Can i help you? Just leave a message in the orthodox fashion below. Please remember to sign.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

A tag has been placed on Hamza Tzortzis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Tiller54 (talk) 20:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Where are you? MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

??? MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Principal religious texts has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Shii (tock) 20:45, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abba (Boko Haram) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abba (Boko Haram) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fisheriesmgmt (talk) 03:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Non-denominational Muslim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-denominational Muslim until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Early scholars of Islam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Early scholars of Islam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - HyperGaruda (talk) 22:16, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Quranic figures, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Al-Andalusi (talk) 01:47, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

can you help? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Occupy_Wall_Street#Huge_section_on_Police_infiltration_is_completely_gone.21 16:00, 23 April 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moscowamerican (talk • contribs)

	The Original Barnstar
	Good work Vinod 06:31, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Muslim denominations, North Atlanticist Usonian!

Wikipedia editor Prof tpms just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Excellent classification

To reply, leave a comment on Prof tpms's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Black voting rights. Since you had some involvement with the Black voting rights redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 04:10, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Nawasib. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 9#Nawasib until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ParthikS8 (talk) 07:08, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia:CPOV and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 11#Wikipedia:CPOV until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 16:18, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of chat websites is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of chat websites until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]