Antisemitism has nothing to do with racism since Jews are white, so hating a Jew is not racism. Blacks suffered a lot due to racism and Jews often exploit this name calling despite the suspicion that significant proportion of the slave traders were Jewish. e.g. http://www.rense.com/general69/invo.htm Please mind the difference! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.223.128.111 (talk) 23:59, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that rense.com is run by Jeff Rense, and covers "subjects such as UFO reporting, paranormal phenomena, Anti-Zionist conspiracy theories..." - TheMightyQuill (talk) 14:53, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Themightyquill (User talk:Themightyquill). I couldn't divine what Jeff Rense was referring to. Richard David Ramsey 16:49, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of people with Restoration Movement ties, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Action Jackson IV 01:43, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Action Jackson IV: Can you perhaps specify the reason for the rejection? Ove Johansson indeed did kick the longest field goal (69 yards in Abilene, Texas, in 1976, a record which still stands). After a few years in the NFL he retired to Amarillo, where he is a member of the Church of Christ, one of the groups in the Stone-Campbell Restoration Movement. David

Richard David Ramsey (talk) 02:26, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. I reverted the latest edit you made to Sweden. Systembolaget is open on saturdays these days, and the piece about drunk driving needs some references. Hope I did not offend. Cheers --mceder (u t c) 21:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all offended. I'm impressed that you read my changes in virtual sync with my making them.

My wife, who is Swedish, was over there this summer but stayed entirely "nykter" (sober). So the information I had was anachronistic. The government is out of money and may be pushing the booze to get some "pengar" (money). Additionally we have seen a number of changes to harmonize to EU requirements. I assume that Systembolaget is still closed on election days. I am certain that the smuggling business has continued as usual, now facilitated by the gleaming bridge between Denmark and the "folkhemmet." We take special note of the fact that, when Sweden entered the EU, the few Swedish taxes which were below the EU norm were raised to meet it but the ones which were above stayed there.

David

Hello! Thanks for your contributions to Sweden; I hope you stick around. I have one request though: Could you include citations for the material you add? Wikipedia is now strongly encouraging that material be cited from reliable sources, and citing is so much easier when done right at the beginning when material is added. If you're not already familiar with the wikipedia citation styles, WP:CITE has some instructions. I'd be happy to answer any questions about it too. henrik•talk 23:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Henrik.

I agree with you about the desirability to provide published sources for data not available in the public consciousness, and I'm generally familiar with the Wikipedia style or know where to find advice.

What I added to the article comes from personal experience in the culture as I have been married to it for over 25 years. You are welcome to insert any published sources of which you are aware and certainly to correct or eliminate any misleading phraseology or inaccurate information.

David

		Edit summary reminder
		Hello. I noticed that your edit to USCGC Eagle (WIX-327) did not include an edit summary. Please remember to use one for every edit, even minor ones. You can enable the wiki software to prompt you for one before making an edit by setting your user preferences (under Editing) to "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary". Thanks, -MBK004 23:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. I've made hundreds of edits, most of them summarized. Some of the others hardly qualify as "minor" but are closer to pedantry or nitpicking. But in the future I'll raise the threshold barring use of the minor-edit checkbox without summary. David

		What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar
		I must say, I am quite impressed by your line of reasoning on the issue of using BC or BCE as you stated on the CoC page. Very palatably convincing. Kudos! standonbibleTalk! 17:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the Bobby Jindal article you inserted a lot of information that was not sourced and that was also your own analysis. Please try and keep the article as encyclopedic as possible by referencing your sources and by keeping articles free of Original Research. Thanks! DanielZimmerman (talk) 05:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I read your letter to the editor about Jindal in the 2008 July 3 Times-Picayune. Richard David Ramsey 03:48, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi, can you provide a reference for the additional information you provided regarding the etymology of "coonass"? Thanks, --Skb8721 (talk) 04:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To establish the equation between cajuns and cajunes, see http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caj%C3%BAn . The transition from cajunes to coonass is not the sort of etymology that easily submits to dignified and written scholarship, but I'll see what I can find. You probably know more about than I do. CODOFIL may have something. Richard David Ramsey 04:46, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Cajunes is actually related to the Cajun term coullon, the latter meaning a silly or foolish person; it's a relatively benign term (coullon, I mean) despite the anatomical orgin it shares with cajunes.

Frankly, however, I don't think the possible cajunes link regarding "coonass" should be mentioned in the article unless there's a verifiable source. Sincerely, --Skb8721 (talk) 20:10, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and I have eliminated it until I have a credible and written source. I'm also in South Louisiana. My Swedish wife knew nothing about Louisiana (when she met me) except that it is the origin of Tabasco sauce, a little bottle of it having always stood on her table in Sweden! You are welcome to send me an e-mail message: Dave.Ramsey@selu.edu. Richard David Ramsey 21:01, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Judith Durham singing 'A Perfect Day'.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:54, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, remove it. I have a couple of other photographs together with clearance from Judith Durham's agent to upload them. Richard David Ramsey

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:200px-Seekersultimate.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 22:30, 9 July 2008 (UTC) --NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 22:30, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the image. Judith Durham has granted permission to use a couple of other photographs if you want them. Richard David Ramsey

Thanks for uploading Image:Judith 2001 Solo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

Sorry, but I find nothing in the link cited above as You may add it back on how to add something back. I have permission for Wikipedia to use the image in question as well as the Judith Durham photo from 1968. Please see string below (emphasis mine) in this section and kindly inform me as to what is still needed. I'm still learning.  :) Richard David Ramsey 16:46, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Date Sent: 7/7/2008 1:26 AM From: <gsimpson@musicoast.com> To: "David Ramsey" <Dave.Ramsey@selu.edu> Subject: Re: Web site enquiry Attachments: Judith - R Whitaker shot 68.jpg, Judith 2001 Solo.jpg,

Dear David,

Thank you for your email, which was forwarded to Musicoast by the Webmaster at www.judithdurham.com.

I am attaching two JPG photographs of Judith Durham, one from 1968, the year The Seekers broke up, and a more recent 2000s photo of Judith performing solo - and this email confirms that I am giving Wikipedia to reproduce them without infringing any copyrights.

I have passed your comments on to Judith and she has asked me to send you her love and best wishes,

Yours truly,

Graham Simpson General Manager Musicoast Pty Ltd Record Production & Music Publishing P O Box 555 South Yarra Vic 3141 Australia Email: gsimpson@musicoast.com Website: www.judithdurham.com

---

Original Message -----

From: "David Ramsey" <Dave.Ramsey@selu.edu> To: <mail@judithdurham.com> Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 2:36 PM Subject: Web site enquiry

> > Dear Judith, > > Do you have a photo suitable for publication with the article about you in Wikipedia? > > I would be pleased to have it (electronic file, preferably JPG) together with a note from you that it can legally be posted on the Wikipedia article. > > You may also be interested to read the recent comment I posted recently on http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=kuj1IC9kXt8 . Additionally, although many artists have recorded \"A Perfect Day,\" I chose your interpretation to link to in the Wikipedia article on Carrie Jacobs-Bond (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrie_Jacobs-Bond). > > You are cool. > > David Ramsey, Ph.D. >

Thank you for uploading Image:Judith - R Whitaker shot 68.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 00:23, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:this edit - in general, it is a bad idea to remove red links. Free speech zone links to Strom Thurmond Jr., as does the article on his father. Therefore, it's probably notable enough to deserve an artilce. By removing red links, you reduce the ability for others to know what articles need to be written. See also Wikipedia:Red_link#Dealing_with_existing_red_links Raul654 (talk) 18:39, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to a point, Raul654, and do not remove a red link uncritically. When I do remove such a link, I almost always substitute a working link to another Wikipedia domain (preferable) or to a credible domain outside Wikipedia. I will try to restrain that practice.

An additional concern is that frequently an external link simply serves to authenticate the linked item. To insert a red internal link followed by a reference (superscript, note) which merely cites an external link appears a peculiar and cumbersome behavior, heedless of the way a single external link can do both jobs.

If your experienced opinion was to reinsert the red link in the instance you cite, you are certainly welcome to do so. I indeed appreciate your close reading and criticism.

Wikipedia also calls for correct spelling, a behavior we all should consider with respect to situations like artilce.

The philosophy that all red links should become English Wikipedia articles will lead ultimately to a Wikipedia article on every individual who has ever lived. Maybe that's not necessarily a bad idea, but it would certainly occupy and redundify a lot of magnetic room.

Perhaps what is needed is a category for external links which need to be replaced by internal Wikipedia links once the related Wikipedia articles are written and posted. Such a provision would obviate the dilemma of having to choose between a sore-thumb red link and an external link which obscures the need for a Wikipedia article. The provision would also eliminate the attractiveness of the writer's/editor's forming no link whatever (so that there's no redness in the article) in situations where the link would indicate the need for a new article.

Richard David Ramsey 05:05, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

I noticed you're making many changes to this article. In the future, it is advisable to make all your changes at once, either by working on the article in a subpage of yours, or working on the article directly and saving all your changes at once. Making nearly a hundred discrete edits greatly clogs the edit history when you could make all those changes in one edit. Please consider this in the future. Thank you. seresin ( ¡? )  23:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good advice, but I'm not unlike a lot of other editors even if I find some of them just making changes with a priority on racking up as many hits as possible. But the Joseph Cao article is a developing story, with the election going on right now. Otherwise I would try to play more in the sandbox, which is probably a good place for some of the politicos in both Louisiana and New Mexico. Rammer (talk) 23:33, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I created this for you. However as a registered user, do you know you can create categories by yourself? Martin 11:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated John Maginnis (Louisiana political writer), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Maginnis (Louisiana political writer). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Computerjoe's talk 12:01, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the revised article as well as my comment on said discussion page. I appreciate that you would vet the article but am relatively certain that it needs to stay. Rammer (talk) 06:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Michael Shonrock, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable vice-pres and associate professor, fails WP:ACADEMIC

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MuffledThud (talk) 18:51, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recommend removal for the time being. Southeastern has an excellent situation. Rammer (talk) 19:24, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

See Talk:Michael_Shonrock. talk talk

Release the article to Wordbuilder. Guns up, Red Raiders! Rammer (talk) 01:17, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, A. Brooke Bennett, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. Brooke Bennett. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DCmacnut<> 00:18, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to expand on my reasoning here and at Joseph Cao. Generally, congressional staff aren't considered notable, unless they have distinguished themselves in some other fashion. Ted Kaufman did not receive an article until being appointed Senator, for example. With respect to including congressional staff in articles about a representative, I once proposed including chiefs of staff, legislative directors, etc. in the infoboxes, but other editors at the Project Congress recommended against it for the same reasons I've stated. As far as adding the information back because Brooke Bennett has an article, wikipedia is not considered a reliable source. So just because an article exists somewhere on Wikipedia, it doesn't mean the subject is notable for inclusion elsewhere on wikipedia. Please see WP:Notability for more information. We'd also welcome you to join Project Congress, because we are always looking for new editors willing to help improve the myriad of congressionally-related articles out here.DCmacnut<> 02:05, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're probably right about Bennett. I'm more concerned to preserve the references. Will take a look at the Cao article later to see whether it can be flexed to meet everyone's wishes. If you delete the Bennett article, please convert the links to her in other articles to external links. On your userpage you indicate that "My interests border on the electic." The word "eclectic" is what you must mean. Rammer (talk) 06:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why we need the references either, unless the references are being used as a source for a different part of the article unrelated to staff members. As far as making external links to Bennett, that would run contrary to WP:External Links against inline external links and overlinking. My arguement is that there is no place to mention Joseph Cao's or any other congressional staff members in any articles, unless that staff member has made a name for him or herself outside of being a staff member or if they became notable as a staff member for other reasons. For example, a Cantwell staffer arrested on child porn charges a few years ago or the intern in Mike DeWine's office that was fired due to a blogging scandal.DCmacnut<> 22:30, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The references have a place in that they are about several matters in Cao's setting up his office. But there are also other scholarly reasons to preserve a bibliographic record. As time goes on and the number of citations grows, Wikipedia cannot be expected to include all of them, but those at the foundation of Cao's congressional career are bedrock and lend credibility which other articles would do well to emulate. Rammer (talk) 17:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(undent) Agreed on the need for adequate sourcing. I just wasn't sure how you wanted to use the references. i.e. as a general source on the hiring of staff or as a source on the hiring of specific staff. I'm okay with the former, but not necessarily the latter.DCmacnut<> 03:19, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The former, but my concern, which is compatible, was to retain the sources. Rammer (talk) 03:24, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of your opinion on Year Month Day date format, it is not one of the accepted date formats on Wikipedia per MOS:DATE. As I noted in Talk:Joseph Cao#Date format, Wikipedia only uses international (Day Month Year) or American (Month Day, Year) date formats in article text. ISO 8601 date format (YYYY-MM-DD) can be used in references, but with the end of linking dates for autoformatting this format has fallen "out of fashion" so to speak and there are now scripts that will change ISO 8601 format in references to MDY or DMY format. It looks like another editor has reverted your change back to MDY format, so if you want the article to use YMD format, please do so in the discussion I linked above. Thanks! --Bobblehead ^(rants) 19:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, and I am not alone. There are numerous articles where the first major contributor opted for Julian dates. See, for example, the article on Bruno Hauptman. Why the concern to switch the date format on the Cao article which I have been shepherding all along? Don't most of us have enough to do already? Rammer (talk) 19:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:DATE: "Edit warring over optional styles (such as 14 February and February 14) is unacceptable." -- You're right, edit warring over optional styles is indeed unacceptable, so please stop. The policy page in question is very clear about referring to "the style used by the first major contributor." Rammer, you are indeed one of the first major contributors to this page, but you only decided to change it to the British format after most of the dates in the article had adhered to the American style since at least December 7. I'm going to make one revert, but that's it (I'm not about to have this listed at WP:LAME). However, if you are going to re-revert, please seriously consider what you are edit warring over before you do. Khoikhoi 05:06, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes, edit warring is indeed unacceptable, and I was not the one who started the war. During the last 3 months I have devoted many hours to this article. Then abruptly a probably well meaning and intelligent person decided to go through it and change the date format, in some cases getting 2008 and 2009 confused. I'm surely a lousy person and have a lot to learn, but, even amid the absence of a kind word in the criticism of my contributions to the article, I went back through and straightened out that confusion. I am a very busy person and lack the time to engage in repetitions of a pyrrhic skirmish. Anyone who has the time to be interested in it is welcome to read the "Edit summary" reasons, which may or may not have been read before. Julian dates, including with the month spelled in letters for clarity, are spreading worldwide although more slowly in the United States, and even there they are provided for by Microsoft and Dell and required by American Psychological Association (APA) attribution style, the most widely used in scholarly journals. Being heretofore unaware that something like a date format could arouse feelings equivalent to religious intensity, and having more significant matters to deal with—such as family and job—in a world which faces challenges like pollution and genocide, I wish to experience no more time tied up in this late-arriving controversy about date formats on Joseph Cao. Rammer (talk) 17:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add Category:Louisiana politicians to people who are already in a subcategory such as Category:Members of the Louisiana House of Representatives or Category:New Orleans Councilmembers. Wikipedia has rules around duplicate categorization; we don't want the general category to be populated with people who are already in subcategories. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 00:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did remove the stub templates. Stub articles are generally only a few sentances long and this article is far from a few sentances. Hope that explains thereasons. Waacstats (talk) 21:49, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I caught on later. The article is one of the big boys now. Rammer (talk) 22:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Katherine Kolb requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ridernyc (talk) 23:48, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's a fast reaction, Ridernyc, which impresses me. The page creation was an accident. It wasn't ready to go when I hit the button. Rammer (talk) 23:59, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Archie Jefferson. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 21:58, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll pull back, but there was nothing personal in the article's motivation, although I comprehend that someone in the environment might have a motivation to perceive it that way. Wikipedia is supposed to be strictly secondary research, as objective as possible. The post was sourced in the Times-Picayune and Harper's. If you have a way to put a more-transparent filter on the facts, you are welcome to. Rammer (talk) 22:12, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:WEIGHT. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:05, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Richard. I reverted and altered some of your recent edits on Wellhausen and the Prolog, not because I disagrre totally with what you want to say, but because the subject is a complex one and it's difficult to get all the nuances across in just a sentence or so. Please don't interpret this as an attack on yourself or your edits. PiCo (talk) 04:59, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the opinion. In the interest of getting "all the nuances across," you IMHO understated the case as much as I had overstated it. Wellhausen was explicit about his quick attraction to the concept that the Jewish law was not what it was cracked up to be. But he is only a pawn on the chessboard of players that the Nazis appropriated for their evil mission: the New Testament, several church councils and Popes, Chrysostom, Ferdinand & Isabella, Luther, Wagner, Nietzsche, the apocryphal Protocols of the Elders of Zion, whatever sources could be wrenched (even out of context) to a purpose aimed at genocide. A corollary was also prevalent—that because Jews were to be perceived (in the Nazi Weltanschauung) as inferior, any source which said as much was deemed credible. Rammer (talk) 05:35, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Claude Pepper, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Donald Albury 10:02, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Next day. Thanks. Fixed. Article is better now. Rammer (talk) 19:26, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful with your additions. I noticed 2 of your additions today caused text to be incorrectly cited to an existing source in the article, which is inappropriate. In the final change in this diff, you edit makes the claim that the deadlinked article found at historyswomen.com was the source of the content that you added, when in fact the earlier sentence was the source of the content. Your content does not actually have a source listed. This is a major problem, since someone like me may want to challenge your addition as WP:POV. Another one of your additions from this diff make the earlier sentence that I wrote look like it's unreferenced, when in fact your addition is unreferenced. I have added the {{fact}} template to your sentence since it's an unreferenced statistic. Please be careful to not falsely claim that your content comes from an existing source, when in fact an earlier addition is cited and yours is not cited. Royalbroil 03:46, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Good points. Rammer (talk) 02:25, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have another item of caution for you. In the Carrie Jacobs-Bond article, you have been adding inline external links to youtube videos. First and most important, you cannot legally add links to copyright violations per WP:ELNEVER. Highlighted in the guideline: This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. So the only circumstances where you could add a link is if the link was to an article/video/song which was created in the U.S. before 1923. Another allowable link would be if you are certain and can prove that the video/image/article/song is published by the real original author. Second, inline external links are frowned upon. Per the external links guideline: "2. External links should not normally be used in the body of an article. Instead, include appropriate external links in an "External links" section at the end of the article, and in the appropriate location within an infobox, if applicable." I have reverted your recent changes to the article based on the guideline. Royalbroil 03:41, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I appreciate our working together. Rammer (talk) 03:57, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate how you're trying to give good citation on references that you've added. However, you are adding commentary references to the Carrie Jacobs-Bond article (diff). I hope you're will to use the citation templates. They make adding citations real easy. They ensure that the citations that you add are up to Good and Featured Article standards. The easiest way to use them is to click "My Preferences" on the upper right hand side of the screen. Then click "Gadgets" tab on the right. In the "Editing gadgets" section, add a check mark to "REFTOOLS- adds a "cite" button to the editing toolbar for quick and easy addition of commonly used citation templates." Then a new button will appear on the toolbar above the editing that says {{CITE}}. Position the insert point where you want to add the citation, then click the button. Select web, news, or book to add a new reference. Fill in the fields. If you want to use that same reference a second time in the article, make sure you add a "Reference name". The following times that you want use that same name, click the "named references" button and select the reference's name from the group. I hope this is helpful. Royalbroil 02:54, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:09, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No objection to its speedy (or even faster) deletion, but the redirect was just a stopgap measure pending an article on Finbar Furey. There are, however, limits to the number of times my hand will get stuck into this fire. If I could delete the redirect myself, I would. Rammer (talk) 23:22, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your reference to WWL-TV being the spring board for Dick Van Dyke is incorrect. Dick van Dyke was never a local employee of WWL-TV. He worked for WDSU-TV as shown by the below reference and many others references as shown by a google search. Please remove reference from the WWL-TV article.

WDSU Serves New Orleans Since 1948 - Community News Story - WDSU ... Television sitcom pioneer Dick Van Dyke hosted his own musical comedy show on WDSU in the early 1950s. After six months on the air, however, he received the ... www.wdsu.com/community/267718/detail.html -

Absolutely right. Fixed. WWL-TV didn't sign on until Dick Van Dyke was long gone from NOLA. I'm old enough to know. WDSU sent the first television picture I ever saw. I was just a toddler at the time, and the family of a kid named Peter, who lived just up the street, had just bought the neighborhood's first television set. Rammer (talk) 03:16, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Wizard Oil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Fences&Windows 01:11, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retain until someone writes an article about Wizard Oil, but I don't have time to write it. The redirect was a stopgap measure until an article exists. Maybe the redirect should instead go to the article on patent medicine. Rammer (talk) 02:25, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Hamlin's Wizard Oil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Fences&Windows 01:13, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retain until someone writes an article about Wizard Oil, but I don't have time to write it. The redirect was a stopgap measure until an article exists. Maybe the redirect should instead go to the article on patent medicine. Rammer (talk) 02:25, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, redirects aren't meant to be stop-gaps. I had a quick check and think that Hamlin's Wizard Oil might indeed be notable enough to have an article about it, if we can find enough decent sources. I've started a stub in my user space at User:Fences and windows/Hamlin's Wizard Oil. Fences&Windows 14:33, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Keith Bardwell, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Bardwell. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. TJRC (talk) 22:17, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retain. People rely on Wikipedia for information. Government officials should not be in charge of approving or disapproving what people choose to do within the law, and Wikipedia editors should not be in charge of denying information to people who are seeking it. The Deletion Policy is well thought out and articulated. Yesterday it might have applied to this situation. Today it doesn't. Your concern has been mooted by a market issue, demand. Rammer (talk) 22:28, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be fabricating claims that Bardwell has paraplegia, was born with no knees, walks on his thighs, etc. I Googled "Keith Bardwell paraplegia" to see if this was really true, and the only meaningful results I could find were the two articles (Keith Bardwell and List of paraplegic people) that you had added these claims to. Not only that, but Bardwell is also a carpenter and I don't think that there are very many (if any) paraplegic carpenters out there. Therefore, it looks like you are making these claims up.

In addition to being dishonest, this is a blatant violation of WP: BLP. Just because you personally dislike him and his views (as I also do) does not mean you can make statements like that without any evidence. The sources you have been using to "back up" these claims, in fact, make no such statements about Bardwell's health. It undermines the integrity of Wikipedia when people use it for that kind of childish name-calling. Stick to the facts, please. Stonemason89 (talk) 10:11, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He is paraplegic, an observation made with no value-judgment whatever. Wikipedia is to convey the facts, not editorials. Why do you think someone is engaging in "childish name-calling" by conveying the disabilities which the subject has congenitally and manages to overcome in the world of work? Another editor wants to know more of Bardwell's biography; yet, when someone includes biographical information, another editor eschews it. Bardwell, incidentally, has an excellent reputation as a cabinetmaker, and he overcomes the handicap in doing that job. Please come out from behind your anonymous username. I live within 10 miles of Bardwell and know his demographics, which were conveyed in honesty and fidelity to the facts. Rammer (talk) 20:14, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So? You say that you know he is paraplegic because you know him personally. That is not acceptable for additions to Wikipedia articles, as it violates WP: OR. And don't accuse my of being insensitive to people with disabilities. I have a disability. But I am also quite well aware that all too many Americans, even in this day and age, tend to use disabilities as insults. Witness the all-too-frequent usage of the slur "retard" (the R-word), as many of us like to call it), or spaz, crip, et cetera, as generic insults in American culture. I still don't believe he is really paraplegic. If he is, how come none of the over 1,000 news articles that have mentioned him in the past 2-3 days have mentioned the fact? Stonemason89 (talk) 20:20, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's a very good question--why the media don't mention it. Yes, I know the WP rule and comprehend the benefit of keeping WP strictly in the arena of secondary research. His paraplegia is part of his biography and has no causal relationship to the event which put him into the news. I didn't "accuse" you "of being insensitive to people with disabilities," and you should not have alleged that I am "dishonest" or engaging in "childish name-calling." Let's put all that behind us and try to improve the article. Do you have a way to get someone in the media to comment more biographically and descriptively on Bardwell? Rammer (talk) 20:32, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious for real, and don't mean to sound sarcastic at all; is Keith Bardwell really paraplegic? I can imagine if he uses a wheelchair, but he walks around on his thighs, and has no feet, legs, or knees? When did he enter the carpenting profession? I guess that's his trade? --rock8591 01:26, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your inquiry. I understand from some of the locals that Keith Bardwell makes cabinets (cupboards). I don't know how long he has been in that business except that it has been a very long time, many years. Yes, he is paraplegic and walks on his thighs, uses a wheelchair, and drives a vehicle equipped with hand controls; but I concurred with others to withdraw all that information until it is confirmed by a primary published source. I anticipate that that will possibly happen before too long. Rammer (talk) 02:29, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For your handling of this situation with Civility, I give you a:

--TParis00ap (talk) 21:06, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked the closing admin to reconsider his conclusion. Probably best if you don't jump in on his talk page too, as he'd probably just feel ganged up on. If he still disagrees with me, I'll be happy to post the deletion review request. Postdlf (talk) 13:39, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. At last count (I read the deletion discussion yesterday) there were more votes to keep than to delete although several voters on both sides recommended renaming the article so as to emphasize the incident instead of the man. Consequently I created a REDIRECT called "Bardwell incident" which could be populated as the main article. You're right to warn against petitioning the gatekeeper, because the evidence so far has been that democracy is not necessarily considered welcome or even desirable. Nonetheless, wiking the article out entirely is not a reasonable alternative. Writers whose legitimacy is above reproach had dedicated many hours to creation of an article which thousands of readers were finding useful. It was the one source on the 'net where people could find a dispassionate attempt to contextualize the situation and to provide more information than just what the man did and how he is horrible. There was good reason for renaming the article but no good reason for deleting its substance. Rammer (talk) 16:10, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please tell me on what basis you chose to add an obscure US protestant sect as the religion of a Welsh politician? Was it a mistake? I ask because this has been done once before (I can't remember if it was you) and I'd like to get to the bottom of the reason. --Snowded ^TALK 02:52, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lloyd George's connection with the Disciples of Christ is well established. For internet sources see the following:

http://www.adherents.com/people/pg/David_Lloyd_George.html

http://everything2.com/title/David+Lloyd+George

http://www.nndb.com/people/935/000088671/

http://www.liberalhistory.org.uk/item_single.php?item_id=12&item=biography

I was surfing for something else when I came across the religion of Lloyd George as indicated by the infobox in the article about him. Rammer (talk) 03:14, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The only one of those which approaches being a reliable source does not mention Lloyd George but only Richard. --Snowded ^TALK 04:23, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cf. http://www.mun.ca/rels/restmov/texts/rbutchart/dcc/DCC25.HTM and http://www.mun.ca/rels/restmov/texts/gchapman/ONELORD.HTM. Lloyd George also may have made contributed a brief article to the Disciples’ publication World Call. See http://www.mun.ca/rels/restmov/texts/world/WCIL.HTM . I don't know whether the Disciples were so enthusiastic to claim him in his later years when his membership and behavior were known to be less faithful. He was, as you are aware, quite a character. I was not, incidentally, the prior inserter of the Disciples monicker into the Lloyd George article, but the contributor who did cited adherents.com. Rammer (talk) 06:05, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

`still mainly internal sources, and I don't see it in the biographies. He was in the welsh non-conformist tradition, but any associations with specific sects were loose at best. Its also not clear (from what I can see) that the chapel in the Llyn Peninsular was really linked to the US movement. I think its a curiosity (and an interesting one) but not for the info. box --Snowded ^TALK 06:10, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See http://yba.llgc.org.uk/en/s-LLOY-RIC-1834.html on the influence of Richard on David Lloyd George. The correlation between the US Disciples and the Welsh Disciples is not necessarily causative although the Americans were certainly aware of their British counterparts and supported them. See Restoration_Movement#Great_Britain. Thomas Campbell (clergyman) and Alexander Campbell (clergyman) had already acquired their religious mind set in Scotland before leaving for America. Rammer (talk) 17:09, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Birmingham. Sorry about the delay in relying, I've only just found your post. I should have redirected that page to my talk page. I think I'll update my profile. TheRetroGuy (talk) 13:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:2009Dec12 Southeastern Louisiana University Center commencement.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Triplestop x3 01:30, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PD-self template added to that image Rammer (talk) 05:12, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A special "thank you" for this article! It's nice to see something on a military figure which isn't ripped off from public domain federal sources, and is instead properly referenced. Keep doing what you're doing :). Ironholds (talk) 20:20, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Southeastern University Center cr sign out.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 17:20, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Rammer (talk) 17:26, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've dropped an unreferenced tag on your new article tantamount to election. Please add some references as soon as possible, or it is very likely one of the deletionists will pick up on it and nom it at AfD. Thanks for your help!--Wehwalt (talk) 22:26, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added sources. Thanks. Rammer (talk) 23:37, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Head poster Garden District.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 22:53, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the duplicate. Connect the other one to the Stacy Head article's link. Find a way to make the uploading of file images between Wikipedia and Wikimedia less confusing and redundancy prone. Rammer (talk) 23:42, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is an easy way to upload files for use with Wikipedia and all other Wikimedia projects. Simply upload your “free” files to the Commons. If it is not a free image, upload it locally and make sure you follow the WP:FURG. --The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 02:34, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you planning on creating an article at this title? At the moment this is a redirect to an article that barely mentions the subject of the redirect. If the daughter meets the notability standard, then she ought to be the subject of her own article; if she doesn't, the redirect serves no purpose. I thought I would check what you intended before doing anything with this. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 17:13, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to revise and extend the redirect into a brief article but may need a few weeks to get around to the task. Miss Johansson now lives in Florida and is out on a touring production. Rammer (talk) 03:15, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reywas92^Talk 22:55, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of African-American Republicans. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of African-American Republicans. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Richard David Ramsey. I'm leaving you this message because you commented at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of African-American Republicans. There appears to have been consensus to clarify the scope of the list. I've started a discussion on the topic at Talk:List of African-American Republicans and would welcome any input you have. Shadowjams (talk) 06:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you had done much work on the Wikipedia page for Frank Lebby Stanton. I recently uploaded a portrait of Mr. Stanton on Wikimedia that I scanned from an October 1892 issue of The Magazine of Poetry, if you would like to incorporate the portrait into the Wikipedia article. You can find the portrait here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Frank_Lebby_Stanton_Portrait_Magazine_of_Poetry.jpg Londonjackbooks (talk) 01:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, much clearer picture. Thanks. Rammer (talk) 02:34, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Category:FEMA critics ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Federal Emergency Management Agency critics ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add links to unofficial sites like you did with this diff. Fansites and unofficial sites are unwanted in the external links section and elsewhere, as it encourages continued addition of such sites. The problem was, is, and always will be, which unofficial and non-neutral sites do you allow and which do you not? The answer is to allow none. In the future, if you see such sites in articles, please remove them. Thanks. — Huntster (t @ c) 00:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. I'm a very busy person and do not need to invest time trying to assist with the Wikipedia. Rammer (talk) 03:39, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Tony Smith (preacher), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Smith (preacher). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. AniMate 06:11, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 21:55, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Always happy to be of help - thanks to HotCat. :-) Excellent article; keep up the good work! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:58, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you think Scott Perrilloux is a notable individual, I encourage you to write an article about him. Creating a misleading redirect, or adding his picture to another article, is not really a useful substitute for an encyclopedia article. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 13:52, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are right about that, but please don't accuse me of being "misleading" with a redirect. There was no intention of parking him there permanently. Rammer (talk) 14:21, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Russ: I believe the reason for your objection is now resolved. Respectfully request that you remove the RFD templete on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Perrilloux . One of these days I may get around to writing an article about the 21st Judicial District. That needs to be done, but my time is limited. I believe that the situation which now prevails with the redirect is the best way in the meantime. Rammer (talk) 15:15, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Thomas Sjöberg (journalist). The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly. What I did was to translate the article from the Swedish Wikipedia. Your problem is with the Swedish version. Respectfully recommend you go to http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sj%C3%B6berg_%28journalist%29 and raise your complaint there. I agree with your complaint. Rammer (talk) 22:15, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm leaving you this message because you are listed as a Wikipedian in Louisiana. The Wikipedia Ambassador Program is currently looking for Campus Ambassadors to help with Wikipedia assignments at Louisiana State University, which will be participating in the Public Policy Initiative for the Spring 2011 semester. The role of Campus Ambassadors will be to provide face-to-face training and support for students on Wikipedia-related skills (how to edit articles, how to add references, etc.). This includes doing in-class presentations, running workshops and labs, possibly holding office hours, and in general providing in-person mentorship for students.

Prior Wikipedia skills are not required for the role, as training will be provided for all Campus Ambassadors (although, of course, being an experienced editor is a plus).

If you live near Baton Rouge and you are interested in being a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador, or know someone else from the area who might be, please email me or leave a message on my talk page.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 17:14, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support! If you think you'd like to help bring the Wikipedia Ambassador Program to Southeastern Louisiana University for some later term, I encourage you to apply to be a Campus Ambassador... either now (we'll probably have a training event in Baton Rouge in early January) or later on. Then you can keep an eye on things as they develop, and maybe take the lead at SLU at a time when you have more time for it. Cheers --Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 15:33, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Richard. I have removed a number of categories from your user and user talk pages. These categories are suitable for articles and article talk pages only, as described at WP:USERNOCAT. Thanks. Rockpocket 00:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever. I use my middle name, David. Rammer (talk) 05:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Whilst I very much support your efforts to encourage the correct use of the semicolon, I do not understand why adding bold to them, like this and this, would be a good idea. I don't think that adding the bold is helpful: surely an informative edit summary would suffice? Thanks and best wishes, DBaK (talk) 23:19, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want semicolons to look like commas. Otherwise I agree with you. Maybe, where possible, the preference would be to use periods (full stops). The main problem, however, is to rid the encyclopedia of comma splices. Periods and commas are never interchangeable. Why someone intelligent enough and informed enough to write an article cannot identify a sentence and punctuate it as such is a mystery. Rammer (talk) 23:27, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the nice reply. I think I understand your point but I don't think that adopting a personal typographic convention will stick - not unless you want to try to get it adopted as part of the MoS! I do love to see semicolons and colons properly used so I'd be a bit sad to see them replaced by full stops. As for the mystery of people who know enough to write but not enough to write well - yes, it's sad, but I suppose that's why we have subeditors, wikipedia punctuation nerds, and the like. I saw an article today, about a railway station in England, which I think would have made you feel quite unwell. It consisted of good information with horrible presentation: I feel as if I'll need a day off before I look at it again. Oh well ... and thanks again for the reply. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 22:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sohaib Athar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sohaib Athar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:53, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alas! Hereby I make the first (personal) comment on the user page of the guy who started the wikipedia article about the guy who happened to be online when Osama bin Laden was killed. Can I get a WP page now too? -- 09:07, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Fine with me, if you happened to appear on every television screen in the world. Rammer (talk) 16:18, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Mr. Ramsey, for writing me. I'm starting to think that perhaps the article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sohaib Athar should be deleted and have that content rolled into Death of Osama bin Laden. Kindest respects: AdjustablePliers (talk) 22:50, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Sohaib Athar article had 263 hits on May 2 and 16862 hits on May 3. I'm aware that the number of hits is not a criterion for inclusion. Nonetheless, Wikipedia has done the service of making the information available to a lot of people who, for some reason important to them, are seeking it. Rammer (talk) 03:33, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Richard. El artículo era muy corto, terriblemente corto. Dos de las referencias eran de la misma Wikipedia y, como seguramente sabes, no son aceptables. No dudo que la persona sea relevante pero no podemos aceptar un artículo tan reducido. Mi inglés, me temo, es tan básico como tu español así que lamento no poder ayudarte. Saludos desde esta tierra de gracia, Laura Fiorucci (talk) 01:49, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Laura. I have decided to agree with you. I may be wrong, but it seems that the "Zacatecas March" was Codino's one stunning work, such that, even though he composed other works, he almost becomes a flash in the pan. There are four images related to him in Wikimedia Commons, plus others on the internet although I'm not sure whether all of them are legally available. Just merge everything toward the article about the march itself. Rammer (talk) 02:13, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Saint Helena Parish, Louisiana, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:39, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Stanton Jacobs-Bond Spencer Just Awearyin 1911 cusb-cyl3824d.ogg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:17, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Standby. Sfan00 IMG, can you update me on what the situation is there? Maybe I'm missing something or not looking in the right place, but I see no deletion tag. Additionally, the file works. Nonetheless, if you can remove it from Wikipedia so that it remains just on Wikimedia Commons, then that action makes sense. The song itself is in several Wikipedia articles, and we only have to be careful that they all link directly to the file in Commons without any need for a page containing the file in Wikipedia per se. Rammer (talk) 15:22, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Already resolved, If all the links are named the same, the image from Commons should show through without intervention:) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:54, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me. Let's see what happens. Rammer (talk) 19:39, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Richard David Ramsey! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Richard A. Batey. Since you had some involvement with the Richard A. Batey redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mabeenot (talk) 19:45, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In Angus Lind, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Howard Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, DPL bot. Fixed. Because of you, the Angus Lind article has more specificity. Rammer (talk) 22:36, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

New Orleans, Jackson and Great Northern (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Right-of-way

Southeastern Louisiana University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Track

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, DPL bot. Thanks. I will remain subscribed because your service is so useful. Rammer (talk) 19:21, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Peter J. Fos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Provost (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, DPL. Fixed! Rammer (talk) 14:49, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Wildlife Protection Act of 2010, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, DPL bot. Thanks. Rammer (talk) 16:24, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Stacy Head, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Firehouse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, DPL bot, along with several broken links. Thanks. Rammer (talk) 17:05, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since he is now a university president, what are your thoughts on Michael D. Shonrock meeting Wikipedia's notability threshold? →Wordbuilder (talk) 08:00, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wordbuilder: If you will, please move the earlier deleted article into the active English Wikipedia. Wikipedia protocol requests that I check first with the deleter, in this case Wordbuilder, and I have now done so. Rammer (talk) 17:03, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been restored to Michael Shonrock. →Wordbuilder (talk) 07:02, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Wordbuilder. Rammer (talk) 21:48, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help. →Wordbuilder (talk) 05:31, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Sandra L. Stosz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Pacific (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, DPL bot. Thanks. Rammer (talk) 02:55, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Tommy Tuberville, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tax returns (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, DPL bot. Thanks. Rammer (talk) 22:27, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You need a page number for the reference The Nazi Connection to Islamic Terrorism: Adolf Hitler and Haj Amin Al-Husseini or it will be removed, okay? --TIAYN (talk) 14:42, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done, TIAYN. Thanks. Rammer (talk) 17:13, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Ba'athism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:02, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, DPL bot. Fixed. Rammer (talk) 21:05, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is probably easiest to upload a derivative file onto Commons. I had thought about cropping it, and then having the cropped picture in the infobox, and the full picture lower down in the article. StAnselm (talk) 04:13, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot get DerivativeFX to work. But the idea is still that the photograph needs brightening. I don't think cropping will help much or even at all, including to display just Luter himself. The current group photo is fine because of the famous company Luter is in there, but we really need a better portrait of Luter. Rammer (talk) 15:22, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we do. That was the only one on Commons. StAnselm (talk) 22:37, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roy Anthony Cutaran Bennett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pageant (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It was pretty late at night. I'll fix it now. Rammer (talk) 17:45, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rockefeller Republican, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim Ryan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, DPL bot. Thanks. Rammer (talk) 18:27, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Waltzer & Associates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. DGG ( talk ) 04:39, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Carter (New Orleans) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Carter (New Orleans) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. BDD (talk) 19:14, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Richard David Ramsey. You are invited to join WikiProject Hotels, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of hotels, motels and lodging-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:55, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for joining the project! Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:08, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hattiesburg, Mississippi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• registration projects in Hattiesburg under the auspices of [[Council of Federated Organizations]]). By 1964, the [[Delta Ministry]] was active in the city. In cooperation with the NAACP and local
• program in Mississippi.<ref>[http://www.wmcarey.edu/com USM College of Osteopathic Medicine site]] (accessed 2013-06-25). The first class to be graduated is 2014.</ref> The Forrest County Center of

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:12, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I am culpable for, and have fixed, the second superfluous square bracket. I know nothing of the first one you cite. Rammer (talk) 19:27, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Search Me is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Search Me until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:24, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Responded in the deletion discussion. Rammer (talk) 01:59, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Illinois–Poland National Guard Partnership may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | adjutant_general = [http://www.il.ngb.army.mil/bios/krumrei.aspx BG [[Daniel M. Krumrei]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:06, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Rammer (talk) 03:14, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Albert Gore, Sr. may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• including Johnson's carrying Tennessee in a three-way race with [[Richard Milhouse Nixon]] (Republican Party (United States)|R]] and [[George Corley Wallace]] ([[American Independent Party|AIP]]).

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:12, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. My edit was really messed up. Rammer (talk) 22:23, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited On the Mall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Military march (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already fixed. Rammer (talk) 22:40, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 17:00, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louisiana's 5th congressional district special election, 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Qualifying (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:46, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will do, DPL bot. Thanks. Rammer (talk) 14:35, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vasily Ivanovich Petrov may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:Recipients of the Distinguished Service in Guarding the State Border]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:10, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, BracketBot. Fixed. Rammer (talk) 06:38, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hark! The Herald Angels Sing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Arnold (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, DPL bot (talk). Thanks. Rammer (talk) 01:49, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy New Year!
	Hello Richard David Ramsey: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Northamerica1000(talk) 08:55, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply] Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2014}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Hello, Richard David Ramsey, and thank you for your contributions!

Some text in an article that you worked on William Prince Ford, appears to be directly copied from another Wikipedia article, William Ford (Louisiana preacher). Please take a minute to double-check that you've properly attributed the source text in your edit summary.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on William Prince Ford at any time. MadmanBot (talk) 16:57, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That tag resulted from the shift of the article from its original title to its current title. I removed the tag. Rammer (talk) 17:07, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cheneyville, Louisiana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Campbell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, DPL bot. Thanks. Rammer (talk) 19:03, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A. S. Mike Monroney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Episcopalian Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter what I think. What you wrote was WP:OR, which is prohibited in Wikipedia. If you wish to dispute what is currently in an article, you need to find a more authoritative source that states what you are asserting. WP:OR is one of the key content policies of Wikipedia. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:10, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quotations from an existing source are not original research. Yes, I know the prohibition. I merely clarified what the article already asserts about Genesis 28:11-19. I did not "dispute" anything, nor will I continue to edit that article. Rammer (talk) 05:15, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure that Lowell Mason's tune BETHANY has yet to make such serious inroads into the British repertoire as to threaten the indigenous British tunes? Compare, in reverse, the way in which—on "Guide Me, O Thou Great Jehovah/Redeemer"—CWM RHONDDA has virtually driven ZION out of American churches. Rammer (talk) 18:37, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This statement is supported by a source from 1898 (a long time ago):

In the United Kingdom, the hymn is usually associated with the 1861 hymn tune "Horbury" by John Bacchus Dykes, named for a village near Wakefield, England, where Dykes had found "peace and comfort". -- Rammer (talk) 05:38, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a more recent source that states which tune is the most popular in Britain in recent decades? -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Bradley in the Daily Telegraph Book of Hymns as of 2006 indicates HORBURY as the dominant tune in the U.K. (with the others in the WP article as alternatives) and BETHANY as the sole tune in the U.S., but I will try to do more checking on the British situation with an informed source on the scene. Rammer (talk) 23:16, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. What page does he say that on? -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:35, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bradley, Ian (2006). Daily Telegraph book of hymns. London: Bloomsbury Academic. p. 294. ISBN-10 = 0826482821, ISBN-13 = 978-0826482822. That's the paperback edition. The hardbound edition was published in 2005. Here's a quotation from Bradley on p. 294:

Perhaps the best-known tune for the hymn, at least in Britain, is Horbury, which John Bacchus Dykes (1823-76) wrote for the first edition of Hymns Ancient and Modern in 1861. He named it after the town in Yorkshire which he had visited two years earlier to make his first confession. In the USA the tune most often used has been Bethany, which was composed in 1856 by Dr Lowell Mason (1792-1872), a bank clerk from Savannah who founded the Boston Academy of Music.

Rammer (talk) 02:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kevin Sorbo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page God's Not Dead (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uh-oh. Thanks, DPL bot. I thought I had fixed that situation. Rammer (talk) 20:02, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of John Hughes (1973-1932), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: John Hughes (composer). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:50, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm in the process of straightening things out. Too many people in Wales are surnamed Hughes! Rammer (talk) 20:56, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Both John Hughes (composer) and John Hughes (1973-1932) now redirect to John Hughes (1873–1932). Rammer (talk) 19:12, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

John Hughes (1873–1932) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to William Williams

John Hughes (1973-1932) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to William Williams

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks. Rammer (talk) 20:23, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Otto Rahn may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• the [[Italian comics|Italian comic book]] [[Martin Mystère]], Rahn fakes his death and joins the [[United States Secret Service] "Elsewhere".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www-en.sergiobonellieditore.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:17, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of German Jews may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)

st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Robinson.html Robinson biography<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref>)<ref>[http://phys4.harvard.edu/~wilson/publications/Human%20rights%20letters.html]</ref> and Anti-Semitism: Aryeh Maidenbaum and Stephen A. Martin, Shambala, Boston, 1991, 416 pp., $35 (for Journal of the American A...<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> * [[Theodor Adorno]] (1903-1969), philosopher (Jewish father)<ref>[http://www.iep.utm.edu/a/adorno.htm Adorno, Theodor [Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#93;<!- * [[Edmund Husserl]], philosopher (converted to Christianity)<ref>[http://www.iep.utm.edu/h/husserl.htm Husserl, Edmund [Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy&#93;<! * [[Otto Rahn]], historian of legends about the holy grail<ref>{{cite web |http://www.otto-rahn.com/otto-rahn-biography |magazine = Otto Rahn Memorial |article = |magazine = Otto Rahn Memorial |article = Otto Rahn biography |date = 2014 |accessdate = 2014-07-18{{</ref> * [[Carl Zuckmayer]], playwright (Jewish mother)<ref>[http://www.content-space.de/textpattern/artikel/the-immigration-of-carl-zuckmayer-into-the-usa The

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:45, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Got that, BracketBot. Fixed the problem. You are a very useful and responsive bot. Rammer (talk) 18:55, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of German Jews page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already fixed. Thanks, ReferenceBot. Rammer (talk) 03:04, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blake Farenthold, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shutdown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, DPL bot. Fixed. Rammer (talk) 02:53, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Richard David Ramsey. Is the reason you redirected the phrase useless eaters to Der Giftpilz because the phrase was coined in that book? Jonas Vinther (talk) 18:52, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure, Jonas Vinther. I have forgotten what happened with that redirect. The term "useless eaters" is nonetheless associated with Julius Streicher as an epithet he used against Jews. But didn't he use that expression before publication of Der Giftpliz? I'll be interested in your response, and I think maybe your knowledge may be more eclectic than mine. Rammer (talk) 20:33, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, according to Laurence Rees, Hitler and the top Nazi chieftains coined the phrase "useless eaters" to describe the Jews. I haven't read Der Giftpliz nor do I know anything in particular about Streicher. I was wondering if the phrase itself would deserve an article? Jonas Vinther (talk) 20:52, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can see that the expression "useless eaters" has had referents broader than just the Jews in the Third Reich. See http://rense.com/general78/philo.htm . That's an article I cannot necessarily recommend, but it does provide indication of a wider meaning of the "useless eaters" term. Rammer (talk) 21:24, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work, Richard. I have quite a lot of Wiki projects running right now, but later in the year I'll make into a full article. Your help is welcome. :) Jonas Vinther (talk) 22:44, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Det är bra, Jonas. Du får bestämma. Min fru är, förresten, svenska. Jag använder mitt mellannamn, som är David. Rammer (talk) 23:35, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, en folkunge? Jamen goddag David, det er rart at møde en af samme slægt. :) Jonas Vinther (talk) 23:51, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nåårh, jeg kan se fra din userpage du er Amerikaner, men kan tale svensk. Fedt man. :) Jonas Vinther (talk) 23:53, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

:) Rammer (talk) 21:18, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Roy Orbison may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• greatest_artists_of_all_time_37_roy_orbison The Immortals – The Greatest Artists of All Time: 37) Roy Orbison], ''Rolling Stone''. Retrieved on June 2, 2009.</ref> This image of Orbison as
• [[Category:Torch singers]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:26, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, BracketBot. 'Twas an accident. Thanks! Rammer (talk) 23:55, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Zach Dasher may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• (United States)|Green Party]] candidate Eliot S. Barron of [[New Orleans]] and [[Libertarian Party )(United States)|Libertarian]] Charles Saucier of [[Ponchatoula, Louisiana|Ponchatoula]]. http://www.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:25, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Repaired prior to receipt of your message, BracketBot. Don't think the problem is still there. Thanks. Rammer (talk) 19:23, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Diego Mendez. Since you had some involvement with the Diego Mendez redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 18:55, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. BDD: You are impressively fastidious to raise such a question, but you worry too much. If the current mention of Diego Mendez is all that Wikipedia has, then the redirect is critical to help readers use what there is. The alternative is to write a self-standing article on Diego Mendez. Embedding his information into the article on Columbus and providing a redirect for individuals who seek information on Mendez alone is the best compromise, the best alternative. Rammer (talk) 19:13, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already voted, Ed17. Thanks. Rammer (talk) 18:46, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zach Dasher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Second Amendment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, DPL bot. Thanks. Rammer (talk) 20:10, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christian Democrats (Sweden), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swedish Evangelical Lutheran Church. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, DPL bot. Already fixed. Rammer (talk) 03:03, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Hotels

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Hotels for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks, Rcsprinter¹²³ (talk) @ 21:14, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cocaine hippo. Since you had some involvement with the Cocaine hippo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AmaryllisGardener ^talk 03:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fadavi Doctrine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fadavi Doctrine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 17:41, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My recommendation is to keep the Fadavi Doctrine article or at least its information per the explanation I have written at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fadavi_Doctrine . Rammer (talk) 03:47, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hal Baumgarten is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hal Baumgarten until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nthep (talk) 14:37, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wilhelm Strienz. Since you had some involvement with the Wilhelm Strienz redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TexasAndroid (talk) 21:48, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Richard Lloyd (religious leader) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — BranStark (talk) 13:37, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After your last edit to the article, there are still 11 junctions listed in the infobox. In the case of long highways with many important junctions, it is often necessary to omit all but interstates and U.S. highways. See New York State Route 22, assessed as a Featured Article by WP:USRD, for an example of this. The fact that LA 21 and LA 25 are federal aid routes does not mean they should be included because US 51 is not. It's about the route class. That said, I see that LA 21 is part of the National Highway System so I'll retain that one as it still keeps the number of junctions at 10. Britinvasion64 (talk) 22:31, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your nice explanation, Britinvasion64. I agree with you thus far and appreciate that you are educating me. I would only point out that LA 25 is a designated hurricane evacuation route. US 51 isn't. Furthermore, US 51 has become essentially a street connecting the towns in Tangipahoa Parish, but the traffic on it is mostly drivers going a short distance. Late in the evenings, the traffic signals at the junction of US 51 and LA 16 in downtown Amite (Amite City) blink red to 51 and green to 16 because of traffic counts. US 51 runs parallel to I-55 except in some cases of concurrence. US 51 long ago lost its strategic significance down here and is now a Federal Aid Secondary except in cases of concurrence with I-55. No need exists in the LA 10 box to indicate both I-55 and US 51. If I were you, I would drop US 51 from the list there and instead list LA 25. I realize the psychology that US-numbered routes somehow have pre-eminence over state routes, but I live in the area and vouch that LA 25 is nowadays more significant that US 51. Please give these observations some thought. Again, thanks for the civility of your explanation. Rammer (talk) 23:14, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Hal[reply]

You bring up some good points. It's hard sometimes juggling the rules vs. what makes sense in a particular situation. (I'm trying to get some of these LA highway articles assessed as Good Articles soon.) I just didn't want to start a domino effect where if you include this one, now you have to include that one, etc. But I think I have a solution that will work for everyone. I combined each concurrency to a single line, freeing up room for LA 25 and two other state highways along the route I felt were notable as well. What do you think? Britinvasion64 (talk) 00:36, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Britinvasion64, really nice. I agree with you. My earlier observation had to do with the eastern part of the Florida Parishes, but in retrospect I know that LA 13 is an important and highly trafficked road, and you apparently realized that LA 1 together with LA 10 forms the potentially forthcoming Zachary Taylor Parkway. Indeed, the Audubon Bridge which bears LA 10 over the Mississippi River is the only such bridge between Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and Natchez, Mississippi; thus LA 1, just west of the Bridge, is one of the more significant junctions for LA 10. Again, I appreciate the civility of your response and indeed will defer to you to decide about such issues in that article. Rammer (talk) 01:58, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As you, Britinvasion64, are no doubt well aware, almost all state highways in Louisiana were renumbered in 1955. The current routings are in many instances just a cobbling together (look, e.g., at LA 16, hardly the route a sane person would take between its termini), but it was a definite improvement over the prior chaos, which, among other anomalies, included road numbers that abruptly changed in the middle of nowhere. Rammer (talk) 04:53, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It certainly was a crazy system in many respects. And they seem to have added so many useless (to the motoring public) routes each year until there were over 2200 by the time of the renumbering. I can't imagine many of those were actually signed.Britinvasion64 (talk) 19:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As I recall, pre-1955 Louisiana routes were somewhat signed. Junction (JCT) signs were rare except maybe at major intersections. The typical intersection of numbered roads would have just a single sign with an arrow. Rammer (talk) 20:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It would be good to add a picture of Lewis Hartsough to the article that we worked on last year. The only image that I can find is here. The same image is on several other websites. However, I am unsure of the copyright position. The image would be public domain in the USA if it were published before 1923, see Public domain in the United States. Hartsough died in 1919, but it is possible that this image was first published after 1923. It looks like a photograph, but it could be a painting. Anyway, I suspect it was from a book or a newspaper. Have you seen it in a pre-1923 book or newspaper? If so, please let me have a reference. If we cannot establish that it is public domain then we could probably include it on the basis of "fair use", see Wikipedia:Non-free content, but this more awkward and less satisfactory. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:04, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Federal Emergency Management Agency critics, which you may have created, has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:37, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As someone interested in the List of ministers of the Universal Life Church (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), I thought I'd let you know an RFC has been started over reliable sources. Please join in Talk:List_of_ministers_of_the_Universal_Life_Church#RFC:_Reliable_sources here. Me-123567-Me (talk) 23:23, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Coffity. Since you had some involvement with the Coffity redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 21:48, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rotary Foundation fellows, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:38, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

Hello. In your article "Elsie Baker", you have combined the credits of Elsie Baker the ACTRESS, (dates as given), with those of her identically named contemporary, Elsie (West) Baker, (9/27/1886- 4/28/1958). She was the contralto SINGER who recorded prolifically, sometimes under the name "Edna Brown".^[1][2]WGH29 (talk) 19:41, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article First Guaranty Bank has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't seem to be a notable bank, I was unable to find sources that met WP:CORPDEPTH.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:49, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jay Wilbur (computer scientist). Since you had some involvement with the Jay Wilbur (computer scientist) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 15:58, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Veronica White is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veronica White until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GPL93 (talk) 19:23, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bubby Lyons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bubby Lyons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GPL93 (talk) 14:36, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Thomas H. Olbricht, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hands On Miami has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since creation in 2010. No indication of fulfilling WP:Notability (organizations and companies). Loksmythe (talk) 16:52, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Loksmythe (talk) 16:52, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Hands On Miami, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 23:09, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Alan Lindquest. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 19#Alan Lindquest until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Tuestor (talk) 14:18, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You created Leah Gordon as a redirect. I have proposed that the redirect should be deleted. You are free to express your opinion on this in Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_January_29. -- Hoary (talk) 00:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Caroline Fayard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject is not notable, having not held public office and not active in politics. Much of the article lacks appropriate sources and reads as if it was created for the benefit of a political candidate.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alice Mendell Starr has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

related to someone notable but is not notable herself.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mireille Gillings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable entrepreneur, probably most notable for her marriage to billionaire Dennis Gillings.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]