Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The article contains no references. A YouTuber with less than one million subscribers is unlikely to warrant an article about them in Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mr. Anime and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:46, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Noname83746, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:46, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Just wanted to apologise for reverting over the top of your edits to this page - I can see that you're trying to improve it. Unfortunately it was riddled with previous vandalism and I didn't see a way to fix that without also reverting the work you'd done. Thanks for the improvements! Marianna251TALK 00:40, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Kyle (musician).

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Stop making unsourced/unexplained changes to years active entries. Ss112 01:43, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 1-800-273-8255 (song). Ss112 03:04, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mr. Anime, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 03:30, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to T-Shirt (Migos song), as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 15:50, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kodak Black. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:17, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 20:26, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:16, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Noname83746! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:17, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Noname83746 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

not fair to ban me

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:30, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A tag has been placed on Brutal Yungenz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 00:32, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Brutal Yungenz has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 00:43, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fatty Spins has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 00:44, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article BIFF XANNEN has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:MUSIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 01:00, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Saran Pack has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:MUSIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 01:00, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mega Man (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:MUSIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 01:01, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ambition (Kodak Black song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:MUSIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 01:01, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Doin' Your Mom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:MUSIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 01:02, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I Go is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Go until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HindWiki^Connect 01:43, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Fatty Spins requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 06:58, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brutal Yungenz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brutal Yungenz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:34, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Santana Sage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 23:39, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ra Diggs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 23:43, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Article creations by Noname83746. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 23:54, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Eulogy (Ra Diggs song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. NikolaiHo^☎️ 00:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- HindWiki^Connect 05:19, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kodak Black. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:30, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ra Diggs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ra Diggs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:47, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  only (talk) 14:18, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Noname83746 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

because I can't credit my sources, it ends up going wrong

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:13, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why can’t you credit your sources? only (talk) 23:57, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Noname83746 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I can credit my sources, but it ends up on the read page, which makes it look bad, and I don't know how to make it perfect

Decline reason:

Declining, turning off talk page access due to persistent disruptive unblock request. Next request will have to go through UTRS. Alex Shih (talk) 16:48, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Noname83746 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #20222 was submitted on Jan 07, 2018 03:56:10. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:56, 7 January 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Noname83746 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #20254 was submitted on Jan 08, 2018 01:20:44. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:20, 8 January 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Noname83746 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #22066 was submitted on Jul 14, 2018 23:37:11. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 23:37, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - at the end of this entry you will find an example of my "substantial well-sourced text," as requested by Just Chilling on July 15. Per the administrator's request, I am also elaborating on my statement "I've learned a lot about Wikipedia in the last 6 months." When I first began editing pages, I began doing so before reading the Wikipedia rules for formatting and sourcing edits. This was an unwise decision on my part, and I continued to perpetuate the problem even after being warned by administrators. I also submitted multiple unblock requests with no evidence that I planned to change the way I did things. Given these situations, I understand why I was blocked.

I have done a lot of research on rap artists and this is where I plan to make the majority of my contributions to Wikipedia. Here is an example of a well-sourced article on one of these artists. I welcome any feedback. Noname83746 (talk) 22:45, 15 July 2018 (UTC)Noname83746[reply]

Clint Massey (born February 18, 1997), better known as RondoNumbaNine, is an American rapper from Chicago, Illinois, known well in the drill movement of rap music.^[1] Massey would collaborate with artists such as Lil Durk, Edai, Fredo Santana, Tay600, L’A Capone, and Lupe Fiasco^[2] . Massey began rapping in late 2011, with his song “#9Rockin Polo,” which as of July 2018, has 1.6 thousand views on YouTube^[3].

During his rap career, he was also a member of one faction of the Black Disciples^[4] gang. Controversy rose in December 2013, when Massey posted a picture of himself holding a rocket launcher-type weapon^[5].

On March 9, 2014, it was reported that Massey was arrested for first-degree murder, following the death of 28 year old cab driver Javan Boyd on February 22, 2014^[6] . On March 11, 2016, Massey was found guilty, and faced anywhere from 45 years to life in prison^[7]. On July 5, 2016, Massey was sentenced to 39 years in prison^[8]. Massey’s projected release date is February 24, 2056, and he will be eligible for parole on February 24, 2053^[9] .

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Noname83746 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I originally sent this appeal in on July 15, but due to an error with formatting, it was not reviewed. I understand that I was blocked due to disruptive edits and repeated disruptive unblock requests. I have spent quite a bit of time over the past few months researching the way Wikipedia works, and learning how to source edits. Obviously, it goes without saying that I will follow Wikipedia's guidelines for editing in the future. Admin Just Chilling requested that I submit an example of "substantial well-sourced text," so I am including the passage below that I wrote on July 15. Thanks for any guidance you can provide. [copy of passage above redacted]--Noname83746 (talk) 00:56, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This submission shows that you have not understood Wikipedia's policy on reliable sources - of the nine sources used, I see only two that would be considered reliable by Wikipedia's standards. If these are the types of sources you would add if unblocked, then this block is still very much required. Yunshui ^雲_水 07:43, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Noname83746 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is a followup to my previous unblock request. After reviewing Wikipedia's sources policy, as suggested by Yunshui, I submit the following text example for consideration. I hope this second attempt will not be construed as making a disruptive unblock request. Noname83746 (talk) 23:20, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline, stale. User appears to have given up. Noname83746, if you return, User:Boing! said Zebedee has offered to unblock you subject to conditions. Please discuss with him below if you're interested. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orignial "on hold" comment: I will consult with the blocking admin. I'll also ask Yunshui too, as the blocking admin has not been active for several months. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:43, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: The example text uses some of the same sources (but with different access dates) as the existing article, Tay-K, but the two texts are otherwise substantially different. I couldn't find any evidence of content being copied verbatim. Not being familiar with the history of the user, I'd say the example demonstrates a certain level of proficiency with regards to citing reliable sources with proper formatting. Definitely an improvement over the last attempt. Regards, decltype (talk) 13:35, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taymor Travon McIntyre (born June 16, 2000), better known as Tay-K,^[1] is an American rapper from Arlington, Texas.^[2] McIntyre is well-known for his song “The Race,” which talks about him running from the police on capital murder charges.^[3]

McIntyre was born in Long Beach, California. During McIntyre’s youth, his father was in prison. McIntyre briefly lived in Las Vegas, Nevada. Eventually, his father was released from prison, and they moved to Arlington, Texas. McIntyre also joined a rap group called Daytona Boyz, performing alongside rappers named Santana Sage and Pimpyz.^[4] They only have 2 songs: “Drift,” released in December 2014,^[5] and “Pharmaceutikal,” released in January 2015.^[6] McIntyre started to release his own songs to the digital music platform SoundCloud in August 2015, with a song called “BIFF XANNEN”.^[7] More tracks would be released, such as “Sly Cooper” in September 2015, ^[8] “Megaman” in March 2016,^[9] and “Kickback” in May 2016.^[10]

In late 2016, McIntyre was arrested on capital murder charges for his alleged involvement in the July 26, 2016 robbery and murder of 21 year old Ethan Walker in Mansfield, Texas.^[11] McIntyre was released on house arrest while awaiting a certification hearing, but on March 27, 2017, him and another suspect, Jalen Bell, reportedly cut off their ankle monitors and flew to San Antonio, Texas.^[12] McIntyre was arrested by U.S. Marshals in Elizabeth, New Jersey on June 30, 2017. During this time, McIntyre was also accused of assaulting & robbing 65 year old Skip Pepe in Arlington, Texas on May 25, 2017,^[13] and also got another capital murder charge for allegedly robbing & killing 23 year old Mark Saldivar at a San Antonio, Texas Chick-Fil-A parking lot on April 23, 2017. In June 2018, Saldivar’s mother sued McIntyre in civil court for more than $1 million over the murder.^[14] McIntyre is currently in the Tarrant County Jail awaiting trial on capital murder and aggravated robbery charges.^[15][16]

@Noname83746: I've discussed this with the blocking admin, and here are the resulting thoughts: While that article is significantly better sourced than previously, there are still sourcing problems...

• The SoundCloud citations are no good as reliable sources from a WP:NMUSIC perspective, as it is user-generated and just about anybody can use it to distribute their own music. So I'm not seeing music notability based on those sources.
• On the crime front, it's largely sourced to a local newspaper, though there is one citation from the NYT (but it's the music section). And there does not appear to have been a conviction. That makes me seriously doubt that there's sufficient there to satisfy inclusion in accordance with WP:BLPCRIME.
• On a WP:GNG basis, there are some independent and potentially reliable sources, but I think it would still face problems with WP:BLPCRIME.
• So we seem to have several distinct approaches to suggesting notability, and I'm not really convinced about any of them. Still, if this was your first attempt, I don't think you'd be facing any real problems - though I'm not convinced it would survive a WP:AfD review.

Anyway, to the point... Overall, you clearly have made a significantly better effort this time and your understanding of sources is definitely improving. So I'll agree to unblock you on the condition that you do not create any articles directly but instead only use the WP:AfC process so that experienced editors can check your submissions. You could appeal that after six months and after having successfully had some articles accepted at WP:AfC. The actual number I'll leave to you, but I'd really be looking for quality rather than quantity - a small handful of well-sourced articles accpeted at WP:AfC with little trouble would count more than a larger number that needed multiple submissions and/or were accompanied with outright rejections. You could appeal directly to me to have the restriction lifted, or to WP:AN (if you prefer, or if I'm not around). How does that sound? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:20, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Noname83746 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i can trust myself to source my edits well from now on

Decline reason:

No answer given to questions after twelve days. ----Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:55, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please respond to Boing! said Zebedee's comments/offer above. This kind of a content-free unblock request is useless. Did you see Boing's offer? Do you agree to that condition? Do you think it isn't necessary? etc. I don't want to decline another unblock request just because you haven't addressed the comments above, and go around in circles some more, but I can guarantee no admin is going to unblock if you don't address the outstanding issues; we don't care whether you trust yourself or not. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:37, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Noname83746 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I really understand why I got blocked and that I willfully ignored the editing rules of Wikipedia and know not to do it again. I'll remember to source my edits with good sources. I realize SoundCloud and YouTube aren't the best sources, but Star-Telegram and MTV are fine to use

Decline reason:

There have been multiple comments here pointing you towards Boing! said Zebedee's proposal above. You haven't acknowledged either the proposal or any of the comments. Huon (talk) 12:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I need help for what I should say in my unblock request.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Noname83746 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It's been over a year of my 2nd block and I really know not to vandalize again

Decline reason:

You still haven't responded to the offer made by Boing! said Zebedee above. If you continue to make unblock requests without addressing it, your talk page access is probably going to get blocked. GoldenRing (talk) 15:44, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS #30451 was submitted on 2020-05-06 19:12:47. This review is now closed. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 05:07, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]