This user has probably not left, who knows man....

• Archive No 1: October 2004- March 2006

• Archive No 2: March 2006- Feb 2007

• Archive No 3 Feb 2007- Jan 2008

• Archive No 4 Jan 2008- Jan 2009

• Archives No 5 Jan 2009- Feb 2010

• Archives No 6 Feb 2010 to May 2014

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just wanted to say that I'm sorry to see you go. A lot of people feel the same way for the same reasons. I wish you all the best for the future. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 14:27, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user has left because he's sick of your shit .. well, not mine, baby, come back, we do need people like you. Hafspajen (talk) 20:04, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

birds
Thank you for quality articles on birds, such as the Golden White-eye, for you major contributions to Bird, and for having "managed to not destroy Wikipedia yet", - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (29 December 2009)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:16, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Two years ago, you were the 325th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:35, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Four years ago, you were recipient no. 325 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for today's White-naped xenopsaris! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:46, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for today's pittas, "one of a lovely and hard to see bird family found mostly in Asia and Africa (and a bit of Oz). Has an astonishing 6 featured images!" - I have a "songbird" on the same page, DYK? ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:34, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seven years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:57, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for Rainbow pitta, "a jewel of an Australian species. I never even really planned to write it but I photocopied the wrong pages at the library. Oh well, turned out to be a great mistake as its lovely." - Did you know that I wrote about an opera director, only to find out when finished that I meant a different one? - DYK that I have a "song bird" on the same page, on Handel's birthday? Enjoy! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:02, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good job hanging onto your admin bit with that one-letter edit, sport! You haven't even used it since 2011, and even that was three years before you diva quit the project. Have some decency and just let it go.  — Scott • talk 08:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's rich coming from you talking about Diva Quits. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:46, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My diva quit was more epic than that ;) Sabine's Sunbird talk 03:16, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sabine's Sunbird. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I've started working this up to featured article status, some way off yet though. I notice that you were a major editor on this, and I'm happy to submit it as a joint nomination when it's ready, if you are OK with that. I don't mind doing the grunt work, I've got decent sources although I might possibly need some help with sources when I get to "Predators and parasites" (haven't even started looking yet). Let me know what you think Jimfbleak (talk) 05:33, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I know we are some way off posting yet, but a few quick comments (not sure how recently you've done an FA, forgive me if I'm telling you what you already know).

• There shouldn't be any refs in the lead
• No wikilinks to continents or sovereign countries
• parts of the article are in AE spelling, eg "defense" (noun) and "behavior". No AE country has bee-eaters, whereas many BE countries in Africa, Australia, Europe and South Asia do. Article should be consistently in BE

No galleries, although obviously some of the pics could be placed in the text if appropriate

No rush to fix these, I'm still collecting refs for predators and parasites. Would you be happy for future discussion to be on the article talk page? That seems more logical than our talk pages. We went to the Western Cape some years ago, great birding and climate and good fun Jimfbleak (talk) 05:31, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know whether you are a native speaker of the English language. My edit relates to an issue of grammar. To "fight" buoyancy is not a grammatically or even a physically correct concept. Feel free to change the wording, but reverting a good-faith edit that is grammatically and conceptually correct, without at least discussing it and/or supplying an inline citation, is just plain rude. DiverDave (talk) 15:18, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sabine's Sunbird. You have new messages at DiverDave's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Sabine's Sunbird. You have new messages at DiverDave's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sabine's Sunbird.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sabine's Sunbird. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Sabine's Sunbird.......welcome back! I thought I'd let you know I've been working on the New Zealand bird list, and am now working on the Chatham Islands list.....I've been using a 200 mile circle around North Island, South Island, and Stewart Island for border definition purposes. This would give the Kermadec Islands, Auckland Islands, Chatham Islands, Campbell Islands, Antipodes Islands, and Bounty Islands their own distinct listing area. The Cook Islands, Niue, and Tokelau already have distinct lists. Just an FYI, unless you'd like to offer suggestions......Pvmoutside (talk) 22:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sabine's Sunbird.....I've moved all your tableized work from your sandbox to the List of Birds of New Zealand. Let me know if you have questions or concerns.......now on to the rest of the families and set definitions of the classification.....Pvmoutside (talk) 16:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've finished standardizing the list, and returned the offshore island endemics. Still some small cleanups to do, and adding the TOC to the top of the page........Pvmoutside (talk) 17:24, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sabine's Sunbird! Great (belatedly) to see you're back, at least partially. Hope you're doing well down there. Thought of you recently as I was watching some courting Laysan Albatrosses, and telling people about your sad pictures of the albatross chick skeletons stuffed with bits of plastic. MeegsC (talk) 13:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article White-naped xenopsaris you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 22:21, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article White-naped xenopsaris you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:White-naped xenopsaris for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 04:41, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ashy woodpecker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Banggai. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oreoicidae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oriole. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not in a bad way. I don't wanna engage the debate in that forum, but... I discussed it in my very final tl;dr post here.  Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 01:00, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sabine's Sunbird. Thanks for prepping the Q.q.-article before review and your offer for assistance. As you suggested, I have somewhat extended the lead, but perhaps it needs a bit more. I also have removed some of the subheadings or merged them, but not entirely to the level that may be consistent with some other articles. I did split up the gallery, although with some feeling of loss, as its intended function was to enable easy comparison of the different plumages among the sexes and subspecies, but since it was far from complete and also contained also other images, I concur it is better to split this one up. However, I think a gallery is sometimes very useful, such as in the Peony-article where I included three galleries: one for different stages in the development, one for as many species as images where available for and one containing an image of each of the six flower types in cultivars. Anyway, could I ask you to have another look at the Q.q.-article and push it a little bit further? Thanks in advance and kind regards, Dwergenpaartje (talk) 09:17, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Inaccessible Island rail you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 22:00, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Inaccessible Island rail you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Inaccessible Island rail for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 04:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the White-naped xenopsaris article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 28 June 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 28, 2017. Thanks! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 17:17, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hooded pitohui you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 21:20, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Melampitta you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 22:21, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Melampitta you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Melampitta for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 04:42, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hooded pitohui you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hooded pitohui for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 19:02, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sunbird, I think I would like to attempt another GA-nomination, this time for Nelicourvi weaver. Last time you gave valuable advise to prep the red-billed quelea article for GAN, which succeeded. Could you have a look and perhaps give me some pointers again. Thank you in advance.`Dwergenpaartje (talk)

On 27 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hooded pitohui, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the toxin found in the skin of the hooded pitohui, a bird from New Guinea, is the same as that found in poison arrow frogs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hooded pitohui. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Hooded pitohui), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like to co-nom the pigeon guillemot to WP:FAC soon? RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 18:59, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pigeon guillemot you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 13:01, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pigeon guillemot you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pigeon guillemot for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 22:01, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rainbow pitta you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 04:40, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rainbow pitta you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rainbow pitta for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 19:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for encouraging me here on Wikipedia...some virtual stroopwafels as a sign of my appreciation! Emilyc15 (talk) 22:51, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for sharing your expertise :-) Ballofstring (talk) 23:15, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I love the idea that I'm sharing, rather than just boring people endlessly. Sabine's Sunbird talk 23:28, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Helping Hand Barnstar
		Thank you for all your help working with new users during the Women in Science workshop – it made a big difference to the day, and several participants commented on how great it was to have experienced editors to help them. Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 10:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I hope you are doing great! The FAC of the mallard was closed before I could leave a thank you note for the review comments and then withdraw it. I thought it was good to go after the PR, GOCE copy-editing, GA passing, and talk page comments on any issues, but I think I was wrong. I hope to fix all the issues and re-nominate it again when all the issues mentioned and any more of them (would ask after I first fixed the issues mentioned on the talk page ). I realized later that it actually was a complex article, when I started editing more on other bird articles. Anyways, thank you again for your comments, and I hope I did not cause much trouble! I hope you have a great day. Adityavagarwal (talk) 02:49, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The HBW page for any bird species would be very very helpful, but it is inaccessible without subscription (for example, for the great white pelican). Could you suggest any way to check out the HBW pages for this (and for any other bird species in future)? Thanks! Adityavagarwal (talk) 08:31, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sabine's, I just set up a RM discussion on the talk page for what you may know as New Zealand fur seal. Some controversy about whether to use scientific name or use common name. You having some interest in New Zealand wildlife, I thought you'd like to add your opinion....Please invite any Aussies or Kiwis you think would be interested in commenting. Any other Bot should have page ready within the hour.....Pvmoutside (talk) 13:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sabine's Sunbird, could you help move Australasian Wren (the former Maluridae family page) to Australasian wren (presently a redirect page)? I do not wish to lose the page history in doing so improperly. Thanks, Loopy30 (talk) 03:49, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sabine's Sunbird. We met at the Women in Red editathon in Wellington a few months ago. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 09:23, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ok yeah let's do this one - should be an easy buff as a collab. Focussing on history and taxonomy at the moment. Feel free to get stuck in anywhere. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:20, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sabine's Sunbird. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hi i think we need protection on article Passenger pigeon due to vandalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yournewsboy (talk • contribs) 19:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm applying for a reasonably large Wikimedia Foundation grant to support a year of Wikipedian in Residence postings at a wide (and growing) range of institutions throughout the country. The grant has just gone live: NZ Wikipedian at Large

Are you interested in helping with any residencies or events around the country – at the moment just in the four main centres? If so, you can add yourself using the Volunteer button and say what you'd be keen to do. I really appreciated your help during the Women in Science event. AND/OR If you think a "Wikipedian at Large" is a good idea, please write a short endorsement, since you've participated in an event I've run. A vote of confidence from the Wikipedia community will make a big difference to the grant's success.

Many thanks! —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 00:55, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've created Editing User:Sabine's Sunbird/training, which is presumably intended to be in your user space. Please move it, or if it is intended to be an article, title it more appropriately.-gadfium 20:41, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply on my talk page. I've moved it to User:Sabine's Sunbird/training, and fixed the link to it on your user page.-gadfium 21:59, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Little spotted kiwi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page D'Urville Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed in your May 2017 edit to the above article, that you used the term "lower addled mandible". I cannot find any explanation of that term. The cited source for your edit is behind a paywall. By any chance, do you still have access to the site, Handbook of the Birds of the World (https://www.hbw.com/species/red-and-white-crake-laterallus-leucopyrrhus) so that your edit may be rendered more clearly? It's a minor matter, but needs to be changed at some point. Thanks.--Quisqualis (talk) 06:01, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sabine's Sunbird. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kurrichane thrush, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transvaal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Sabine's Sunbird, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, Everedux (talk) 20:43, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

If they are cited texts, they should be in line and show up in references76.189.141.88 (talk) 23:19, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pitta you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 20:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pitta you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pitta for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 19:21, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Toucan barbet you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 11:00, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Toucan barbet you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Toucan barbet for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 21:02, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sabine's Sunbird, in this edit you state that rostris means "bill" and capillus "head", but the proper Latin word for bill is rostrum and capillus actually means hair (of the head). I can not access full content of the source you have provided. Is explicitely stated in this source that rostris means bill and capillus means head? Thanks for the response, Wimpus (talk) 21:30, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• According to the source the first can mean either headed or hair of the head, the second I have amended. Sabine's Sunbird talk 20:41, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andaman woodpecker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vulnerable (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Coconut lorikeet - some interesting molecular data published on this group at last. NB: I am just excited that I finally got to see this on my 5th visit to Norfolk Island....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:29, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pink-necked green pigeon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 08:00, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pink-necked green pigeon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pink-necked green pigeon for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 13:41, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for helping and welcoming the new users at the editathon. Much appreciated. –Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 02:34, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• No worries! Shame I couldn't be there. Sabine's Sunbird talk 02:35, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the Pitta article has been scheduled as today's featured article for April 30, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 30, 2019, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

We also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors on the day before and the day of this TFA. Thanks!

On 15 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cuban warbler, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that no one suspected that the two species of Cuban warblers (Oriente warbler pictured) did not belong in the New World warbler family until 2002? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cuban warbler. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Cuban warbler), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bonin white-eye you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:20, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bonin white-eye you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bonin white-eye for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:01, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pink-necked green pigeon, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the pink-necked green pigeon (male pictured) was one of the first species of bird recorded on Krakatoa after the main island erupted in 1883? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pink-necked green pigeon. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Pink-necked green pigeon), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 16 April 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chatham shag, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the scientific name of the Chatham shag (pictured) commemorates a former Governor of New Zealand? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chatham shag. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Chatham shag), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 April 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bonin white-eye, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Bonin white-eye can evidently learn about new food sources by watching warbling white-eyes feed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bonin white-eye. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bonin white-eye), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:59, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:21, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that Rainbow pitta has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 23 February 2020. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/February 23, 2020. Thanks! Ealdgyth - Talk 23:52, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, if you have any time, if you could have a look at secretarybird before we nominate at FAC? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:40, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I've tried to fix a few links to the (nematode) family name Leptosomatidae to links to the (bird) name Leptosomidae where appropriate. Your page User:Sabine's Sunbird/families is an obvious candidate; but since it's a user subpage, and since I do not know whether you "keep it mainly for nostalgia" or as an active work tool, I won't do that fix myself. Thus, it's all up to you. Regards, JoergenB (talk) 14:15, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:53, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for Bee-eater, about "a family of colourful, conspicuous birds that feed mainly on venomous flying insects such as bees and wasps"! - Impressed! I have a FAC open. --–Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thagomizer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thagomizer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hemiauchenia (talk) 12:45, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Seabird for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. (t · c) buidhe 01:27, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the Pigeon Guillemot article has been scheduled as today's featured article for April 23, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 23, 2021, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:07, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

wild garlic

Thank you today for your share of a "delightful little seabird from the north Pacific"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Point Blue Conservation Science is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Point Blue Conservation Science until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 06:51, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

I have nominated Procellariidae for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 05:08, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:00, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux ^Talk 01:04, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is a Featured Article Save Award nomination at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/Procellariidae/archive1. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:35, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:31, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for Hooded pitohui, introduced (in 2017): "Another bird, this time from New Guinea, but this one is intriguing as it is the most poisonous bird in the world. Didn't know birds were poisonous? Neither did scientists really till they started looking at this one." --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:47, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 4 March 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/March 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 15:58, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hello, Sabine's Sunbird! i had a quick question regarding this article and the associated blurb. is "kleptotoxicism" a word used in the relevant literature? it appears to have been added to the article by an ip user, here, without a reliable source. the word appears on this site as well, though it cites wikipedia as a source. dying (talk) 14:04, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just happened to see this and removed the claim per WP:OR, it does appear to be an original invention on Wikipedia. Shyamal (talk) 09:59, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know some folks stop editing but continue to check their talk page ... hope that includes you. I've got this article listed as the April 24 TFA. No need to do anything if that works for you. Let me know if there's anything I can do. - Dank (push to talk) 02:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now April 30. - Dank (push to talk) 16:03, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

story · music · places

Thank you today for the 2017 article, introduced: "Another WP:BIRD nomination and another esoteric small rail (we do so love them on the project). Hopefully you'll enjoy the story of its discovery, and the variety of images we're grateful people have released on Wikipedia friendly licences or such a hard to see species."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]