Welcome!

Hello, Profitoftruth85, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Lightsaber. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --EEMIV (talk) 13:34, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear concerned, I appreciate your efforts for helping in editing and revising the article on Bhagat Singh. I had added information regarding the said topic along with the required citation, which was removed by you in an attempt to improve the article by removal of original researches, and the citation proves the information to be a fact rather than original research. I request you to go through the citation and read through the comment on the Bhagat Singh Talk page that I've added. Thank you for your sincere efforts. - Ashubhalaa (talk) 06:36, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Someone named Sardar Ujjal Singh was governor of Punjab province from 1/9/65 until 26/6/66. This may make him notable, assuming that this is the same person as the astrologer, which I consider somewhat unlikely (Very many Sikhs in Punjab). I spent over twenty minutes googling various combinations of his name and astrologer/astrology, and didn't come up with anything coherent, or really anything useful at all. Now, it is entirely possible that astrologers are too busy looking at stars to bother making a webpage, and that their followers are too busy living their lives by the stars. India is an enormous and somewhat undeveloped country with more people than my mind can really comprehend - with population(as well as belief system(s), education, and technology) what they are in India, I could also see where this man has been very influential in the lives of very many people. More influential, and to more people, than many contemporary English Fiction authors and pop music writers, many of whom have their own WikiPedia page without "notability" tags. Really, this page might be able to use an "expert attention" tag.. (Attention from an expert in what, though?!) I can certainly see, however, where this section you dispute has POV problems... As well as your deletion of it. On a more personal note, sorry if my tone has been somewhat terse and acerbic; I've just fought with Windows Vista and my ISP for an hour or more, and had to rewrite a longer and better worded post. I posted something very similar to this on Talk:Kotkapura as well. Nowhere near as well worded as what I had written, I swear.. Also, you ought consider making a userpage for User:Profitoftruth85 as well - that's you, and you're redlinked. (On a sidenote, after looking at the article, but before reading the talk page and your posts to user_talk:Hydrogen_Iodide, I considered slapping you with a uw-delete1. However, I decided against this because you were civil, and explained your rationale. Now, I am completely undecided on the issue, and I think it needs expert attention. If you decide to take on this article yourself, and want any copyediting or other minor help.. Let me know on my talk page; I'm a historian and philosopher by education and a construction worker by trade. Beats me if I really would be any use.)

𝕭𝖗𝔦𝔞𝔫𝕶𝔫𝔢𝔷 02:18, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

I think your best bet is to highlight this as breaking the 3reverts rule and taking it from there to Edit war.--Sikh-history (talk) 11:41, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently changed several of the information boxes regarding battles of the First and Second Anglo-Sikh wars. Replacing Khalsa by Sikh Empire might not be controversial, but you exchanged the sides for the combatants so that the Sikhs appeared to be led by British generals and vice versa. Likewise, the strengths and casualties were reversed. When making such changes to an info. box, all the information must be switched to avoid incorrect details. HLGallon (talk) 22:44, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:07, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Please refrain from creating articles with insufficient context to identify the subject and which only consist of two sentences. Thanks. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:47, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did delete them, but I can restore them for you. Sorry about the inconvenience. PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:11, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Citation Barnstar
		Profitoftruth85 has been awarded "The Citation Barnstar" for provide references and in-line citations to previously unsourced material and deleted statements..... Moxy (talk) 00:44, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The failure of Britain to abandon the posts on what became US territory per the Treaty of Paris (1783) is not relevant to the War of 1812. Jay's Treaty of 1794 solved this issue, as well as the failure of the US to observe the same treaty and pay debts to British creditors. Historians cite issues about maritime disputes, the problem with the Indians, impressment, and the claim that the US wanted to annex Canada. Dwalrus (talk) 01:53, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:59, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant was that, in the previous version of the article, there was written 'in 2009'. This seems to have been added during the year 2009 wth the intention of it meaning 'this year'. However, because the year has passed, it is no longer meaning 'this year'. And if there was a year, the year given would have to be updated every year. Thus, it is best not to include any year when the meaning is basically 'as of now'. Did I explain that well enough? Munci (talk) 23:40, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Profitoftruth85. You have new messages at Deepak D'Souza's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

When you are finished making your revisions, please feel free to remove the under construction template, I added it to keep your article safe from speedy deletion (or a PROD) in case someone didn't see your edit note prior to there being any content up. Great work by the way! ialsoagree (talk) 15:28, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well. i haven't been editing much of the English Wikipedia (well i was mostly involved with list articles and episode pages on eng wiki) recently or Punjabi wikipedia either. I am on and off because of college. I havn't really seen or contacted anyone that edits sikhism articles on english wiki, so i can';t really be sure who's active and who's not. there aren't much editors on Punjabi Wikipedia either. well, maybe you could ask people on sikhiwiki, i think [user:hari singh] and User:Hpt_lucky (this one his english wiki user page User:Harisingh and User:Hpt_lucky, ythough i think they can be reached quickly on sikhiwiki rather than this wiki) I think you will find some editors that edit sikhiwiki and were at some point active on english wiki page. or someone else at that wiki might help. I don;t really know anyone that active on english wiki. Im sorry, i'm not much help i guess. pa:User:Guglani might help with some, but I've only seen him come on like once a month or several months after sometime of punjabi wiki. Gman124 ^talk 14:03, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Profitoftruth85. You have new messages at Magicpiano's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The following categories:

- British Mandate of Palestine

- Pre-IDF military units

- Militant Zionist groups

- Yishuv

- Revisionist Zionism

- Zionist terrorism

- Jews and Judaism-related controversies...

were removed from the Irgun's article because already are in the main category of this organization.

The only category I completely deleted is history of Israel, because the category British Mandate of Palestine is already included in Israel's history category.

I hope this explanation be helpful for you. Greetings--AndresHerutJaim (talk) 04:04, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

People use to commit that mistake. See here.--AndresHerutJaim (talk) 04:18, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On the contrary, users can find everything related to "Irgun" easily, just in one single correct place.--AndresHerutJaim (talk) 04:38, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree. I think categories are confusing to navigation if they are redundant. Should we ask for some kind of mediation in this dispute?--AndresHerutJaim (talk) 04:48, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading this media,

However, it would be nice if you could give some kind of indication as to what license the media is under. That way other people can be confident in making use of it for many varied purposes :)

Adding license information also helps prevent media you've put effort into creating from being deleted :)

You may wish to read Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags#For_image_creators which will assist you :)

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:57, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Is your other problem with the source "the writer of the article has POV issues"? What is the basis of your claim? The edit referring to this article does not use anything the writer is saying. So POV should not be a problem here. A reliable source, TNIE, is being used here to get info about a white paper by government. White papers are accessible via RTI for public reference. So Even if there is a POV issue with the writer, this particular edit is under criticism section. Arguments and counter-arguments are necessary to be mentioned to make the section balanced and neutral as far as possible.

--Deshabhakta (talk) 15:03, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is the article on TNIE is an editorial in the opinions section of the newspaper, its not in the news section. So this isn't really about the reliability of TNIE but about the reliability of that opinion piece. I'm not removing any information I just read them and thought they would be challenged later on. I inserted the better source template so another editor with more knowledge on this white paper would find a more reliable source.

I also understand what you're saying about POV being needed to balance the article, however, it's important that POV sources not be used to quote primary sources, because they could make their own intrepretaion seem like the reality.

--Profitoftruth85 (talk) 18:51, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

... are always a great idea. In that specific case, my revert was a screwup, and no, I have no idea what I intended to do... whatever it was, it failed. Thanks for noticing.- Sinneed 06:54, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am betting I saw that as *removing* (reading the diff backward) the content, rather than adding it... then the ES would be needed to avoid wp:blanking unexplained-removal-of-content. In any event, thanks again for catching my error.- Sinneed 07:00, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Kiladar, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiladar. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dengero (talk) 11:50, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The WikiChevrons
		Awarded to User:Profitoftruth85 for your article Battle of Attock, an outstanding contribution to the area of military history. Doc Tropics 17:09, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Military of India. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BilCat (talk) 10:02, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I've removed the "warning" issued by the IP user. It is probable that the same person is using several IPs to revert you, and thus is "baiting" you into getting a block, while escaping one themselves. It's tough, but you need to back of the reverting for awhile, and try other means, such as protecting the page. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 21:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your message on my talk page about Attock. Yes they are two separate towns. Attock Khurd is the historical town where the battle took place. The distinction is important as the current capital is also known as Attock (was originally Campbellpur, founded by the British in 1908). Rzafar (talk) 08:24, 23 June 2010 (UTC) == Regarding signing of posts on RSS page ==[reply]

Dear friend thanks for your advice and i am fallowing it but i think there is some technical issue at my side and i am unable to solve it due to my lack of knowledge. If you can help me or guide me for the same. I using that sign of pencil but still the sign is not posted in proper way....regards --Sandeep 04:29, 24 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandeepsp4u (talk • contribs)

Well done on your input on article Misl. Might I make a suggestion that you may find some other references, eg Bhaghat Siinghs book on Misls etc. Thanks and Keep it Up --Sikh-History 07:22, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not restart the edit war here which me and several editors were at pains to resolve. The change in edit is very mischievous, and seeks to deny any connection between Jats and Roma. The quotation from the article was left in so as to leave no abiguity. Thanks --Sikh-History 21:11, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You uploaded File:NORTHERN_INDIA_1780_by_hellbat.jpg which was deleted. It is now back and permission has been confirmed. Nillerdk (talk) 20:10, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have added this link that refers to operation Blue Star as a massacre. Any views? Thanks --Sikh-History 12:59, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think too often important information can get deleted from wikipedia because of a lack of reliable sources. It was good you found a source to back up that view because obviously many people feel that way. --Profitoftruth85 (talk) 15:10, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Did you add the pic of the Maharaj? If so, good job! Gorkhali (talk) 00:41, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear friend,

Yes I will definitely help out with the article, I added the aftermath of what happened to his family. I have a deep interest in the article because we are related to the Maharaja through matrimonial ties.

However, I am glad to see you on the scene because it becomes frustrating dealing with POVs and political agenda type edits.

Again, thanks for the great work you're doing!

Gorkhali (talk) 21:31, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page has been moved to Guru Hargobind.

Sorry you didn't get a response quickly in the live help - usually we respond quick there, but we were a little busy at the time. But I did note your request, and checked to see if it could be done later. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  01:21, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

.......for your improvements to Indian religions and Religion in India.--Indian Chronicles (talk) 04:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliment! If you are interested I think you should add more of a Jain perspective to the articles. Right now they seem a bit weighted against the idea of Jainism and Buddhism as separate religions, perhaps you could split them into separate sections? thanks for the compliment anyway!--Profitoftruth85 (talk) 04:40, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please, since the entire goal of mediation is to get you to talk to each other, I'm here to please ask you to refrain from edits such as this in future.

Wikireader41, this is a mediation, not an opportunity for you to start frothing at the mouth about Pakistan.

This is an ad hominem that adds nothing to your position, but poisons the well. Salvio ( ^{Let's talk 'bout it!}) 12:36, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to link to a category and not insert an article into it, you can write [[:Category:Name of the category]]; for instance, [[:Category:Massacres in places of worship]] gives you Category:Massacres in places of worship. Hope this helps. Salvio ^{Let's talk 'bout it!} 17:24, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is this about? I've been busting butt to clean this page up. Professor marginalia (talk) 22:25, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I assumed you were a vandal because the entire page was blanked for one reason or another. I don't know if you are going to find some sources and improve the article because otherwise alot of information was deleted.--Profitoftruth85 (talk) 22:33, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's been painstaking work involving identifying relevant merges, creation of new main articles, checking copyright infringements, and trying to locate WP:RS for the unsourced content. The article is being rebuilt to discuss the topic and themes of creation myths. Before it was like trying to write an article about Religion or Mythology with nothing but a long list of every religion on the planet or every myth ever told. But no problem...thanks for the reply. Professor marginalia (talk) 22:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey buddy go right ahead if you're rewriting it, you got no problem with me. List of Creation mythologies is currently a redirect that might better service the original role before your rewrite btw.--Profitoftruth85 (talk) 22:54, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the wl. That will be useful. That's an excellent place to do some assembling. There's a lot of work to do. Thanks! Professor marginalia (talk) 23:28, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help on this article. I think the editor Pectore is trying to engage people in edit wars. He tries to WP:Censor, quotations he does not agree with. Thanks --Sikh-History 07:28, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You input maybe useful here too. Thanks--Sikh-History 08:28, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm closing the case as stale, after a week of inactivity; should this dispute flare up again, feel free to reopen without prejudice. Salvio ^{Let's talk 'bout it!} 14:40, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If you believe that the redirect Singh Sabha should be deleted, list it at WP:RFD with your rationale for deletion. Thank you. Jon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.50.205 (talk) 22:12, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ghadar Party. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. rueben_lys (talk · contribs) 13:03, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Profitoftruth85. You have new messages at Talk:Óglaigh na hÉireann (Continuity Irish Republican Army splinter group.
Message added 16:01, 17 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I know this editor has tried to engage you in edit wars. Do not get drawn in or revert the page more than twice or you may find yourself blocked. Instead inform me or an Administrator and maybe we can reason with him. At the moment he has been blocked again. Hopefully we can make him understand teh Wikipedia rules. Thanks --SH 23:40, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi fellow editor, I would like to commend you on your great work on this site. I have one question however. I noticed you removed a certain editor (who tends to have a pro-Brahmanical stance on most articles), additions. Do you think there is any harm in letting it stay? He will only start an edit war when he comes back from his two week ban? Thanks--SH 21:19, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't seen him actually add any meaningful information to articles. His MO seems to be just adding his caste name to prominent people, so yeah I think there is harm in letting him stay. He's getting in the way by taking up the time of people who are adding to articles.--Profitoftruth85 (talk) 18:02, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, fair enough, but let me know if he causes any trouble. Thanks --SH 20:37, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Raise it as WP:AN/I. Thanks--SH 09:02, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see you haven't been notified about the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive editing - Systematical removal of edits out of religious prejudice regarding an issue with which you have been involved. Dougweller (talk) 08:41, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have a new message at Template talk:Terrorist organisations active in India's talk page.

abhishek singh (talk) 04:06, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw you uploaded , can you tell me where you found information on that flag? I'm trying to improve articles on Sikh history so I'm going to see if I can make an article on each of the flags of the Sikh princely states. Thanks--Profitoftruth85 (talk) 17:32, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's been so long I can't remember. I did the flag but had to do some research at FOTW and other sites.--RobNS 21:12, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Outline WikiProject is currently working on the Outline of Sikhism.

You, and the rest of the Sikhism WikiProject are invited to join this collaboration.

The Outline of Sikhism is the latest addition to the religion section of Portal:Contents/Outlines.

We look forward to learning from your expertise on this subject.

The Transhumanist 05:34, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, made correction as you suggested!!!! Decora (talk) 02:22, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reason I changed it from fifth to eighth is because when you click that link on the text "fifth-largest" leading to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_religious_groups it shows sikhism as being the eighth listed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Myxsoma (talk • contribs) 19:28, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:03-Men of the Loodiaah (Ludhiana) Sikh Regiment in China, Circa 1860..jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Need some input Kapoor family, as an author has taken particular exception to adding anything related to Punjabi there. Your input at the talk page would be welcome here Thanks --SH 08:56, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok we need some consensus here. Thanks--SH 19:29, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please add your proposal here or indicate which proposal you prefer.

Ok, lets included the prefered edit, it would be good if either you or Dianna could include it. Thanks--SH 14:23, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One comment. We may not want to associate Sikhism with some of the Bani eg Sarbh Loh, but it maybe an idea to still include them. Reason why because someone may wish to delete other ones. Thanks--SH 09:32, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi fellow editor, I could probably do with some assistance in trying to create a proper article from at Gur Sikh Temple, as the editor there seems to have taken a particularly hostile attitude to anything I am doing there, since I removed "Sikhiwiki" links. Thanks --SH 08:09, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm busy with some work but I'll help edit that article once I'm free later this week. There are a ton of articles like that which could use the attention of multiple editors at once. --Profitoftruth85 (talk) 16:25, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks--SH 06:52, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jassa Singh Ramgarhia - Thakur Singh.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:05, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jassa Singh Ramgarhia.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:05, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Lyndon B. Johnson visiting National Youth Administration projects -36-1slash2-1- Jan.Feb, 1936.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:42, 4 May 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:42, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Recently PROFIT.. undid my addition, that could only enrich the article. My humble submission is that "Quality Information" should not be stopped from reaching those scholars who do not have access to these costly articles.

I mentioned a path breaking article published in prestigious journal India Review (Taylor and Francis, U.K.). The article costs $35. Scholars from developed country have access to such articles (that is why they are far more advanced in producing research output) but wikipedia can help un-resourceful aspirants by at least communicating to them the key arguments of such important papers which are published in these reputed journals only because they are "path breaking"/innovative and tells something new.

I can guess why you deleted it. So I will make those changes.

NOW, in future, before you decide to undo any such edit that shares a new RESEARCH (inaccessible to IIIrd World scholars) , PLEASE think of millions of people who NEED information FREE of cost. Mdhsj71 (talk) 04:52, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I removed that section was because the purpose of the article is to be a general overview of Indira Gandhi's life, not an in-depth study of her economic policy. Also, sources are more reliable the more they have been cited in other papers and this paper seems to go against current scholarly research, so it seems to be a fringe viewpoint. In addition, there are far more important papers on India's economic policy which are not described in detail because that is not the purpose of wikipedia. I also suggest that you take article discussions to the talk pages of articles so other editors can weigh in. I am reverting your edit, if you want to discuss further let's create a new section on the talk page.--Profitoftruth85 (talk) 12:10, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Akal Security is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akal Security until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 02:22, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Babbar Akali movement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to Anglo-Sikh wars and Tarn Taran

Sikh extremism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Anglo-Sikh wars

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Sant Bhasha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bathinda.gif, which you've sourced to http://punjabgovt.nic.in/ which states "Copyright 2012 Government of Punjab. All rights reserved.". I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 13:10, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Profitoftruth85. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 01:48, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:1928 Southwest Texas State Teachers College Debate Team - 28-13-1 - ca. 1928.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 10:04, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi fellow editor Diet in Sikhism seems to be continually attacked by some strange people. Could you please help keep an eye on it? Thanks SH 20:16, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I could also use your impartial input here Thanks SH 15:30, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. SH 16:29, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Qila Ram Rauni at Ramgarh.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:55, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Profitoftruth85,

I am contacting you regarding the article Ranjit Singh. There is ongoing discussion on Talk:Ranjit Singh about the dispute on the article. You can participate in the discussion on the Talk:Ranjit Singh. I'd be very appreciative. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theman244 (talk • contribs) 23:56, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sikh man surrounded 1984 pogroms.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:28, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bhagat Singh 1922.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 16:17, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Any insight would be helpful:

A scandal broke out a week ago in the BAPS group about two former swami's that accused the head of this organization of rape. I have been dealing with Swaminarayan topic for a few days now. Could some one explain the WP:BLPCRIME policy as it relates to this. This is a sensitive topics and any input would be helpful. Here is what is posted now in the controversy section:

On 22 Oct 2013, BAPS responded to the allegations made by two former sadhus (Sanjay Shah (Priyadarshandas) and Rakesh Bhavsar (Nishkamsevadas) ) that the claims made against Pramukh Swami and his sadhus are utterly baseless and false.^[1] Indian reported that “Pramukh Swami, who heads BAPS, and four other top swamis, of alleged assault dating back to the 1970s when they were students at the gurukul.”^[2]

Here are additional sources:

http://www.dnaindia.com/ahmedabad/report-ahmedabad-sexual-harassment-case-against-more-sadhus-1907573 http://www.baps.org/Announcement/2013/Message-for-All-5347.aspx http://www.indianexpress.com/news/baps-refutes-allegations-by-former-sadhus/1186609/ http://www.sandesh.com/article.aspx?newsid=2878833 http://www.dnaindia.com/ahmedabad/report-ahmedabad-2-ex-sadhus-accuse-pramukh-swami-and-4-of-sexual-abuse-1908114 http://www.gujaratglobal.com/index.php/current-news/2222-now-baps-sadhus-in-sex-controversy http://daily.bhaskar.com/article/GUJ-AHD-swami-maharaj-performed-unnatural-sex-on-me-for-over-25-years-in-gujarat-and-on--4413768-NOR.html

Main question here is that should these allegation be on Wiki for Pramukh Swami Maharaj under a controversy section. Reply here and there. The main controllers of the article claim that this man is relatively unknown outside of India but in the article itself, it states that he is single-handedly responsible for global growth.

Any help would be helpful. Thank you for you time.

Bluespeakers (talk) 14:19, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I also want to know that I am apart of an ongoing sock investigation and I am currently fighting. Here is the link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Swamifraud. I do not want this to affect your ability to assist in this article so after reading some of the accusing parties attacks, I am displaying. Please take a look at the articles above and contribute because there are many people patrolling the articles making sure that their religious group is only being portrayed in a certain way.

Bluespeakers (talk) 17:23, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Village Scene 1906- pg 174 - India under royal eyes- Henry Francis Prevost Battersby.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:45, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Lahore Street Scene 1906- pg 86 - India under royal eyes- Henry Francis Prevost Battersby.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:45, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Harmandir Sahib Causeway 1906- pg 86 - India under royal eyes- Henry Francis Prevost Battersby.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Harmandir Sahib Bir Tree 1906- pg 123 - India under royal eyes- Henry Francis Prevost Battersby.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Amritsar street 1906- pg 119 - India under royal eyes- Henry Francis Prevost Battersby.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Amritsar Akal Bunga 1906- pg 127 - India under royal eyes- Henry Francis Prevost Battersby.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:President Lyndon B. Johnson meets with Civil Rights leaders 2.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:01, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Battle of Multan - Devender Singh.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:03, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Diwan Mool Raj by Jarnail Singh.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Coke R Stevenson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The page File:35th Sikhs, Soudan, 1896..jpg has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image was an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links were updated.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:48, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Mohkanchand.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Gujranwala Sikhs 1860.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Sikh and British officers of 26 Punjab regiment, bengal native infantry.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:World Sikh Organization logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:57, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Punjabiyat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punjabiyat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hemantha (talk) 14:12, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sikh Gunners with an Ordinance rifled muzzel loading 2.5inch mountain gun, the 'Screw-gun'..jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 10:44, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Risaldar-Major Gurdath Singh 12th Bengal Cavalry and his orderly.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 11:11, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Rohilla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Rohilla until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 04:47, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]