The article you wrote, Cancioneiro da Biblioteca Nacional, is uncategorized. Please help improve it by adding it to one or more categories, so it may be associated with related articles. A stub marker or other template doesn't count - please put in an actual category in the article.Eli Falk 22:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Antonio Carreira, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Antonio Carreira is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Antonio Carreira, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 08:00, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nuno, I saw your post on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Composers, I don't know if you're aware that a number of Portuguese composers recently featured in a special BBC Radio 3 broadcast in their regular choral evensong. The service was sung by the choir of The Queen's College, Oxford who were on tour in Porto. Full details of what they sang are here. I'm not sure this is significant enough to be added to the articles of the composers featured, but I thought you might be interested, unfortunately the service is no longer available on the BBC's Listen Again service. I've heard rumours that the choir may be releasing a CD of this sort of music in the not too distant future. David Underdown 13:33, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Olá Nuno, por favor preciso que me ajude com uma dúvida: você tem realmente certeza que o Cancioneiro de Lisboa é o pequeno manuscrito de apenas 72 folhas [1] também disponível na Biblioteca Nacional? Tenho a impressão que faria mais sentido dar o título de Cancioneiro de Lisboa ao Cancioneiro da Biblioteca Nacional, que é um volume muito mais importante, com mais de 1600 canções, não acha? Se possível responda aqui, assim eu já corrijo o título do artigo. Grato. Carlos (talk) 16:11, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article you contributed too:

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_units_in_the_Age_of_Mythology_series_(2nd_nomination) Ikip (talk) 19:57, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Estádio da Luz, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. SLBedit (talk) 16:35, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nuno Raimundo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nuno Raimundo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Bomtempo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]