Welcome!

Hello, RM-47, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Grand Pier, Weston-super-Mare. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! — Rod ^talk 07:37, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1000% apologies, I'll fully admit I just saw a red-named user making subtle edits without changing sources and I assumed you were vandalizing. Entirely my fault, really am sorry. The data had been there for a while so I just assumed it was correct. Staxringold _talk^contribs 00:15, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In your edit summary of the article, you said "It is incorrect and incredibly biased to claim that ALL 440,000 of Amazon's sales were down to the 99 cent deal." That source came specifically from Billboard, which said that "AmazonMP3 sold upwards of 440,000 downloads of its 99-cent "Born This Way" album." I interpret that as saying that the $0.99 contributed 440,000 to the album's total. Entertainment Weekly also said "Of course, Amazon.com’s controversial (and intially botched) decision to sell the record for just 99 cents no doubt helped goose the numbers, as it’s estimated that the online retailer sold upwards of 440,000 of the album at the cheap price." How do you interpret these claims? Orane (talk) 04:22, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		Research Participation Barnstar
		For your participation in the survey for Anonymity and conformity on the internet. Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 08:29, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey One Among Many, I wanted to let you know you've done outstanding work on the two 30 Rock episodes you composed and wanted to ask you a favor. I absolutely dread authoring plot synopses for new articles and was wondering if you could take a crack at one for the recently started article for the most recently aired "A Goon's Deed in a Weary World". Most of the other work is done, but I'm hopeful to pawn off this chore if possible. Jg2904 (talk) 06:00, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; glad you've enjoyed them. All done. One Among Many (talk) 14:09, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, thank you! I absolutely detest writing those, and yours are far more detailed anyway. Jg2904 (talk) 22:19, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I keep re-reading these articles with great pleasure. You did a superb job. Jg2904 (talk) 02:59, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Took me a couple of attempts to get the plot summaries right, but I'm glad you enjoyed. One Among Many (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]