I was just wondering why you were deleting the Snowta Ent. Page.

Can you review this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lil_Saggy there are new refences avuialbe but i cant create it anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thecreator1234 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, a quick reminder, when you delete pages take a look for redirects to them, and delete them (CSD-G8) if appropriate. I noticed a fair number of items today at Special:BrokenRedirects that pointed to PRODs you'd processed. (It's an issue I'm a bit extra aware of because I'd missed quite a few myself last week. D'oh!) Have a great weekend! --j⚛e decker^{talk to me} 19:32, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nakon. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

John Vandenberg ^(chat) 00:49, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because you blocked the one user for being a sock I was curious what assumptions can be made about the account they created? Thanks for considering this as well. My76Strat 03:39, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I did cteate the page for artist Sevil Soyer by her own web site and other sources, actually Sevil Soyer is my wif since 1980 and I wrote her web pages, saatchionline (biography), list of exhibitions, list of articles about her because I did collect them all. This or that reason you deleted her from Wikipedia which also I created, and now I have to create it again with a new text (specially her biography). Please let me know ASAP, how can I do this. Thank you, Nejat Soyer nsoyer2000@yahoo.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nejats (talk • contribs) 19:20, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Um, don't you think you should wait until he actually vandalizes again before blocking this account? --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:15, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked based on this edit, as well as for using a sock at [1]. Nakon 21:17, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I had missed that last sock. Still hesitant about voa/indef, though. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:35, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to alter it as you'd like. Nakon 21:39, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nakon, I saw that you were active at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Account creator, and I thought I'd ask you a question. On Friday 4 March I'm organizing an "Introduction to WP" session at my university, for English instructors and other interested faculty members (i.e., not vandalism-prone teenagers). In the past, I've had problems with new users creating accounts in the computer lab--this is the result, I understand, of only 6 users being allowed to create an account from the same IP address in a 24-hour period, correct?

It is likely that in this session I will have more people than 6 signing up for an account, and I want all of them to be able to make some sandbox edits, created a talk/user page, etc. How do I circumvent the restrictions? Do I request to become an account creator? Would I be granted such a right? (It's not something that I've been active in--and neither has my Arb-com approved top-secret alter ego, who can email you for confirmation.) I'm in English--would I understand how to do it? (I'm only half-kidding.)

If that is not the appropriate way to go, what else do you suggest? Asking a friendly admin or account creator to stand by at that exact time? BTW, I'm going to ask as many participants as I can to get accounts before the training session, but that may only go so far. OK, by now I'm rambling. I await your response and your advice. Thanks in advance, Dr Aaij (talk) 16:28, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can temporarily grant you the account creator bit for the day and remove it once you're done. Nakon 22:43, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That would be great. I'll drop you a line when the time is nigh, and then perhaps you can point me toward the proper instructions. Is there someplace where I can read up already? Again, my job is relatively simple: I will need to be able to have a bunch of people log in from the same computer lab (same IP address, I suppose) at one time--no more, really. Thanks Nakon! Dr Aaij (talk) 04:12, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nakon, the session has been moved to 1 April. I'll remind you before that time. Thanks, Dr Aaij (talk) 20:18, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nakon, I am querying your recent removal of the GOTW page. This is a real phenomena in the Knocklyon area. A desperately sought after title that brings honor to the weekly winner, it is one of the communities most prestigious awards. I feel its inclusion on wikipedia is of the utmost importance and necessary to our parish. Many Thanks and Kind Regards, Patrica Walsh

Wikipedia is not for stuff made up in school one day. Nakon 00:13, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

on the contrary this award has been the culmination of a lot of time and effort on the committees part. we would appreciate its reinstatement as a wiki page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.7.71.5 (talk) 00:18, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You said you were going to delete it, but I was the one who wrote this story in the first place. Therefore, I have the right to post it. But you deleted it anyway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrissy Gilford (talk • contribs) 02:02, 1 March 2011 (UTC) -[reply]

Wikipedia is not a web host. Using it to host a book you've written is not an appropriate use. You may want to look at Wikisource, which may be better suited to your content. Nakon 02:08, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hi Nakon,

The article on yaathu has been deleted.. its a Sanskrit word & i found the same through many different websites... a nice sanskrit word has the rights to be in wikipedia for more people to know about it... i hope u consider my conversation. you can check "yaathu" word in any good sanskrit dictionary.... also, let me know why was it deleted?

Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bharat.sanskriti (talk • contribs) 11:21, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya, can you please check back over that deletion? I know this is going back a little - early Feb - but I missed the AN thread at the time.

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive669#Blocked_user_Marknutley_claiming_a_copyright_violation.

It looks to me like the attribution is OK, so it is not copyvio. It may, of course, have all kinds of other issues - but maybe we're throwing out the baby with the bath-water?

Cheers,  Chzz  ►  14:50, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

At this point, I'd take it to DRV. I'd rather not restore it and cause a huge drama fest that involves a banned user. Nakon 15:46, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, yes; I'll think about it a bit more - see how the article could shape up, and so on; and DRV if it is worth it. Thanks!  Chzz  ►  15:59, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I work for Oxygen, so have rights to post copy from our Press Releases about our series. Please reinstate the All About Aubrey page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annapakman (talk • contribs) 18:35, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article was deleted through the proposed deletion system. To request undeletion, please file a request at WP:REFUND. Also, if you work for a company and intend to edit articles related to it, you most likely have a conflict of interest, which would prevent you from editing pages that you are closely related with. Nakon 19:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious why you deleted the Camera (band) wiki? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessicakrzywicki (talk • contribs) 05:32, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock IsmaelandLuigi21 please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArmandotheObese (talk • contribs) 19:33, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nakon,

I noticed that you deleted the Femininities page I created that redirected to Femininity. It is very common in gender studies to discuss the concept of multiple "femininities"; I do believe the redirect to be valid. Would you object to me restoring the redirect?

Neelix (talk) 01:16, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Why was this page, Virginia and The BlueDots deleted?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.52.62 (talk) 15:25, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] 

Would Like to say Wikipedia in general has been one of the most unfriendly, unhelpful group of people in the universe to have to deal with. Could never get any helpful advice with questions, information etc. If you read blogs, and do a little research you'll find other people who've had the same experience. What a shame. Gin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.52.62 (talk) 15:34, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm creating a page for my friends band, and I was just wondering what you deleted about harmonica lewinsky before, it told me to ask if i was unsure... when I clicked the link nothing came up it was just blank, so for now I'm just going to continue adding info, but I would appreciate it if you could just let me know anything before deleting!

Thanks, Seanbateman7 (talk) 15:37, 18 March 2011 (UTC)Sean[reply]

Can I create a page for Damon Fizzy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaryAnnSweetAngel (talk • contribs) 04:51, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I found that this page was deleted and I wanted to contact you on why that is? I was confused when I visited the page to see it removed. Could you please help?

Thank you,

--Zigbert (talk) 15:53, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you take a look at this disruption again please? RashersTierney (talk) 22:31, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could restore this or send any usable content to my userspace? It is the 19th most popular website in India.[2] Marcus Qwertyus 05:24, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nakon--in reference to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Knowitallfortoday/Archive, I tagged User talk:567fuall as another sock. BTW--is that what I need to do? Is that all I need to do? Your advice is appreciated. Anyway, the edits were made a month ago--does that make them stale already? I hadn't checked on the article in a while. Thanks in advance for your attention. Drmies (talk) 17:13, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi everybody who backed to delet Vibes FM from Wiki.

The main reason some made was because there was not enough article press on Vibes FM. In a review, Vibes FM has been published in two magazines and 1 daily press in Germany...

I will be greatful if the Vibes FM page will be review..

Thank you (Patriciajba (talk) 16:33, 6 June 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Hello! I want to report a problem, about the article Athens Metro. Well actually the main problem is with User:Sv1xv. Although I understand that he has a great contribution in Wikipedia, he seems a little bit of stubborn about the specific article, or I should say, he believes that he owns it. If me, or anyone else, changes something there, even a "dot", he is going to revert it because he doesn't like it. For example, in my last edit, I updated the Athens Metro Map (by adding 3 new stations) so i changed also the text below the map [it was : A map of rapid transit systems in Athens, showing ISAP (green line)
and Attiko Metro (red and blue lines), in 2007 ] to the new text: A map of rapid transit systems in Athens. Meaning that it is up-to-date, and the word rapid transit includes both ISAP and Attiko Metro lines... But he reverted again, using as excuse: "The regular sneaky POV edits".

Well I think that someone should stop that! Really I appreciate his contribution, but he can not do anything he want! And also by his meaning "regula sneaky" he means that the kind of changes (which refer to ISAP and Attiko metro) are regular because many try to change the article, but he reverts it again. What I mean is that if you check Athens Metro in all other languages, you will find out that there are 3 rapid transit lines in Athens. The line 1 (operated by ISAP SA) and lines 2 & 3 (operated by AMEL SA). So many other try to put in the article information about all three lines. User Sv1xv, insists that line 1 is not a metro line, because it is operated by other company (ISAP) and is not actualy underground. If we keep believing in his opinion, then actually we should change the article to: Attiko Metro (operation company) SA and not "Athens Metro",since it refers only to lines 2 & 3!

Finally in Greece there is not a clear dinstiction between what metro and what is not. ISAP means electrical railways of Athens-Piraeus. Metro is also electrical railways in Athens Metropolitan area. And the reason that AMEL lines are numbered 2 & 3, means that there is another line before them (ie ISAP line 1)..

Can we open a discusion please about that?

--Skgxt2 (talk) 15:36, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I have revived the page Ronen. There is a note there that such a page was previously deleted (by you), so please have a look (I don't know what the previous one was about, the current version contains nothing outrageous, I hope).

Thank you very much, Sasha (talk) 18:37, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nakon,

I see that you deleted the page for Rauda Morcos in 2006. I have been doing research on feminism and homosexuality in the Middle East and actually think that her work is of prominence enough to warrent a Wikipedia page. Since you are away from Wikipedia I will create the page, but please let me know what you think.

Best, Mari — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mari.miyoshi (talk • contribs) 04:28, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While I have no intention of Creating a new Rodney's Funscreen Article nor of Requesting to Create one at this time, I am curious about what the Archived Debate looks like on this particular past Deletion. It was deleted before I Created my Wikipedia Editor Account, so I never saw that Discussion when it was still active. If you could please send me a link to the appropriate AfD Archive, it would mean a lot. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 07:30, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I just noticed this user blocked and a quick sampling of contributions seems to look legitimate. Could you recollect the reason for this block ? Shyamal (talk) 14:55, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, found that the account had been compromised. Did not check the deleted contribs. Shyamal (talk) 16:21, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	test Om mu (talk) 12:15, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Talk page guidelines. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 07:45, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

not sure why you have deleted a bio on Shon Boublil. the information is taken from his own personal web site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronbob (talk • contribs) 20:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nakon, you deleted the 'Serianna' page. Unlike 99.9% of other musical artists who don't follow the wikipedia guidelines, Serianna does. THEY HAVE AN ALBUM THAT CHARTED IN THE UNITED STATES, AND THE PAGE I CREATED HAD A CITATION CONFIRMING THIS. Quit wasting people's time and only delete pages that DON'T FOLLOW THE WIKIPEDIA GUIDELINES. If a page meets the guidelines but needs work, make it better rather than deleting it all together. You're a complete waste of a human being. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.217.153.178 (talk) 23:30, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This line under Technology on the Gann academy page is not true

Most of the computers are underwater and badly damaged, with rust coating 85 to 90 percent of all surfaces. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madhyp (talk • contribs) 16:23, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Gann Academy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

You semiprotected this indefinitely a year ago. It's unusual to do so without some expiriments to see if the kids quit vandalizing their school page. Sometimes I forget to change 'indef' to '1 week'. So I unprotected it, letting you know in case that wasn't your intent. tedder (talk) 18:53, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are on wikibreak, give me a {{tb}} if you comment on this, I won't be watching your page. tedder (talk) 18:55, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:06, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A user ([3]) on IRC wanted to edit from an address in this range. I kept the block but allowed account creation and edit from IPs from this address. Hope that is ok, if not go ahead and re-block.--Commander Keane (talk) 11:07, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 16:37, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you consider reverting your deletions? Template:PD-CAGov applies; this wasn't clear at the time; precedent has changed. (The permission tags one sees at File:Seal_of_California.svg do too.) And if you can think of anything else worth undeleting that Template:PD-CAGov justifies... (Update: see Cleanup note below) --Elvey (talk) 21:04, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you've been inactive for over a year. I did this on your behalf; you'll want to undo if/when you return. I'm also removing a ton of FRSBot messages that my noted edit put a stop to from your page as part of this edit; I bet you don't care about 'em, which is why I'm turning 'em off for you...--Elvey (talk) 21:39, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In November 2010 you deleted the article Al-ighatha al-khaira as an expired prod. Unfortunately, whoever placed that prod didn't bother to leave a heads-up on my talk page, and I only became aware of the deletion now.

I request userification to User:Geo Swan/userified 2012-05/Al-ighatha al-khaira please. Geo Swan (talk) 16:59, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nakon,

I am writing you this message because I want to receive a copy of the the deleted article, "Project Lead the Way". Can you please send it to me on my talk page?

Sincerely,

Colosiant (talk) 01:45, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]