Some interesting articles:

49.0 percent of the US electric power was generated at coal-fired plants. 19.2 percent was generated at natural gas-fired plants, and 1.8 percent was generated at petroleum-fired plants. So, 70% of the electricity is provided from fossil fuel sources.

Nuclear plants contributed 19.8 percent.

So, fossil and nuclear (both called foclear) sources provides 89.9 of the electricity in the U.S.A., showing the nowadays dependence on this resources. [1]

In other countries, with more nuclear and fossil independence, the main electricity source are renewables [2] or includes fossil or nuclear phase-outs.

On the other hand, a sustainable growth is based on nuclear and fossil fuel-free energy, that avoids a toxic, radioactive, dirty and carbon-driven world. [3]

Fossil energy sources includes coal, natural gas, and petroleum, out of which petroleum dependence poses the most immediate consequences due to limited supplies that may reach maximum production much sooner than other resources, see peak oil.

Petroleum dependence consists on the reliance of a nation or other entity upon the discovery, mass production, and distribution of fossil fuels and related products, frequently by another nation (i.e. OPEC) or monopolistic or oligolopolistic group, comparing petroleum extraction and refining to renewable energies, which originary sources (i.e. sun or wind) are more generally distributed on the world and for the citizens.

Political effects of oil dependence include monopolization, sociopolitical instability, geopolitical hegemony, dictatorship, terrorism and war [4], (see U.S. Energy Independence). Economic effects include large foreign trade deficits, inflation and impacts to other areas of the economy during increasingly frequent periods of high oil prices (i.e. see 1973 oil crisis) [5] Health effects include asthma, lung cancer and other pollution-related diseases.

Reduction in oil dependence is impeded by financial incentives favorable to petroleum companies, large infrastructure investments, corruption and cultural inertia.[ citation needed]

As an example, cars and vans consume 35% of Europe´s oil [6]. In the USA, automobiles are the single largest consumer of oil [7] (40%) and the source of 20% of greenhouse gas emissions. [8]

Nuclear power currently has the ability to replace other forms of electricity generation, this does not include a large number of petroleum uses.

Since the beginning and renaissance of the Anti-nuclear movement and the nuclear waste, proliferation and security problems, however, there have been people who have claimed that the production of high level nuclear waste and damage done by Uranium mining is comparable to the environmental damage done by coal or petroleum.

Environmentalists say also nuclear power will not significantly cut carbon emissions anyway. Given that even under the WNA's most optimistic outlooks nuclear will only account for 18 percent of electricity demand, the amount of carbon foregone comes in at just four percent [9].

Because of this is proposed a nuclear phase-out and nuclear independence.

EERE means energy efficiency and renewable energy.

Due to the impact of oil on the environment limited supplies alternatives are considered; in the more or less long term, the replacement of this energy by another which is more sustainable.

Renewable energies are alternatives to fossil fuels in the production of electricity. Other technologies may allow them to replace petroleum in transportation.

Also renewable energies are not vulnerable due to centralisation.[10]

• North American energy independence
• U.S. Energy Independence
• Alternative propulsion
• Electric vehicle
• Emission standard
• Global warming
• Institute for Energy and Environmental Research
• No-carbon renewable-energy economy (NCREE)
• United Nations Commission for Sustainable Development
• Winning the Oil Endgame

• Commission on Oil Independence
• Non-renewable energy
• World oil market
• Oil phase-out in Sweden

• Hubbert peak theory
• Post carbon

• Anti-nuclear movement
• Nuclear-Free Future Award
• Nuclear-free zone
• Nuclear phase-out

1. ^ http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/epm_sum.html 2. ^ Wind power in Spain 3. ^ http://www.un.org/Pubs/chronicle/2007/webArticles/022607_energy.htm 4. ^ Graham Paterson, "Alan Greenspan claims Iraq war was really for oil" September 16, 2007 The Sunday Times 5. ^ http://serviciodeestudios.bbva.com/TLBB/fbin/EURO_070717_EconomicwatchEuropa_55_tcm208-102497.pdf 6. ^ http://www.transportenvironment.org/docs/Press/2007/2007_02_12_te_letter_environment_council.pdf 7. ^ http://jumpstartford.com/why_ford/ 8. ^ http://finance.senate.gov/hearings/testimony/2007test/050107testwm.pdf 9. ^ http://www.un.org/Pubs/chronicle/2007/webArticles/022607_energy.htm 10. ^ http://www.be-here.com/alternativeenergy.htm#vulnerability

   * UN:World's Youth Demand a Nuclear-Free and Fossil Fuel-Free Energy Future.
   * Carbon-Free and Nuclear-Free: A Roadmap for U.S. Energy Policy, by Arjun Makhijani, IEER.
   * Dependence Reduction Through Innovation in Vehicles and Energy (DRIVE) Act in United States Senate Committee on Finance .
   * Carter urges oil independence
   * Energy Security Leadership Council.
   * The Short Path to Oil Independence.
   * Can oil independence be achieved?.

Nudecline: nuclear decline. --Nudecline (talk) 07:34, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you a lot. --Nudecline (talk) 09:18, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is it? You need to add some text explaining that much, at a minimum. 76.102.27.141 (talk) 17:43, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is Traffic Message Channel, a free system to warn about traffic jams (I included this aticle in the category). There are two main devices in the Market= TomTom Go Live 1000 and Pioneer Avic.--Nudecline (talk) 17:53, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:TMC, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:44, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have improved the article, creating the section about TMC devices. When appearing more devices, one can use more widespreadly the category (or create subcategories) --Nudecline (talk) 07:44, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I saw someone copied the table from Electric car#Charging to Charging station#Technical issues. It took me 15 minutes to track down the revision you made in which this occurred. Please in "Edit summary" say broadly what you're changing in each edit; it's polite and makes others' lives easier. Thanks! -- Skierpage (talk) 01:07, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You copied the table I added to Electric car#Charging to Charging station#Technical issues. I wondered about where to put it and maybe this is a better place, but I don't think duplication is the answer, it means redundant information that will drift out of sync. It feels like the best approach is the two articles could transclude part of a free-standing Level 1, 2, and 3 charging article (currently that page is just a redirect) (using <noinclude>stuff not to show up in the other pages</noinclude>), but Wikipedia policy seems to frown on transclusion of articles, see Wikipedia_talk:Template_namespace/Archive 1#transcluding prose. For now I added <-- table copied from [[Electric car#Charging]] --> to Charging station page, I dunno if there's a template for copied material.

A freestanding article could give the history of "Level 1/2/3 charging", while the other articles just use the current definitions. I made the assertion that CARB came up with the terms but don't have complete proof. I'm also not sure what the authoritative modern description of the levels is -- it seems companies wanting to go beefier (Tesla, Coulomb Technology, etc.) have simply increased the max. current for level 1 and 2 to suit their products. I'd love any well-cited additional information, this is important stuff! Cheers, -- Skierpage (talk) 01:17, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You never deigned to reply, so just to let you know I removed the table you duplicated into Charging station#Technical issues as part of general improvements. -- Skierpage (talk) 02:31, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I have seen the message, but I forgot to answer, because there was a lot of move in my talk page :-D. But I have added some questions in the article's talk page (charging station). I am very interested about this topic. I think that the best page to put the information is in the article "charging station", because can be used by electric cars and other vehicles. I have recently been in an official course about electric vehicles, so I can give more information about this topic (they talked about 1/2/3 level charging. --Nudecline (talk) 08:01, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Rede Integrada de Transporte. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. However admirable biofuels might be, this article on the Rede Integrada de Transporte transit authority is not the place to promote it. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:07, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why have I added promotional material to Rede Integrada de Transporte ?. --Nudecline (talk) 06:25, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, does the transport authority use all these biofuels -- or is it that you want to say that they are available for use? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:53, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete it without read ?. --Nudecline (talk) 06:37, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the text after reading. However, it does appear as if you are paraphrasing the transit authority's own website, and citing it as a primary source, so I will restore the deleted section. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:00, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, it was not the soapbox for "my" goods or my biofuels. It was the exposition of a RIT policy. Without this clarification, I would include a non-neutrality tag in the article. Now people can freely judge if the environmental effort of the RIT (qualified in the past as a model) is now enough. I personally think that no, because the use of combustion buses is a bad policy. In any case, it is my guilty ;-) if I have not explained it better before. Now, I close the gate upto the next week. Good weekend :-)--Nudecline (talk) 19:33, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add redlinks in disambiguation pages as you did to Mobility. Wait until the article actually exists. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:53, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see incredible there is not an urban mobility article in Wikipedia. With the nowadays Wikipedia, the link must go to sustainable transportation.--Nudecline (talk) 06:35, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nudecline. Please see my recent comments about the deletion of your edits on the electric bicycle article. I hope you will contribute to the discussion. Thanks! Ebikeguy (talk) 15:21, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I though you might be interested in participation in this discussion Talk:Toyota Camry Hybrid#Restoring_this_article. There is a user that wants to merge all hybrid model specific articles with the article of the main model.-Mariordo (talk) 16:30, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you planning on creating the All risk insurance article that you linked to from Insurance? If not, I think we should delay adding the link until someone creates it. Jojalozzo 16:28, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can create the stub. For sure, I cannot believe there is not a such article in Wikipedia. --Nudecline (talk) 13:58, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please in the future check before adding a link. Wikipedia doesn't need an article for every concept in the universe. In my view a section in the Insurance article would suffice for introducing the all risk concept. Jojalozzo 14:52, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to find the words all risk and all-risk and only found : "Builder's risk insurance insures against the risk of physical loss or damage to property during construction. Builder's risk insurance is typically written on an "all risk" basis covering damage due to any cause (including the negligence of the insured) not otherwise expressly excluded. Builder's risk insurance is coverage that protects a person's or organization's insurable interest in materials, fixtures and/or equipment being used in the construction or renovation of a building or structure should those items sustain physical loss or damage from a covered cause.". Are there other mentions?. For sure, all-risk insurance in car insurance is very important nowadays. --Nudecline (talk) 11:32, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there's no mention of all risk except in the builder insurance bit. I encourage you to add an entry for "All risk" at the top of the Insurance#Types of insurance/Other types section. Jojalozzo 15:15, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks. --Nudecline (talk) 10:42, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the source (App Store) restrictions are already mentioned earlier in the article, perhaps your edit would be better in the iOS (Apple) article. As for the knockoff devices, adding them places undue weight on them. I see no evidence that the world media cares beyond a few blogs. There were lots of knockoff iPhones and it isn't even mentioned in the iPhone article now because it would be undue weight so a few small copying companies. Perhaps in the future these devices will be notable, but I don't see that now.--Terrillja _talk 14:29, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are not right. They are not few blogs. It is the New York Times (and other media) and very important companies, as Google and Adobe, between others (as referenced). : "Companies like Google and Adobe have accused Apple of unfairly using its clout to exclude their technologies from the iPad. And some application developers are fretting under Apple’s tight control of those devices. [1]. Also are appearing free source alternatives to the iPad, as the iFree Tablet. [2], [3]." I think this can be embarrassing for Apple, and because of this the interest to quickly delete, but this is a very important criticism to the iPad (of course, iPad has no criticism or free alternatives, so this cannot be added to protect neutrality). --Nudecline (talk) 14:53, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is offhandedly mentioned. Hardly extensive coverage. Perhaps I should rephrase, there is no extensive coverage outside of blogs. And I didn't object to Google and Adobe, I just said that the same type of issues were already mentioned in the article and they would be better to have in the iOS article. It isn't a criticism of the iPad, but rather the iOS family of products instead. --Terrillja _talk 15:02, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Really, it is a specific problem of the iPad, because there are hardware and free source hardware alternatives. You cannot use the hardware to download or transfer files from other places (although can be censorship in App Store, this is an additional problem). So, they would appear mentioned in the main iPad article and a link to somewhere showing the alternative(s) to iPad. I think mine is a very moderated position. --Nudecline (talk) 15:16, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What do you propose?. If no answer, I am going to include the same text.--Nudecline (talk) 10:33, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mac. Thank you. T. Canens (talk) 06:16, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the first read, I thought it was an ANN's notice ;-) I have answered there. --Nudecline (talk) 10:35, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot access to the page about the incident, so I cannot now see the thread :-( and see if one say that I am User:Batgirl or something similar ;-) In any case, I have several times said that I am not Mac. How many times do I have to repeat it ?. --Nudecline (talk) 09:02, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nudecline (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have said several times that I am not Mac and my Comments were deleted

Decline reason:

You've been determined to be a sockpuppet per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mac/Archive and a discussion at ANI, which can be seen in the archives. These studies are convincing. Merely declaring your innocence is not enough. There is also a long history of bad behavior and ignoring feedback, so it's more than just a technical issue of misusing multiple accounts. EdJohnston (talk) 11:34, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do you say that I am not answering to the questions in my talk page?. This is not true. On the other hand, you say a thing a do other. If there is a reason, this reason must be true and not change it every time. --Nudecline (talk) 11:46, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am very worried. Following the Wall Street Journal, and other media, there are 49,000 less editors in Wikipedia in the first three months of the year. Is Wikipedia unfriendly for new editors?. [4] . Alternatives ?. I think another wiki freespeech project can be started. Name : 49000plus, Inclu(sive)pedia or similar? and donate to it. --Nudecline (talk) 09:20, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PIGS is a "beautiful" article name and content for Wikipedia. It is racist and xenophobic. And totally biased, so as "true" as the weapons of mass destruction. Shame. Anothe name included in the article is GIPSY. Nazists would not think about a better and more racist name. In which line of democracy and human rights Wikipedia is?. For me and now, it is clear. --Nudecline (talk) 12:58, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is a lesson. PIGS countries (namely Spain) have WIN the soccer world cup !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. This is the pic of the GLORY: http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2010/07/11/sports/soccer/WORLD-CUP-REPLAY-11.html and http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2010/07/11/sports/soccer/WORLD-CUP-REPLAY-12.html. PIGs means now Pass Into Glory Sport !!!!!!. Bad for Wikipedia insults and insultants in the referenced article and good for the winners. And see the KISS http://goal.blogs.nytimes.com/ . On the other hand, the real pigs are in Wikipedia child porn. --Nudecline (talk) 06:18, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You added a numbered set of reasons why Better Place is so awesome to Charging station#Battery swapping. But

• They're just a copy and paste of user "jwz"'s response to a random blog post. I don't know all the Wikipedia acronyms, but that is not a decent supporting citation.
• Many of them are unsupportable, e.g. battery swap isn't a "necessity" for the garage-less, Japanese city dwellers are getting around fine with occasional DC fast charge.
• You conflate the benefits of battery leasing with battery swapping, the two are related but not the same.

I removed some and rewrote the rest. -- Skierpage (talk) 21:25, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey my name is nigel. I am working on an article on the copyright laws of fonts/typefaces and their current trends. Its just starting up, so take a look in my sandbox if your interested, any help would be greatly appreciated. My user name is Legin-gross-drawkcab

74.79.221.25 (talk) 02:10, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Nicole Notat has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Epbr123 (talk) 11:05, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Center for Automotive Research has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non-notable topic, with no reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wizard191 (talk) 17:55, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Get Hot New Stuff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get Hot New Stuff until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Joe Chill (talk) 22:53, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Environmental protection, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 23:30, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Full-size bus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Full-size bus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Rcsprinter (gossip) @ 09:46, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Taurus Bike. Since you had some involvement with the Taurus Bike redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ego White Tray (talk) 16:29, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect MobiSystems OfficeSuite. Since you had some involvement with the MobiSystems OfficeSuite redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). mabdul 22:31, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Manzanita Micro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. MrOllie (talk) 20:04, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Presidential Climate Action Project. Since you had some involvement with the Presidential Climate Action Project redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. prokaryotes (talk) 18:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Child computer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I removed previous PROD, as the nominator did not supply a reason in the PROD. However, the term Child Computer appears to be a non notable neologism and in any event, the material is covered under various articles, including Educational toys and Educational software. Very little of use here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 05:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Green Energy and Green Economy Act. Since you had some involvement with the Green Energy and Green Economy Act redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 17:05, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 3D laptop. Since you had some involvement with the 3D laptop redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ho Tuan Kiet (talk) 09:06, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Greenhouse gas emissions by California. Since you had some involvement with the Greenhouse gas emissions by California redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Climate change in Maldives. Since you had some involvement with the Climate change in Maldives redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 21:41, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Standard Type Services Framework. Since you had some involvement with the Standard Type Services Framework redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 14:00, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect CrystalClear. Since you had some involvement with the CrystalClear redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Freedom EV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freedom EV until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 21:47, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Scuppie. Since you had some involvement with the Scuppie redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Paradoctor (talk) 17:09, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Consumer entertainment device. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 20#Consumer entertainment device until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 07:45, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Electrical junction requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Larryzhao123 (talk) 16:24, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of production battery electric vehicles (table) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nowadays the list is impossible to keep up to date as there must be thousands of them. Even if you could keep it up to date it would be far too long.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Twin Drive. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 6#Twin Drive until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:59, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FromMeta has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Elli (talk | contribs) 12:32, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that List of production battery electric vehicles (table), a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It covers a topic on which we already have an article - List of production battery electric vehicles. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of production battery electric vehicles, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. User:JTZegersSpeak*Aura 14:09, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of production battery electric vehicles (table) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of production battery electric vehicles (table) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 03:16, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Micky Bly and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 31#Micky Bly until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 (talk) 01:06, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Electrifying Times and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 16#Electrifying Times until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  03:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nudecline. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Book Industry Standards and Communications".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:10, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Americas Energy and Climate Symposium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Americas Energy and Climate Symposium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Longhornsg (talk) 07:33, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Libopenraw has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 26 § Libopenraw until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:58, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]