Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:54, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Emerson. Do you have a source for all this stuff? A citation would be nice. Thanks, --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 17:02, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. Please cite that source as part of the text you're adding. --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 17:18, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The book does not a have a 'line of succession'. It lists all the Bourbon and Orleans so I suppose its possible to compile a 'list of living males' from those families. - dwc lr (talk) 14:08, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It contains some lines of succession such as France (Orleans) and Bulgaria. - dwc lr (talk) 13:46, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Emerson. What I mean by this is along the lines of the following: Devote one or more edits solely to the changes of "de" to "of" (these seem a good idea to me), then devote one or more edits to changing people's surnames to "of France" (I don't know that this is a good idea, but am willing to discuss), etc. The work for you would be the same, while it would decrease the work for others who want to address your different changes in different ways. Thanks, --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 03:39, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Emerson. Please refrain from characterizing others as blindly loyal to the views you oppose. FactStraight cited Dumoulin because he thinks the quote is relevant to the issue at hand, not because he is committed to opposing Legitimism. At least, that is what we must assume, or else Wikipedia simply does not work. Sarcastic comments such as "your beloved Dumoulin" are unproductive and are insulting to FactStraight, and your further denigration of Dumoulin himself (who is potentially a very important source if we can get a better handle on his meaning and put him in proper context) is even less germane. --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 02:16, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited James VI and I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles I (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Royal descendants of John William Friso, Prince of Orange, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Princess Marie of Saxe-Altenburg and Alexandra of Greece and Denmark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]