Fuerteventura Airport page needs a photo. I can't upload one because I have terrible Internet. Can you please find one and upload it, since you edited the airport page recently? Hopefully I'll receive your reply with this terrible wifi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woodywyatt (talk • contribs) 14:37, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I'm guessing you're an ex-Computer-Park person as it looks like you created CP's wikipedia page. See the link I've just added to that page for the discussion group we've recently started for CP alumni.

Hello, Pmbma, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! --TAG 22:20, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on List of downloadable airline timetables, by Masaruemoto (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because List of downloadable airline timetables is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting List of downloadable airline timetables, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing some of the ground work with removing Sterling Airlines from the airports after they went down the drain today. However, we have decided at Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports that the airports are not to include any "former airlines and destinations". More about this topic can be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports#Should former airlines and destinations be included in airport articles?. Thanks for your understanding, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia, and sorry for puting this on your user page instead of your talk the first time. Arsenikk ^(talk) 16:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. To be honest, I don't know, though I will find out. I simply copied all the info that was already in the article into the table. If I've made a mistake (which is more than likely!) then Il change it. Thanks again,--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 17:03, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Pmbma! I regarding to message left on my talk page, and saw that Marco1990's edits to this airport. He may be a suspected sockpuppet of User:S marky 90, as both of these users have made simliar edits to this airport. If I were you, I would alert the admin of this matter. Have a great day! Cashier freak (talk) 20:41, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried making changes to he article but same keeps happening to me. It looks like he owns the Venice Airport article and when he's undoing our edts, he doesn't use the edit summary. Cashier freak (talk) 20:10, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pmbma,

I do not agree if this was the case all other airlines AA, DL, NW, AS, UA should have their destinations list updated for PHX since most of them provide same plane and flight number service to a number of cities outside of their initial stop. The fact is if you look at all the airlines and their destinations listed they are all NONSTOP not 1 stop service. If it is to be kept it should be noted that AM MEX is not a nonstop destination for AM otherwise it is provided false information. ops sorry forgot my sig04:32, 18 December 2008 (UTC)Daltnpapi4u (talk)

I agree that AA, DL, etc... provide 1-stop flights out of PHX to a variety of destinations. However, most of these 1-stop flights are via a hub of the airline. Many of those flights on for example AA go non-stop from PHX to either DFW or ORD or another AA hub, and then onto somewhere else. Look at all those 1-stop flights, and then cross off the list all the ones which go via an airline's hub, and see what you're left with. I suspect you will be left with comparatively few destinations. Pmbma (talk) 01:46, 19 December 2008 (UTC)Pmbma[reply]

I agree with you on that however if the editor is only going to choose 1 airline to do this for and not the rest then the entire page is providing incomplete information. So why just AM? why wont they verify all those other flights to? thats what my problem is.. the biggest airline where they will probably have alot of work to do on is WN since they provide many 1 stop same plane service to many destinations outside of their initial stop out of PHX. And then on that note they should get working on all those other cities as well since WN also does this out of almost every city the fly to.Daltnpapi4u (talk) 03:23, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pick an airline (something relatively simple - not WN !), list the destinations (on my talk page, not the PHX page) that you think should or shouldn't be listed from PHX, and we can discuss in more detail Pmbma (talk) 03:30, 20 December 2008 (UTC)Pmbma[reply]

I've had a look at airports flown by WN from PHX. I'd suggest that if a route is served only from PHX or only to PHX (i.e. unidirectional rather than bidirectional) then it should not be listed as a PHX destination. I've chosen the week beginning 10-Jan, as this avoids any one-off specials over the Xmas period. This means we can rule out Albany, Cleveland, Corpus, Ft Myers, Harlinger, Hartford, Jackson, Midland Odess, Washington Dulles.

Of the remainder with bi-directional flights not involving a code change, Amarillo is flown via Denver (a hub), Boise is flown via Las Vegas (a hub), Ft Lauderdale is flown via Birmingham (a hub), Jacksonville is flown via Birmingham (again, a hub), Long Island is flown via Chicago-Midway (a hub), etc..... which then rules these routes out if one is to follow WP policy. There might be the odd missing destination, but at least for WN, I'm having difficulty finding errors in the PHX article on WP. If you think there are any specific examples that are missing, I'd be keen to hear about them Pmbma (talk) 04:03, 20 December 2008 (UTC)Pmbma[reply]

Hi,

yes, they have ceased these flights in November. Normaly they dont't publish any news about this.

I will reply to your questions asap on the article's talk page Talk:Ace_of_Spades_(junction) Ren ✉ 07:25, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your note. It's probably all a bit moot now, but I've moved the discussion from that IP user's page to Talk:Shannon Airport. Cheers, --A bit iffy (talk) 17:04, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi,

Could you give me the name of the tour operator which use Jet2 for these flights. Thanks. Jamie2k9 (talk) 22:30, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to compre times with Jet2 DUB charter as currently its impossible for jet 2 to operate it as the aircraft is coming from there to DUB and last year it was done by NCL aircraft but its not being done by any UK base at the minute.

Hi. When you recently edited List of the busiest airports in Switzerland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I did realise it was for 4 days only but I didn't realise I saved the edit, I didn't mean to save it. Jamie2k9 (talk) 22:56, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pmbma! The instructors at the Counter-Vandalism Unit Academy have seen your hard work reverting vandalism, and we would like to thank you. But do you want to go to the next level? Would you like to know how reverts, warnings, reports, blocks, and bans all come together to keep this Encyclopedia free from disruption? Then consider enrolling today! Electric Catfish 00:01, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pmb, I'll be your instructor in the Academy and we can get started tommorow or whenever works for you. Let me know Dan653 (talk) 02:34, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK - How do we start ? Pmbma (talk) 20:14, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First, read wp:vand and let me know if you have any questions. Dan653 (talk) 22:14, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Read the page. In the past I've often edited wikipedia pages under an IP address for various reasons, so understand that it is not in itself vandalism. However, I've recently seen a case where someone using different IP addresses seems to be putting up plausible information without a source and which go against information on reliable websites, combined with a degree of edit-warring without providing an explanation. If the dubious user gets a different IP address each time they connect their PC to the web, how does one inform said user to try to provide a reference for their claims ? Sure, you can wait for the user to get bored of the silly game, but there has to be a better way without necessarily locking pages that they regularly seem to target

Separately, if one wishes to revert a page to a specific version and don't want to use 'undo' - either because someone else has made subsequent edits rendering the dodgy edits non-undoable, or because there are *lots* of small dodgy edits which would be very laborious to undo individually, what's the best way to approach this ? Pmbma (talk) 23:02, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you list a few of the Ip adresses and I'll look into it. This might be for an administrator to deal with. I'll let you know.

For you, you would probably have to edit each of the edits out of the page individually. If you let me know the page(s) I might be able to edit them out with rollback. Dan653 (talk) 23:12, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pages which I'm pretty certain are sneaky vandalism are Prague Ruzyne Airport (I've already reverted manually) and M. R. Stefanik Airport (Sir Tanx did the revert but user seems to want to undo the revert. 2 other pages which seem to have certainly dubious edits (but on which I'm not sufficiently knowledgable on the subject matter to say for definite) are Tribhuvan International Airport and King Hussein International Airport (manual undo of dodgy edits is not available because of subsequent good edits by another user). IP addresses are 180.149.17.123 and 180.149.12.207 which both tie back to the same ISP. One of the IP addresses has had other edits a month earlier which seem to be genuinely good edits, so blocking the IP address is probably a bad idea. Pmbma (talk) 23:23, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't mind, but I hid your warnings on 17.123 and 12.207 and put up an unsourced warning. All warnings can be found here User:Arnon_Chaffin/Anti-Vandalism_Center, it's a great resource. Where it says article just put the articles name. I'm still looking into the Ips. I'll let you know what I find. Dan653 (talk) 02:36, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported both Ip's to wp:aiv. I'm gonna let an admin sort this one out. Dan653 (talk) 02:43, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For your next assignment please read WP:CUV and let me know if you have any questions. Dan653 (talk) 02:47, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The admin has decided that the Ip's edits are not mostly vandal edits. Dan653 (talk) 02:48, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can not find your message, please post exact link! --Tito Dutta ✉ 02:16, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have found your message! --Tito Dutta ✉ 02:35, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been dropped from the CVUA due to inactivity. If you would like to rejoin you will need to re-apply at the enroll page. Dan653 (talk) 00:53, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

In this issue:

• Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
• Research: The most recent DR data
• Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
• Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
• DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
• Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
• Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 19:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of the busiest airports in Spain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Leon, Cordoba, Santander, Vitoria, San Sebastian and Leon Airport

List of the busiest airports in Germany (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Halle and Hanover Airport

List of the busiest airports in Italy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Florence Airport

List of the busiest airports in Portugal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Santa Maria Airport

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:11, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Newquay Cornwall Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norwich Airport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles, such as the edit you made to Mutoko Airport. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. Please do not sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. Please use the "Preview" button before saving your changes. Jetstreamer ^Talk 01:16, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jetstreamer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, British Airways destinations, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 00:37, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of the busiest airports in Luxembourg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the busiest airports in Luxembourg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ironholds (talk) 23:43, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

... is appreciated, but unclear to me. Tearfully, none of Ukraine's airports is among "busiest" in either Europe or Eurasia so far(

BTW, come flying here to boost the stats) Thanks anyway, Ukrained2012 (talk) 09:38, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm King Of The Wise. Pmbma, thanks for creating List of the busiest airports in Morocco!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add a suitable lead (introduction) for your article list of busiest airports in Morocco describing what it is about. Thanx.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. King Of The Wise (talk) 09:45, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm King Of The Wise. Pmbma, thanks for creating List of the busiest airports in Morocco!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Try increasing the information on the table ( such as by further increasing the total ranking). Take help from some other similar page such as List of busiest airports in India by passenger traffic

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. King Of The Wise (talk) 10:07, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Busiest airports in the United Kingdom by total passenger traffic, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Norwich Airport and Exeter Airport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pmbma, A few weeks ago we had a revert 'conflict' over Germania's flights between London Gatwick and Prishtina. I had 'inside' information that these flights would continue during the winter season (the same as last year). This has now been reflected in Germania's official flight plan on their website flygermania.de. Hope this resolves the issue. I apologise if I gave the impression of being impolite, however I simply wanted the correct information to be reflected on the Wikipedia article. It just took a bit of time for the official information to be reflected in Germania's timetable. Kind regards, Kosovar (talk) 19:05, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again and thanks for the message. No, I do not know what will happen beyond April 2015. Sadly, Germania no longer flies from London Gatwick to Erfurt, so their only flight out of London is to Prishtina. That makes this line vulnerable in my opinion because LGW-PRN line does not fit with the rest of Germania network. It does, however, make British Airway a wee bit more likely to resume its London Gatwick-Prishtina route. How I wish that happened! Best wishes, Kosovar (talk) 19:58, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of the busiest airports in Spain

added links pointing to Leon, Cordoba, Santander, Vitoria, San Sebastian, Leon Airport and Santiago Airport

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandroupoli, Naxos and Skyros airports do serve international destinations. See YPA's statistics for 2014: http://www.ypa.gr/userfiles/4659ed30-b59b-4111-9747-a3550129731a/statistiki_aerop_kinisi_2014_1.pdf

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About Heathrow Airport edit; I didn't know that it goes for ambiguity. I'm still rookie on Wiki. Thank you for advice. Brgds, ZPσβ (talk) 03:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pmbma. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit [1] what the IP did is an unsourced change, as they did in other Bulgarian airlines articles. Your reversion only backs their actions, which are against WP:VERIFY. I've reinstated the previous version. Also note that they didn't even bother in changing the access date if the source under a paywall was accessible to them.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited FlyViking, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alta. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pmbma. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Mohammed V International Airport. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jetstreamer ^Talk 16:14, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:BURDEN regarding the claim in your edit summary [2]. Thank you.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:51, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pmbma. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I see that you recurrently add "missing ref" tag on Ryanair disappeared services (mainly in Italian airport pages). Please, if a service is no longer available, remove it, instead of adding tags. In the "Airlines and destinations" sections there is no need to reference services that are ongoing and those that have been deleted can be removed directly. In this pandemic period is normal that an airline remove services without announcing if and when will be resumed. Wherever a service will re-start, it will be re-added without problems.

ty Riktetta (talk) 06:46, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. Please note that Alsie Express removed Bornholm from their destinations guide while the seasonal summer charters for 2021 still remain. The route is therefore likely not resuming. Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:A61:3A4A:D701:580A:630C:C2D7:E8C9 (talk) 13:37, 20 January 2021 (UTC) This is a route solely within Denmark, targeted at passengers who almost all have Danish as their primary language. The destinations page of the airline in Danish lists Bornholm as a destination - I would treat this as more reliable than a page in English Pmbma (talk) 01:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! About this edit I am aware that Fastjet moved to the center of London. Note that the listing I put it in was of former companies, as in companies not there anymore. ("Other airlines which had headquarters")

Happy editing, WhisperToMe (talk) 05:54, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. COVID-19 outbreak has hit airports hard around the world and many airlines cancelled thousands of flights. There is a deal to not remove flights on Wikipedia if they are on a hold. If we only follow one rule "where can person buy a ticket" at this moment, hundreds of fligts would be removed from Wiki, and "Airlines and destinations" part would be completely blank (for example Airports in Australia). Word "cancelled" is often used on Wikipedia, both for airport pages and List of destinations by airpline companies, so it is not only for Niš Constantine the Great Airport.

Now, what is specific for Niš Constantine the Great Airport. Ryanair flights to Berlin and Bratislava are not on sale at the moment, but Ryanair is planning to outline the resumption dates. It was planned for November 2021, but there is no date still. However, this is just suspended route, not terminated like Stockholm–Skavsta and Weeze, when the same company cancels flights and officially announced that information. Do not forget, Serbia is not a member of the EU and this still makes it difficult to restore all suspended lines to EU countries during Covid-19.

Air Serbia added twelve destinations of public interest in 2020 and 2021 from Niš Constantine the Great Airport. Hahn and Ljubljana have been restored and Budapest is cancelled. Air Serbia contract with the government is signed until 2023 for suspended lines to Rome, Hannover, Bologna, Göteborg, Friedrichshafen, Karlsruhe, Salzburg, Nuremberg. It is clear to everyone what "suspended" means and we will update Nis page once we receive new info..

PS. You could wait for my answer before publishing reports, as you first asked a question on my page

It's not about can you buy a ticket to travel today or tomorrow - it's about can you buy a ticket for a date in the future. Granted you cannot buy a ticket from Australia to many countries for travel in January 2022... but you *can* buy a ticket for many of these routes in December 2022, showing that an airline has an intention to resume flying in the future. The Ryanair website has removed routes from Nis to Bratislava and Berlin from its web page at www.ryanair.com - so there is no obvious intent to resume flying these routes. They do however list routes on their home page to Malta, Stockholm and Vienna, showing active intent to fly these routes instead. Air Serbia at airserbia.com shows routes from Nis to Belgrade and Hahn (for example) on their home page, but doesn't allow attempting of booking of flights on their home page from Nis to (for example) Bologna or Friedrichshafen - so they show no clear intent of resumption of flying these routes. Yes, it is possible that some of these suspended routes will return to being actively flown - but there is no clear and active intent from Ryanair or Air Serbia to do so any time in the future on the suspended routes and the airlines have not stated a date when they plan to resume flying. As passenger airlines exist to sell tickets for travel in return for money - not being willing to sell a ticket between 2 cities for any date in the future indicates a lack of desire to be a passenger airline between 2 cities. For a commercial company, actions speak louder than words.
Separately, I don't see what Serbia not being a member of the EU has to do with the matter - an airport in Serbia should be treated the same way as an airport in (for example) Russia - we list the routes that are flown, and don't show any other routes.
As an aside, I raised the proposal for suspended routes being removed 2 days before you reverted (again) another person's attempt at removal of the suspended routes - you did not make any response on either your talk page of the Nis airport talk page. Had you engaged in discussion earlier, I would not have filed a report over edit warring. Pmbma (talk) 02:32, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is a war in Ukraine from today, airport in Kiev is destroyed, airspace is closed, so that airlines wont return in few weeks as it was in old sources. Dont add it back please. Peter11700 (talk) 15:11, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Just wanted to inform you that I recently removed your edit yesterday from the page of Heathrow Airport. The reason because PAL actually not fully drop flight to and from London. Plus I recently saw the post in Facebook (although I save it in my photos) that they are temporarily suspension of the flight due to economic considerations. So yeah, hope you understand! Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 01:54, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About Bucharest Băneasa Aurel Vlaicu Airport. https://panorama.ro/aeroportul-baneasa-renovare-costuri-rute/.--MSClaudiu (talk) 18:00, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pmbma! I just want to talk to you about what we have just talked about at Heathrow Airport's talk page. Can you be one of the helpers to add another column in the airlines and destinations called terminals and assign airlines to which terminal they operate at? The reason is because it is better to show which terminal they operate at. If you can, then you can find another set of people to collaborate together and I will help as well. Thanks for your appreciation! Loveheart547 (talk) 00:28, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not allowed, per WP:NOTTRAVEL. The Banner talk 19:19, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wizz Air will be again closing down its base at Chisinau Airport early December because of russian missiles crossing regular Moldavian airspace. https://www.dw.com/de/russische-raketen-dringen-in-moldauischen-luftraum-ein/a-63397235 Though as this only is a temporary security measure, we don't need any citation needed tags or to remove the routes from there completely.
Best regards
Der HON (talk) 17:15, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

... You have got to understand that Corendon still displays flights in its booking system which are marked as "sold out", but won't operate. I did already remove these so I won't have to do all the edits again in a few weeks.

Source: https://aviation.direct/corendon-rhodos-fluege-ab-graz-und-linz-auf-der-kippe

Best regards, Happy Holidays,
Der HON (talk) 17:27, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that if the flight is marked as Sold-out, then it is unlikely to be flown. However, if the flight is showing a price on the Corendon website - then one should take it as being a genuine intention to fly.Pmbma (talk) 17:29, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is just highly unprobable that Corendon will operate four flights in April only as e.g. FKB-FUE as they had already cut the whole schedule this winter, even though displaying a price. But for me it is okay if you re-add that bunch of destinations, I just don't see the point in removing them again after the next schedule update.
Der HON (talk) 17:35, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of BA CityFlyer destinations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calvi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! The article already has little relevant information. Let's keep that paragraph that I just added like it is for now, please, and once flights start, we can simply replace it with a statement that flights debuted in June 2023. BaboneCar (talk) 14:54, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I believe that I know what you mean with only including notable information, even though I am not very familiarized with the guidelines in the aviation portal yet, but I can learn further about that. Since it is an airport opening now for the first time, I believe that the first flight announcements are quite relevant information since they are a first, but I do agree that we should not then continue with adding paragraphs for every other routes announcements that will follow from now on in the future if that is considered not notable. I believe it could be relevant and useful if a history of the routes operated over the time from the airport was included in that paragraph (if notable per the guidelines indeed), but only if that was thorough and not only including random information. Thanks, Pmbma. BaboneCar (talk) 15:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Harstad/Narvik Airport, Evenes, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quick note- the correct maintenance tag there would be the ^{[needs update]} tag, not ^{[citation needed]}. There was already a citation there. RedundancyAdvocate (talk) 18:28, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pmbma,
First of all wishing you a happy new year :).
Please be aware, that when adding a source to the airlines and destinations paragraph, the comma comes before the source itself according to the wikipedia standard WP:CITEFOOT.
Should look like this then:
CORRECT: [...], Munich,^[1] [...]
WRONG: [...], Munich^[2], [...]
Thanks and have fun editing. Der HON (talk) 18:47, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references, as you did to Sharm El Sheikh International Airport! However, you should know that adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to linkrot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources. A bare URL is a URL cited as a reference for some information in an article without any accompanying information about the linked page. In other words, it is just URL copied and pasted into the Wiki text, inserted between <ref>...</ref> tags, without title, author, date, or any of the usual information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web}} template to cite a web page:

Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:

Lorem ipsum^[1] dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:

1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already entered one or more bare urls to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations; try the reFill tool, which can resolve some bare references semi-automatically. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles, and to avoid future link rot, please consider supplementing your bare URLs—creating full, inline citations with title, author, date, publisher, etc. More information can be found at Wikipedia:Inline citations. Thank you. :Jay8g [V•T•E] 22:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Córdoba Airport, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was the dumbest thing I've done at least today. Thank you for the fix. Sam Kuru (talk) 02:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pmbma!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AnadoluJet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page None.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Airlines established in 2024 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:24, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references! However, adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to link rot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources, including details such as title, author, date, and any other information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web}} template to cite a web page:

Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:

Lorem ipsum^[1] dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:

1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already added one or more bare URLs to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations; try the reFill tool, which can resolve some bare references semi-automatically. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles. VenFlyer98 (talk) 17:23, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fly POP UK, IPS AIRWAYS, and Global Airlines 110.137.39.22 (talk) 02:49, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand this message. Pmbma (talk) 04:48, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Condor destinations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Faro.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Play destinations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Faro.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Article wizard/Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adana/Mersin Airport and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikishovel (talk) 19:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pmbma! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wikishovel (talk) 19:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Pmbma, please try to not use bare URLs as a citation, such as this edit to List of Air France destinations. Bare URLs provide almost no information to the reader of the article, and are subject to link rot. Wherever possible, please try to use full citations, such as those provided by citation templates like Template:Cite web. Thanks! Danners430 (talk) 09:48, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi... I know I'm meant to use full citations. However there are 2 things discouraging me. First CitationBot exists and does a good job. Second, there are a vast number of references that I want to add to wikipedia for what are currently unreferenced or primary-source-only statements. I just don't see a way of adding tens of thousands of individual references quickly without it tripling the time (or longer) it will take to include the references. There are enough people who regularly suggest a page be deleted from wikipedia (with only a week or two of notice) due to lack of independent source references, and very few people seem to care about this, so wikipages built up over years by dozens of volunteers disappear within a few weeks. No, this is not a new thing - been happening for years. I think it's more important to get independent sources into wikipedia and ensure wikipages are not deleted, than worry about how those sources appear.Pmbma (talk) 10:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Except it's not just how sources appear, is it? It's also about preventing link rot. Also, it takes but two seconds to use a tool such as WebRef to automatically generate the full citation for you, which you then copy and paste into the editor. Finally, please don't expect other editors to do your work for you. All that will cause is other editors to get annoyed at constantly having to chase after you and tidy up what you have left. Danners430 (talk) 10:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at reFill, WebRef and others... but I see something that works on small scale for adding one or two references, not something that works at large scale, for adding tens of thousands. I see a very large number of references needing to be added to back up existing statements on wikipedia (often because years ago people weren't so worried about references on wikipedia), but nobody else willing to get involved on a large scale.

Which do you prefer ? Perfect references - and wikipages being deleted on a regular basis... or basic references being added and wikipages not being deleted ? I don't see anybody else willing to add references to back up existing statements on the wikipages I have in mind (mainly airline and airport pages), but I do see people on wikipedia raising large numbers of requests to delete pages because of lack of non-primary-source references.

Big job that cannot be deferred any longer, limited time, not enough people available - what do you do in the real world ? Pmbma (talk) 10:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do I do? I chase after people like you and finish the job that they started… it doesn't take much to copy and paste a fully formatted cite between multiple articles. Once you've found the cite that backs up the statement being made, use WebRef (a 2 second job) then copy the result to all of the articles that you want to cite with that webpage.

It's not like you're using an automated tool to do what you're doing - it adds but one or two steps to fully format a cite over a completely unformatted cite. Danners430 (talk) 10:48, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any tool/website whereby I can paste a simple URL into a simple form in a web page, press a button and it will generate a full citation for me ? No filling in lots of additional boxes in a form to handle all kinds of more complex cases, no login - just a really quick-and-eaay-to-use form on a page with three features - a textbox for a basic URL, a button and a space to hold the text for the full citation. If that exists, I'm willing to use it Pmbma (talk) 11:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - have a look at Web2Cit - it claims to do exactly what you require Danners430 (talk) 11:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Athens International Airport, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:47, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pmbma. You have new messages at Talk:Gatwick Airport.
Message added 14:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ExclusiveEditor _{Notify Me!} 14:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted this edit. Perhaps you meant to leave that on the user's talk page at User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish? --Yamla (talk) 14:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you comment on connections when there is doubt about them? And why do you restore edits from a known serial vandal? The Banner talk 15:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• In the past (e.g. 5 or 10 years ago), when an airline no longer sold tickets for a route, I would just remove the route from Wikipedia - i.e. ensure that Wikipedia reflects what happens in real life. If it was a seasonal route (e.g. summer only) I would wait until the airline had put on sale all the other routes for a season - just in case there was a delay of some sort. Now, if I delete a route, people on Wikipedia immediately revert my edit asking for an independent source before deletion is possible. If I just put a citation-needed or better-source-needed tag without a comment, and then wait a month, people still insist on an independent source and revert my edit. So... it becomes necessary to justify in explicit and great detail every single change, or my edits will almost certainly be reverted within 12 hours. I add a citation-needed or better-source-needed tag only when I have good reason to believe a route is closing - I always verify on an airline website over a period of several months if tickets are being sold before considering a route is potentially being closed. Again, the airline-destination tables on wikipedia should come as close as possible to real life. Regarding the serial vandal, the edits I reverted were with the explicit written agreement of the wiki-admin who was originally trying to revert them - see my comment on the talk page of ScottishFinnishRadish and his/her reply. The Eindhoven routes are no longer listed on airline websites and there has been a citation-needed or better-source-needed tag with an explanatory comment for over 4 weeks - this edit from the IP address in question in this case seemed valid. Pmbma (talk) 15:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]