Archives
One · Two

Hi - thanks for doing that to the MLR page. The duplication wasn't done by me - I did all the research and put it into the MLR page where it was originally. It was someone else who copied it into the Metropolitan Goods Line page. Despite your work, though, I think you've taken a bit too much out of the article. The MLR article now only covers construction of the line to Darling Harbour. The freight lines from Darling Harbour to Sefton were built a long time after the Darling Harbour line was built, and that needs to be mentioned. It need only be a few sentences outlining this as well as the opening of the Darling Harbour line. I have a lot of newspaper articles on the proposals, building and opening of the light rail that I can add to the history section at some stage. Also, I'm tempted to get rid of some of the images and/or tables at the moment. There's too much clutter in the article. JRG 12:35, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to find articles about the conversion of the line from freight to line rail - which government ministers were behind it, which companies kick started it - but as you probably know there is limited info on the web for this. If you have articles that can contribute it would be great to add these. I was going to have a look in the state library at old SMH articles of the time.

If you can see parts of the info which I removed that are relevant to this article - remember it should be primarily focused on the light rail side of things, then add it back in. It would be good to take this to Good Article status, it shouldn't be too hard of a jump. Nomadtales 00:22, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've had access to Factiva for a while and was able to get hold of them then. I believe I've got about 20 different articles covering different proposals for the line's use going back to the mid-1980s. Among earlier considerations was to join it up as part of the CityRail network, or to turn the line into a busway! The existing proposal came about because of Olympics funding from the Federal Government to revitalise the Pyrmont area.

You might want to have a look at what I wrote on the Summer Hill article (in the transport section) and there's a couple of articles on the recent extension proposal to Dulwich Hill/Summer Hill which you might like to expand on. There's also this page on the upgrade of Jubilee Park station, though it may be more appropriate on the station page.

We also desparately need some photos. There was a dodgy fair use one from Star City station here before and it got deleted, and I've taken some station photos from the stations at the far end of the line, but we need some photos of rollingstock, maybe one of the goods line beyond Lilyfield to illustrate expansions, and maybe a ticket (for a future "fares" section or the like). I can't really help - I've taken what I can - but given that the LR is in the city it shouldn't be too hard to take some photos of stations and trams. JRG 03:38, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duns Creek is a suburb of the Port Stephens Council LGA and is officially recognised as a suburb according to the Geographical Names Board of New South Wales.[1] It used to be a collection of farms until some of them were subdivided into smaller residential blocks but it is most definitely not a town. To be honest, it really doesn't fall into the Wikipedia definition of a suburb either but it's more close to a suburb than it ever will be to a town. --AussieLegend 09:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anyway to fix the year and name text? They look absolutely horrible and grainy -- especially hard to read. --TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 05:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your posts on the Melanesia pages. I created an article, Copra dummies. How can I get it assessed in terms of Melanesian/PNG importance? I thought it would be good to get it assessed by someone else for quality and importance. Thanks, Lester 22:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Harold Holt at car boot.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Harold Holt at car boot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:59, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Fly River Tailings Disaster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 17:25, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:John Hinde ABC.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 17:26, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Wreck of Anna Maria sm.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:26, 20 October 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Damiens.rf 17:26, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Paterson bridge construction.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:26, 20 October 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Damiens.rf 17:26, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sydney Cricket Ground Ladies Stand.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 17:27, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Paterson bridge construction.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 12:50, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Paterson bridge construction.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 04:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any new info about her? Is she still sitting in Lae? Fightin' Phillie (talk) 00:10, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've used photos of signs previously, at One Mile, New South Wales in support of confusion over the suburb's name, and at Tanilba Bay, New South Wales as support for information about Tanilba House. I have no doubt that others will have some issues about the lack of references for this article but I don't see anything controversial about what you've written that really requires citations and I can't see why the information sign isn't a valid reference. Sometimes you just can't find references and I think a photo that can be viewed immediately is far better verification than a book that can only be found in a library or obscure bookshop. --AussieLegend (talk) 11:01, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re Template talk:BS-Infobox#Units, rail gauge templates and conversion templates, please see my remarks. Peter Horn 18:31, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I got your name from this list, and thought you might be interested in a meetup in Sydney at the Alexandria Hotel tomorrow. I hope you can join us. Sorry for the late notice. --99of9 (talk) 11:22, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nomadtales, it would be good to meet with you and chat about PNG. I've set up another meetup page for 10 January, Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/January 2013, however my wife and I will be happy to come and meet you anywhere near a NSW train line.(wmau:User:John_Vandenberg/January_2013) John Vandenberg ^(chat) 03:08, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would welcome your input on Proposed changes to Main Southern railway line, New South Wales and its associated route diagram template which you created or substantially expanded. Dbromage [Talk] 08:05, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Papua New Guinea place has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:59, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Royal Australian Navy Seahorse Standard.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. TLSuda (talk) 18:29, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cross City Tunnel logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:30, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to HMS Oxley has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. SpinningSpark 15:57, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BS-Infobox has been nominated for merging with Template:Routemap-Infobox. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 06:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Hello, Nomadtales. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Districts and LLGs of Morobe Province requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Steven (Editor) (talk) 01:55, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider returning to the project. —philoserf (talk) 01:56, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Trans-Mongolian Railway has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Trans-Manchurian Railway has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:56, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]