Hi, while I was digging Ambeinghari for finding any possible evidences connecting to Ilmulnafia's, I came across this SPI case of three years back. It is surprisingly closed without blocking, given that the evidences were strong and Hammersoft too was urging to block saying there was additional technical evidences too. But, even without any additional evidences, it was very conclusive with those variety of evidences provided. I suggest you should re-review that case, because it's a clear case of block evasion. Additionally, I found two more sock accounts and some off-wiki evidences too, which I shall email you. Continental Rift (talk) 08:49, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors June 2019 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the June newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since March 2019. You can unsubscribe from our mailings at any time; see below. Election time: Nomination of candidates in our mid-year Election of Coordinators opened on 1 June, and voting will take place from 16 June. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. June Blitz: Our June blitz will soon be upon us; it will begin at 00:01 on 16 June (UTC) and will close at 23:59 on 22 June (UTC). The themes are "nature and the environment" and all requests. March Drive: Thanks to everyone for their work in March's Backlog Elimination Drive. We removed copyedit tags from 182 of the articles tagged in our original target months October and November 2018, and the month finished with 64 target articles remaining from November and 811 in the backlog. GOCE copyeditors also completed 22 requests for copyedit in March; the month ended with 34 requests pending. Of the 32 people who signed up for this drive, 24 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. April Blitz: Thanks to everyone who participated in the April Blitz; the blitz ran from 14 to 20 April (UTC) inclusive and the themes were Sports and Entertainment. Of the 15 people who signed up, 13 copyedited at least one article. Participants claimed 60 copyedits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: As of 04:36, 3 June 2019 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 267 requests since 1 January. The backlog of tagged articles stands at 605 articles. May Drive: During the May Backlog Elimination Drive, Guild copy-editors removed copyedit tags from 191 of the 192 articles tagged in our original target months of November and December 2018, and January 2019 was added on 22 May. We finished the month with 81 target articles remaining and a record low of 598 articles in the backlog. GOCE copyeditors also completed 24 requests for copyedit during the May drive, and the month ended with 35 requests pending. Of the 26 people who signed up for this drive, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Miniapolis, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Reidgreg and Tdslk. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:Best Georgians GPB ad December 2008.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  04:29, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing up this issue. I believe the image is appropriate for use in the article in which it appears. Pending a final determination on this point, I have reverted your removal of the image from the article on Freedom of religion in Georgia (country)—so that the image page will show the image is being used—and I have also modified the text of the article adjacent to the image so that it makes explicit reference to the image. I have also made a slight change to the non-free use rationale to indicate that the image is mentioned in the relevant article. Hopefully this will suffice to address concerns over the propriety of using this image. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 05:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

I note that you removed my added text "As illustrated in the accompanying screen shot from the program". I added this in order to address your objection about "Specific image not discussed". If you are going to continue to raise this issue as a reason to delete the image, I would ask you either to reinstate my addition to the text or else propose a satisfactory alternate wording. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 05:37, 21 June 2019 (UTC)