Welcome!

Hello, NextEditor123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 19:33, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy NextEditor123!

I noticed that you self-revert quite often. Do you know that when editing an article, next to the "publish changes" button there is a "show preview button" which will show you how your changes affect an article. Might make editing smoother. Best, 165.1.194.41 (talk) 07:14, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League winning players requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League winning players. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:21, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creating an article that was just deleted is disruptive. Please stop or you will be blocked again @NextEditor123. Star Mississippi 17:48, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

NextEditor123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am writing to request an unblock of my Wikipedia account, which was indefinitely blocked due to disruptive edits and edit warring over articles about football players. I recognize that I failed to engage in consensus building, attempted to illustrate a point, and violated several Wikipedia guidelines. I sincerely apologize for my actions, which breached important policies such as WP:FAITH, WP:POINT, WP:TALK, and WP:TECHNICAL. At the time, I did not fully grasp the importance of these policies, but I took more time to learn them in details. Now I understand the importance of collaboration and consensus-building in maintaining integrity of the Wikipedia community. I want to be useful for the community and will be committed to follow the guidelines. If there are gonna be big disagreements arising about editing one of Wikipedia articles, I will engage in constructive discussions on the articles' talk pages first to solve the further arguments and reach consensus. It will ensure that all my edits will comply with Wikipedia policies to avoid further disruptions. I will accept implementing the one-revert rule to my Wikipedia account, if necessary. I also understand that my previous unblock requests were declined. Since then, I have taken the time to carefully reflect on the feedbacks and make adjustments to my approach. I am willing to accept any conditions or guidance that are necessary to rebuild trust there. I value being part of the Wikipedia community and hope to demonstrate my commitment to thoughtful, policy-compliant contributions moving forward.

Accept reason:

I have unblocked. Welcome back. PhilKnight (talk) 06:17, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NextEditor123 (talk) 14:29, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Drmies: - how do you feel about a possible unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 15:36, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • PhilKnight, I think you know I'm all about second and third and fourth changes, and this case is no different. Plus it's been a while. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 22:19, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:33, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your unblock was granted on the expectation that you would stop edit warring. Instead you immediately resumed the edit wars that made the previous block necessary in the first place. At best, this looks like you don't have the requisite competence to contribute usefully, at worst as if the content of your unblock request was an outright lie. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:41, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Sputnik, I used to be blocked due to edit warring. But I didn't dispute with anyone in that case. I was just just restoring articles that needed missing edits. Can you explain to me what I did wrong now, please? NextEditor123 (talk) 21:15, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I have already said, you immediately returned to the edit wars that made the previous block necessary. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:26, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a admin, but I do suggest a T-ban from football until the editor can learn to contribute positively to the topic. DACartman (talk) 21:31, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]