A tag has been placed on your user page, User:NetTV, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: Click here to contest this speedy deletion which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy deletion candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bentogoa (talk) 17:19, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... If someone considers the article on NetTV being promotional, one should remove the following on the article on Face Book as well. I have not promoted any of the features on NetTV but has merely discussed the reasons behind setting up such a channel which is a mere justification. Furthermore NetTV is a non profit organization, therefore there is nothing to gain from any so called promotional page. However, FB is on the other hand is a commercial organization. If promoting the features on FB is not considered as promotional, I do not understand how my article could be viewed by someone as promotional.

This is what is published on Wikipedia on Face Book....

After registering to use the site, users can create a user profile, add other users as "friends", exchange messages, post status updates and photos, share videos and receive notifications when others update their profiles. Additionally, users may join common-interest user groups, organized by workplace, school or college, or other characteristics, and categorize their friends into lists such as "People From Work" or "Close Friends". Facebook had over 1.44 billion monthly active users as of March 2015.[7] Because of the large volume of data users submit to the service, Facebook has come under scrutiny for their privacy policies. Facebook, Inc. held its initial public offering in February 2012 and began selling stock to the public three months later, reaching an original peak market capitalization of $104 billion. As of February 2015 Facebook reached a market capitalization of $212 Billion

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a business listing directory or a place for companies to tell the world about themselves.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 20:07, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account because Wikipedia accounts are for individuals only, who are personally responsible for them, and accounts whose names are the names of companies or groups are not permitted. Your username may be based on your real name, or not, as you choose (see WP:REALNAME for some considerations), but it should not be the name of any other living person. A username of the form "James at NetTV" would be acceptable, and would serve to declare your affiliation.

Comments on your message above:

• The article Facebook was not written by User:Facebook. No such account exists or would be allowed.
• It is not Facebook telling the world about itself. It has been developed by many users, and is based on many references to reliable, independent sources which establish its Wikipedia:Notability.
• It is not only commercial organizations that want to promote themselves, but see Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause.

Even with an individual account, before writing about your own organization you should read the guideline Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. In brief, you should not edit directly, but may submit a draft for approval. If you want to do that:

• Read WP:Your first article and User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard
• Collect references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. If you cannot find them, it is unlikely that an article will be accepted.
• Prepare a draft using Wikipedia:Article for creation. Make sure you write frojm a neutral point of view and do not try to "sell" NetTV. Do not take the option to post it directly, but send it for review. The reviewer will either accept it or give you feedback.

JohnCD (talk) 20:36, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]