Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

User talk:Redluxy

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrea E. Davis (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 19:53, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Redluxy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 19:53, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all the feedback and patience with me this is my first Wiki page! I will make all the changes and resubmit. Have a good day. Redluxy (talk) 15:34, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Andrea E. Davis has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Andrea E. Davis. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:59, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the feedback. I will work on updating. 2600:8804:825C:1A00:8C23:2B78:A243:A1DB (talk) 23:21, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrea E. Davis (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See WP:COI. See also WP:BLP. Statements need to be sourced or removed. Here, the entire early life section is unsourced, and the career section has a single source making only a passing mention of an "Andrea".
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 13:45, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Quelle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Redluxy