Hello, Paper45tee! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Levine2112 discuss 06:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Please, please, please...

I am now, for the third time, correcting "week" to "weekend" in the Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed article. Did you not read my comment to you here? [1]

Please look carefully at the figures, and at the table headings of the sources. American films are apparently primarily rated by their "weekend" figures, where a weekend is defined as Friday, Saturday and Sunday. The figures listed in the article are "weekend" figures. Add up the daily numbers if you need additional verification.

Thanks. --RenniePet (talk) 08:46, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paper45tee, RenniePet is right about weekend v. weekday figures. You can prove it by examining the numbers at RottenTomatoes.

Note that the cumulative numbers are more than the "Wkd" (weekend) numbers add up to. That's because the weekday numbers are not included in the weekend numbers. (Yeah, the "Wkd" caption is confusing.) Note, too, the tiny-print footnote: "Box office cumulative figures also include daily grosses from Monday through Thursday (not shown)." NCdave (talk) 10:15, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's not much for Wikipedia to do about that since we are written from a neutral point of view. If someone like Weikart or Stein misquotes or quotes out of context and reliable sources notice that we can report what they said. But other than that not really. JoshuaZ (talk) 21:03, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed your Jindal edit for the reasons listed on the talk page. Let's discuss the issue before getting into a revert war.DanielZimmerman (talk) 01:07, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting me and read the policy on pseudoscience. Paper45tee (talk) 19:10, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will continue to revert your edits to the Bobby Jindal page as long as you continue to place information there that is irrelevant to the Bobby Jindal article. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. DanielZimmerman (talk) 05:16, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Paper45tee! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Larry Arnhart - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:56, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Legal controversy between Answers in Genesis and Creation Ministries International is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legal controversy between Answers in Genesis and Creation Ministries International until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StAnselm (talk) 18:52, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Mathis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Mathis (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]