Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ukrah, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 17:08, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to XTools, you are nowhere near 16,500 edits on wikipedia, and do not have extended confirmed rights on this account. However, if you have had a previous account, you should not put those stats on this account. Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 16:31, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My faults...its about previous account data that putted here for curriculum purpose. Paramount force (talk) 16:33, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, its all good! If i came across as stern, i didn't mean too. However, If I were you, I just would put it there, but I would say ¨I had a Previous account that had (insert edit amount here)¨ Also, I would put your account here, so people think that you aren't a new editor. Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 16:39, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Paramount force (talk) 01:10, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bobby Cohn were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Resubmitted without any change?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nagarukhra Gram Panchayat (I&II) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paramount force! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]