Hi Oskosst! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:03, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Oskosst. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, ACS Peacock, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:11, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Oskosst. Please read Wikipedia:Notability, Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest as a starting point. Deb (talk) 13:58, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please take note of the above advice and do not create any further new articles unless they comply with these guidelines. Deb (talk) 15:27, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oskosst,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Stanley Farlow should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley Farlow .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Slatersteven (talk) 16:52, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please note this edit. Under WP:MOS, one does not capitalize an initial letter merely because it's in a section heading. Michael Hardy (talk) 13:45, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Peter Decherney, Oskosst!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please avoid bare urls for references, as they make it harder to verify the sources. See Wikipedia:Citing sources and Help:Referencing for beginners for more info.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 22:47, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Oskosst. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 22:51, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

When creating pages, please format the references to include more than a URL. An easy way to do this is with WP:REFILL; directions to add a link to the Wikipedia interface can be found on that page. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:48, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Oskosst,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lutyens & Rubinstein for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:09, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oskosst,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether ACS Peacock should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ACS Peacock .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:14, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oskosst. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Daniel R. Headrick, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:40, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Shakespeare Quarterly ‎, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. and North Shore High School (New York) ‎ and Folger Shakespeare Library ‎. Please stop creating links to a non-existent article. If you think she is notable then WP:WRITETHEARTICLEFIRST Meters (talk) 07:00, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that (a) some of your recent new articles about historians have been proposed for deletion and (b) you have tended to provide just bare-URL references (as others have commented above). The two subjects may be related: providing clear references to reliable sources makes it more likely that an article will be perceived to be robust and on a notable subject. Sites such as Goodreads involve user-generated content and it is best that an article should not rely on these. The information at WP:CITEHOW may be useful. AllyD (talk) 10:46, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.64% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities this month: WiR Loves Pride Singers and Songwriters Women in GLAM Geofocus: Russia/USSR #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 06:25, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oskosst. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Barry Hollembeak, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Barry Hollembeak to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Diptanshu 💬 17:01, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oskosst,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Barry Hollembeak should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Hollembeak .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Diptanshu 💬 17:03, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oskosst,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Dirk Imhof should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirk Imhof .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:20, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of Indian cities by number of airports, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 20:34, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Nitin Sandesara.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Please improve the format of the references for this article.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:15, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Quentin Skrabec.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Please improve the formatting of these references too.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:31, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Keith Wrightson.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Quick question–do you know that this person is an American citizen? His faculty bio says he grew up in England. I've deleted mention of this unless there's a source. Also, his faculty bio says he's a historian of early modern, not medieval history-these are not the same thing-so I've changed that. Otherwise looks OK and I've activated the authority control tag.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Blythwood}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Blythwood (talk) 13:34, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Howard E. Smither.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

I've added some relevant categories, most importantly 'living people': this matters because articles on living people get enhanced protection from vandalism. I've also run the citations through the refill tool so you have some text on them. Since the external links to Grove aren't really to his "official" website (that would be his personal or faculty website) I've deleted them.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Blythwood}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Blythwood (talk) 13:53, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oskosst,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you:-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, John Ben Snow Prize, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:45, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oskosst,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Nabtesco! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you:-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Most likely notable, but currently nothing but routine sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:49, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oskosst,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Keyvan Mohajer! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you:-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please take a look at WP:CIT and WP:CITE on how to use and format citations and footnotes.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:56, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oskosst,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you:-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Juha Matti Tilli, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:03, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lira has been nominated for merging with Template:Pound (currency). You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Eyesnore 15:41, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oskosst. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Indian cities by number of airports".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 17:57, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Émery Bigot, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 09:28, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oskosst,

Thank you for creating Marios Costambeys.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This subject needs to demonstrate the GNG (multiple reliable and independent sources that discuss the subject with significant coverage) or else needs to met WP:PROF (body of work notability).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 12:33, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oskosst,

Thank you for creating Hugh Gerard Evelyn White.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This subject needs to demonstrate the GNG (multiple reliable and independent sources that discuss the subject with significant coverage).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 12:35, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Barbara Bombi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ingratis (talk) 18:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on David Braund requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Numan765 (talk) 13:10, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Chetan Sandesara, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 13:12, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nitin Sandesara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nitin Sandesara until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Numan765 (talk) 13:13, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sterling Biotech has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Resorces are just passing mentions. No indepth coverage. Most of the references are Press Releases.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Numan765 (talk) 13:16, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you use the standard citation templates when providing references. At present the article that you are creating are remarkably difficult to navigate because of the lack of clarity around referencing. Please see WP:CITE for detailed guidance on citing sources. Thank you  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   21:28, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• I see that you have been advised many times above about this. Please take the trouble to create proper references for your articles: this should have had references, not bare URLs. At the very least, if you are going to leave the URLs bare please don't put square brackets round them. This version still looks a mess but at least the reader can see what sort of sources you're using, and which of them are identical. You're not a new editor, so please learn how to create references. Thanks. PamD 09:45, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You stated that Eucharius Cervicornus was born in 1516 and died in 1547. That is incorrect. Your source, the Library of Congress authority file, says "active 1516-1547". That means that there was some evidence that he existed on those dates. You could say "born before 1516" and/or "died after 1546" (might have been as early as 1547), or use the conventional fl. 1516-1547 (which means we know he was alive during that time but with no indication when he was born or died).

Please be very careful not to add incorrect information to the encyclopedia. You seem to have mis-read his date of admission to university - or perhaps disbelieved 1513 as you'd got him being born in 1516. Read the sources carefully.

Eucharius Cervicornus is on my watch list - I see that I nominated a previous version for deletion in July 2017 as part of cleaning up the contributions of a banned user. PamD 09:59, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• OK, I've now cleaned up your mistakes in that article, upgraded the references (I can't be bothered with the External Links bare URLs - a bot will probably come along and try to fix them), rejigged the text, and added a fascinating snippet which was in one of your sources, as well as LC's list of variant names. You needn't have done all of that, but please:

1. Be careful about accuracy: you had false birth, death, and university dates for this man: that's a lot of mistakes for one very short article
2. Add properly formatted references, so the reader can see where you got your information from. You've found good useful sources, please take the time to create a proper reference. If you use the "Ref toolbar" facility you can put in the Googlebooks URL, click on the little "autofill" icon, and it will make a fair stab at expanding the reference, though needs to be checked carefully and sometimes expanded.

Happy Editing, but please take more care. Thanks. PamD 10:50, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm PamD. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Heather Dalton, but you didn't provide a reliable source proper reference. Please read Wikipedia:Citing sources. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

It is not enough to quote a bare URL for a reference, and even worse when this is enclosed in square brackets rendering it invisible. The Wikipedia policy WP:Verifiability states that "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution". A bare URL concealed from the reader does not constitute an inline citation. Your continued creation of articles with these poorly-presented references is disruptive to the encyclopedia. PamD 18:19, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Oskosst, I see you have started an article on Graeme Dunphy. Well actually, that's me. I'm delighted that you think I am noteworthy enough. I write for wikipedia too, but I really don't want to write about myself, so I will not be editing this new article at all. But you are welcome to ask me if you want to know anything. Incidentally, I am not a historian, my field is actually modern languages. The overlap with history is my work on chronicles, which are usually the provence of historians, but I treat them as works of literature. I am currently professor of translation in Würzburg at the FHWS (https://fang.fhws.de/fakultaet/personen/professoren-und-lehrkraefte/person/prof-dr-graeme-dunphy/). From 1993-2013 I was lecturer of English in Regensburg. If you are interested, you will find PDFs of a lot of my work on www.academia.edu. Best wishes, --Doric Loon (talk) 21:15, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oskosst

Thank you for creating Richard William Pfaff.

User:Blythwood, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I want to thank you for all your hard work creating articles. I really want to express my concern that you need to pay more attention to what you write and what it means. Writing an article about a man who died four years ago as if he was still alive, despite your only source for the article being his thorough, heartfelt obituary, can't seem anything other than insultingly slapdash, a cruel joke likely to cause distress to his family. I see you have been warned about shaky sourcing in the past, by me among others. Please be more careful in future. Your work really is appreciated, but your articles could be a lot better with just a little more time taken.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Blythwood}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Blythwood (talk) 22:13, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Braund is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Braund until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PamD 14:08, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oskosst

Thank you for creating Robert Mimpriss.

User:Gazal world, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello. Thanks for creating this page. Please add more details about life and works of Robert Mimpriss from ODNB entry. There is little information about his contribution. Regards.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Gazal world}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Gazal world (talk) 07:06, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gazal world, Oskosst has been blocked indefinitely, so presumably won't see this. His/her edits have been problematic, and even before the blocking, messages left here were invariably ignored, so I am afraid you will have to sort the problem yourself. --Doric Loon (talk) 09:14, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Doric Loon: Hello. Thanks for notifying me about this. I will solve it myself with the help of ODNB entry. Thanks. --Gazal world (talk) 09:48, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Keyvan Mohajer, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 13:29, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oskosst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Keyvan Mohajer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oskosst. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Keyvan Mohajer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:18, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]