Thanks for uploading Image:Iraq-us-soldier.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot 18:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading Image:N500270321 5374 3437.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:18, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading Image:N500270321 1793227 622.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:46, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that Bas van Leeuwen has reverted your addition of this section and that you have since reverted it back. I notice you're new to Wikipedia so I thought I'd drop by and give you some friendly advice. Like I said I personally have no issue with that section, but other editors here will. Make sure to take a look at Wikipedia's 3 revert rule. Basically what it says is that you really can't revert the same thing more than 3 times. Trust me when I tell you this, most admins will block you for 24 hours for violation of this rule without even blinking an eye. So make sure you keep an eye on how many times you revert this, as I'm willing to bet the minute Bas van Leeuwen see's you've reverted it back he'll just go and remove it again. The reason for the 3 revert rule is to prevent edit warring. If you find that you're unable to resolve your differences with the other editors on this subject I would also suggest setting up a request for comments on the issue. If you're unsure of how to set one up just let me know. I'd be more than happy to help you put it together and get it running. Cheers! Elhector (talk) 21:01, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear RMouser,

I take it from the photograph that you have served time in Iraq, nothing but respect.

Regarding the article, I have already expressed my opinion regarding the relevance of your addition to an encyclopedia entry. Just as it is relevant to include the opinion of the international and Iraqi public, it is interesting to give information regarding the stance of U.S. soldiers. However I do not see your addition as encyclopedia material. The people you quote are not authorities, and the selection is not justifiably representative. And even if it was, it would be your personal research. There are a large number of places to publish your research, perhaps you can start a web log.

In summary, unless you have a reliable source claiming that certain opinions are representative of a substantial number of soldiers, I would think the addition to the opinion section unsuitable.

kind regards,

Bas van Leeuwen —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bas van Leeuwen (talk • contribs) 21:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading Image:N500270321 1793227 622.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 03:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edit to Iraq War. You have added the section to the article numerous times, against the wishes of myself and several other editors. Please discuss the section here before adding it again. Thanks.--Rise Above The Vile 04:17, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To expand on the message above - continuing to add content which a consensus of editors agree is inappropriate or in violation of Wikipedia policy, without discussing it on the article talk page at all, is what we call a sterile edit war. If you were doing this more often you would have been blocked for a short time already for having done it so many times.

Please do not re-add this text to the article again prior to successfully concluding a discussion and getting consensus on Talk:Iraq War. If you can get the other editors who are involved to agree on phrasing and content then feel free to put that consensus wording in.

Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 04:21, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but your photograph is not notable enough, and you're not allowed to put captions like that in either. Look at the other photos in the article - they don't have credits in the caption, and your photos is not significantly more notable than any other photo by any of the other hundreds of thousands of soldiers who have served over there. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 03:00, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:01, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:N500270321 1793227 622.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:43, 3 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:43, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]