Hello, Jeda045, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Getting started
• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 01:29, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mike V • Talk 18:31, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jeda045, you created the article Hurdiidae. I ordered to the transfer it to the German WP and translated it. Now it is listed as an article with issues. Do you have more infomation and sources to improofe it? --Hans Haase (有问题吗) 21:18, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bidentalia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Volaticotherini, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oxfordian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. Ornithopsis, thanks for creating Aparaglossata!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please expand.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 02:10, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ornithopsis. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since Argyrosauridae doesn't really exist anymore, the former members Argyrosaurus and Paralititan are sort of just floating about in the abyss, as they haven't been placed in the family pages. Think your up to the challenge of placing them according to the newest phylogeny study(the one with Mnyamawamtuka)? OviraptorFan (talk) 02:44, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Mnyamawamtuka study is enough to show that Argyrosauridae is poorly-supported, but the analyses do not provide strong support for any particular phylogenetic position for either taxon. They shouldn't really be placed in any particular family right now. Floating in the abyss is about as accurate as we can get right now. Ornithopsis (talk) 04:28, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sakoura Mansa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danakil. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mande Bory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keita.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for adding the info about Abu Bakr II not being the predecessor of Mansa Musa to List of common misconceptions. I have removed that because you have given no evidence that this is a common misconception. (Criterion 2: The item is reliably sourced, both with respect to the factual contents of the item and the fact that it is a common misconception.) --Macrakis (talk) 18:38, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Macrakis, to quote the source I cited: "We often read that Musa's unfortunate predecessor was called Abu Bakr or Abu-Bakari. This was absolutely false, even though author after author diligently repeated it." If you google "Abubakari II" or "Abu Bakr II" you'll find thousands of results mentioning the alleged mansa, and you'll find far fewer results for Mansa Muhammad. Certainly sounds like a common enough misconception to me. I figured I didn't need to explicitly say "this is considered a common misconception"; including it in the article and citing a source that more or less calls it a common misconception seemed adequate to me, since it seems that's what every other entry on the list has done. Ornithopsis (talk) 18:50, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, regarding the matter of whether this is a trivial topic or not, this voyage is often the subject of pseudohistorical claims that "Abu Bakr II" discovered America—and the pseudohistorical sources almost invariably call him by the incorrect name of Abu Bakr II. So this is bigger than mere uncertainty of the correct naming of an obscure monarch. Ornithopsis (talk) 19:17, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The big error (or misconception) -- as documented in your source -- is the pseudohistorical claim that any African traveled to the Americas and founded the New World civilizations. The name of the supposed leader of the fleet is a minuscule detail. It may be a "common misconception" among pseudo-historians, but that is already a fringe group. --Macrakis (talk) 22:53, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mari Djata II of Mali, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fez and Musa II.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If Theriodonta is contested, then we should just merge it into Neotherapsida. Currently, most of Wikipedia just repeats the Theriodonta proposal as if it is uncontested, should this be changed? Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:52, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We should probably merge both Neotherapsida and Theriodontia into Therapsida, or at least retool the pages to be like "Theriodontia is a controversial proposed clade of therapsids..." etc. Angielczyk and Kammerer (2018) state that the monophyly of Eutheriodontia "is the only uncontroversial aspect of higher therapsid phylogeny". Fraser-King et al. (2019) found dinocephalians to be the basalmost major therapsid clade, whereas Cisneros et al. (2015) and several dicynodont phylogenies (e.g. Kammerer et al. (2017)) find a dicynodont-dinocephalian clade, which is sister to Eutheriodontia in the latter. Cisneros et al. (2015) also find gorgonopsians to be nested within biarmosuchians, and find eutheriodonts to be the sister taxon of other therapsids. An unpublished study presented at SVP a while back found biarmosuchians to be a paraphyletic grade of basal theriodonts, with an anomodont-dinocephalian clade as the sister taxon of that clade. To sum up, any possible arrangement of Biarmosuchia, Dinocephalia, Anomodontia, Gorgonopsia, and Eutheriodontia into higher clades is poorly-supported at the moment. In fact, I'm having a hard time thinking of any phylogenetic analyses in the last decade or so that support the conventional Hopson-Barghausen paradigm of therapsid relationships. The therapsid infobox needs major revisions as well, both so that it no longer presents the poorly-supported Eutherapsida, Neotherapsida, and Theriodonta as fact, and because there are numerous genera that are arguably misplaced. I've been meaning to do some of this cleanup for a while, but haven't gotten around to it because it would be such a big task. Ornithopsis (talk) 23:19, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and made the changes to the Therapsid infobox, it's a small step, but it's a start. Do you think the next proper step is to start merge requests for Neotherapsida, Theriodonta and Eutherapsida? Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:52, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciated your help with making my illustration more accurate.

P2N2222A (talk) 01:51, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tetrapod osteology has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:59, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are right about the info box but not about the change of content, Fixing it on an iPad while I’m in hospital is beyond me so I reverted. The fact that his name in his article doesn’t match the title of the article nor of Gao (mansa) is a major problem and a move will require a move request showing the spelling most used in English reliable sources? Doug Weller talk 19:47, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I've put up move requests on Gao (mansa) and Mohammed ibn Gao; the spelling Qu is definitely more common in reliable sources. In general the transliterations used for Mali-related topics are a mess; for a while there were two separate pages for Abu Ishaq al-Sahili based on different transliterations. Incidentally, it seems to be more common to refer to rulers of Mali as "Mansa (name)" than is the case for many other royals, so I'm unsure whether the titles of pages on mansas should be standardized to "(name) of Mali", as per WP:NCROY, or "Mansa (name)". Mansa Musa, obviously, should stay at that title in either case as per WP:COMMONNAME. Ornithopsis (talk) 20:55, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I’ve noticed the problem of titles of Mali rulers, I’ve got no idea what would be best. And it’s not just Malis where I’ve seen big transliteration problems, but I try to avoid them as I’ve got no expertise. And some editors get very entrenched about being right because they know they are right. Going home from hospital today after bowel cancer surgery and can use my PC again to edit! Doug Weller talk 12:58, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great to find someone with expertise on sources! I just looked at your move posts and subscribed to them, although I may not feel able to comment. Doug Weller talk 13:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sulayman of Mali, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that unlike his famously generous brother Mansa Musa, Mansa Sulayman of Mali was considered a miser? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sulayman of Mali. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sulayman of Mali), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ornithopsis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of proposed Titanosaurus species, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I saw the edit you made on the Florida Horse Conch page, the one where you added a link to a sentence I wrote (On average, it weighs over 11 pounds). It made my day, seeing the link to the Nat geo wild mini documentary. EVANPUPPYDOG (talk) 09:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]