=}} instead of just {{WikiProject Germany}} when tagging, so it is easier for others to assess the articles? Many of them are probably already quality-assessed by the Military history people, in which case you could just use their quality assessment. Thank you for tagging, and happy editing! Kusma (討論) 17:11, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A bot is a great idea. Most sub-, subsub-, subsusbsub- etc. categories of Category:Germany should also be eventually tagged (not all though, as our categories are not arranged in a treee structure). Kusma (討論) 17:39, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you'd be interested in this:Talk:Historical_Eastern_Germany#Requested_move. -- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 05:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This newsletter was delivered by Kusma using AWB to all members of WikiProject Germany. If you do not want to receive this newsletter in the future, please leave a note at the talk page of the Outreach department so we can come up with a better spamlist solution. Thank you, Kusma 12:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. If I give you a list of System messages that need translation, would you change them?

I got this list http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki/trunk/phase3/languages/messages/MessagesIs.php?view=co and could use it to build a complete Icelandic System messages. What do you think? --Steinninn 07:27, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Humm... it seams that this liste http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki/trunk/phase3/languages/messages/MessagesEn.php?view=co is much more complete. The first list I sent you only has the messages already translated. --Steinninn 07:29, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You mean to take the text and put it somewhere els for them to copy past? I don't think I have access to change the svn page. You know what would be the best thing to do is to take the version from is: and make that the default, it's already has almost everything translated and standardized. If that's not possible that I can probably put up a ftp page with all the english messages from SVN translated. --Steinninn 04:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explain more fully this rewording? You aren't challenging that Dilawar was beaten to death by American GIs, are you?

Dr. Elizabeth Rouse, the military pathologist who performed the autopsy recorded the cause of death as homicide. She wrote that the only other corpse she had seen with legs as badly damaged as Dilawar's had been run over by a bus. Geo Swan 06:14, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon! I was looking at one of your old extensions to MediaWiki, Assert Edit, and wanted to get it enabled on this project. I talked to a few people on IRC and they mentioned that it would have to be moved into the SVN repository and cleaned up - I wonder if you could spare a few minutes to do that? (I'm also looking at the code and I see a few other things it would be nice to add, like the ability to check more than one assertion, but that would be easy enough to do once it's online) Could you please move it over to SVN? Thanks, --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 18:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Tim asked me to confirm that it's ready for use - would you agree with that?

Also, I have a patch allowing users to use AND or OR (not both, because that's ugly and not needed) and adding a notexists assertion for use with things like &assert=botANDnotexists for page creation bots - if you have a moment, could you have a look at that as well? (Or should I just pop it on bugzilla after the extension is live?) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 15:44, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ryobi logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steve,

I'm really looking forward to your extension of the &ltref&gt tag! I'm sure that you're busy and I don't mean to pressure you, but I'm wondering whether you know roughly how long it will be before your work goes live, i.e., before other editors can start using the <note> tag? I'd like to be able to give my humanities friends a rough idea so that they can plan their editing accordingly. I don't know everything that's involved in getting an extension accepted here at EN:WP, but I hope that it won't take long. Thanks again for solving that problem! :) Willow (talk) 13:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As one of the aforementioned humanities nerds friends, I'd like to thank you for pioneering this solution. Have a cookie. (I expect you've enabled them.) Will it support lettered notes (which Awadewit had advocated)? Cheers. – Scartol • Tok 15:45, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'm glad to see that it's useful here. It would be nice to support those as well, when I can find time to work on them. -Steve Sanbeg (talk) 19:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Newsletter Bot Talk 15:39, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This newsletter is delivered by a bot to all members of WikiProject Germany. If you do not want to receive this newsletter in the future, please leave a note at the talk page of the Outreach department so we can come up with a better spamlist solution. Thank you, - Newsletter Bot Talk 15:39, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've just spotted your "group=note" changes to refs to allow one to create a set of footnotes for comments rather than references. However, there doesn't seem to be a way of adding an inline citation to one's footnotes. For example:

...and this was an amazing property.<ref name=FredFirst group=note>Fred was the first person to discover this property.<ref name=Fred2008>Fred (2008) An amazing new property. Amazing books. London.</ref></ref>

to produce:

...and this was an amazing property.^{[note 1]}

Notes

1. ^ Fred was the first person to discover this property.^[1]

References

1. ^ Fred (2008) An amazing new property. Amazing books. London.

Hope I've explained this. You'd need to be able to nest one <ref> within another, for a different group. Colin°^Talk 19:36, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there has been a fair amount of talk in various places about additional features to add; hopefully I'll find time to work on some of that. Ideally, I'd like to have a note tag that's the same as the ref tag, but uses letters instead of numbers. It may help to nest them, if two different tags are used, although for some reason even nesting <ref> and {{#tag:ref}} doesn't work. -Steve Sanbeg (talk) 21:51, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steve,

I'm sorry to bother you, but we really need that refinement of your footnotes solution we spoke of — you know, the one that produces automatically incremented, alphabetical footnotes? Surprisingly, it's not my humanities friends I'm pleading for, but myself. I rather impetuously committed myself (in every sense ;) to saving action potential from being delisted as a Featured Article, and the person who decides whether articles become/stay Featured, SandyGeorgia, seems to be insisting that the footnotes be alphabetical (see discussion here). I know you're busy, but it would mean a lot to me if you could fix that this week. Maybe it's as simple as using a < ol type=a> in the analog of the footnote_references_prefix string and maybe defining a new backlinks label string? Alternatively, we could ask that my admittedly kludgy solution be adopted temporarily until you get yours fixed up? Whatever you think is best, but let's please decide quickly, Willow (talk) 10:13, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have been thinking about that, although I've been fairly busy off-wiki, so haven't looked at the code too much lately. Originally, I was thinking to internally add some prefix to each group to specify the numbering, but I think I've come up with a better idea; to do a bit of refactoring to that we have two instances of the Footnote class, one for each tag/numbering scheme. Hopefully, that could make things work without complicating the structure any more. BTW, if you do want to try sharing your changes, it would be best to try changing the latest SVN version, then producing a unified diff-Steve Sanbeg (talk) 19:15, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have gotten no help over on meta with some trouble I'm having with the Poem extension, as installed on my own personal wiki. User:Nikola Smolenski recommended I ask you. On the talk pages of other namespaces, Poem makes an error - UNIQ583c33685170dbcd-poem-00000000-QINU? - (example). It is also fairly incompatible with the Semantic Mediawiki extension, since it makes the fact box right after the closing of the Poem (example). I don't know the mediawiki framework well enough to know why either of these might be. Do you have any ideas? --Aquatiki (talk) 07:10, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The UNIQ.. problem seems to be unrelated to the poem extension. Basically, the preprocessor hides XML-style tags with strings like that to prevent them from being treated as wikitext, then unhides them later on; something in the state of your parser must be getting messed up. I looked at your wiki, and I get the same result with poem, cite and nowiki. It's probably best to try disabling some extensions to see which one is causing that. I'm not sure about semantic mediawiki; I'd guess that it's using the wrong hook to detect when the page is ends, so the recursive parse triggers the fact box. That sounds like a bug in semantic mediawiki. -Steve Sanbeg (talk) 15:23, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:The Pretenders - Greatest Hits.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:09, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have used your wonderful "grouref" system at Mary Shelley, but there has been some discussion at the Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mary Shelley and at User:WillowW#Mary Shelley regarding documentation of said code. Would it at all be possible for you to throw together something so that we can use this system? I would really appreciate it! Awadewit (talk) 00:04, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your interest, I'm glad to see that's getting some use. I've added a little to User talk:WillowW#Mary Shelley and mw:Extension:Cite/Cite.php#Grouped references; and I see WillowW has added to the footnotes page; hopefully that will all help. -Steve Sanbeg (talk) 17:30, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just saw your edits on Transcluding visual section headings. I was wondering--if the feature is stable, why not enable it at least on test.wikipedia.org for further testing. I'd eventually love to have functionality along those lines in Wikipedia itself, but one step at a time. What say you? ←Spidern→ 05:33, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added the visual headings feature mostly because there were a few requests for it while I was developing it to simplify using it, although it wasn't necessary for the task LST was developed for, and I don't think it's been looked at carefully to determine whether that part is suitable for inclusion here. I'm not involved in deciding which features are activated, but the only concern I'd have with that feature is that someone could change a visual heading without realizing that their edit will break transclusions; since the section markers don't render at all, it should be obvious to anyone that they have another purpose. -Steve Sanbeg (talk) 18:23, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My primary use for it would be as a mere convenience to aggregate information on to my user subpages. The problem of not having permanent links which you describe is similar to when people include an anchor (labeled section) in a Wikilink, only to have the anchor stop working when someone renames the section.

I suppose one way to deal with this is to transclude by using the numbering of the sections, although that doesn't help when the order of sections is changed. To take this a step further, one could use a double-pronged approach: transclude by specifying both the number and title of the transcluded section, turning red (or some other indicator) if either does not match what is actually on the transcluded page. As long as one of these factors matches, the section would still be transcluded but by will have a little indicator somewhere stating which factor has changed (allowing for user to rename the requested title for transclusion).

I don't think the feature (as is) is ready for use in mainspace Wikipedia. It could, however be useful in its current form to transclude certain static pages like archived discussions, sometimes applying a few formatting modifications (such as using {{hat}} and {{hab}}). ←Spidern→ 20:01, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, similar to linking, but I think the linking issue is accepted, since the link will still go to the right page. But I really, I don't think anyone has seriously advocated enabling labeled section transclusion here, or the visual heading feature on any of the projects, so I can only offer my educated guess about how that would go. Any feature that is enabled here will get used in article space, so it would need to be evaluated for that. If what you want can be done with the same functionality that is enabled at wikisource, or some enhancement to that, that would probably be an easier case to make; either to get consensus for it, file on bugzilla:, or appeal to someone like Tim Starling, who reworked the extension significantly, and gets to decide what features are enabled. -Steve Sanbeg (talk) 00:27, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have compressed several major Wikipedia images(and may be able to compress them a bit further). I need a developer to take a look and let me know if it is worth updating. I have compressed the main wikipedia header (the Wikipedia title at www.wikipedia.org) by about 5kb. See Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Smaller_Wikipedia_Logo_files. Thank you in advance.Smallman12q (talk) 22:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably not a major difference, but if you get the same result with less bandwidth, it should be improvement. Could you tar or zip the final versions of the ones from svn with the correct names, and post it on bugzilla: or email it? -Steve Sanbeg (talk) 00:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Afd2-s requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:46, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I happened to come across your image File:3B2_detail.jpg, which got a "source missing" template. I assumed you created it yourself (judging from the license/quality/exif data) & added info accordingly. Of course, if this is incorrect, please correct it. Kind regards, Deadstar (talk) 09:30, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; yeah, that was just a quick shot to document it before it went out; it is self made. -Steve Sanbeg (talk) 21:44, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated ParserFunctions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — Gavia immer (talk) 20:51, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the same Sanbeg behind the Labeled Section Transclusion extension?

If so, great extension. It has proven itself quite useful. I'm wondering if you ever figured out a workaround to use the section tags in a template? Smile Lee (talk) 22:22, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I invite you to the yearly Berlin hackathon, 1-3 June. Registration is now open. If you need financial assistance or help with visa or hotel, then please register by May 1st and mention it in the registration form.

This is the premier event for the MediaWiki and Wikimedia technical community. We'll be hacking, designing, teaching, and socialising, primarily talking about ResourceLoader and Gadgets (extending functionality with JavaScript), the switch to Lua for templates, Wikidata, and Wikimedia Labs.

We want to bring 100-150 people together, including lots of people who have not attended such events before. User scripts, gadgets, API use, Toolserver, Wikimedia Labs, mobile, structured data, templates -- if you are into any of these things, we want you to come!

I also thought you might want to know about other upcoming events where you can learn more about MediaWiki customization and development, how to best use the web API for bots, and various upcoming features and changes. We'd love to have power users, bot maintainers and writers, and template makers at these events so we can all learn from each other and chat about what needs doing.

Check out the the developers' days preceding Wikimania in July in Washington, DC and our other events.

Best wishes! - Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation's Volunteer Development Coordinator. Please reply on my talk page, here or at mediawiki.org. Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation Volunteer Development Coordinator 02:38, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Milwaukee-tool-logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thank you, for uploading this file.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm some details,

If it's your own work, please include {{own}}, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant. You can also add |claimed=yes to the {{media by uploader}} or {{presumed_self}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

If it's not your own work please provide as much sourcing/authorship information as you are able to.

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Milwaukee-tool-logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]