This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

This user reverts vandalism in the blink of an eye with Twinkle!

		The Original Barnstar
		In grateful recognition of your fine work on Wikipedia's law articles, I award you this barnstar. Thank you for making wikipedia a better source of knowledge for people curious about law-related topics. Non Curat Lex (talk) 20:34, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For fixing my oversight in my own talk post, and for keeping an eagle eye on the constitutional amendment articles (even when we don't agree), I award you this barnstar. hamiltonstone (talk) 00:20, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For SMP0328 in recognition of years-long dedication to making Wikipedia's constitutional law articles more compliant with Wikipedia policy, and more perfect too. Thanks. Anythingyouwant (talk) 22:19, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Half Barnstar
	I can't tell you how much I appreciate you having looked over my shoulder while editing the Neurotically Yours page. Thank you! Poodle of Doom (talk) 03:28, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Thanks SMP0328. for helping to promote Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give some a pat on the back today. --Sp33dyphil © • © 05:51, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

constitution
Thank you for quality articles on law and the US constitution, such as Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, for fighting vandalism and patient talk about amendments, for thanking and missing, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:20, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. SMP0328. (talk) 22:28, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

I was glad to see your name in the 25A edit history. In times like these we must all find ways to contribute. Let me suggest that you and I focus on making sure certain relevant articles are as up-to-date, accurate, and informative as they can be. Along with 25A and Presidential Succession Act (or maybe better, United_States_presidential_line_of_succession) where else would you suggest we concentrate? EEng 05:36, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Between January 11, 2021 and January 11, 2021 I edited the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. The edits deal with a historical and legal analysis of the 2008 U.S. Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller by Pennsylvania attorney Anthony Picadio. The aforementioned analysis was included in the Heller article by me, but was multiple times reverted (Compare this edit and the ones which followed). Because of this reverts I'm unsure wether and where the historical and legal analysis of the 2008 U.S. Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller by Picadio should be included in the Second Amendment wikipedia article. Can you please 1.) review my edits and 2.) tell me wether and where the historical and legal analysis of the 2008 U.S. Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller by Pennsylvania attorney Anthony Picadio should be included in the Second Amendment wikipedia article. Thanks in advance. --P3Y229 (talk • contribs) 18:38, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You recently restored a detailed listing of degrees and concentrations at Western Michigan University Cooley Law School. The degree programs are already listed in the preceding paragraph; we don't need them listed twice. We also don't include detailed listings of courses and curricula, including listings of specific degree programs and concentrations. This is discussed in our advice for college and university articles and more generally in WP:NOT. Thanks! ElKevbo (talk) 01:52, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:09, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]