Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:20, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RafaelS1979, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 11:59, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

Hi RafaelS1979. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Mz7 (talk) 14:25, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for granting me the right. I'll use it in a serious manner and correctly. Regards. RafaelS1979 (talk) 14:30, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RafaelS1979,

I see you were turned down by Amanda for the NPR user right, I'd suggest heading over to WP:Articles for deletion and over to WP:Requested moves and participating in some discussions for a while before applying again. While CSDable articles are less common after WP:ACTRIAL went permanent, you should carefully review the CSD criteria before applying again (note this in your application if/when you apply again). — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 21:12, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Insertcleverphrasehere and thank you for your comment. While I agree that I don't have that much of experience in page moving and CSD, I'm willing to learn and help, that's I wanted the right. I'll take your advice and I'll participate in discussions to gain more knowledge and experience. RafaelS1979 (talk) 21:19, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just some general advice on CSDs, be extremely careful with them, and only use CSD in the most blatant of cases. If in any doubt whatsoever, use AfD or PROD instead, CSD's tend to only get seen by one other set of eyes before being deleted, and admins can make mistakes too. That's why people like to see a lot of care taken with CSD nominations, and failed CSD nominations tend to reflect badly on editors/reviewers that are applying for additional user rights. If something is CSDable, and you take it to AfD instead, and you get a few !votes of 'Speedy delete per XXX' there is no harm done, so lean that way if in any doubt. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 03:19, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CVU Academy Graduate

On behalf of the Counter-Vandalism Unit Academy, congratulations! You have successfully completed all assignments and have now graduated from the Academy. You completed your final exam and no major issues arose during your 7-day monitoring period – well done! Further information on your achievement can be found here. It's been a pleasure to work with you these past few weeks. Congrats again! Thank you for putting up with my occasional lapses of idiocy :). I hope you gained important knowledge from this course and GOOD LUCK in the future! As always, if you have any questions, you are always welcome to leave a message on my user talk page. See you around, Hummerrocket (talk) 16:48, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RafaelS1979. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RafaelS1979 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I often use a VPN for security and privacy reasons. I'm a frequent editor mainly on the french and english Wikipedias (Football, F1, music, etc.) and I always have to log off my VPN whenever I want to edit on Wikipedia, which is, to be honest, really annoying. It would help to have a permanent IP block exemption. thanks RafaelS1979 (talk) 22:43, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only; please make your request by following the instructions at WP:IPECPROXY. A checkuser must examine this situation first. 331dot (talk) 10:38, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot I sent an email to checkuser-en-wpwikipedia.org in the hope that someone will reply soon. RafaelS1979 (talk) 11:30, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Once the checkuser examines the matter, they will then tell how to proceed. The requirements for an exemption have been loosened recently; previously a mere desire for security and privacy was not sufficient(especially if a user is able to turn off their VPN), but now most trusted users are permitted the exemption- though it is not usually given out without an end date of some kind. 331dot (talk) 11:35, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks for the info. RafaelS1979 (talk) 11:44, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason you reverted my reversion on Headlong (song)? Was the information the disruptive IP introduced correct? Can you provide a source or an image link that proves it? The entire section is uncited. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 11:06, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ResolutionsPerMinute It's you to prove that John Deacon did backing vocals on the album. It's not because we see the for of them around the mic that John sings. It's the same thing as in Somebody to love, we see the four of them around the mic for aesthetics reasons. John didn't sing. Go see the booklet of Innunedo, he is not credited with backing vocals. RafaelS1979 (talk) 12:24, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So he isn't. That's all I needed to know. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 12:58, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]