Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at 2020–2021 China–India skirmishes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. — Czello ^(music) 21:13, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mokal Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sisodia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Gagron, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Merta and Rathore.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdom of Mewar - Delhi Sultanate Conflict (1326 to 1518), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ratnahastin (talk) 10:44, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please take care when reverting; with this revert diff you also reverted my edits of the caption and the note of the Network-model map. Your previous mass-revert diff also removed some gnomish edits. Take this as a soft warning. Regards, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 07:48, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi@Joshua Jonathan Apologies for that Rawn3012 (talk) 07:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 07:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The argument you just used about Romila and other historians being used a source for hole map , I was saying that argument since day 1 of this discussion, no one seemed to understand.

If your going to start a RFC, then do it, people have been clearly POV pushing very hard.

They have been ignoring our hundreds of sources which I mentioned when I started this topic discussion, instead prioritising their own sources bigger than us.

They think that just because they are "experienced editors" they can do anything and devalue our opinion , they have been putting our sources as unreliable.

@Rawn3012 JingJongPascal (talk) 13:20, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will you be doing a RFC? @Rawn3012 JingJongPascal (talk) 10:55, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, by Monday most probably. Rawn3012 (talk) 11:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rawn3012 I would suggest you to go for Status quo, like it was agreed before, we have a lot of things to improve in the article except for endlessly arguing regarding maps, As far as I have seen these discussions, they are never ending reaching no conclusion or consensus, it is a waste of time to go for an RFC, better is to go for Status quo, let both of the maps remain in the article as they were beforeJingJongPascal (talk) 16:27, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JingJongPascal Agree for now the max extent map remains must be goal. Edasf«Talk» 16:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bahmani Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmad Shah II's invasion of Mewar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

- Ratnahastin (talk) 16:41, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This kitty is for you, happy editing!!

Garuda ^Talk! 21:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!!! Rawn3012 (talk) 05:06, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rawn3012. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Maharana Pratap’s reconquest of Mewar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]