User talk:Pablo-flores

Archives:

/Archive 1 (January 2004 – 27 July 2005)
/Archive 2 (1 August – 31 December 2005)
/Archive 3 (2 January – 21 March 2006)
/Archive 4 (21 March 2006 – 29 June 2006)
/Archive 5 (7 July 2006 – 27 September 2006)

argentino

Por que escribiste tan buenos articulos sobre la argentina en ingles donde algunos ni siquiera existen en español.Armaste uno completo de un gobernador de la rioja en ingles?! por que? es una curiosidad. saludos —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.139.32.217 (talk) 00:54, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

conlangregionalpower Article

Yo Pablo. just recently read your article "How to create a language". Twas a great help in creating my conlang. -Dantai_Amakiir —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dantai Amakiir (talk • contribs) 18:48, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

regional power Article

I need your help in this article. For months Argentina hass been included as a regional power, with two valid sources backing up that information. An user known as Kardrak started taking out Argentina for no reason a month ago. I reverted his changes, and I also lloked up more sources stating that Argentina is a regional power to make my point more solid. There are four external sources now. But he just wont care. He edits the article and just removes Argentina without any discussion, and he doesnt care about the four external sources I found. Sometimes, he removes Argentina without logging in to avoid the 3RR rule. Please assist! Aletano (talk) 15:25, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History of Argentina and Talk:National Reorganization Process

Hi Pablo! Nice work at translating Noche de los Lapices! I didn't do it now, I'm a bit in a hurry, but maybe adding the ages of the high school students would be useful? Else, I've left a comment proposing to rename National Reorganization Process, your opinion is of course needed! Que te vaya bien, saludos! Tazmaniacs 12:43, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Hype about Hydrogen

Thanks for your comment on the talk page today. I feel that Potomacfever is attacking me for some reason, perhaps because he has political disagreements with the book and its author, who happens to be a friend of mine. I did not write the article on this book, but since I saw it, I have tried to improve it. And as for Romm's bio, I merely split it out of the Hype article and then expanded it with online sources. Today Potomacfever put the author's bio up for AfD. I would value your input to the article itself and also to the Afd for Joseph J. Romm. This whole issue needs more editors to get involved and resolve it. Regards, -- Ssilvers 23:45, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Should this go back in the article?: The book states, "Neither government policy nor business investment should be based on the belief that hydrogen cars will have meaningful commercial success in the near or medium term." I think that's the core of Romm's thesis. If you agree, please put it where you think best. I am trying to minimize my edits on the article, because of the accusations by Potomac. Thanks! -- Ssilvers 21:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Impersonator

Secret admirer? You mean a clone?

Is he vandalizing? I don't understand exactly what this means. The dugout 16:01, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's funny since I have never even touched the article in question, I don't get into politics here. The dugout 15:46, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal on Néstor Kirchner

Greetings. I'm looking at the history of vandalism on this article. Can you help me here: look at [2] (if you get this message within the next couple hours), and check all the accounts created between about 17:15 and 17:30 on 21 September. That's when the vandal was making most of his throwaway accounts. I've blocked one more obvious one (KingofAr) but maybe you will recognize some more. There is also a similar vandalism spree (which you may have noticed) on the Spanish wiki. Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 01:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's because they are "aged" sockpuppets (he created them on 21 Sept) -- which is long enough to bypass sprotection. This is why it would be good to shoot them out of the user creation log. We also could request a checkuser on this. Thanks for your excellent work! Antandrus (talk) 01:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your contribution in The Quran and science article. Please spend some more time on the article and try to improve it. I am trying my best but have limited time. --- ابراهيم 17:26, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Can you please add from there in the Big Bang section. I really need to sleep. In case you do not find time to do that then I will try to do it tomorrow. Thanking you in anticipation. --- ابراهيم 22:55, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think things are getting a bit out of hand at the Quran and Science article, Arrow740 is being pretty insulting. I am still too new to know exactly how to handle it, though I did put a note of the WP:Civil policy on the talk page, if that was not my place please let me know. Ratherhaveaheart

I'm sorry, but saying that "a drop of semen" and "a single sperm cell" are the same thing gets me angry. Any "insults" I made were, from my perspective, true observations. Anyway I think you've been something of a moderating influence on that article, though it looks like you don't care about it enough to keep it fair, or else when I came across it yesterday it wouldn't have been the poorly written, badly spelled list of half-truths that it was. Arrow740 05:43, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Atheism

If you don't mind my asking, why do you believe in it? Arrow740 07:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please Guide

Is that possible that they delete the article now and then I work on my User space. I will try to give all the references and making it as best as possible. I will fairly also try to give other side views with references (you and other neutral people are also welcome to contribute). Once we are done than we could move it back? Is that possible ? --- ابراهيم 08:28, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

After The Quran and science was saved Ibrahimfaisal removed all my additions, so I renominated it for deletion. Could you weigh in? Arrow740 21:31, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Traduje las dos Marchas de la Paz

Las pasé al castellano, gracias por los Arts. en english. Interesante el tema de lo cómo una Constitución da "una" versión: la Constitución del reino de España dice que el idioma oficial es el castellano. Franco y los nazionalistas querían que fuese el español. Y en la Constitución Argentina no existen los aborígenes (¡palabra más peyorativa, difícil de pergreñar!, sino pueblos originarios). Saludos desde la calle 3 de Febrero 939, en la Rosario, en la primavera austral. Rosarinagazo 03:59, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: The Quran and science article

hello Pablo-flores, i know some time ago on the talk page you said you weren't going to bother with the article because of the state of affairs at that time. i do however believe your contributions would be extremely useful and i do think that we can move forward as long as the editors concentrate on working together instead of against each other. there are a number of reasonable editors popping up who seem to be interested in making something of this article, and as long as you are still interested i would definitely recommend you help contribute wherever you can. thank you. ITAQALLAH 22:49, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hello, there is a dispute on Talk:The Quran and science about how WP:V is to be interpreted regarding published Muslim sources to present Muslim opinion. i thought it'd be useful to ask a more seasoned user to provide their thoughts, so so your comments on that matter would be greatly appreciated. ITAQALLAH 15:11, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Que tal!

Bueno aunque esto suene mas una cosa "myspacera" (mi spanglish es selectivo),siempre me alegra encontrar un vecino preocupado en probar que el eje del mundo (al menos el fìsico) no se encuentra en el noreste de aquella tierra situada entre Canada y el antigo virreinato de la nueva España,y que es escoltada por dos gigantes,uno Atlante y el otro Pacifico.

De todas formas,este paria cultural muy respetuosamente le saluda. El Gostro 05:35, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign trade by country

Foreign trade by country is a sub category of International Trade, and it is the same as international trade. --Endgame1 12:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CFD can you do it? I don't understand.

The Argentine

Not to defend people hiding behind IP addresses, but "the Argentine" used to be a perfectly normal way of referring to Argentina. Try, for instance, to google "The Argentine" and definition. I think it was probably due to the influence of French. -Yupik 09:14, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinately blocked

User:24.199.238.170 has been indefinatley blocked for persistant vandalism.

--Suicidal tendancies 16:58, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings and dulce de leche

Hey there, I'm Gustavo and I want to introduce myself and to collaborate in this beautiful project. I'm Uruguayan but I'm currently living in Spain, country where I'm studying to major in English. I hope we can keep in touch and help each other with language. By the way, "dulce de leche", as you mentioned it in your user page, is not Argentinian but Uruguayan as well, so I would rather use the word River Plate... You will see, there are several theories on the subject and you may have your opinions which do not prove to be fully considered as true or reliable evidence. Indeed, we should take into account the fact that Uruguay and Argentina were and still are countries with a similar history, more or less the same kind of culture and customs and, what is more, we both speak "Rioplatense Spanish", perhaps that being the reason why here, in Europe, people tend to associate Uruguay with Argentina and viceversa. They don't see the difference, then, I say, should we? It's not my aim to argue about something irrelevant but I thought we, as River Plate brothers, must take conscience of this fact and stop with that rivalry. Nice to meet you and I hope we can be friends. Sorry for expressing my point of view, lol. Regards, --Gustave - May I help you? 23:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC) PS: If you don't mind I'll put this in the discussion page of "dulce de leche".[reply]

Uruguayan newspapers

I've read in the cellulose conflict talk page that you were looking for more websites of Uruguayan newspapers. Here you have some of them: the websites of the best-seller dairy newspapers are La República (left-wing, socialist or sort of, usually supports the current administration), El País (liberal conservative, linked with the Herrerismo, Partido Nacional), El Observador (conservative, linked with the Catholich Church) and Últimas Noticias (n idea on what ideology it supports, linked with the Unification Church), while some of the weekly newspapers are La Juventud (radical left, linked with the 26 de Marzo, Frante Amplio), Crónicas (liberal conservative, probably linked with the Illuminati), Brecha (democratic socialist, independent) and Búsqueda (social democratic and/or social liberal, independent, no current website).

I hope this is useful to you :) -- NaBUru38 00:15, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Railways in Argentina

Hola, soy galio de la es: con unos minutos de tiempo libre que no bastan para loguear allá. Cuestión que le pasé una revisada rápida al artículo Argentina en inglés y aparentemente, en algún momento entre la vez anterior que lo leí y esta, alguien modificó el apartado sobre transporte. Donde antes decía que la red ferroviaria cayó en desuso y deterioro notorio desde la liquidación de FA en 1993, hoy dice algo como que "después de décadas de falta de mantenimiento y malos servicios, los ferrocarriles se privatizaron en 1993". No sólo es tendencioso, sino que omite la parte más importante —el hecho de que hubiera trenes hasta el '93 y no después— y para peor es falso.

La cantinela de la falta de mantenimiento es más para Dromi que para una enciclopedia, y aunque desde 1955 las sucesivas administraciones se encargaron de ir destruyendo los ferrocarriles, decir que FA no hacía mantenimiento es una mentira infundada como decir que Gas del Estado no hacía obra. Hasta 1993 los 34.000 kilómetros de vías entonces activos eran operables, con una mayoría de vías en buen estado, servicios de pasajeros a todo el país. Incluso durante los años '80 se hicieron cosas, como la electrificación del Roca, la nueva señalización del Urquiza —que ALL desmanteló—, etc. Perdón que te lime, pero un poco de evidencia empírica para respaldarme no sobra. ¿Podrás hacer algo? Los historiales de la en: me pierden, pero en algún lado está la frase vieja. Saludos y gracias. --200.85.115.19 02:57, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Naming conventions

Pablonque, I know it was not a written rule, but so far cities had the format Name, Province except for the capitals which had Name, Argentina (Mendoza, Argentina, La Rioja, Argentina, Formosa, Argentina, Córdoba, Argentina, etc.) This is specially helpfull for ambiguities with other important cities in countries ( La Rioja, Spain, Córdoba, Spain).

Even though it's true that there are other cities that collide with foreign cities, having a Citiy, Province collision with another country would be quite weird, and (usually) only the capital city has the same name that its subdivision.

BTW, Tobias have been moving a lot of pages in a way I don't agree. Mendoza, Viedma and several other should point to the city, and a proper City (disambiguiation) article should be made available. See for instance the useless Resistencia. Mariano(t/c) 10:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I kinda had it with discussions, and I really don't care that much about the naming. Do as you see fit. BTW, I going home in 3 weeks, this time for a year or so! Mariano(t/c) 07:53, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hola

Pablo me preguntaba si conoces bien el alfabeto fonetico KeNNy 00:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ipa

  Detesto que pongan las pronunciaciones usando una mezcolanza de ingles unida con guiones. Es bueno cambiar eso cuando se lo ve en un articulo. Como se escribiria esto?
                              " Ickes (pronounced IK-is) "   KeNNy 01:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Argentinidad

Los invito a participar de Argentinidad, un proyecto wiki que usa el mismo software que wikipedia, y por ende funciona exactamente igual. Es una wikipedia de la argentina con un punto de vista patriótico-nacional.

Aquí se podrán crear artículos sobre la cultura, geografía, economía, historia, gente y demás de la Argentina, con la condición de que el punto de vista NO sea neutral, sino argentino . Este no es un lugar para la militancia política o social, sólo para escribir y "hacer algo". Para eso estamos, para los que nos cansamos de que insulten al País y ver como el mundo de nosotros ríe. Siempre se dijo, "hay que hacer algo" pero nadie lo hizo. Es dificil hacer algo, nadie por sí solo va a levantarse un día y transformar a la Patria en una potencia mundial, o expulsar a los ingleses de las Malvinas, pero no por eso se va a "hacer nada". Espero que te unas al proyecto, cordialmente

Andrés 02:10 19 nov 2006 (CET)

Dict

Hiya, fellow language-lover. I've only now found out about your Argie slang dictionary. As a contributor to the Spanish Wiktionary, I'd be glad to be able to lift some of your stuff for our own use. I suppose you wouldn't object, but the license you've chosen (cc-by-nc-nd) utterly precludes any sort of wiki usage. How would you feel about dual-licensing it under the GFDL? It would speed thing up a bit if I ever got around to writing a parser for easy formatting.

Drop me a line when RL allows for this superfluous stuff. Best, Taragüí @ 18:36, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BTW: You're missing a football-related definition for "caño" (a pass delivered through the opposing defense's legs). And I'd venture that "sarpar" is, in fact, but a semantic extension of "zarpar" (departing, as it were, from the established norm). But I have no recollection of seeing it in any published sources. Taragüí @ 18:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We're not so pedantic as regards sources over there at the wikt. If accompanied with a solid, real-life example of language in use, things pass muster without an Academy to vouch for them. And I'm certain I'll be able to document most, if not all, of your stuff with Clarin.com and Página/12 quotations, my favourite source nowadays.

CC-BY is indeed much better for reuse. I'll simply state in the history that the entries are so licensed, so that anyone willing not to undergo the additional pains the GFDL imposes may choose to do so. Thanks a lot for the support. Best, Taragüí @ 21:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Menem

Hello. Just a quick question on phrasing: when we say things like "Menem cut the military budget" or "Menem abolished conscription", do we actually mean "Menem signed (and maybe advocated) legislation doing these things"? Presumably the Congress has a role too. Biruitorul 06:43, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congress has never been independent, least of all under a Peronist president, ever. What Menem didn't want, Congress didn't pass, and conversely, what Menem wanted, the Congress always gave (the opposition either sheepishly agreed, or was outnumbered). But yes, you make a valid point; we should find references that indicate which measures were passed as presidential decrees, which were sent to Congress by the Executive, and which were original Congress initiatives. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 19:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted link in Spanish_Language

hey, just a quick question.

I added my link to the Spanish language wiki after not hearing anything about it in the talk section. In the history of the Spanish language page, you mention it is for being a tips based site. I can understand that a lot of people must try to spam wiki, but I don't think I'm doing that at all.

My site is tips based (just like wiki) because I want to help anyone learn Spanish. It is a free site, but if someone wants to help me out (Hosting isn't free) I'm more than happy to take their money to improve the quality of the site.

Just wondering what it would take to put the link back on the page?

Cheers, Sean —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.107.172.115 (talk) 12:48, 9 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

hey Pablo,

Looks like it's a matter of understanding what wiki is all about and I'm certainly not an expert on that. It seemed logical to me that wiki would want to link to quality sites to help the readers, but if that isn't the case, then I stand corrected. I'm not sure if I have a case, but I am dedicated to building the best free learn Spanish site around. I've looked at a lot of the top rankers in the search engines and I'm not really impressed. A link from wiki would help me in that endevour, but if it is not to be, then it is not to be. I'll have a think and might see if I can make a case by starting a topic in the talk section. Cheers, 58.107.172.115 15:32, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Villa de Maria

Bien por la correccion de la confusion Villa Maria-Villa de Maria que habia en Wikipedia. Yo lo habia notado hace un par de meses pero no estaba registrado como usuario. Cuando me registre me olvide por completo!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Krazykenny (talk • contribs) 01:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

WikiProject Argentine Film

Hola el argentino magnifico. Como estas? A page has been established for missing Argentine film articles on wikipedia. Please help out on MASSIVE missing part of wikipedia and Argentine culture at Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/List of films without article/List of missing Argentine Films or contact me for help in this Argetine project. See Agua (2006 film) for format.Ernst Stavro Blofeld 17:00, 13 December 2006 (UTC

User talk:217.98.20.20

Hi, you have previously warned 217.98.20.20 about vandalism, he is continuously vandalizing (reverting to POV version) kaczism. I'd appreciate if you could have a look at it. Cheers, Roo72 20:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kaczism lock

Some corrections of Roo72 statements:

Your warning for IP: User talk:217.98.20.20 was for other internet user and article - this is IP number of large Internet provider and can be used by hundreds of users. Roo72 used this confusing situation for his own private interest
the article is locked on his obviously POVED version - with accusation of fascism of democraticaly elected president and prime minister of european country without any single proof attached.
The user is known for his political edits - (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Roo72)
and last but not least there is no revert war (as he has writen) because only his (Roo72) edits was the reverts - other edits introduced new facts or corrected the article.

--83.29.153.85 21:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied to the above on Talk:Kaczism. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 23:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look > http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/english/200104/29/eng20010429_68920.html

article for deletion

Hola, perdon que te moleste nose si vos te encargas de estas cosas o quien pero te dejo un articulo que necesita ser borrado Ranking of Latin American cities, se trata de unas listas de ciudades sacadas de una revista no muy seria y muy criticada que es de capitales chilenos "America Economia" y que no me parece que sea un articulo para wikipedia; si todos pusieramos rankings de cualquier revista de economia que nos favorece un poco, seria cualquier cosa esto ..... 201.231.36.39 17:14, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peronism

These recent uncommented anonymous edits to Peronism strike me as not entirely wrong, but at best a mixed bag. I simply don't know enough to go in and make corrections, and the article is way undercited. I'm calling it to your attention in hopes that you can do a better job than I would. - Jmabel | Talk 23:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding those edits, I don't really know what to do about them... My first impulse was to revert them because they are unsourced, but then the content of the previous version which was changed was also unsourced, and the current one is, as you said, not clearly wrong, and quite NPOV (with the exception of the wording about fascism). I'm by no means an expert on Peronism and I don't have good sources on me. If you feel you can do better, start a discussion in Talk:Peronism and invite the anonymous editor in question. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 00:39, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article in general eventually needs an overhaul, but I hesitate to wade in without good sources at hand. I'd barely dare write a factual biographical piece on Perón, let alone the much more slippery topic of peronismo. - Jmabel | Talk 00:51, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Hi Pablo! I just want to say Merry Christmas to you! Have a nice holiday time. - Darwinek 19:36, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pablo.

I've seen that you work in many Spaniard articles. I just fixed one major mistake in Argentina`s history. Is there something in particular you want me to help you with? Best regards --Damifb 06:59, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rehola

Hace unos meses te dejé un mensaje, el cual no obtuvo respuesta, pero creo que tampoco era necesaria. Ahora vuelvo a contactar contigo para comunicarte que de nuevo el enlace que hay en el artículo lengua construida está roto. Supongo que es porqué ha caducado tu contrato de alojamineto con pueblacity.com. Por lo que me preguntaba si lo has alojado en otra parte.

Sin más me despido esperando impacientemente una respuesta y como no brindándote un feliz año nuevo. Pasqual (ca) · CUT 19:35, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ya no es tanto por mí como por otra gente, principiante, a la que le puede venir bien una ayudita como tu trabajo. Cuando conocí tu página web (alojada entonces en angelfire y no en pueblacity como erròneamente de dije en mi primer mensaje de setiembre), yo ya tenía mis proyectos en marcha, cierto es que me ayudó, pero una parte (no sé en qué proporción) de conocimientos ya los había adquirido por otro lado.

Así que quién me impulsa a pedirte que se mantenga tu trabajo en línea es mi lado altruista, porqué considero que hiciste un excelente trabajo y que puede servir de base para cualquiera que se adentre en este apasionante mundo de la glotogénensis.

Hoy se me ha ocurrido colgarlo en Ideolengua, una lista de correo de Yahoo!Groups sobre las lenguas construídas, que supongo conocerás.

Hubiera preferido primero que nada pedirte permiso para realizarlo, pero debes saber que ya lo he hecho, en principio era una prueba para saber si iba a caber ya que se está agotando el espacio reservado para subir archivos e incluso para poder subir éste, he tenido que eliminar un archivo propio que colgué hace algún tiempo. Si crees que debe ser eliminado sólo tienes que pedirmelo, lo aceptaré sin ninguna objeción. Pasqual (ca) · CUT 14:23, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Excelente, este nuevo trabajo tuyo! Pasqual (ca) · CUT 01:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would be immensely grateful if you could help me on my work with Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/List of films without article/List of missing Argentine Films and List of Argentine films and cinema people filling in red links. Category:Argentine films is now almost 230 films!! Ernst Stavro Blofeld 15:33, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nilsson was a major missing director cheers! You are very welcome to join the sub project of Argentina Wikipedia:WikiProject Argentina/Cinema of Argentina‎ to help with a vast missing and important part of Argentine culture. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 15:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

image license tags

Hola Pablo, quiero subir una foto de super etendard propia, me podes recomendar alguna sin llegar a ser release to public domain? algo mas estricta Jor70 14:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

J. B. Alberdi

Thanks, Sr. Flores, for your assistance on starting a bibliography in the English-language article on Alberdi. As I am an American with kinsmen in Argentina, translating the article from the Spanish-language Wikipedia allowed me to improve my dominio del castellaño, aprender algo, y ser útil -- all at the same time. But I'd be grateful if you'd give a quick look to the added reference to the original article, to see if my format is acceptable. Thanks! Firstorm (23:14 UTC on February 19, 2007)

vandalism, a reply to Pablo-flores from lionhearted99

To say what really happened is not vandalism. When we talk about ideas, there are as many truths as there are human beings upon this earth, but history is only one and immutable, like the natural laws that govern the universe, because it can not be changed. To say that Jose Ignacio Rucci was murdered by the Montoneros leftist organization on September the 25th, 1973, a couple of days before the presidential election, is not vandalism. It's part of history. When an organization, whose members do not summit their political ideas to the popular vote during an election under the established Supreme Law, which is the National Constitution, and the institutions that make up a nation, but rather break the law and try to get their extremist ideas across through murder, kidnapping, and mutilating, then these guys are plainly terrorists, an association of psychopaths. I advice Mr. Pablo-Flores to go back to school and learn more, because he seems a bit ignorant.

Mr. Lionhearted99

P/S: By the way, the lunatic guerrilla fighter who failed, known as the Che-Guevara, was not from Rosario, but from Cordoba. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lionhearted99 (talk • contribs) 15:52, 20 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Colocolo vs Pampas Cat

These have been split. See User:UtherSRG/Carnivora. I'm in the process of updating all of the Felidae articles. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:56, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userfication request

Aloha. I saw the author of The Gods' Pack, which you deleted after a proper AfD, off-wiki unhappy about wasted work. I'd like to ask for a brief userfication of its contents so that I can move them over to Comixpedia. --Kizor 17:50, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you. I'm rather new at this, though, and it seems that I have to further request a copypaste of the article's history. --Kizor 14:18, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To repeat, you can nuke the page any time now, but could you also access its history, select it as text and copy it here? Apparently it's good for the license. --Kizor 02:15, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again. It's quite sufficient. Done. --Kizor 17:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your the one....

Who puts uncited claims and your unjust obvervations on the talk pages and Argentina pages. Like your claim on the "substantial number of immigrants from south Asia". You then again state you see beggers in parts of Argentina that are Mestizo so you automatically assume that the Mestizo/Indian population is more then the population of Blacks in the US! comon. Why is that racist now because I am going against what you said? I don't think so. Its Obvious that Mestizos dont make up nearly as much as Blacks in US! So stop claiming me to be a racist as you seem to be the one who is bothered by Argentina's Whiteness, Pablo you are. This is not a ""Personal attack"".(XGustaX 17:58, 8 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

I didn't say anything about the Asian immigrants. Since it was removed without justification, I removed it. And I'm not assuming anything about mestizo population. If you cared to look, I restored the "97% white" figure when it was replaced by a lower number, because that lower number wasn't sourced. You're now saying I seem to have racist bias against white people. That's not only false but clearly a provocation. I won't accept more falsities from you in my talk page. Do as you please elsewhere; I won't fall into the trap of blocking you and then be accused of having a personal grudge against you. Someone else will deal with your edits eventually, I guess. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 01:13, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I am sorry then. I only mean to tell you because you and me know, as Argentines, that the Mestizo/Indian population is no were near larger then the black population in the US. You said before that you "hated the CIA world fact book" for that reason. I must have misunderstood or something. So to me it just seemed like you were being baist against white people for that reason. I am sorry if my edits came off as me being a jerk. I was not in anyway trying to upset or get you in a trap. So I am sorry if my edits came off as me being like that, I apologize. Thank You. (XGustaX 02:08, 9 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

CONLANG

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article CONLANG, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. utcursch | talk 11:10, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

necesito template

Algo de Argentina asi {{Brazilian military}}, o sea algo mas simple y chiquito que {{Infobox National Military Argentina}} para poner en Argentine Navy,Air Force y Army, podra ser ? Fijate que el encabezado de Brazilian Navy esta mas piola que Argentine Navy --Jor70 15:15, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Che Guevara

Hi Pablo, I've started to work (today) on the english Che Guevara article. It has a very POV tone and clashes terribly with the info in the spanish Che Guevara entry. If you have a free moment at any time, can you please give the english article a look and lend a little help?Wryn 15:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2007 in Argentina

You feel like working on it? --Mariano(t/c) 18:37, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very mucho!--Mariano(t/c) 01:43, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Rosario_desde_el_aire_1.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[3][4]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 18:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know?

On 19 May, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Center Region (Argentina), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 17:05, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese language & Palau

Hi. Any idea why that part about Japanese in Palau is becoming such a point of contention? --RJCraig 17:13, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal

Hola, se que sos un administrador, y queria pedirte consejo (y advertirte). Creo que se debería bloquear al usuario Halfstar por vandalismo. Sus ediciones fueron proncipalmente de vandalismo, y ha ignorado (y borrado) las advertencias que le fueron hechas. Aqui estan sus contribuciones para que constates. Gracias. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Halfastar&action=history

TerrorStorm

An editor has asked for a deletion review of TerrorStorm. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — Xiutwel (talk) 21:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry.

I am sorry. I was trying to make the article better. Excuse me. I have done what you have told me. Thank you for your help.=) Gasriloc 14:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rosario city.

Hey Pablo, I already joined Wikiproject Argentina, thanks for your invitation and your suggestions. I will try to help in any Argentina-related issue.

Im also very interested in creating and improving articles about Rosario. I started creating an article about the Facultad de Derecho. Next on my list is improving the Policia de Santa Fe article.

Mucha suerte y cualquier cosa q necesites decime. Aletano 02:08, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Argentine Railways

Hi Pablo, Many thanks for the barnstar. I'm having a fascinating time sorting out all the old Argentine Railway Companies and the way that they have merged, were then nationalised and later privatised again. My aim is to provide a summary of all these various changes over the years. Needless to say I'm learning a great deal about the history of Argentina from all this. I should perhaps mention that my wife is Argentine and that I'm a regular visitor to your country.

One thing you may be able to help me with. I want to use the image:
Imagen:FCMMAP1jpg.JPG|thumb|250px|Mapa del trazado del Ferrocarril Midland atravesando la provincia de Buenos Aires
from the Spanish section of Wiki, in my new article Ferrocarril Midland de Buenos Aires in the English section. I've tried prefixing the image name with :es: but it comes up only as a link and not as the image itself.

Best regards David(Talk • Contribs) 15:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help, it's fixed. David(Talk • Contribs) 21:48, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pablo, someone has been playing with the Agentinian section (a Venezuelan it seems). Could you check the page when you get back?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.16.20.42 (talk) 11:12, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again vandalism in the demographics

I know we have been building the Argentinian site for like wow three years now. But like always another guy who doesn't bother in read the archive with the previous discussions is changing the section. Dunadan or something like that.

Dunadan:

We decided included the genetic research (the one you posted is not the only one and other ones contradict this one). Besides we discussed it was made to the entire population (10% of which is not Argentinean-born but immigrants).

You are putting the minority groups that were taken in that research (which was very discussed anyway) into the majority of the population.

Second we (like Americans, brazilians and Canadians) decided not to included the diversed genetic studies because is not relevant, is like said norwegian because they have a 1% of african admixture are not scandinavian!.

Check out the archive of discussions in the Argentinian section, and you'll the other studies too. We just added in the largest article.

As for the article we decided only included the official numbers of the government and the CIA.

As for the research you cited (which is just one of many) with different results, and the ones that are made to white people are the ones that account to have in mind the admixture in white people, which you just seems to included without noticed that the research was made to the inhabitants a great percentage not "Argentines", you're misunderstanding some dates. that was about mtda and y-chromosome not about mixture in dna.

And what the reaserch shows (again there was another research with another very different results) is that 10% have mtda and y-chromosomes form their parent that COULD BE (but not necessary are) compatible with native americans. You can have 80% european descendents and come out with these results, and anyway, the markers taken as native american are presented in a minority of southern europeans (again check out the archive) and are common in Asians (which account for about 1% of the Argentinian inhabitants this days).

And finally because of this and because the phenotipical traits are the most important in the Argentina, the United States etc for race. And they are present in like the census said 95% of the NATIONAL population, those are the numbers important at least in this article.

And again check out the previous discussions in this subject. Americans decided not to included the results of distant native americans ancestries in white people in the main article because of the same reason that we Argentinians didn't because the are many they don't agree with each other and because they are not relevant for this article.

Second you

Further to the message above to you from IP user 190.16.20.42 and your semi protection of the article to try and stop the edit war, I have tried to reach a compromise in this by asking the IP user and Snowhite1985 (who would appear to be the same person), to discuss this issue on the talk page as they also do not leave an edit summary which would help to prevent other users thinking their edits could be vandalism. I have asked them twice now also to sign comments. And also asked them to leave an edit summary, and to discuss this on the talk page, all to no avail so far. I don't know the rights nor wrongs in this but something needed to be done to stop the edit war. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 01:00, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thanks for the message, I have read through the various discussions on the articles talk page about the demographics and it does seem that there is always going to be disagreement. However, keeping any content to that which is sourced which seems to what has recently happened at least works toward a compromise. I see from the above users talk page that they have agreed to leave the content that is in there now and rather than changing it to a different version, try adding to it. That might work, hopefully! ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 02:23, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

triple A

Hi, I saw you reverted me earlier on the Triple A article [5]. There is little factual information that NATO / Gladio was involved in these acts. See the various parliamentary reports on that. Intangible2.0 22:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Argentina

Hey, I saw you removed the IP users comments. When I added the unsigned tag I was not sure whether or not I should actually have just removed the comments like you did! Removing them is best though as there is no need for the sarcasm and mocking tone. Cheers! ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 23:41, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

placebox-map template for towns in prov. of BA

Hi Pablo, I would like to use {{placebox-map|*.png}} for locating the town of Coronel Pringles in the south of the province of Buenos Aires. Is there a .png image I can use for this? Regards David(Talk • Contribs) 12:55, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coronel Pringles is now on the map!! Thanks to your help, Pablo. Regards David(Talk • Contribs) 13:44, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User adding external links

Hi, please can you help. User:190.16.57.7 has been persistently adding back links to Ojos del Salado and Monte Pissis. I do not think that these links are suitable, for reasons I have posted to his talk page. Please let me know if you disagree. Otherwise, please can you explain to him why he should not be adding these links. I think he is problably from Argentina, and does not understand English, and unfortunately I have very little Spanish. Thanks. Viewfinder 20:00, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My principal objection to these links are the incorrect elevations. The EIR survey which he highlights is consistent with the other sources, but the linked site claims that the EIR elevations are 40m higher. Otherwise, there are some nice images and it does not appear too commercial, it would probably be OK. Viewfinder 20:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ImageMap para el mapa de Argentina

Hola Pablo,

 hice un ImageMap para el mapa de Argentina (en Ingles), con los nombres (sin acentos) y los links a las provincias.

Si te sirve, acá va. Sino, cuando desbloquees la página, avisame y lo subo yo (aunque tengo q ver cómo se pone este tag q nunca usé).

Gracias che,

 Daniel.

El tag:

andreaaaaaa —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.10.120.200 (talk) 17:35, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cortito

Che, como andas, tanto tiempo? Te escribo nomas para dejarte este enlace si te interesa: http://www.wikimedia.org.ar

Un abrazo, Mariano. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marianocecowski (talk • contribs) 01:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Imaginate que tan poco entro a wikipedia que ya me olvido de firmer! Bueno, yo estoy en BAires y fui a la reunion del 1ro de Septiembre. Si venis por aca avisa, si? Un abrazo, --Mariano(t/c) 12:23, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blood bond

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Blood bond, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Gavin Collins 10:59, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Grünberg

Can you delete this file Image:Peter Grünberg.jpg - there is a free image in Commons with the same name, and the one which is currently on en-wiki blocks the proper display of it from Commons: [6] --Zureks 07:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Córdoba & Rosario Railway

Hi Pablo, Many thanks for adding a great photo to my new article about the Córdoba & Rosario Railway. It's good to know that someone is taking photos of these railway architectural gems. Keep up the good work! Best wishes David(Talk • Contribs) 19:48, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sorry but...

me tomé el tiempo de leerlos y lo del desempleo "estructural" no es mas que una opinión particular

muy distinto de un hecho, ademas de tener todo un tufillo a viciado terrible

saludos —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.253.147.134 (talk) 14:10, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"de Kirchner"

aparte de sonar machista, esteticamente no queda muy bien que digamos en el encabezado -- Paullen(Talk • Contribs) —Preceding comment was added at 16:29, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Devaraj Urs

Hi......I read your question about your curiousity to learn about Devaraj Urs.....did you happen to know about him or was it something you passed by? I am curious as to how someone from Argentina would have heard about Devaraj Urs. The below link will lead you to the page where you asked the question

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:D._Devaraj_Urs

Dev —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.7.133.59 (talk) 03:27, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saludos Pablo

Estimado Pablo:

Saludos. Por la presente, le envío varios enlaces que podrían responder las interrogantes que plasmó en la página de discusión sobre Argentina en el wikipedia en inglés. Sus comentarios se referían a la aprobación de la Cámara de Diputados de la República de Argentina a los efectos de aprobar Resolucion/es a favor de la libre determinación e independencia de Puerto Rico.

Si fuera tan amable, podría verificar los siguientes enlaces. De entender que se confirma la información que usted aún no había podido confirmar, ¿podría usted volver a ingresar la información que estaba plasmada en el artículo que usted editó? En cualquier caso, según su criterio, agradecería si pudiera añadir la información que se desprende de los enlaces que le someto en la porción inferior de este mensaje.

Lista de algunas de las Resoluciones y/o Resoluciones o leyes aprobadas por la Cámara de Diputados o el Senado de la Nación Argentina:

http://www1.hcdn.gov.ar/folio-cgi-bin/om_isapi.dll?clientID=37635286&advquery=2641-S-06&infobase=dae.nfo&record={5F10}&recordswithhits=on&softpage=proyecto (DECLARA: Su beneplácito por la resolución del Comité de Descolonización de la Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU) para que la Asamblea General considere el caso de Puerto Rico sobre su derecho a la libre determinación e independencia de su pueblo de conformidad con la resolución 1.514 (XV) de la Asamblea General.)

http://www1.hcdn.gov.ar/proyxml/expediente.asp?fundamentos=si&numexp=1828-D-2006 (EXPRESAR APOYO A PUERTO RICO EN EL RECONOCIMIENTO DEL DERECHO A SU AUTODETERMINACION E INDEPENDENCIA.)

http://www1.hcdn.gov.ar/proyxml/expediente.asp?fundamentos=si&numexp=3086-D-2006 Aprobado el 22 de noviembre de 2006 (SOLICITAR AL PODER EJECUTIVO APOYO A LA INDEPENDENCIA DE PUERTO RICO POR PARTE DE LA REPUBLICA ARGENTINA.)

Cordialmente,

(Felicia Krupman de Concepción Saltisantori - FeliciaKrupmanCS 18:26, 1 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Artículo falso?

Te escribo porque me llama la atención un articulo de un supuesto presidente argentino "José Domingo Molina Gómez" y quería conocer tu opinión. También me gustaría saber que pensás acerca del Template Presidents of Argentina, en especial la parte de First military dictatorship, en la que se incluye a Justo, Ortiz y castillo, que a pesar de ser electos en sufragios más que truchos, no deberían ser catalogados como dictadores militares. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krazykenny (talk • contribs) 01:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Martín Lousteau

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Martín Lousteau, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Martín Lousteau seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Martín Lousteau, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 16:00, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Placebox

Hi, sorry for bothering you on vacation. I have been using the placebox templates you created quite a lot recently for places in Argentina. It is being suggested that they be replaced by {{Infobox Settlement}} becuase it contains a map. I wondered if it would be possible to put the map function into the placebox, which would save rewriting loads of information into the new format like this and preserve the Argentina specific functions like postcode and telephone which I think are pretty neat and would be lost in the conversion. Alternatively the Argentina specific functions could be copied into the Infobox settlement template. I'll leave it with you because I wouldn't know how to start coding either way. Regards King of the NorthEast 00:07, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of category from your userpage

Hi. In enacting consensus from User categories for discussion, I have removed the category Category:Wikipedians interested in books from your userpage. It was determined in that deletion debate that this category should be depopulated of individuals, but kept as a parent category. If you wish to display a category reflecting your interest in books, please consider one of the specific sub-categories under its umbrella. Thanks, and please excuse the necessary editing of your user page! ----Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:53, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 2007 in Costa Rica

I have nominated 2007 in Costa Rica, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 in Costa Rica. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. jonny-mt 04:56, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contacto

Hola Pablo: me gustaría contactarme con vos, por un evento sobre nuevas tecnologías e Internet que se va a realizar en Rosario organizado por la Municipalidad. Nos gustaría que haya una charla sobre Wikipedia. Mi email es: pvncho@gmail.com (veo que no es común que haya mails en Wikipedia, si estoy inflingiendo algo pido disculpas, y borrá lo que haya que borrar. Es que no encontraba otra forma de comunincarme). Saludos —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pvncho (talk • contribs) 18:16, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hola

Argentina tierra del Dulce de Leche?, no ser Uruguay? ademas tierra del Tango? yo conosco y puedo citar cartas de 1815 qe hablan de Tango en Montevideo XD. Mas bien dejalo Rioplatence —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.132.133.141 (talk) 12:56, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCookie

Hola Pablo, soy Carlos Garza de Monterrey,Mexico.Quisiera contactarme contigo, mi mail es : hcasado@yahoo.com.Espero y me puedas escribir.Quiero que me ayudes, sies que puedes, con esto del wikipedia. Saludos!

Carlos —Preceding unsigned comment added by Garzagarza (talk • contribs) 19:36, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

reference of genetic algorithm

Hi, Pablo-flores

Currently I am working on GA algorithm. On the page of selection (generic algorithm), you insert the following: "There are other selection algorithms that do not consider all individuals for selection, but only those with a fitness value that is higher than a given (arbitrary) constant." Could you please indicate some reference papers on this? I really appreciate it. Thanks a lot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Edadeveloper (talk • contribs) 14:29, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Argentine English

Evening Pablo I'm recollecting information about the Argentine English in Argentina. This page that I attached here was the last version before to have been deleted. I believe that it was a step back to the expression or our culture, can you help me to rebuilt it? Here is the las discussion on it deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argentish Hava a nice day. Carau(User talk:Carau) The mentioned page:

^[1]

^ [1] Argentine English (as the last wiki version was)

I'm afraid I agree with the deletion, and I would further advise you not to take it personally, avoid blaming it on "authoritarianism" and least of all invoke the disappeared in reference to what was done to the article you created. It doesn't help your cause, and as a comparison it's completely tactless.Wikipedia does not exist to promote new truths or discoveries or personal anecdotes that may point to new developments in society; it exists to report on things already known and well-documented. You're free to request a deletion review, but based on my experience, it just won't fly. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 20:50, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pablo, Thanks for your information on the issue; sorry about that tactlessness by mentioning that, certainly I was a little bit angry given the deletion decision. Anyway let me know whether you find some well-documented sources to get something on the use of English in Argentina. Best..

—Carau (Talk) 21:54, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Latin-American Wikipedia Meeting

"Latin-American Wikipedians,unite us!"

Hi wikipedian!Today I'm going to talk you about a new proposal that can to advantage you and many other users of Latin America.

You,that is from Latin America (second your userbox),already shall to have observed the importance of the Wikimedia Frojects in the region.Only Wikipedia represent 40% of the internet access^[1].With every this importance,why don't we make a big meeting?

Of this idea,was borned the proposal for a Latin-American Wikipedian Meeting.Various Wikipedists has Latin-American users and this is a proposal of a culture and ideas interchange,that can be help all projects.Above this,comtemplate to help in the formation of new WMF chapters in Latin America.

The main page and the talk page is originally in English,with translations in Dutch,French,Portuguese and Spanish(NOT YET).

Tosão (talk) 22:12, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

maplandia

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Carcarañá River do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. [7] --Ronz (talk) 18:02, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Year in country

Template:Year in country has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. ^Avicenna_sis @ 20:33, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Catholic-Hierarchy-bishop

Template:Catholic-Hierarchy-bishop has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:26, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Elections in Argentina

Template:Elections in Argentina has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:03, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pablo-flores. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

UOJComm (talk) 06:28, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:La Florida (Rosario) 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:La Florida (Rosario) 1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 21:02, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:La Florida (Rosario) 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:La Florida (Rosario) 2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 21:02, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:La Florida (Rosario) 3.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:La Florida (Rosario) 3.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 21:03, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Stories Project

Aloha!

My name is Victor and I work with the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organization that supports Wikipedia. We're chronicling the inspiring stories of the Wikipedia community around the world, including those from readers, editors, and donors. Stories are absolutely essential for any non-profit to persuade new people to support the cause, and we know the vast network of people who use Wikipedia have so much to share.

I find stories that drive our annual fundraising efforts. It's important to convey the incredible diversity of people who've come to rely upon Wikipedia every day.

I'd really like the opportunity to interview you to tell your story, with the possibility of using it in our materials, on our community websites, or as part of this year’s fundraiser to encourage others to support Wikipedia.

I will be in Buenos Aires from the 10th - 11th of March 2012.

I'm hoping you will elaborate on your story with me. Please let me know if you're inclined to take part in the Wikipedia Stories Project!

Thank you,

Victor Grigas

user:Victorgrigas

vgrigas@wikimedia.org

Victor Grigas (talk) 01:43, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 18:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

N.B.: I apologize if you have received any duplicate e-mail messages pursuant to this notification; this may have been due to technical difficulties on the Toolserver. Thanks, — madman 18:45, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Puerto General San Martín

Hola, antes que nada gracias por subir info de mi ciudad!!! Te escribo porque no he podido corregir el error detectado en referencia a Puerto General San Martín, si bien es correcto todo lo que dice cuando la busco en el mapa, figura como una localidad de Perú! y en realidad la ciudad pertenece a la República Argentina. No se como modificarlo pero no me agrada que mi ciudad figure en otro país. Tal vez te parezca algo banal pero para mi, como nacido y criado en Puerto San Martín, no es agradable. Te paso el link de facebook donde se ve mejor el error: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Puerto-General-San-Mart%C3%ADn/108084189219457?fref=ts#

Debajo de la imagen dice: Ica, al hacer click sobre el link me lleva a Perú! (https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ica/108743492490504)

Espero no te moleste.

Slds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wlara (talk • contribs) 00:43, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vampire (World of Darkness) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vampire (World of Darkness) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gargoyles (World of Darkness) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.