Maybe just type updated changes in without reverting good edits at the time that they were made, as reverts are a statistic in the user record. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:24, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood ‍—⚰️NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 11:25, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of spacewalks since 2025 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Now that we have had the first private spacewalks, are new spacewalks really notable enough to have a separate list for future ones? While they may still get mentioned, it's rare that they are the focus of much attention any longer.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 15:53, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lets keep it for those who read, there's only 1 private eva till niw also for same reason i broke since 2015 till 2024 not till 2029, if Wikipedia gas unlimited space why hesitate@Fram ‍—⚰️NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 15:56, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of spacewalks since 2025 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of spacewalks since 2025 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 08:46, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RIP B1058. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ajit Krishnan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:51, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RIP B1058. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Angad Pratap".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:51, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]