Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Editor, IMDB cannot be used as a source to prove WP:NPEOPLE.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karzan Kardozi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 15:27, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Naderjamie6! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 15:27, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I updated the listing with reference to reliable and academic sources.

Hop that will work.

Thanks,

Tony Naderjamie6 (talk) 16:36, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Karzan Kardozi. Thanks! ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 17:33, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As requested, added the page number to each books mentioned. As for other sources, they are mostly in Kurdish, and there is no way for me to reference those Kurdish sources. Also: IMDB is mention in relation to the filmography. And you can look at other Kurdish Director's listing here at Wiki, they all have same references. such as Karzan Kader: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karzan_Kader".

Please know: I'm a cinephile, I happened to watch the films of Kardozi, especially his new film, "Where is Gilgamesh?" at a Kurdish film festival here in NY, and I was surprised to see there is no page for him in English here at Wikipedia, so I decided to make this page. It is time you guys help us list more Kurdish filmmakers to Wikipedia, they deserve more atttion.

Thanks,

Tony Naderjamie6 (talk) 00:02, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDb is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karzan Kardozi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 18:04, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As requested, added the page number to each books mentioned. As for other sources, they are mostly in Kurdish, and there is no way for me to reference those Kurdish sources. Also: IMDB is mention in relation to the filmography. And you can look at other Kurdish Director's listing here at Wiki, they all have same references. such as Karzan Kader: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karzan_Kader".

Please know: I'm a cinephile, I happened to watch the films of Kardozi, especially his new film, "Where is Gilgamesh?" at a Kurdish film festival here in NY, and I was surprised to see there is no page for him in English here at Wikipedia, so I decided to make this page. It is time you guys help us list more Kurdish filmmakers to Wikipedia, they deserve more atttion.

Thanks,

Tony Naderjamie6 (talk) 00:02, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Johannes Maximilian were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karzan Kardozi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 17:35, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Karzan Kardozi. Thanks! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 11:47, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Karzan Kardozi. Thanks! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 12:33, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough significant, independent coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karzan Kardozi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 10:29, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Naderjamie6! Your additions to Draft:Qarachatan have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 is not a compatible license. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to I Want To Live.... Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:I Want to Live Film Poste 2015.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Qarachatan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^{talk to me!} 05:39, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Recommend searching for more in-depth sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:I Want To Live... and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 05:52, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Image of Karzan Kardozi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Image of Karzan Kardozi Filmmaker.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 01:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to 1,001 Apples has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. Diannaa (talk) 21:56, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karzan Kardozi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karzan Kardozi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

NameGame (talk) 17:32, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Where Is Gilgamesh? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where Is Gilgamesh? until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

NameGame (talk) 17:44, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As my other Kurdish friends in our group, Kurdish Wiki, mentioned in their talk page to your request to delete their creation, can you explain to us why are you vandalizing and targeting Kurdish related pages for deletion? Your history in the past day alone shows that you deliberately target Kurdish content for deletion. Please stop this vandalism:

User contributions for NameGame Naderjamie6 (talk) 11:56, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Naderjamie6. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 18:52, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|I worked at local library here in the city of Sulaimani, with other friends we do edit content mostly for Kurdish wikipages. It seem I have been blocked with my friend, Alan aka "Wendy2024" for the same reason stating that our accounts been used used abusively, because we with other Kurdish wiki editors appealed for Kurdish pages not to be deleted. Please check the IP address on our account, you see it comes from our local library. I have not abused anything here, only contributed to Kurdish pages. It is unfair that we are getting blocked for such reasons. Time after time Kurdish pages get deleted for reason that are not justified, and when we as a group appeal, we get blocked and banned. I do not use any proxy server, please, why you blocking people like us who contribute to Kurdish pages? It is not fair, and it only lead to Kurdish users like me going away and not contributing anymore~~}}

Please note that this user is still evading their block. See User:BonitueBera. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:14, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And User:Hendrea44 as well... There's so many of them. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:18, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Naderjamie6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

To Wiki Legal Team:

As members of the Wiki Kurdish group, many of us who gathered at our local library contribute to Wiki articles and work together to stop the vandalism and deletion of Kurdish-related pages. We demand justice, a review, and an explanation for why we are blocked based on the IP address used by our local library. All our user are not target as “Sockpuppet” to my talk page. (The user Spiderone keep targeting all our previous and new members as Sockpuppet to my page based on the relation of the IP address in our local library)

Not only are we blocked for unjust reasons, but we can no longer edit articles or contribute our voices to Kurdish pages that are vandalized and deleted without proper justification.

Some of us, like our colleague Alan (username: Wendy2024), have been clearly threatened with having our right to pursue legal action and appeal for justice by users such as Ymblanter. This is a clear case of extortion – threatening us to abandon our legal rights in exchange for having our blocks removed.

As members of the Kurdish Wiki group, we will provide all the necessary proof to demonstrate this violation of our rights and the rules and regulations of Wiki that we agreed to when we began contributing. We will pursue legal action in the US and consider joining a Class Action Settlement if our IP is not unblocked and our accounts are not reinstated. We will also demand the release of the names and IP addresses of those responsible for this injustice committed against us.

We have done nothing that violates Wiki's rules and policies, yet we are repeatedly blocked and our articles deleted simply because they are related to Kurdish topics.

Injustice has been committed against all of us. We are all banned and blocked due to the prejudice of a few, especially the user "NameGame," who nominates Kurdish articles for deletion. Instead of investigating "NameGame" and their destruction of Kurdish Wiki articles, we are the ones blocked and banned. Why is this user not investigated for their vandalism and targeted attacks on Kurdish pages? Time and time again, we have appealed to have this user's vandalism stopped and to prevent them from targeting Kurdish pages, but we were the ones blocked and banned for voicing our concerns. Please look at his contribution history just in the past few days, all targeting the deletion of Kurdish related pages:

User contributions for NameGame

We appeal to you to make a just decision, restore our rights as users, and investigate the true reason and cause for all these problems: the vandalism and deletion of Kurdish-related pages.

Decline reason:

Legal threats mean automatic blocking. You are in full control of that; withdraw the legal threats, and that aspect of the block will be relieved. If you wish to address the "wiki legal team", you will find contact information here. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:23, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As already noted, there is a strict policy that while legal action is pending or may become pending against Wikipedia, the participants may not contribute to Wikipedia. This doesn't remotely fit any legal definition of extortion, as the party in a legal action is always allowed to request an end to legal proceedings, and there is no legal right to edit content on a privately owned website. Even assuming in good faith that what you say is true, that you are editing as a group of people and these are not your sockpuppets, there's no right to group edit Wikipedia, there's no group-reporting in Wikipedia, and, in fact, many things that groups can do violate WP:MEATPUPPET.

Threatening Wikipedia users -- and English Wikipedia users especially -- with legal action is a spectacularly ineffective tactic. You won't get your way in the end, and even if you follow through, you'll spend tens of thousands of dollars or more, depending at what point the frivolous lawsuit is dismissed. If your ultimate goal is to improve English Wikipedia on Kurdish topics, this is about the worst possible way to achieve that goal. If you actually care about Kurdish topics, your best chance of contributing to those topics would be to be an editor in good standing who doesn't violate Wikipedia's policies. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 16:09, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]