Hi SBKSPP! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as DWCH, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae (talk) 16:53, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good day, SBKSBPP! Thanks for your contributions on Philippine radio. Good to see you're now using the recent listing from NTC as one of your sources as of recent. I hope you can go back to your early articles & fix them just like what you're currently doing. And if ever, try to look for more sources. "Punch me, I'd bleed." -Peter Parker 16:12, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. I'll get back to some of them. SBKSPP (talk) 07:48, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your contributions on Philippine radio. Good to see you're improving a bit in your recent articles. SUPER ASTIG 01:36, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DZRV-FM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DZRV-FM (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 23:04, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SBKSPP

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, DWKB, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SBKSPP

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, DZLU, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:08, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SBKSPP

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, DWLU, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:08, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DZLU is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DZLU until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DWLU is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWLU until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:39, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, DWCH, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 03:16, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DXDD-FM, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:40, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on DZHH-AM requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DZHH. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hug^syrup 12:27, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on DYOP requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hug^syrup 09:58, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DXDD-FM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXDD-FM until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on DXAL requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hug^syrup 11:52, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on DYAA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hug^syrup 11:54, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DYAA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYAA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hug^syrup 13:47, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DXAL is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXAL until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hug^syrup 13:48, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DWCH, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

I dream of horses ^{(talk) (contribs)} _{Remember to {{ping}} me after replying off my talk page} 06:52, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SBKSPP

Thank you for creating DXIC-FM.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice start.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:18, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on DXJB requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ... discospinster _talk 01:43, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article DWEA has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and doesn't meet WP:NBROADCAST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:04, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good day, SBKSPP. Thank you for your contributions on Philippine radio. Unfortunately, I've seen a couple of flaws in your contributions, especially DXCT. DXCQ is the correct callsign per recent NTC listing. That's already taken care of. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 01:39, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Superastig: Thanks for correcting it. Unfortunately, I can't edit cause I'm blocked for being a "sockpuppet". Ever since I started editing, I'm never a sockpuppet of anyone. My edits have been done in my own right, in good faith. SBKSPP (talk) 08:45, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you've done good faith edits. Unfortunately, you getting blocked from editing is not my concern anymore. As much as I love cooperating with anyone, my neutral POV remains. It's only you who can defend yourself at this point. I hope you understand. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 12:57, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Superastig: alright. Looks like I'm on my own from hereon. If they still decline my unblock request, then screw it. SBKSPP (talk) 01:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article DYTA has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Meets neither WP:GNG or WP:BROADCAST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:32, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DXTM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXTM until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:38, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SBKSPP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm not a sockpuppet of any user. My contributions are done in good faith. Pls unblock me. SBKSPP (talk) 08:46, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

A simple denial is insufficient, as every sockpuppeteer denies doing so, since that is the whole point. If you are not a sockpuppet, you will need to give a plausible explanation as to why others might think that you are, if you are not. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:41, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DYQU is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYQU until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

SBKSPP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Whoever blocked me didn't mention whose sockpuppet I allegedly am of. I swear I am never a sockpuppet of anyone. All my edits are done in an organized way, they're not like the edits of Bertrand etc. Pls unblock me this time. SBKSPP (talk) 01:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Given the inability to confirm the correctness of the original block, and therefore the impossibility of SBKSPP to offer more than a simple denial (which has already been rejected), a sense of fairness obliges me to accept the unblock request. I also note that they were incorrectly named as a sock in a prior case, so clearly the possibility does exist. To SBKSPP - the list of deleted article notices above and behaviour to trigger socking concerns on at least 2 occasions clearly indicates that you might want to take a more cautious step. You have used AfC in the past to success, I suggest that it continues to be used for new article creation. Unblocks in these circumstances inherently lead to increased observation and reduced tolerance to mistakes, so please be careful. Nosebagbear (talk) 17:09, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Discospinster: Would you mind taking a look at this block, please. SQL^{Query me!} 16:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, when I block someone as a sockpuppet I normally say who the sockmaster is. This was over five months ago so I can't really remember the context, sorry! ... discospinster _talk 16:59, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SBKSPP, now that you're unblocked, I suggest you focus on improving articles, including some of the ones you created. And just like Nosebagbear said, be careful in creating a new article, if ever you'll create one in the future. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 05:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Thanks. SBKSPP (talk) 22:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good day, SBKSPP. Thank you for your recent contributions on Philippine radio. There was a discussion regarding the infobox which took place months ago. Whenever creating articles for certain radio stations, please indicate the "Licensing authority" and "Language" fields since you're using the recent listing from the NTC. Examples are indicated here. BTW, I already fixed your recent articles. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 01:36, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. I'll add those from here on. SBKSPP (talk) 00:52, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DXFK is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXFK until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:30, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DYTA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYTA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:02, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DZRI is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DZRI until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:09, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DWFJ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWFJ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:45, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DXFP is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXFP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:19, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DYTJ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYTJ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:22, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DZSB (Bansud) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DZSB (Bansud) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DWHQ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWHQ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DYIK is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYIK until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:52, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DYBK is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYBK until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:34, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DXLJ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXLJ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:51, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DXFU is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXFU until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:06, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DYWC-FM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYWC-FM until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:56, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar

I appreciate your contributions, especially when it comes to defending your articles in their AfDs. As much as I'm glad that some of your articles ended up being kept, I'm saddened with the results of your other articles, which ended up being deleted or redirected to their respective owners. It must've been crab mentality from the "delete" voters who disregard WP:NMEDIA. I guess we're among the few who acknowledge NMEDIA as a recommendation of WP:GNG. Anyway, keep up the good work. ASTIG😎 (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 10:36, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Superastig: Thanks for your comments. I'm very very disappointed with the outcome of a lot of my articles that they were deleted or redirected, even if you and Neutralhomer did everything to defend them. I would've been happier had they been closed as no consensus. Some of those admins are assholes for ditching NMEDIA or BCAST. And one of them even gets in the way with my articles, especially the ones that are well sourced. Thanks to them, I barely make an article nowadays. And whenever I can't find an article to improve on, I find myself participating in a lot of AfDs. But I can't stick to that forever. SBKSPP (talk) 01:00, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SBKSPP, I understand how you feel regarding the articles you created. I've experienced that before. That bookburner you mentioned loves to get in the way with radio station articles and insists at times that any of them doesn't pass NMEDIA or GNG, even if in fact it does. And this is unfair for us, but there's nothing we can do about it. On the other hand, I've done more than a lot in contributing to PH radio. Those are the reasons why I moved on to other aspects, like music and film.

The fate of NMEDIA remains unclear amid the talks of making it an SNG. I'd have been happy if it's acknowledged as an SNG. We've done our best to defend a lot of your articles from deletion, but it seems that we've run out of bullets. So, you have no choice, but to drop the stick and accept their consensus. You can come back to them once the time is right. For now, focus on improving articles if you can find one. I also appreciate your participation in several AfDs. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 12:36, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Superastig: Alright. I guess I have to lie low from creating articles and focus on improving articles, especially the ones I created. Again, thanks for defending a lot of my articles as much as you could. And thanks for your advice. SBKSPP (talk) 01:35, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ACEs (BGYO fandom). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 18#ACEs (BGYO fandom) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Howard the Duck (talk) 20:00, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am contacting everyone who participated who didn't know already that the AFD was restarted by someone unhappy that the administrator closed it as "no consensus". Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don't Leave (Simba Tagz song) (2nd nomination) Dream Focus 23:31, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect List of Home Along Da Riles guest stars and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 18#List of Home Along Da Riles guest stars until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 02:42, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've previously voted in the discussion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Bengali_songs_recorded_by_Shreya_Ghoshal. Similar article List of Bengali songs recorded by Runa Laila is considered for deletion. Would you please share your views here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Bengali_songs_recorded_by_Runa_Laila. Abbasulu (talk) 18:24, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect UP Halcyon and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 10#UP Halcyon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 05:35, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I evoked WP:HEY on Tulip Drive. Let me know what you think. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:46, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. I believe it now meets NALBUM. SBKSPP (talk) 07:00, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page Esteban Abada High School has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. UtherSRG (talk) 10:50, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for reverting your edit in the mentioned deletion discussion. I pressed something by accident while looking for the deletion discussion of one of my articles. Your version is already restored. ASTIG😎🙃 07:21, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok. Not a problem for me at all. SBKSPP (talk) 03:40, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DYAW is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYAW until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MarioGom (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DXFD-FM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXFD-FM until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MarioGom (talk) 16:37, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]