Hello, PWilkinson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Lst27 22:35, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)

That's a sound entry! Vet my changes, would you? Wikipedia still has no Kingdom of Arles entry. Look at the brief bit on medieval Arles (don't be rough on me: I was working beyond my competence there), which should have a tag: Main Entry is at Kingdom of Arles. Just a thought... --Wetman 05:23, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Your changes look OK: there's one bit of punctuation that doesn't look quite right to me, and I'd like to double-check your "at Arles" addition if and when I can get more detailed sources - but neither seem to require urgent change (if change at all). If nobody gets in first, I will probably try a Kingdom of Arles or Kingdom of Burgundy article sometime - but it'll need a bit of research and thinking through first. Though I'll probably try tidying up at least some of the names in the Arles article meanwhile. PWilkinson 18:51, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I noted that you have been contributing to articles about saints. I invite you to join the WikiProject Saints. You can sign up on the page and add the following userbox to your user page.

This user is a member of the Saints WikiProject.

Thanks! --evrik 17:14, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken your advice and redirected it to Sivota (which doesn't exist yet). It's described as being a city across from Corfu on the mainland, so it certainly fits. Choess 05:52, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you signed up as an early proponent for the creation of WikiProject Logic. Since then, the proposed project has been moved to it's own space and you have been listed as a Charter Member. Thank you for paving the way for the creation of this project. This is an invitation for your continued and perhaps renewed participation and correspondence. Be well.

Gregbard 03:06, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peter, Fyi, there will be another London wiki pubmeet on the 13th of July. It seems to have settled on something that is usually a Joms weekend. But just in case you're available... --Peter cohen (talk) 21:27, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I assure you that you have nothing to worry about. The prior contents of that article were comprised of a vulgar non sequitur added by a vandalism-only account. Any actual article on the topic would be more than welcome. Cheers, ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 00:45, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see: Cologne War .... :) Auntieruth55 (talk) 23:36, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied on User talk:Chalst/tasks. — Charles Stewart (talk) 12:57, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your recent help in sourcing some of the game designer pages that are up for deletion. If you have the time, other articles similarly in need of sourcing include Paul Drye, Ann Dupuis, Pete Fenlon, Geoffrey C. Grabowski, Rob Heinsoo, Gary Holian, ‎Jeff Koke, Christopher Kubasik, Scott Leaton, Chris Wiese, Ken Lightner, and Clinton R. Nixon. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 23:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Surreal Barnstar
		For your bizarre yet humorous comments at WP:AfD. Bearian (talk) 19:57, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PWilkinson. You have new messages at Stickee's talk page.
Message added 03:23, 9 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello, PWilkinson. You have new messages at Talk:Dickson McCunn.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I just want to say thank you for cleaning up my translation at Johannes Emde. Cheers! Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:17, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to let you know that I quoted you at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Notability of local level elections because of how well you explained the fundamental policy implications. My apologies if you do not want to be quoted. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:26, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(Namely, your statement at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamworth Council election, 2008). Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:27, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PWilkinson. You have new messages at Atama's talk page.
Message added 18:00, 19 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

I'll go ahead and email it to you. If and when you're ready to bring the article back to the main space, just let me know and I'll undelete it for you, and then you can just replace the existing material with what you've worked on. That way we still have the history preserved. You could ask another admin to do it for you, but you might have to convince them of why it's necessary. Thanks. -- Atama頭 23:26, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peter - thanks for pointing out the deletion request about the Hugo image. I've replaced the contentious image with a generic one which should hopefully satisfy the deletion requester. VJDocherty (talk) 21:29, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Data exchange language is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data exchange language until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. See discussion. No formal definition. --Chire (talk) 08:33, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification. I think that User:Ladislav Mecir, as the article's creator, and User:AndriesVanRenssen, as the other main contributor to it, should be informed of the deletion discussion. I myself have no objection to merger or redirection, and will be saying so in the AfD. PWilkinson (talk) 13:10, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

In the deletion debate about Adolph Aloys von Braun, you attributed some of my remarks to User:Cullen, linking to his page. I am Cullen328, and started editing about the time that Cullen became inactive in 2009. However, we are two different people. Just so you know. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:39, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing clarity to the deletion discussion about Le Hoang Hung. Crtew (talk) 12:45, 30 October 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, PWilkinson. You have new messages at Toddst1's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I think it was a mistake to delete the page. Arpad Szabo was a member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, and he published widely on the history of exact sciences, see here. See also this: [1]. Kope (talk) 22:19, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The only people who will have considered it a mistake, I'm afraid, are those who, like you and me, already knew of Arpad Szabo. The article is now in my user space, at User:PWilkinson/Arpad Szabo. It currently says very little - which, I am almost certain, is why it got deleted. Please feel free to edit it, so we can get it up to Wikipedia standards and restored as a Wikipedia article - I don't know Hungarian and I am not a professional mathematician, so that gives you two big advantages over me. PWilkinson (talk) 19:43, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Gabriel Tammelin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tammela (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question on your de-prod on List of Havyakas. I agree that prodding a blank list is problematic--it looks devious. However, none of that information was sourced, so removing all of it was acceptable. Some of the people, in fact, must be removed per WP:NLIST, because they're listing living people as having a particular characteristic without reference (either on the list or on the target article). What then should be done if an article has no verifiable content? Should we keep all of the content in unverified then go to AfD? There's a proposal at WT:INDIA#List of members of X caste that discusses this issue you might be interested in (basically, extended the BLP protections on ethnicity to cover caste, as they have exactly the same effect, or maybe more so, in India). Qwyrxian (talk) 03:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Aavik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norwegian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	I accepted your arguments as the best upon closing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umm Ishaq bint Talhah. Bearian (talk) 22:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Created effectively in one edit, no wikilinks or accessible references, not even an assertion of notability for the game. I wonder where the text comes from? I've restored this now (an TPH is innocent this time), cheers Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The link you provided was identical with the article. Once I found that I proposed speedy deletion as a copyvio. Honour is therefore satisfied, but I suspect the battle itself, rather than the gaming bovine scatology, might well be notable. If you are a battle historian this may be right up your street. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 18:51, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For the moment, I have recreated the article as a redirect to Spitamenes - which is itself both poorly written and appallingly referenced but almost certainly not a copyvio (and is certainly improvable, in both language and references). I suspect that that might have been the result of the AfD if it had gone the full week - if, as is quite possible, Arrian only gave the battle three sentences, there would probably be plenty of reliable sources but mostly doing little more than paraphrasing Arrian. PWilkinson (talk) 19:37, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About you contested the proposed deletion of Al Ansar Club (Libya) on the grounds that the club had played in the Libyan Cup. Are you able to support this claim with reliable sources? Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's over three weeks ago and I don't remember exactly what I had found then. However, given that it was a PROD only a day from expiry and I will have found it while skimming through WP:PRODSUM, I may have assumed (possibly rashly) that Libyan Cup 2008–09 – First Round, Libyan Cup 2008–09 – Second Round and 2009–10 Libyan Cup – Round of 32, while not themselves reliable sources, were based on reliable sources. The club is listed as Al Ansaar in each of these, but the links go through to Al Ansar Club (Libya) and in my experience, that kind of discrepancy is common in transliterations from Arabic. I would also mention that if, as in this case, I say something like "feel free to take to AfD" in the edit summary, it is usually because, while I think I have good grounds for the deprod, I'm not entirely certain of them (though in this case, I think my uncertainty was actually about whether I had interpreted the notability criteria correctly). PWilkinson (talk) 22:50, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of Arthur C. Clarke Award Nominees, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Barnes and Christopher Priest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:50, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Author/PWilkinson

My name is Nuša Farič and I am a Health Psychology MSc student at University College London (UCL). I am currently running a quantitative study entitled Who edits health-related Wikipedia pages and why? I am interested in the editorial experience of people who edit health-related Wikipedia pages. I am interested to learn more about the authors of health-related pages on Wikipedia and what motivations they have for doing so. I am currently contacting the authors of randomly selected articles and I noticed that someone at this address recently edited an article on Advance health-care directive. I would like to ask you a few questions about you and your experience of editing the above mentioned article. If you would like more information about the project, please visit my user page (Hydra_Rain) and if interested, please visit my Talk page or e-mail me on nusa.faric.11@ucl.ac.uk. Also, others interested in the study may contact me! If I do not hear back from you I will not contact this account again. Thank you very much in advance. Hydra Rain (talk) 21:42, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Sarmin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:28, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Periya Kozhappalur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Arani

Tetagunta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hyderabad

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hala, Sindh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Suhrawardi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PWilkinson. You have new messages at Secret's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Secret ^account 22:37, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Calera de León, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grand Master (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new message here regarding your contribution to Afd discussion. MilaPedia (talk) 06:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ensemble interpretation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boolean operator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saint Marcella, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pope Damasus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pieve Vergonte, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Treaty of Münster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Polish cavalry brigade order of battle in 1939 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[Wołyńska Brygada Kawalerii]] ([[Rivne|Równe]] under Colonel [[Julian Filipowicz]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:07, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Cyprus Joint Declaration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DISY (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Primary schools in Singapore may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | North View Primary School]] || Government || Co-ed || Yishun || || [http://www.northviewpri.moe.edu.sg/]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:41, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited François Zajdela, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Curie Institute (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Lithuanian partisans (1941), has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:16, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello — A few days ago you commented on Vax gold key as part of an AfD discussion. I believe that the article was about two sentences long at the point in time when you saw it. Another editor and I have made some significant improvements to that article since then. If you're still interested in the subject, check it out and see if the article looks like something that would be an acceptable part of Wikipedia moving forward. At the moment the AfD discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vax gold key only has three firm positions stated, which seems very few on which to base a permanent deletion decision, and the discussion closes in less than a day. In any case, thanks again for contributing your perspective. 50.181.30.121 (talk) 21:22, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings fellow disambiguator! Remember back in February when we made history by clearing the board for the first time ever, for the monthly disambiguation contest? Let's do it again in May! I personally will be aiming to lead the board next month, but for anyone who thinks they can put in a better effort, I will give a $10 Amazon gift card to any editor who scores more disambiguation points in May. Also, I will be setting up a one-day contest later in the month, and will try to set up more prizes and other ways to make this a fun and productive month. Cheers! bd2412 T 18:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Johannes Belksma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dutch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A user you may know of is recommending my article at Young Living for deletion. If you would please consider advocating at the deletion page for preserving the article or else revising, it would be greatly appreciated. I did a lot of research for the article and I believe that it would be a real shame if it was deleted as it hardly seems unsalvageable.Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Young_LivingChristopher Lotito (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 16:54, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Metsovo (mountain range), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aspropotamos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Francisco Cano. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 00:11, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for supporting this. I must confess to being dismayed to find this piece was a candidate for deletion before it was ever written! I understand the AfD designation was generated by a bot, within minutes of my beginning to write it, which strikes me as being a highly dangerous way of organising WP. Where will it end? I hope I will have better luck when I have finished editing it. Kind regards Apwoolrich (talk) 17:52, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for cleaning up Helan, Mandi Bahauddin. Based on your edits, I have withdrawn my nomination. I have also added an external link mentioning the village. Thanks! I eat BC Fish (talk) 22:00, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		The Modest Barnstar
		For your disambiguating. Esquivalience t 01:16, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pertaining to your the information you furnished(thanks by the way), I found this which states Al-Hakim al-Kalbi won back what the enemy had conquered from him. Which would insinuate Al-Hakim had lost a battle and with it land/city/region, which he later regained. Possibly a battle in 738? Perhaps that battle in 738 wasn't as final as what some sources state? Thoughts?
Also, on the following page(210) a governor during the Abbassid caliphate, Hisham ibn 'Amr at-Taghlibi(appointed 758CE), conquered lands that Muslim rule had not yet touched. Interesting! --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:49, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I am leaving this note for you because you participated in a deletion discussion about the Wikipedia article titled Institute of Continuing Education. I substantially expanded the article today (for the helluvit), and would appreciate if you would take a look and see if it’s better than when you last saw it. Cheers.Anythingyouwant (talk) 03:41, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Im leaving a message because you asked for a portuguese speaking member in the case of marcelo Del Debbio. He is one of the most important brazilian role playing games authors. A simple google of his name will show over 82.500 entries. The reason Im telling you this is because he published a game called "pequenas igrejas, grandes negocios" (small churches, big business) and has been suffering great deal of vandalism and attacks from religious in Brazil, including two attempts to delete his entry on the portuguese wikipedia. One of the anonymous proposers even used you and your comment on the debate in the first time they tried to erase his entry in english to justify that the author "has no relevance". (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 00:10, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Invisible Barnstar
		For long-time anti-DABing activities. LavaBaron (talk) 20:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of rulers of Kabul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sadozai. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Arthur Watts (illustrator)

added a link pointing to Norwood, London

Eille Norwood

added a link pointing to Norwood, London

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I think the Cristóbal Bencomo y Rodríguez needs a group of references. But I do not can you help me? Thank you.--83.59.138.183 (talk) 15:48, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I thank you fro correcting my edit: [Thanks again] --Bhadani (talk) 07:33, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PWilkinson. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PWilkinson. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PWilkinson. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marcus Rowland (author) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcus Rowland (author) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 07:32, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article François Zajdela, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/François Zajdela until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

by The Telegraph. Andreas JN466 22:02, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]