I have some new proposals that I think might help calm things down. Could you let me know your thoughts? Thanks, Mitsube (talk) 08:03, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sacca, the theologian material is not sound. Please see [1]. Thanks, Mitsube (talk) 22:44, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also I thought that including the Almeder response to the criticism about the preexisting belief objection was helpful. It is in this earlier version [2]. Do you believe it should be left out? Mitsube (talk) 22:46, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PaliPN has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:59, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]