Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, RowanJ LP! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! - GA Melbourne (talk) 05:11, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for this welcome! I do have one question though, are the cookies Kosher? RowanJ LP (talk) 17:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't assume so. - GA Melbourne (talk) 22:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well that stinks, I can't really eat them then. But thanks for the cookies still! RowanJ LP (talk) 22:36, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought I'd piggyback on this welcome to you and a thanks for your contributions. I'm impressed by your acknowledgement of previous contributions that were potentially controversial and your openness about it along with stating future intentions. More people should take after this behavior of trying best at being open and transparent with the past and future. Shalom Aleicham my (assuming based on the cookie comment which made me lol) brother from another side.

Happy editing! Ramahamalincoln (talk) 06:21, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just try to do what's best for the community and suck up whatever mistakes I've did/done, may HaShem bless you, and Shalom Aleicham brother! RowanJ LP (talk) 21:12, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm cool

A tag has been placed on Jewish Protection of Tel Aviv requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WhoAteMyButter (📨_talk│📝^contribs) 02:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Jewish Protection of Tel Aviv, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:57, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RowanJ LP. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:16, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jewish Protection of Tel Aviv requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WhoAteMyButter (📨_talk│📝^contribs) 19:19, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! RowanJ LP, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 04:33, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RowanJ LP! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, This isn't an editing question but.., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add some coverage of the company itself.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DreamSky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:DreamSky, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:DreamSky clock company.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nomon Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Westerly wind belt may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the . or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tol (talk | contribs) @ 02:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Diagram of the trade winds.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Ruben Sim On A Skateboard.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.rubensim.com/product/hash-tee. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:51, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Biographies of living person require that negative material be sourced with high quality reliable sources. Please familiarize yourself with the policy and do not restore material that has been removed unless it supported with reliable sourcing and in line with other applicable policies. Whpq (talk) 18:21, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And by "reliable sources" we do not mean private YouTube videos or podcasts. Primefac (talk) 19:06, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Saleh Al-Qaraawi's Press Photo.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 03:39, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Socialist Movement (United States), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DW. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RowanJ LP, is RowanJ LP2 (talk · contribs) actually your account or an impostor? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:00, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a temporary alt, I lost the password to the account and I don't have access to the email that I put for OG RowanJ. RowanJ LP2 (talk) 20:10, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can confirm, he is my alt. RowanJ LP (talk) 21:37, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RowanJ LP. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:DreamSky, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:26, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RowanJ LP. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Westerly wind belt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:45, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chemical Structure Depiction of Octatriacontylic acid.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Leyo 16:02, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RowanJ LP. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Westerly wind belt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:01, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the Hassan al-Basri Brigades.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:30, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RowanJ LP. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jewish Protection of Tel Aviv, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Shield of Islam Brigade, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:22, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RowanJ LP. Please, be careful with the link you wrote here, because it is illegal and it mustn't be published in Wikipedia. Greetings. Tajotep (talk) 20:54, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, thank you for telling me that! RowanJ LP (talk) 21:03, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the article of AlHayat Media Center we had the same problem, someone (a Wikipedia user which is globally blocked for this reason) put the previous active link of I'lam Foundation (as you can see, the edits between June and October are hidden). Don't worry :) Tajotep (talk) 21:22, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How is it "illegal"? Can you cite a source for this? Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 23:42, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not illegal, I'm guessing he meant it as it violates Wikipedia guidelines. RowanJ LP (talk) 20:50, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Would you kindly show me where it says that an image becomes public domain if its subject is deceased, as per your justification for File:Image of Ronnie McNutt.jpg. -- Pokelova (talk) 03:16, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here: Personality rights#United States. RowanJ LP (talk) 04:12, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that says what you think it says, but I'll leave that up to someone else to decide. --Pokelova (talk) 05:07, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I'lam foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'lam foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:04, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rowan, I have removed the Good Article nomination tag on Damar Hamlin without a review. This is for two reasons.

We generally look for nominators to be substantial contributors to the article in question. Per WP:GAI, Anyone may nominate an article to be reviewed for GA, although it is preferable that nominators have contributed significantly to the article and are familiar with its subject and its cited sources. Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article must consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination.

It is also abundantly clear that, with the subject in critical condition in a hospital, there is no possible way that it could be determined to be stable. Stability is a GA criterion: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. The page is changing significantly. The article was created in April 2021 and has 616 edits, of which 570 (92.5%) have been within the last week. I'd advise to wait three or six months after Hamlin is released from the hospital to reconsider whether the volume of news items and resultant article edits necessary has gone down. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 03:17, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you very much for telling me! RowanJ LP (talk) 03:57, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RowanJ LP. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jewish Protection of Tel Aviv".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:22, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RowanJ LP,

Thank you for creating Niko Defence League.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please find relevant categories for this article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|BoyTheKingCanDance}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

George Custer's Sabre (talk) 03:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RowanJ LP, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username BoyTheKingCanDance, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Niko Defence League, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niko Defence League (2nd nomination).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|BoyTheKingCanDance}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

George Custer's Sabre (talk) 03:34, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:My Ummah Dawn is Looming, the anthem of the Islamic State of Iraq and Levant.mp3, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 21:15, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Niko Omilana instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:RowanJ LP/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 00:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Niko Omilana's voice.mp3. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 07:45, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Niko Omilana's voice.mp3. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 00:12, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RowanJ LP. Thank you for your work on Wang Dong (hacker). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello! Thanks for writing this article. I encourage and hope you will write more! Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:969 Movement Flag.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:37, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain to me why your user page now contains what you refer to as "mildly offensive userboxes" here? The first userbox declares "This user is against Trans rights" and the second userbox supports the JDL and the Kach Party, both designated terrorist groups in the United States. These userboxes are below. Nythar (💬-❄️) 02:31, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, I'm so sorry for the guideline violations, I didn't mean to violate anything, and secondly, I don't think Kach and the Jewish Defense League are considered terrorist organizations in the United States anymore, but besides that, I won't re-add them or add anything like the userboxes below on my userpage, thank you for understanding and have a good day. RowanJ LP2 (talk) 18:50, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And the trans rights box? Weird how you specifically addressed the other one but not that one, even though that's far worse. --Golbez (talk) 19:12, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RowanJ LP2, "I didn't mean to violate anything" and "I don't think Kach and the Jewish Defense League are considered terrorist organizations ... anymore" seem to be a hurried apology in order to avoid a block. This doesn't indicate that you've changed your way of thinking and it's difficult to tell if you actually won't be creating such userboxes in the future. — Nythar (💬-❄️) 19:12, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have a right to my own opinions, but I will not create userboxes relating to any hateful ideology or organization on Wikipedia again. RowanJ LP (talk) 21:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user is against Trans rights This user is a supporter of the JDL and Kach party

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.— Nythar (💬-❄️) 15:11, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 18:51, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently been editing gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;

follow editorial and behavioural best practice;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Lemonaka (talk) 07:45, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Good Russians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Russians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:58, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Logo of an Al-Hayat Media Center Nasheed.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 25stargeneral (talk) 03:13, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You recently submitted the article Windows 10 Mobile for good article nomination. However, you have only made a single edit to this article and are therefore not a significant contributor. Good article nominations may only be started by significant contributors or editors who have received approval from a significant contributor to start a nomination. Given that you are neither, I have removed your listing. If you would like to renominate this article, please reach out to the relevant contributors and seek their approval first before beginning that process again. Best, Horserice (talk) 01:26, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Image of Ronnie McNutt.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Salavat (talk) 14:11, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Chichan has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 5 § Chichan until a consensus is reached. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:55, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rowan,

I tried to follow several of the references you added to the Tetranitratoxycarbon article. None of them seemed to mention that chemical, or even support the general ideas where you added them. Spot-checking several other science articles where you added references, I found every ref you added was similarly problematic (Levomethamphetamine, 4-PrO-DMT, Holmium phosphide, Tetrahydrocannabivarin). Could you explain this situation please? DMacks (talk) 06:55, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DMacks, did you get a response to this somewhere else? The same issue has just been raised by @ViridianPenguin at Talk:Mating of yeast/GA2. -- asilvering (talk) 02:25, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Went through RowanJ LP's five most recent edits to scientific articles and found multiple issues:

• At Neodymium(III) hydroxide, a footnote was added in Aug 2024 to support a statement on the reaction between neodymium(III) hydroxide and acid, but the cited Levitskaia et al. (2011) paper never remotely discusses that reaction. (Since deleted by me)
• At Modified starch, a footnote was added in June 2024 to support the statement "Pre-gelatinized starch is used to thicken instant desserts, allowing the food to thicken with the addition of cold water or milk." However, the Ma et al. (2022) paper actually says the opposite: "The water absorption capacity and swelling power of native starch without gelatinization are relatively low; therefore, it is difficult to produce some [...] low-temperature processed foods (e.g., instant puddings, cold desserts, baby food) due to its low water absorption capacity and swelling power" (Since replaced with a "citation needed" tag by me)
• At Gene expression, across seven edits in June 2024, 76 citations were added. Spot-checking citations did not return any issues, so nice job supporting a WP:Vital Article!😊
• At Periodontal abscess, 17 footnotes were added in May 2024. I found two issues, both of which I have since resolved:

1. You added a footnote to the statement "A gingival retraction cord which is accidentally left in situ is an occasional cause of a periodontal abscess," citing Vittorio Andreucci's 1989 book "Vascular and Peritoneal Access for Dialysis." This book never discusses gingival retraction cords, leading me to believe you misunderstood a book on the peritoneum (membrane lining the abdominal cavity) as a book on the periodontium (tissue supporting teeth).
2. You added a footnote to the statement "Systemic immune factors such as diabetes can predispose a person to the formation of periodontal abscesses," citing Li et al. (2000). However, this paper considers the opposite relationship, given its title "Systemic Diseases Caused by Oral Infection."

• At Phenelzine, six footnotes were added May 2024. Source 38 is Matveychuk et al. (2022), which only supports that claim that phenylethylidenehydrazine is a metabolite of phenelzine but does not support the latter claim that phenethylamine is also a metabolite. However, you took that claim from having no support to partial support, so no blame. Otherwise, your contribution here looks good!

@RowanJ LP, to clarify, such edits are disruptive. Whereas the lack of a citation or "citation needed" tag makes it clear where editors need to find relevant articles, putting unrelated footnotes makes potentially untrue claims appear supported by the scientific community. ViridianPenguin 🐧 ( 💬 ) 14:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I explained to DMacks in this quote: "Let me explain why I made those edits, I don't do any chemistry articles anymore since I'm not trained in that area, and secondly, I use to copy sentences and paste them into Google looking for a NIH article to use for a citation, you may undo these edits, and I'm sorry for the false citations and hopefully you understand I've stopped doing that." I started doing those types of articles again but instead of just copying and pasting I did legitimate proof reading but to do my lack of knowledge I probably mistook some information as something else. RowanJ LP (talk) 21:50, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, apologies if I came across as overly negative today! Going through your editing history, it is clear that you made significant improvements to our vital gene expression article. What I want to convey is that when trying to add sources, keep in mind that any uncited claim is potentially wrong. In the modified starch case, you could have instead used the Ma et al. (2022) paper to delete the existing statement and claim the opposite. ViridianPenguin 🐧 ( 💬 ) 00:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to him on my alt account User:RowanJ LP2 due to me have lack of access to this one currently. RowanJ LP (talk) 21:44, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shield of Islam Brigade, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Clearfrienda ^💬 19:06, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hey! i just wanted to say hello and thank you for making all the contributions for the hacker articles. they are very professional! HeraTheGoddess (talk) 01:05, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Khan Yunis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al Jazeera.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey rowan,I realized an error in the wiki article for johnny somali and I was wondering how it came to be and why you claim he is somali when there is lots of evidence pointing him to be ethiopian and only donning the somali name to put down their reputation EagleHead871 (talk) 07:56, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, most reliable sources say he is Somali and the only other sources that say he isn't is a forum post and some YouTube videos which don't meet the criteria of reliable sources, but I already have a note near where it says he is Somali-American that states: "Some dispute that he is from Somalia and say that he is from Ethiopia".

But all in all, every citation on the page that mentions his origins state that he is Somali. RowanJ LP (talk) 12:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello rowan as you know Somali is a ethnicity and as a Somali myself I can attest to it that the Somalis in Somali region of Ethiopia don't identify as Ethiopian and it is very clear that him being "Somali" contradicts itself when it states that his mother is of Oromo descent (not Somali completely different ethnicity) and his father of Habesha descent (again not Somali a completely different ethnicity) and the key thing is that these 2 ethnicities he hails from identify as Ethiopian and these 2 ethnicities are completely separate from the Somali Ethnicity so it would be wrong to call him Somali when he doesn't even come from the ethnicity first of all and then to further contradict yourself by stating he comes from a "Somali family" when that infact is also wrong since his family don't identify as Somali (and they can't because they are from completely different ethnicities which consider themselves Ethiopian) and also there is many evidence such as his former username being habesha central or many videos circulating on the internet where he claims to be half Oromo and half Yemeni as well as another video where he states that he identifies as Somali to solely tarnish the name but all of that aside it doesn't make sense or add up to how he is Somali when your own edits contradict itself stating he is of different ethnic descents which aren't Somali but then labelling him as Somali, Please fix this issue and do research on the diverse ethnic groups of the horn of Africa and don't spread misinformation. EagleHead871 (talk) 04:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do have citation to back this up? Because without citation I can't put anything down and all my citations state that his is Somali. RowanJ LP (talk) 04:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But the literal writing contradicts itself and you lack citations that concretely prove he is somali since you claim that he is habesha and oromo effectively making him ethiopian and not somali and another proof is his name "ramsey" that is not a somali name and is more common as a ethiopian/western name not a somali one. EagleHead871 (talk) 06:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then, I wasn't the one who put down the Oromo or Habesha descent, and the citations do say he is Somali, I'll check the BBC News citations and see if it says anything about his heritage and if he's Somali or not. RowanJ LP (talk) 11:39, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From what I read on the articles, his father is Somali and his mother is Oromo, so please stop saying he is from Ethiopia. RowanJ LP (talk) 11:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RowanJ LP HIS MOTHER IS SOMALI AND HIS DAD IS OROMO/YEMENI [1]https://x.com/injeracel/status/1665467608613937153?s=46&t=weRAVmCrg5RzCo1rjFO7YQ] 2605:B100:704:BD6:15F7:3062:1619:CE7A (talk) 02:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Twitter (now known as X) isn't a reliable source for information especially regarding biographies, so your statement of his ethnicity is null and void. RowanJ LP (talk) 02:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok then put it as Ethiopian then because he would be that since we identify from our paternal lineage and not from the maternal and once again your own sources and the stuff you wrote contradicts itself. EagleHead871 (talk) 02:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Or if you want to just settle this just put him as african american and then state in the text his lineage put just dont smack the somali label on him when he is clearly ethiopian and he would identify as ethiopian since its paternal lineage that horn of africans identify from since in somali society if your father is not somali then you arent somali because what makes you somali is having a clan lineage and only a somali father can pass down that clan lineage. EagleHead871 (talk) 02:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I said before, the BBC News article says his father is Somali, so by your logic he is Somali RowanJ LP (talk) 02:43, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Send the link. and you literally have VIDEO proof of him stating his background but you are covering it up by saying it is twitter you and I both know very well that the video you showed is concrete evidence so why are you denying it? you have no reason to? and thats the only source you have? and many other sources highlight his background and it revolves around that video you just showed further cementing their claims? Look I am not being biased but the wiki article is spreading misinformation and is not accurate. EagleHead871 (talk) 02:49, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh also his name is Ramsey Khaild Ismael stop trying to switch it around to contradict you trying to claim he is somali and also whenever I ask for source where is it? EagleHead871 (talk) 02:51, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the linkand it is stated that his name is Ismael Ramsey Khalid like all the other sources say. RowanJ LP (talk) 03:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok good we got the name right and also the page literally states it was published by twitter which last time you said "was not credible sources" and If we are going to play like that, here is more evidence debunking this one article that you showed

https://twitter.com/_MrInsanity_/status/1680556719066296322

https://twitter.com/_MrInsanity_/status/1680557445960159233

His former account, https://twitter.com/HabeshaCapital

https://twitter.com/k7bb7/status/1689168197126111232 thats him liking ethiopian videos on his former account

https://www.tiktok.com/@ifr33x/video/7241842310705696006 the same video you showed is also circulating on tiktok and its clearly johnny somali with his kick label and all but I will presume you will say "its not credible evidence" even though its a video which is concrete proof. EagleHead871 (talk) 03:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't understand do you? If a Twitter link is published through a credible news source, then it's okay, but if it's just a Twitter link by itself, it isn't, and until there's an actual news agency that says this, I will then change it. RowanJ LP (talk) 03:32, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You dont even have any other links to back up this false claim? and this time I literally provided video evidence which you refuse to admit? the video itself is credible evidence and is accurate? EagleHead871 (talk) 03:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh btw your news article is not credible evidence since it was written by twitter which again contradicts your claims of twitter not being a credible source. EagleHead871 (talk) 03:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Majid Dastjani Farahani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majid Dastjani Farahani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AusLondonder (talk) 17:14, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Johnny Somali, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Somali.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Jimmybingus (talk) 16:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Johnny Somali. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Aoidh (talk) 17:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

RowanJ LP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand that I violated the three revert rule and I admit to it, the only reason I am appealing my block is because I thought that through reverting edits that I thought were poorly sourced was allowed and I wasn't fully aware of the rule, I did try before my block to consult with whomever I had the conflict with and resolve it peacefully. I apologize for the actions I have committed and from now on I will attempt to converse and talk my concerns instead of causing an edit war. RowanJ LP (talk) 17:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Looking at it closer I do think this falls under WP:3RRNO #7. Aoidh (talk) 17:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, I think I looked at the wrong diffs and got mixed up on who made which reverts. - Aoidh (talk) 17:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine, but I still will keep in mind to attempt to resolve the issues more peacefully. RowanJ LP (talk) 17:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RowanJ LP. Thank you for your work on Zürich stabbing attack. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2022 Russian Aerospace Forces Antonov An-26 crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Russian Aerospace Forces Antonov An-26 crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aviationwikiflight (talk) 07:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RowanJ LP. Thank you for your work on Genesee Building/Hyatt Regency Hotel. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Statin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Statin you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Statin for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mating of yeast you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Wolverine XI -- Wolverine XI (talk) 08:24, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Johnny Somali.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 05:16, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article University of Texas at Austin stabbing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Texas at Austin stabbing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 23:19, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mating of yeast you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mating of yeast for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Wolverine XI -- Wolverine XI (talk) 13:01, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Leicester Square stabbing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A mentally disturbed man stabs but luckily doesn't kill someone. How is this supposed to meet WP:NOTNEWS?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 14:37, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cover art of the song 3HunnaK.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I need help with making a Wikipedia page for a producer named Heavy L Beatz. Please reach out to me. When you get the chance. He is a producer from United States, who has worked with a couple of Nigerian & American musicians. Coolkid3318 (talk) 01:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Coolkid3318 also made the same request of me - you can see my response at User_talk:Gronk_Oz#Heavy_L_Beatz. --Gronk Oz (talk) 11:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Zürich stabbing attack has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is an example of WP:NOTNEWS WP:LASTING WP:SUSTAINED etc. Only one casualty was reported and none of them resulted in death.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JuniperChill (talk) 13:27, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

==  Proposed deletion of Wuppertal stabbing ==

The article Wuppertal stabbing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

this article doesn't appear to meet the notability criteria for such events

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.Deb (talk) 12:02, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mating of yeast you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BluePenguin18 -- BluePenguin18 (talk) 04:21, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mating of yeast you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ViridianPenguin -- ViridianPenguin (talk) 10:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, ive nominated the 2023 Nicosia Israeli embassy bombing article for deletion for a few reasons:

1) No motives were ever given to the public by either police, judicial system or even an organisation claimning any sort of attack

2) The Israeli embassy wasnt even hit, there were no casualties (Deaths/injuries) and there was maybe some property damage to a building nearby thus not making it in any way notable either

3) Generally there is a lack of sources that actually state the Israeli embassy was the target, just that it happened near the embassy but thats not enough to make the assertion without it being original research, remember, Cyprus has always had an issue with fireworks and pyrotechnics ranging from football to other crimes, thus it doesnt necessarily mean this case was any different.

Feel free to take part in the deletion discussion but I just laid a couple points out for you. ShovelandSpade (talk) 17:59, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Nicosia Israeli embassy bombing, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Nicosia Israeli embassy bombing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lil JoJo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil JoJo (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Darrion N. Brown 🙂 (my talk page / my sandbox) 08:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Syrian Civil War and ISIL. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:54, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]