Archive 1

Hi, I just want to say thanks for supporting me on my request for adminship! It passed by a 58/3/0 margin, so I am now an administrator. If you need me to help you out, or you find that I'm doing anything wrong, please don't hesitate to contact me. --Idont Havaname (Talk) 20:14, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Orioane! I hope i can help you in the future. Let me know when you need some help on issued regarding Constanta.Pacalan 13:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

well, thanks for welcoming me :) and for explaining how to sign!
now signed, -Paul- 15:35, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my Oradea contributions? It wasn not really fair. I only added in the Hungarian name for the place given that in Oradea Hungarian is a legal language and in the English version of wikipedia one can point to the existing names (legal, in use - what do you want more?) because the English language does not have an English name for the town. This is common practice in the case of other multilingual spaces as Belgium etc. I really hope that you did not do this just out of nationlist impulse. I am an Englishman spending some time in Oradea/Nagyvarad and I appreciate the way people here do not behave as some do in other places around on the nationality question. I also corrected some of the English errors - again I do not see why you reverted those. Please answer to me on your talk page since I do not know how things go around here and I do not even know whether I have one. Hope you enjoy Brittany. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.79.158.166 (talk • contribs)

I wasn't at all nationalistic, in fact, my conviction is that on wikipedia we should point out the alternate names for different cities, especialy in Transylvania. But, these alterante names are not to be used every time a mention is made about that place. In the case of Oradea, you can see that at the beginning there are the romanian, the hungarian and the german names, but the article name is the official name of the city, and only one name should be used when reffering to the city, not a list of all the names. So it's either Oradea, either Nagyvarad. The same thing is about the rivers, which also have a number of names which are listed at the corresponding articles, but due to the fac that there is a city in Romania the romanian names should be used. So the reason why I reverted your contributions was the overuse of multiple names you have added. About the english errors, I am sorry, I'll se that they are recorected, the way you did. Hope to have been clear enough, if not, I'll be happy to answer any of your eventual questions. --Mihai -^talk 16:50, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

when you will remove that delete thing??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Serkanbulan (talk • contribs)

Orioane, thank you very much for supporting me during my recent RfA campaign! Thanks to you, I am now an admin. Please drop by if you need anything - I'll be glad to help you. Once again, thanks! --M@thwiz2020 22:59, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Orioane

Thanks for your recent support on my RfA. It passed with a final vote of 24/1/2 :-). If you ever need anything, feel free to leave me a message! --Admrboltz (T | C) 04:35, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain your edit [1] ? --Zirland

I don't have a fancy layout like other new admins, but I just want to thank you for your support at my RfA. It passed 47/3/1, so I have officially been promoted. I hope I won't let you down. If I'm not doing something properly, please tell me. Aecis ^{Mr. Mojo risin'} 21:32, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For the revert on Craiova! Can you please give a look at FC Universitatea Craiova, too? I've formatted the article like the Romanian version & removed some blattant POV but a newly created user (sockpuppet?) keeps reverting it, claiming that I'm vandalizing it?!? Thank you, Mihai --Vlad 12:09, 15 January 2006 (UTC) (I'm Vlad on ro.wiki)[reply]

Look: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FC_Universitatea_Craiova&diff=next&oldid=35264123

Then look: http://ro.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=67.71.74.210 He is clever, now is reverting but not as Steel1, so techincally it is not a 3RR, but the revert comment is the same. Do you think I should add {{NPOV}}? --Vlad 12:24, 15 January 2006 (UTC) Back as Steel1, reverted my NPOV: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FC_Universitatea_Craiova&curid=2384859&diff=35264539&oldid=35264512 I'm not sure what I should do next? --Vlad 12:32, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't say trolling exactly, more about strong feelings and hot tempers, resulting in some objectionable behavior. But you're right, for now it will be for the best to let things cool down a bit. Anclation 20:08, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salut! I'm currently in the process of starting a request for arbitration against Anittas, for the personal attacks he continued making after his second RfC, as well as for the insults that were not rectified in that RfC. I would like to know if you would support this RfArb. I think it's very worrying that he continues making significant personal attacks after two RfCs. The attacks made against you that can be used for this case are at: [2] [3]. He's also made a significant amount of attacks against multiple users. Thanks, Ronline ✉ 05:49, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While you did Category:Local Politics in Romania, some others considered my categories useless. Have your say at Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_January_16, chapter 1.15. I am annoyed since I digged a lot for those obscure mayors and the proof that they are all social-democrats.--Luci_Sandor (talk, contribs)   06:27, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All my edits on Transylvania were made in the spirit of respect for truth, so I do not accept your threats and intimidation. Please do not make Romanian nationalistic propaganda in the aformentioned article. Let's have a text that can be verified and doesn't contain wishes, but facts. Regards, Erdelyiek 00:12, 19 January 2006 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Erdelyiek"

Hi. The IP above is a proxy. Iţi scriu în română, sunt convins că înţelegi :)

Sunt aproximativ 800 de oameni în spatele acelui proxy. Îmi pare rău dacă cineva încurcă trebile pe aici. Pe ro.wiki se pare că totul e ok. Poate aveţi o politică în ce priveşte blocare proxy-urilor. Personal nu editez paginile în engleză, dar mi-ar fi de ajutor să mai urmăresc vreo sursă de aici. Dacă totuşi se insistă, măcar nu blocaţi accesul la vizualizare.

Merci.

Dacă vrei să îmi răspunzi, user Picsel pe ro.wiki. 86.127.48.229 17:49, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please accept my embarrassingly belated thank you for supporting my RfA, which much to my surprise passed 102/1/1, earning me minor notoriety. I am grateful for all the supportive comments, and have already started doing the things people wanted me to be able to do. And hopefully nothing else... Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 12:13, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't like to start a revert war, but I'd like to know why did you revert my edits? Isn't it true that some Romaians claim that their direct ancestors were the Dacians (which opinion, as internationally thought, is unacceptable)? Maybe all of them do so? Anyway - even if they happen to be the forefathers of the Romanian people - Dacians are no more, so I think it's proper to write about them in past tense.

And what's the problem with their arriving dates to Transylvania? I admit that what I wrote first (in an increasing number from the 16th century) could have been interpreted as if Romanians hadn't been there. They arrived there in the 13th century (of course, if one accepts the Dacian-Romanian theory, they had already been there for centuries), and after Transylvania was sacked, raided and punished by the Ottoman armies (17th century), and lost a significant proportion of its population, more Romanians settled there from the Romanian principalities. --Mathae 16:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You were right, it's not ok; have you mentioned it as a problem article on the Romanian Wikipedians Notice Board? --Vlad 19:27, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you've reverted it just when I was reverting it manually as well! :) --Vlad 19:35, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He persists: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transylvania&diff=36546778&oldid=36534173

--Vlad 21:12, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nu prea ştiu ce să zic, pentru că de data asta a scris altceva... --21:46, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Hello there Mihai. Would it be possible to rename my account to KinghtLancelot, please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jxdent (talk • contribs)

I remember about your help in romanian Wikipedia! Thanks a lot for welcoming me here. I have a small question: could you translate the article ro:Românime into English? I'm working on polish version of this and En version will be a big help. Michał P. 15:50, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I didn't know. I assumed it was, I'll correct the article accordingly. Thing is, I've been to Sibiu once, but could not be bothered to watch out for the statue when the city has so many beautiful sights. Dahn 11:50, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For your kind support of my Rfa, which passed. If you should ever have any complaints about my admin actions, please let me know. Also, should you ever need my help with anything, please do not hesitate to ask! Thanks again! All the best Banez 17:06, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, this is perhaps a bit overdue, but thank-you for your support in my recent RfA! I passed with a final vote count consensus of (82/1/0), which was a lot of support that I really appreciate. I'll try to live up to the expectations; and on that note, if there's ever something I do wrong (or don't do right), please spit in my general direction. Cheers! --PeruvianLlama^(spit) 05:31, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mihai,

i suppose i should thank you as well for the wellcome note - i find this Wikipedia idea quite interesting and "close to my heart" ... of doing something by free contributions from a community of people...

If in need I will come back to you for more help -

Best regards,

Catalin (born in Sibiu, living in Bucharest for ~9 years already) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cata bog (talk • contribs)

Hi! It was an editing conflict, that's why it appears that I made the changes. Erdelyiek 17:28, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mihai, could you do me the service of reverting to before the completely useless contributions of the unsigned user (the same one you reverted before)? I don't wanna break "three revert", and I had a talk with the guy, explaining what he was doing wrong. Apparently, he won't revert it himself, as I also instructed him on "three revert" - see User talk:80.80.173.168. Thanks a lot. Dahn 22:54, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Hi Orioane. On behalf of my right eye, I'd like to thank you for giving me your support on my recent RfA. It ended with a final tally of (73/2/2) and therefore I have been installed as an administrator now, and I'm ready to serve Wikipedians all over the world with my newly acquired mop and bucket. If you have any questions, do not hestitate to forward them to my talkpage. Once again, thanks for your support. SoothingR 21:07, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question. What template should i put in the images with Steaua? I don't know. I don't have FC Steaua approves. What template should i put in the images with Steaua? User:Messager

Can you do something? Please tell me a copyright tag for sport club images!!! User:Messager

Thank you for your support of my request for adminship. I'm delighted that the RfA ultimately succeeded with a final consensus of 52/1/0, so I am now an administrator. If you ever have any comments regarding my editing, or I can help you at any point in the future, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Again, thank you!

Hi! Why did you delete my additional informations? Are them embarrassing?

HunTomy —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HunTomy (talk • contribs) .

Then correct my phrasings, but do not delete the datas...—The preceding unsigned comment was added by HunTomy (talk • contribs) .

At Talk:Music_of_Romania#Odd_character_.28.22.60.22.29 you both seemed to miss the point of my question, so I have asked again, could you please take a look? Thanks. - Jmabel | Talk 19:07, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for supporting me in my successful RFA. The admin tools will definitely be useful for dealing with vandalism more swiftly. Please drop a note on my talk page, should you have questions about any of my actions. -Kmf164 (talk | contribs) 02:00, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am well aware of what is or isn't vandalism. The section I deleted on Romanians is the number of any people associated with the territory of Romania, meaning Ukrainians, Hungarians, Gypsies, etc.. etc... It is incorrect for use in the article because we are talking about ethnic Romanians, and all together unreliable. Please check the links attached for yourself. Is it ok if I revert back now? I will do so only with your permission to show you I am not a "vandal". 72.144.68.124 20:20, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I removed the 2 million "upper estimate" only because it was being pushed up by the 1.5 million mark in the US. In reality, if you add up all the reasonable lower estimates and censuses, the number only floats around 24 million. Anyway, I won't change the number back since you seem to be protecting it from further tampering as before.

Mihai, I will not cease to sustain the truth even I took my retreat from Wikipedia, and you will certainly not stopping me to post on that page, understood? I post where I want, right! Ande for your information, if you want some sources about what me I sustain, just tell me and I'll give you a couple of sites to check. You can take a look on the site that I gave at Romanians_talk.

Regards, NorbertArthur 24 February 2006

Many thanks for helping with the Hugo Jan Huss article.RFD 21:03, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One more item:the main obituary for Hugo Jan Huss was in the La Crosse Tribune on February 26,2006- today.I used some of the information in the article.Thanks-RFD 21:11, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I looked thru the website that has this page and I don't see any permissions for free usage of photos. I will search a little bit more, and then ask the authors the permission to use under the conditions of wikipedia. mikka (t) 22:55, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The owner finally answered. He said that he was careless with images in his website, paying little attention to copyrights, and therefore he is not in a position to give any permissions. he further wrote that he is in process of remaking his website that will use only his own images, and when he finishes "we may return to this question". I don't know exactly what to think about his last phrase; we'll see. mikka (t) 23:08, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry I rollbacked your edits. On it.wikipedia we are using a different approach to geography stubs than here. The it:Template:Stub Romania would only be applied to geography-related stubs. --Ft1 08:45, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, that's a kind of mistakes I do ten times a day :->, so there's just no reason to be sorry. Bye. --Ft1 09:12, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm planning to expand this section as much as I can but there is a limit to what is available in English. I can read Romanian to a degree but I'm not a native speaker and I might get things wrong. Any help much appreciated. If you are interested there is a Wikipedia:WikiProject Rugby union that you might want to sign up to.

Interestingly the 'official site' that isn't really an official site, is listed by the IRB as being the home page for FRR.GordyB 13:35, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Joe,

I have a small question to ask you. Could you take a look at the article about Satu Mare in the history section. There is this phrase which I find puzzling:

Despite the many casualties and discriminatory measures, the bulk of the Jews of Northern Transylvania, like those of Hungary as a whole, lived in relative physical safety, convinced that they would continue to enjoy the protection of the conservative-aristocratic government. This conviction was shattered almost immediately after the German occupation of Hungary on March 19, 1944. As a result, the fascist puppet government began deportation of Jews in May of 1944.

I do not know anything about the situation of jews in Hungary during WW2 and I can't say if it is right or wrong, but it sounds like ideeas that circulated in Ro, stating that there was no Holocaust in Ro, the germans did it all. Mihai -^talk 09:17, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know specific details, but that sounds about right. Northern Transylvania was, of course, precisely the portion of Transylvania under Hungarian control after the Vienna Arbitrations. Horthy was an anti-Semite, but did not sign on to the Holocaust (although 20,000 Jews were deported in Sub-Carpathian Ruthenia). As long as he retained actual power, it looked like the Jews of Hungary were going to make it through the war intact, or nearly so. Things changed radically once the Germans took over in March 1944. See [4]; also [5] and [6]. - Jmabel | Talk 19:30, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you say that it is OK, then it is OK. I am no specialist in WW2 history, but what seemed wrong was that it sounded very much like public opinion in Romania at the beginning of the 90's - a period of Holocaust denial, at it is in line with the Horthy artcile, which in my pov is more gloryfying than it should be. That's why I wanted to ask for your oppinion because I've lost track of the edits over there. Thx Mihai -^talk 20:29, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, the Romanian record in Moldavia, Bukovina, and the eastern territories they conquered was as bad as any in Europe. But in general, in Wallachia, Transylvania, and Hungary proper, the bulk of the local populace, while certainly anti-Semitic, was not, on the whole, murderously so. The fate of the Jews was all a matter of who was on top at any given moment. The Iron Guard in Romania and the Arrow Cross in Hungary exceeded the Nazis in their anti-Semitic zeal, but both held power only briefly. Bucharest and Budapest had two of the highest survival rates for Jews in Europe. Budapest has a large Jewish population to this day; most of Bucharest's Jews slowly moved to Israel (much as the Transylvanian Saxons largely went to Germany) because the Romaniana Communist government was basically willing to "sell" them to Israel and West Germany respectively. -- Jmabel | Talk 20:39, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not an expert on the matter, but I've seen you reverted Hungarian statements about the origin of the name. The now added now by an IP seems reasonable: I too am inclined to believe that "Ardeal" is the Romanian version of "Erdely"). Dahn 20:28, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Ok. Dahn 20:49, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok great. I was not sure which logo was the correct one. Thanks. Forever young 03:48, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orioane, I'm a PhD student too, in Political Sciences! And what you write about Romania is copied from Legionnaire (Iron Guard) and National-Communist history books. This is the true vandalism in Wikipedia. By the way: niveau moyen en Francais, se deverait rendre tres dures tes etudes a Rennes! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.76.161.38 (talk • contribs) .

salut. is mitrut. imi e teama ca nu am nici un copyright, ci doar am prelucrat o imagine. Totusi, nu inteleg un lucru, e spre folosul meu imaginea respectiva, sau spre folosul celor care cauta acest item? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mitrutpopoiu (talk • contribs) .

and what do i have to do to make that map dissapear? last time i checked, that`s what the "edit this page" was about... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Greier (talk • contribs) .

romanainsalute.jpg can be deleted. about copyright, it`s a 19th century pic. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Greier (talk • contribs) .

Hello,

After a quite long period of work at ro.wiki project or doing other unintresting tasks around here I've decided miself to create another article from the scratch. It's about the ASTRA National Museum Complex Sibiu. If you have some time, I would be grateful if you could have a look at it. Thx! Mihai -^talk 14:06, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great stuff. I copy-edited and recommended it for WP:DYK. Please see my half dozen or so questions at Talk:ASTRA National Museum Complex - Jmabel | Talk 18:00, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. To tell you the truth, I was bewildered back there: I find it hard to picture what people such as Greier do to end up like that, and I had just noticed the message he had for me on his userpage. Well, anyway. I'm gonna look over his edits. Thanks again. Dahn 11:03, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It was the 3rd time I was removing Janos Bolyai from the list of Romanians (as being Hungarian). If he keeps adding it, it means breaking the 3RR. --Vlad 17:36, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Before you start lecturing me, perhaps you should query with that woman-hater Bog-dumb-ass or whatever his name is, what on earth gives him the right to delete my valid entries. If he doesn't like them, i suggest he doesn't read them. Now get lost. —This unsigned comment was added by Olympic (talk • contribs) .

Thank you, Orioane
	for voting in my RFA. It passed with a result of 100/1/0. Thanks for your vote! If you have any comments, please say so here.

I'm going to unsprotect this now, since it's been about a week since you protected it. Since WP:SEMI is for dealing with serious current vandalism, this seems longer than "current" can really be stretched to. Can I ask you to take a cruise through your protection log and see if you have others that got left protected? Thanks. -Splash^talk 23:36, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I noticed that. The weakness (or strength) of WP:SEMI is that it effectively expires after 4 days, sicne then an account can edit through it. By now, Greier's account is more than 4 days old, so, if the article still needs protection, it will have to be fully protected. This is a fairly heavy price to pay, of course, so it'd be important to try to unprotect as soon as possible in such a case and have no fear of handing out escalating blocks for disruptive editing. -Splash^talk 13:16, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vad ca insisti sa fie trecuta sTEAUA Bucuresti la Sports and Entertainment in articolul Culture of Romania.

Poti sa ii incurajezi pe stadion aici nu intereseaza pe nimeni cu ce echipa simpatizezi. —This unsigned comment was added by Taviii (talk • contribs) .

Salut! Te-am contactat pt. ca avem o problema cu articolul despre Romanians. Nu stiu daca ai observat, da' este acolo un usar cu nick-ul de Jayig, care tot scrie la Canada cifrele de la mixed ancestry si single ancestry, dar asa ce va nici un articol in Wikipedia despre un grup etnic nu are. Am incercat sa-l opresc, da nu am putut. Te-as ruga daca poti sa faci ceva sau sa imi zici ce sa fac in cazul asta, ca de cand a inceput sa editeze articolul ala, nu mai inceteaza. A fost totul OK pana cand nu a aparut iel. Mersi mult ! NorbertArthur 30 Martie 2006

Hi. I'm doing a survey of Wikipedia editors as part of a class research project. It's quick, anonymous, and the data will be made available to the Wikipedia community later this month. Would you like to take part? More info here. Thanks! Nonplus 00:49, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Buna. Te contactez pt ultima oara, fii linistit. Am un ultim lucru sa iti cer, si te-as ruga f. frumos sa-l faci. Eu plec de pe Wikipedia pentru totdeauna, si vreau ca account-ul meu sa fie inchis, la fel si username-ul meu sa fie blocat. Te rog enorm sa faci asta cat de repede poti. Mersi si toate cele bune, Arthur 28 Aprilie 2006

Revision as of 10:31, 29 May 2006 (edit) Orioane (Talk | contribs) (Reverted edits by 82.78.147.136 (talk) to last version by Eugen Ivan)

pot afla care a fost motivul?! multumesc

--LaurentiuR 00:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Constantzeanu#Second_block_for_incivility will you also help for an RfC against Mikkalai? --Brasoveanul 13:09, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Buna,

A inceput un vot pentru stergerea "Wikipediei Moldovenesti", o creatie a unui American, cu origini suspecte in Basarabia si care nu vorbeste limba wikipediei la care pretinde a fi sysop. Il cheama Node ue si pentru a crea impresia ca lumea doreste aceasta wikipedie, a apelat la toti utilizatorii rusi care au venit sa voteze de partea lui desi nu cunosc bine subiectul si li s-a spus ca voteaza pentru supravietuirea alfabetului chirilic. Asa a ajuns ca votul sa fie 31 pentru stergerea Mo wiki, si 42 impotriva stergerii - deci in alte cuvinte pentru pastrarea wikipediei in limba "moldoveneasca". Vino si voteaza aici[7] , ca sa sergem acesta creatura cu miros bolshevic, care insulta toti romanii de pe ambele maluri ale Prutului. Node ue le-a spus rusilor sa traduca mesajul lui in limba rusa si sa-l transmita mai departe. Trimite si tu mesajul acesta la toti utilizatorii romani-unionisti sau romani-moldoveni unionisti pe care-i cunosti pe en.wiki sau ro.wiki. Dapiks 23:46, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salut,

AFAIK, the correct name was "Cîndrel"/"Cândrel" (see this link also [8]). I changed the name of the article thinking it was added to the encyclopedia before it was possible to use diacritics. "Cindrel" is also accepted, I'll revert the article back to its original version. Mentatus 12:22, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi Mihai

I'll have to look again - to check on copyright policies, but I think if a copyright is noted, that is you do not plagerize, it is legal. As well, information that is used solely for educational purposes and not being marketed is legal. At least that is my understanding.

I only included this information as it felt needed. I think Romania has many wonderful qualities but it seems fair to balance the material, give more updated and accurate information (despite being 6 years out of date . . .) and not give false impressions.

Thanks for responding and I'll check on the copyright.

ana

În 17 septembrie va fi referendum în Transnistria legat de independenţa regiunii. Cu această ocazie probabil multă lume va căuta pe Wikipedia informaţii despre Transnistria. Am încercat să adaug în articol nişte informaţii legate de acest referendum, anume:

- faptul că mai multe organizaţii antiseparatiste au lansat un apel la boicotare, considerînd referendumul "farsă"

- faptul că din 46 de ţări membre ale Consiliului Europei, 45 sînt împotriva recunoaşterii referendumului, numai RUsia are altă părere

- faptul că datele Comisiei Electorale Centrale din Tiraspol au fost schimbate în mod ciudat, anume numărul total de alegători s-a micşorat cu 7% faţă de 2005, ceea ce ridică suspiciuni asupra unei încercări de creştere artificială a prezenţei la vot prin raportarea unui număr mai mic de alegători înregistraţi.

Totdeauna am dat lincurile care dovedesc cele scrise de mine, n-am născocit nimic din burtă.

Userul Willian Mauco, care pare fan Tiraspol, mereu mi-a şters adăugirile. (vezi istoria paginii)

Puteţi vedea la pagina de discuţii Transnistria ce argumente a adus. Anume: ăia care cer boicotarea referendumului din Transnistria sînt foşti KGB-işti, că aşa zice o organizaţie rusească de analiză (a dat un linc pentru asta). Întîi a spus că respectivii nici nu sînt din Transnistria, ci doar din Basarabia, dar i-am dovedit că unii dintre semnatarii apelului la boicot sînt transnistreni. Am fost împăciuitor, i-am zis că n-are decît să adauge părerea organizaţiei ruseşti că antiseparatiştii sînt foşti KGBişti, că n-are decît să-i considere pe cei care vor boicotarea referendumului drept băieţi răi, dar faptul în sine, că s-a cerut boicotarea referendumului, trebuie menţionat. Degeaba, mereu mi s-au şters adăugirile - pentru celelalte 2 fapte nici n-a adus argumente.

A mai fost o adăugire care a şters-o, despre arestarea a 4 persoane din Transnistria care sînt împotriva separatismului (între timp li s-a dat drumul). În cazul ăsta am renunţat eu să mai insist pentru includerea informaţiei în articol (deşi informaţia e incontestabilă), tocmai fiindcă n-am vrut să mă cert prea mult.

În perioada asta cînd agenţiile de ştiri vor menţiona referendumul de la Tiraspol, se va citi articolul Transnistria în Wikipedia poate mai mult decît într-un an întreg. De aia acum e nevoie să existe în articol informaţii despre contestarea corectitudinii referendumului. Nu cer să se menţioneze ca adevăr absolut faptul că referendumul e incorect, ci doar că există unii (OSCE, 45 din 46 ţări ale Consiliului Europei, unele organizaţii din zonă şi din Basarabia) care consideră asta. Vă cer de aceea sprijinul ca să interveniţi pe pagina de discuţii Transnistria pentru a susţine rămînerea informaţiei în pagină şi să repuneţi informaţia atunci cînd Mauco o şterge (eu nu pot să verific chiar 24 de ore din 24). Evitaţi atacurile suburbane, păstraţi ton civilizat. mulţumesc.

Who is William Mauco Here is an article about a Wikipedia celebrity, William Mauco, and his relations with the International Council for Democratic Institutions and State Sovereignty (ICDISS), an organisation "which seems to be a front organisation for a Kremlin-backed rogue statelet called Transdniestria" (quote from the article) http://0.bypass-filter.com/index.php?q=aHR0cDovL2Vkd2FyZGx1Y2FzLmJsb2dzcG90LmNvbS8yMDA2LzA4L2dvdGNoYS0yLmh0bWw%3D

Edward Lucas wrote about Mauco: "The other lead is William Mauco. He has an extensive record of posting intelligent and fairly neutral entries on Wikipedia, not only about TD but about other unrecognised statelets. Crucially, these predate ICDISS's birthday of January 2006. And he also claims to have been at their conference in Mexico City in April of this year. I have written to him asking to get in touch, and had a friendly email in reply. I am planning to follow up this research in an article in European Voice at the end of August, so watch this space!"

Together with EvilAlex (a guy from Transnistria) I created an article regarding Transnistria's separatist propaganda Heaven of Transnistria. It was nominated for deletion. Please help to keep this article, voting against deletion [9]. Enough was deleted from Transnistria article itself, Wikipedia is full with Tiraspol's propaganda, let's have at least an article that explain this propaganda--MariusM 18:22, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Orioane, for contributing to my in many languages… page! I appreciate it very much, and I will remember you if I have any questions about your language. Thank you again! —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  19:54, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for catching my mistake at 2007 Rugby World Cup - European qualification. I had used that section as a template for creating something similar for the 2003 version...I guess I accidentally pasted it in more than one place. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alanmjohnson (talk • contribs) .

Thanks, I guess I did not see it--Xanxz 14:40, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for having pacience with me. I will (re)edit Education in Romania very intense until Friday Nov 17, 2006. After that date I strongly ivite you to see my job. DorianS1 12:41, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DorianS1

00:47, 17 November 2006 (UTC) Vrea cineva sa-mi propuna un articol ptr stergere : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformations_imposed_by_the_Soviet_Union_in_Romanian_Education_after_the_WW_II

DorianS1 00:47, 17 November 2006 (UTC) Also, I created an article "History of Education in Romania"[reply]

Your vote is much appreciated, Mihai. Thank you. Biruitorul 21:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An image you uploaded, Image:Coa Mangalia RO.jpg, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 12:02, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for cleaning this up, I don't write many geographical articles, and never before for Romania. jimfbleak 16:34, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at my user page, you'll see my main interest is birds. Europe's third Long-billed Murrelet turned up near PdJ, (I'd seen the second) and on a whim I decided to stub the location. Incidentally, Birding World magazine used the Hungarian name, which I retained in the Long-billed Murrelet but piped to PdJ. Should it be changed to the Romanian alone? jimfbleak 19:14, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I imagine the murrelet was on one of the lakes you mentioned - storks are an uncommon wanderer to the UK, although easy to see in Iberia. jimfbleak 19:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On the WikiProject Countries talk page, you had either explictly declared a general interest in the project, or had participated at a discussion that appears related to Location Maps for European countries.
New maps had been created by David Liuzzo, and are available for the countries of the European continent, and for countries of the European Union exist in two versions. From November 16, 2006 till January 31, 2007, a poll had tried to find a consensus for usage of 'old' or of which and where 'new' version maps. At its closing, 25 people had spoken in favor of either of the two presented usages of new versions but neither version had reached a consensus (12 and 13), and 18 had preferred old maps.
As this outcome cannot justify reverting of new maps that had become used for some countries, seconds before February 5, 2007 a survey started that will be closed at February 20, 2007 23:59:59. It should establish whether the new style maps may be applied as soon as some might become available for countries outside the European continent (or such to depend on future discussions), and also which new version should be applied for which countries.
Please note that since January 1, 2007 all new maps became updated by David Liuzzo (including a world locator, enlarged cut-out for small countries) and as of February 4, 2007 the restricted licence that had jeopardized their availability on Wikimedia Commons, became more free. The subsections on the talk page that had shown David Liuzzo's original maps, now show his most recent design.
Please read the discussion (also in other sections α, β, γ, δ, ε, ζ, η, θ) and in particular the arguments offered by the forementioned poll, while realizing some comments to have been made prior to updating the maps, and all prior to modifying the licences, before carefully reading the presentation of the currently open survey. You are invited to only then finally make up your mind and vote for only one option.
There mustnot be 'oppose' votes; if none of the options would be appreciated, you could vote for the option you might with some effort find least difficult to live with - rather like elections only allowing to vote for one of several candidates. Obviously, you are most welcome to leave a brief argumentation with your vote. Kind regards. — SomeHuman 7 Feb2007 20:27 (UTC)

I have voted for 6. Mihai -^talk 09:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are some phrases in the article that have to be added by hungarian language users or fans all time. il post the links where I have exposed my opinions and the changes:

the changes in the article

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=T%C3%A2rn%C4%83veni&diff=114859866&oldid=114797744

my opinion

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Khoikhoi#Tarnaveni.2C_Romania

his answer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Olario

In romanian if I can it's easy for me: este o fraza care o tot introduc in text si nu-i nici la locul si ii si malitioasa. Si mai sunt si niste nume de orase care ei zic ca atunci?! (atunci cand ca acum vorbim despre ele) se numeau asa ..cum si el zice si si noi stim limba latina o fost pana tarziu limba oficiala in ungaria deci sa zici ca limba oficiala era maghiara si de aia le ziceau asa la orase ii absurd. Sper sa ma poti ajuta cand mai intrii oricum daca o sa tot schimb ce alti batjocoresc o sa trag concluzia ca nu se poate free encyclopedia. Multumesc spor la treaba! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Olario (talk • contribs) 22:57, 13 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I have read the pages about this on wikipedia and I have came to you because you seem to be a person who knows how wikipedia is supposed to work and are most likely 100% neutral on this matter. I am involved in a rather intense edit war with two other editors of the article Miriam Rivera. In the last days the user User:Jokestress has quite reasonably asked for the article to be backed up with more reliable sources. Well I found them and that seems to have placated her. She has acted in 100% reasonable way in all of this. The problem arises in that she has asked in the spirt of resolving the conflict we were having other people who are not 100% neutral it seems to comment on the matter. These being the user User:Longhair and the userUser:Alison in particular who have not bothered to justify anything that they have done. Longhiar being an admin seems to feel no need to discuss anything and I feel is abusing her powers. Is there anything you can do? --Hfarmer 04:18, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One user have been reverting my edits that I have made to the article. First, He/she have been readding faux-direct destinations to airlines that make a plane change. Second, he/she have left Bangkok not disambiguated since Bangkok is served by 2 airports. He/she thinks that I have been putting nonsense to the article. Can you help me? What should I do? Thanks a bunch!! Bucs2004 19:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried several times to delete the article on the romanian philosophy, posted by myself. This article is an individual research, and I DO NOT WANT to give up copyright in favour of wikipedia. I claim that this article is my intellectual property. And, more, it does not respect the wikipedia standards, since it is an original research. So, please, do not restore the article anymore. Thanks.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ionescu03.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 18:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, long time no seeing! How's stuff? Dahn 17:15, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hei Orioane! it seems that you don't like my Timisoara map site... You all the time remove my link from the External Links section. What is the problem? You never give any clues.. Here is an ideea: if you don't like the link description, why don't you modify it and keep it. This will transform you from a police guy to a contributor (wiki style)!

Hei Orioane! it seems that you don't like my Timisoara map site... You all the time remove my link from the External Links section. What is the problem? You never give any clues.. Here is an ideea: if you don't like the link description, why don't you modify it and keep it. This will transform you from a police guy to a contributor (wiki style)! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.43.34.135 (talk) 16:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently proposing that the Garrigues page should be replaced by the content now found on the Garrigues (disambiguation) page and the the material presently on the Garrigues page should be moved to a new page to be titled Les Garrigues, Catalonia If you have the time I would appreciate your comments on the Discussion page at Garrigues. I hope you will agree. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:58, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wish you a very Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! --R O ^{A M A T A A} | msg  18:01, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have some questions:

• Can you tell me how I can create an archove of my earlier discussions?
  • Can I ... Am I allowed to delete the useless conversations (mainly about unused pictures, wrong copyright tag, and that sort of bla-bla-bla that I took care of)?
• Can you tell me how I can make me a more "fancy" signature?

thankyou!

PS: please forgive the spelling, and feel free to answer in Romanian! if you don't mind, that is. --ES Vic (talk) 19:13, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I solved one of the problems by myself. I have just one more: Can you tell me how I can make me a more "fancy" signature? (like Roamataa perhaps?)

thankyou!

PS: please forgive the spelling, and feel free to answer in Romanian! if you don't mind, that is. --ES Vic (talk) 15:23, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to create a page on 'Graffiti Records' a UK Record label and I have had the page 'Salted'. I was typing true and verifiable content but I guess that someone decided that they didn't like me :( I will recreate the page with lots more content that is also truly verifiable, if I can get someone to actually un'salt it.

Thank you Adam J Mills. UK. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stardog7 (talk • contribs) 17:35, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw that you collaborated on articles related to Dacia and thought this could be of interest: WikiProject Dacia is looking for supporters, editors and collaborators for creating and better organizing information in articles related to Dacia and the history of Daco-Getae. If interested, PLEASE provide your support on the proposal page. Thanks!!--Codrinb (talk) 05:13, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD: Nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caş. Burghiu (talk) 13:33, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 04:34, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 07:19, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 03:40, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WilliamH (talk) 21:07, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lazar8.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:05, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, amending the {{information}} added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:15, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coa Campia Turzii RO.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]