what page? ... aa:talk 19:17, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you're looking for this:

• http://www.hqmc.usmc.mil/factfile.nsf/0/03ae5c82962bc0f48525627b006d3126?OpenDocument

... aa:talk 19:21, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thx--Sanandros 19:22, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The scope is a Tasco I think, but I don't know which model. The rifle is a Winchester Model 70 chambered for .243. --Captaindan 08:44, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

THX--Sanandros 08:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist unter GFDL, ich kann aber auch eine Lizenzänderung davon machen, wenn du das für irgendwas unter PD-Lizenz benötigst. Der Scan ist auch nicht grade der Wahnsinn, wenn du vorhast, das Foto für irgendwas zu verwenden, kann ichs gerne nochmal auf den Scanner legen und in etwas besserer Auflösung neu einscannen -- Ferkelparade π 18:00, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright owners were contacted directly and image was released as CC. What more information do you want? Timbatron (talk) 19:47, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was already uploaded to the article. I just cropped it to remove some matting around the image. I believe (not sure) that the original was PD as well. Alcarillo (talk) 06:46, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just found the original image here; it's listed as in the public domain. Alcarillo (talk)

I am not entirely sure how to do this. Along with the original email, do I have to send anything else? Thanks, Hayden120 (talk) 03:00, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I cropped the picture of the Taovr. [1] In the original picture the Tavor is not the main subject. Flayer (talk) 07:31, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm ok not the best solution 'cause many pictures is the location not the main subject but also categorized in locational categories.--Sanandros (talk) 12:43, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I actually copied it from the German and Chinese articles, and from the HK416 article. bahamut0013^words_deeds 22:34, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On 28 September you tagged File:Fog nozzle5.JPG indicating that you copied it to Commons. I see several examples of fog nozzles placed on Commons by you, but not that one. Did I miss something?--SPhilbrickT 01:15, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank u probaly i messed a little bit up... Now it's on Commons--Sanandros (talk) 16:50, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Zamzam Well, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Well (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited One Hyde Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dila District, Afghanistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sandstorm. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sanandros. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sanandros. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just a friendly heads up on NGC 3862. I had to decline your speedy deletion request, since redirecting to a list that it's not on unfortunately isn't one of the valid speedy reasons for redirect. The correct way to go here would be to list it at WP:RfD----Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:42, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I wound up adding it to the list and changing the redirect to a stub.----Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:58, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sanandros. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Recently we have been helped by German Wikipedia users in copyediting & partial translation of english wikipedia article en:Kithaab to German Wikipedia article de:Benutzerin:IvaBerlin/Kithaab. The article is about a play on women rights issues.

The english wikipedia article is already being translated in various global languages like es:Kithaab & we are looking forward to getting it translated in various European languages including rm: ru: fr: from German Wikipedia article de:Benutzerin:IvaBerlin/Kithaab before we go forward in getting translated in other European languages we wish that preferably translation of the article en:Kithaab es:Kithaab to de:Benutzerin:IvaBerlin/Kithaab gets completed. So there chances of mistakes in other European languages will be lesser.

Looking forward to your inputs & kind help regarding the same

Thanking you with warm regards

Bookku (talk) 15:24, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually not the right person for that because I have dyslexia. But I read and it doesn't have big errors. But did you check the relevany on de:Wikipedia:Relevanzcheck? Because German WP is pretty strict with relevancy.--Sanandros (talk) 20:22, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, I suppose Relevanzcheck need not be a problem because the first German translating user has strong experience on German language Wikipedia. She left translation in between because of length of the article and any other problem. Thanks any way, & best wishes.

Regards Bookku (talk) 06:03, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]