Hello, Rosuav, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.

It is always wise to read the talk page of an existing article before making major changes on it, to see if your idea has already been discussed. Even then, it is often helpful to suggest a major change before making it, to see if anyone objects or wants to discuss it. Do not delete materials on other people's talk pages or on the talk pages of articles.

When you contribute to a talk page, please sign your name using four tildes: ~ ~ ~ ~ but without the spaces.

Again, welcome! -- Ssilvers 15:49, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for joining the G&S project. See the to do lists at WP:G&S, if you'd like to help out! Best regards, -- Ssilvers 05:23, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chris. Take a look at Trial by Jury if you can, and let me know if you have any comments. We are getting ready to submit the article to FA review. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:49, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping out! We hope to be working on more of the G&S opera articles soon. Best regards! -- Ssilvers (talk) 12:30, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please vote or comment on the FA nomination of Trial by Jury here: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Trial by Jury. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do almost anything for my otters (with the possible exception of eating raw clams along with them). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!)} 18:47, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article HTMLayout, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TN‑X-Man 15:43, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, thanks for contributing. The main issue with this article appears to be lack of reliable sources that show why the software is notable. The fact that the software exists isn't reason enough for their to be an article about it. You may want to look at this guide for some tips. If you have any questions, feel free to let me know. Cheers! TN‑X-Man 16:23, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You remember diskettes? Hey, I still use them. I've got a highly efficient computer that runs from a single 720K diskette. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 03:18, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're right about the old diskettes. I have a bunch of them but I can't recall the last time I actually used one, as the USB memory sticks have a slight edge on storage capacity. Let's see, a 4 GB chip would be the equivalent of something approaching 3,000 of the standard 1.44 MB disks. And a tad faster also. But apparently diskettes are still available. I just wonder what kind of machine someone is running where those are actually useful. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 03:31, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think of old floppies as useless. Think of them as donations to the landfill. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 03:38, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on HTMLayout, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. CalendarWatcher (talk) 13:26, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Moore's Inverse Square Law of IT Satisfaction (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 15:34, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I'm writing to let you know that Wikimedia Australia is now accepting members. Membership is $40/year or $20/year concession. There is no joining fee, only the yearly fee. To read a description of the process, go here: <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Australia/Membership>

The membership form is here: <http://membership.wikimedia.org.au/memberdb/index.php?page=signup> After completing the form and after the committee approves your application, you will receive an email with instructions on how to pay membership fees.

I am writing to you because you have listed yourself at <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Australia> as someone interested in the Wikimedia Australia chapter. If you are not longer interested in WMAU I recommend removing yourself from this page.

If you have any questions or encounter any difficulties in this process please contact me. blaugher@wikimedia.org.au or just reply to this email.

thanks,

Brianna (pfctdayelise (talk) 12:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC))[reply]

interim WMAU secretary

Hello, Rosuav. I noticed today that you made an edit to Threshold (online game). Unfortunately, as the content you restored to that article violates various policies, content guidelines and style guidelines, I have reverted to the previous version. The relevant pages are these:

• Notability; content about Threshold's landmasses and detailed information about character classes and religions does not meet muster for this guideline.
• Verifiability; content such as the number of players on at peak times during the 2000s does not pass this policy.
• What Wikipedia is not, particularly WP:SOAP; stating that "few games have sparked as much passion as Threshold" blatantly violates the latter policy.
• Guidelines for Video Games articles; in order to become anything more than a start-class article on this WikiProject's scale, we pretty much must follow at least the basics in this guideline. It mentions many of the above, especially that excessive information about gameplay is not relevant.
• Wikipedia Manual of Style; especially about sections, but in general there are problems.

I would also like to let you know that the content was contributed by an editor who is known to have a conflict of interest (see here for the report which was archived about 1h10m before you made your edits). —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 12:43, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rosuav. Since there have been disputes about this article, and it's been posted at WP:COIN, it would be helpful if you would try to get consensus for your changes on the article's Talk page. If the thing doesn't settle down soon, it may get fully protected. EdJohnston (talk) 14:07, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I'd like to apologize if I came off confrontational or aggressive above; these articles have been a tad frustrating because of the COI matter. I'd absolutely like to discuss the article at Talk:Threshold (online game). I'm writing a better summary of what I'm thinking about with the article at that talk page; I hope you'll participate and help to resolve the problem! —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 22:57, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rosuav. You're a good faith editor, but unless you add specific comments on the article Talk page, you risk being pegged as just another edit-warrior. EdJohnston (talk) 18:25, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair play, I thought I'd seen it all on wikipedia but your move this morning was pretty nifty. Did he write the review first (what about twenty minutes ago?) and then email you or did you email him and ask him to write it? I laughed my balls off when I checked out the review - a masterful move (although strictly speaking I shouldn't approve of such - if you excuse the pun - gameplaying). --Cameron Scott (talk) 08:59, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Or maybe he found it while searching for additional sources on Threshold? I hear there is a lot of that thats been going on lately. --Theblog (talk) 09:14, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unsure whether he's still reading WP as he's blocked, but as you are a member of the forum could you pass onto him a note that despite the disruption and sock-puppetry, I am prepared to unblock him after the AFD has ended (whatever the result) as long as this does not result in further promotional editing of Threshold and related items. If he posts an unblock request at that time quoting my username, someone will no doubt alert me. Thanks. Black Kite 19:24, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Threshold rpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Threshold rpg is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Threshold rpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 15:10, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I remember that you helped with our last FA project, Trial by Jury. I have now nominated Pinafore at FAC: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/H.M.S. Pinafore/archive1 If you have a chance, would you kindly take a look? All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:15, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm about ready to submit Rupert D'Oyly Carte for GA review. Please let me know if you have any comments/corrections on the article. Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:02, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing the broken link. Unfortunately, the Archive re-named many of its pages about a year ago, and now there are dozens, if not hundreds of broken links, especially to the Gilbert plays and Sullivan works. If you have any time, it would be wonderful if you could check out links to the Archive in some of these Gilbert play articles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibliography_of_W.S._Gilbert All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:36, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rosuav. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Hello, Rosuav. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article HTMLayout has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Looks like a minor project that was never all that relevant.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pmffl (talk) 20:29, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HTMLayout is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HTMLayout until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pmffl (talk) 00:35, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]