Hello! I was hoping to help complement English pages about Mexican political institutions and politicians with information available in the Spanish version of the same pages. I'm struggling a little bit to figure out how to properly give credit to the work of the editors in the Spanish versions of the page. I'd appreciate any guidance I could get on this matter and thanks in advance! --TrayectosEnElMundo (talk) 01:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• @TrayectosEnElMundo: - at the top of the page there is an auto-cite option, if the references are from a website, you can plug that in. If not, the rules for citation are at WP:FOOTNOTES and WP:CI to my knowledge. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 15:29, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you so much for taking the time to reply! I'll be sure to give these a read! TrayectosEnElMundo (talk) 01:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your edit to Summer Phoenix after I replied to your message on the article's talk page. Unfortunately, I had to revert your addition of a date of birth because IMDb is not a reliable source. Please see WP:IMDB for comments on that topic. You might want to look at WP:USERGENERATED to see names of some other sources that are similarly unreliable.

Also, when you add a source to an article, you need to do so in the form of a citation, rather than using an embedded external link. Wikipedia:Citing sources gives guidelines as to how to create citations for various kinds of sources. If you use the source editor, four templates for different types of citations are available via a drop-down menu to make creating citations easier. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:18, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sir. I want to ask how to create a page for the startup Primebook. They are the one who manufactures the cheapest laptop in India based on android. Please help me in that --Sidharthpandit555 (talk) 06:33, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sidharthpanndit555: this might help. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 11:13, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My feedback says that my draft doesn't include the minimum standard for inline citations but I'm not really sure what that means --Anansol0 (talk) 16:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Anansol0:. You need to have better references and it needs to meet notability standards. Check this out Wikipedia:Verifiability. Also this - Wikipedia:Notability (people) Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 00:02, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jon Kiper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Kiper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 14:52, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Recently I have added an article on DailyRoutine Hub platform. I want to know when will it publish. Thanks --Shahmeer1 (talk) 18:52, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My friend, hope you have been well. Could you take a peek at this if you have time? Cheers!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_talk:Amann%E2%80%99s_Index_of_Hygrothermy --Ittybittykittycommittee (talk) 14:55, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ittybittykittycommittee: Just to confirm, you want Hygrothermy to redirect into Amann’s Index of Hygrothermy? Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 05:20, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's correct. Ittybittykittycommittee (talk) 11:51, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ittybittykittycommittee: Gotcha. Put Hygrothermy into the search, there should be a red link, click on that and make the redirect there. Instructions on how to make a redirect are at Wikipedia:Redirect Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 13:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You were assigned as my mentor about 2 years ago and I would like to ask you what would be the best course of action in this scenario. I would like to nominate the Mewing (facial restructuring technique) article for deletion. From what I understand it does not meet the standards of notability. The article was only created last month and clearly only exists because it is a current meme. I just want to know how exactly I should go forward and what type of deletion would be best for it. Polargrizbear (talk) 04:21, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Polargrizbear: The deletion process is discussed here, this would probably go to AFD if you would like to nominate it for deletion. There's more info on the deletion process here. Let me know if you have any other questions. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 00:38, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I previously messaged you to ask about possible ways to delete the mewing article. I have failed to do this. Since then I have discovered that the creator of this article also has created several articles related to so called 'brain rot' terms. Some of their other contributions include Gyat and Rizz. It appears they are also drafting other pieces of brain rot articles for the future. This person is almost definitely a troll/griefer. I would just like to know what I can do to bring this to the attention of a moderator or someone else that has the power to stop this. Polargrizbear (talk) 15:07, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Polargrizbear: I think the best place to start would be WP:AN, the administrators might be able to provide details on how to proceed. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 17:09, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that users who haven't made any edits aren't supposed to be welcomed. I understand, because I have done it in the past too. (Please let me know if you think I made a mistake) thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 02:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheTechie: Hi. If someone is new, then I am going to welcome them regardless of edit count. Thanks! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 10:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See here: Wikipedia:Welcoming_committee#Discuss_plans: It is widely accepted (but not required!) that users with no edits should not be welcomed to save on server resources and also because most templates start with "Thank you for your Contributions" (or similar). Furthermore, until edits are made, it's impossible to determine if the user has bad intentions, and created the account purposely to vandalize Wikipedia. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 15:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheTechie: Thanks! But like I said, I will continue to assume good faith per established project guidelines. I'm sure if server resources become an issue, then the talk pages and contributions of the blocked users can be deleted once it is determined that they are not here to edit the encyclopedia and they cannot be reformed from their behavior. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 16:23, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, looks like Jon Kiper's page was deleted. I guess he's not a notable person under Wikipedia's guidelines. Then again, I would expect you to know that if you weren't so busy engaging in personal attacks against the opinions of others. Although I suppose if your argument was stronger, you wouldn't have had to resort to your tone. Given your incivil tone, I honestly think that your opposition to my nomination had some kind of ulterior purpose. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 06:48, 9 July 2024 (UTC) @BottleofChocolateMilk: Your comments reflect your own behavior perfectly. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 11:59, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]